Steward requests/Permissions/2011-08

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in August 2011, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Contents

Administrator access

Solstag@ptwikiversity

According to the community vote, please grant permanent sysop access for Solstag@ptwikiversity. Ozymandias 14:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 14:25, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Zylbath@nds.wiktionary

Zylbath was elected as an admin by a local vote but the project does not have any bureaucrats of its own. Please promote Zylbath to admin status. Thanks ::Slomox:: >< 08:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done, to expire 3.2.2012 Matanya 08:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. But why the expiration date? --::Slomox:: >< 20:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Unless a project has a lot of active users and has admins and bureaucrats we tend to give adminship for various periods (1 month, 3 months, 6 and so on. With communities with active users we would give perm. Hope that helps and feel free to ask any questions. fr33kman 21:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for the clarification. Never heard about that rule before. I guess, I'll have to check in again in six months then. --::Slomox:: >< 07:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

小躍@hak.wikipedia

    • English:I wish to protect the wikipedia, makes the biggest of contribution for hakka wikipedia.
    • Hakka:Ngâ hî-mong pó-fu Ngùi-kî pak-khô, vì Ngùi-kî pak-khô cho-chhut chui-thai ke kung-hien. 小躍 02:11, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
On hold until 10 August. Ruslik 05:21, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes!! I hold for 1 days. 小躍 04:20, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done to expire 10.2.2012 Matanya 00:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
removed due to sock puppetry. Matanya 12:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

B20180@th.wikisource

Please, provide a link to a local announcement. This concerns all your requests below. Ruslik 20:40, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Local links were provided in all requests. B20180 has changed the links to the exact location (template, in some cases) where the announcement is written. Site announcement in English (and, of course, in Thai too) is clearly visible on the front page of all local sites. --Taweethaも 04:47, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
On hold until 12 August. Ruslik 06:11, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Today is the 12th of August and there is no objection on any of the proposed sites. Please kindly proceed with the request. --Taweethaも 08:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done for 3 months, expires on 12 November 2011. Ruslik 09:41, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

B20180@th.wiktionary

On hold until 12 August. Ruslik 06:11, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done for 3 months, expires on 12 November 2011. Ruslik 09:41, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

B20180@th.wikibooks

On hold until 12 August. Ruslik 06:11, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done for 3 months, expires on 12 November 2011. Ruslik 09:41, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

B20180@th.wikiquote

On hold until 12 August. Ruslik 06:11, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done for 3 months, expires on 12 November 2011. Ruslik 09:41, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you sir --B20180 03:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Reder@sg.wikipedia

I've been an admin on this wiki for more than a year, and I would like to extend the mandate. On this wiki there is no community, and they need someone to control vandalism and make a bit of order. I would like to request an admin access for 6 months if it is possible. Thanks, --Reder 16:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 07:18, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. --Reder 20:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC

Obelix@da.wikibooks

Have you tried to reach the two bureaucrats there? Please note that we may only grant temporary adminship as per the one comment only. -Barras 18:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
The bureaucrat Bisgaard has not been active since April 3 and and is not possible to contact by email. The other bureaucrat, Christian S, has not been active since December 13 2005. Temporary adminship would be quite acceptable. (Sorry för my bad english) Obelix 18:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Granted expires december 1st 2011 Laaknor 18:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Hanberke@tk.wikipedia

I've been an admin on this wiki for more than two years. Please grant me 1 year temporary sysop status. I'm only sysop there. Thanks in advance. Hanberke 07:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Done. To expire on 24 August 2012. This post copied over to approved temporary subpage. -- Daniel Mayer (mav) 00:47, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Rashad-95@az.wikiquote

This user has been elected. PPerviz 08:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --FiliP ██ 08:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Hanberke@tk.wiktionary

I've been an admin on this wiki for more than two years. Please grant me 1 year temporary sysop status. I'm only sysop there. Thanks in advance. Hanberke 07:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

There is no text on the linked page and your last edit was in February 2010. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 00:53, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Dear Daniel, I've fixed the link. As for my last edit date you are right, however please note that when I first visited the site it was at the verge of closure. I personally built up 97% of the site. Presently I keep watching the site. I hope one day new contributors will join the team. Until that day I think it will be good to supervise things there.

Best Regards Hanberke 10:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Since you aren't active there, you don't need the flag there. Please re-apply for it when it is needed and you are more active there. -Barras 08:13, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Ciphers@ar.wikinews

I had the admin access three months ago, and it expired recently. Please renew my temporary access, or grant me a permanent access. Thanks in advance. Ciphers 07:20, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Please, post a local notice. Ruslik 16:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
There is already one in admin nomination page since May 2011, but it received no votes. --Ciphers 00:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Done, to expire 25 February 2012. PeterSymonds (talk) 08:05, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Psneog@as.wikipedia

I would like to nominate as:user:Psneog to adminship on the Assamese Wikipedia. Psneog has accepted the nomination. A discussion page has been setup here. The Assamese Wikipedia has seen a growth in recent days/months and there are a host of admin work needed. Chaipau 13:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello Chaipau. The discussion you quoted just started today. You need to wait one week, until 28 August 2011 (see here). Cordially, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 14:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Matanya 03:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

Hazard-SJ@testwiki

I am fairly active on the developer wiki, test.wikipedia, and would like the bureaucrat right. Unfortunately, there are over 30 bureaucrats, only about 5 of which have more than 10 edits in the last 30 days. I would love to be better able to assist on the developer test wiki.  Hazard-SJ  ±  04:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

You need to open a local discussion. Ruslik 04:59, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Whenever it is responded to, I always get the same "We have enough already" response.  Hazard-SJ  ±  05:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
I might not be familiar with meta's policies, but I really doubt that's a valid reason for getting 'crat via meta, and bypassing local process. Gfoley4talk 05:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
stewards do not override local policy and consensous. Matanya 07:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Seksen iki yüz kırk beş@trwikinews

I request bureucrat rights on Turkish Wikinews per the discussion above. Thanks in advance. Seksen iki yüz kırk beş 11:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 11:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Crochet.david@fr.wikiversity

Merci beaucoup pour votre aide, amicalement. FrankyLeRoutier 02:50, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

(my French is everyday worse, but I'll try) Bonjour. Ceci est une demande d'accès aux des outils de bureaucrate, oui? Parce que vous avez mis cette demande dans la section "retrait des statutes". RM77 a été un peu actif. SVP de envoyez lui un message (PDD/email) avant demander aux stewards. Att, -- Dferg ☎ talk 07:46, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour, je lui est écrit un message par email le 13 août, il n'a pas eu de réaction de sa part, que faut-il faire d'autre ? Tanks FrankyLeRoutier 11:04, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
I suggest to wait a few more days to give RM77 some time (it's Summer vacation time, after all). RfB aren't usually urgent, and this one doesn't seem to be the exception. guillom 12:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Rebonjour Crochet.david est maintenant bureaucrate par RM77 [1]. Merci beaucoup pour vos avis. FrankyLeRoutier 03:23, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Nartay Asimov Ashina@kkwp

The KKWP (Kazakh Wikipedia) community representatives at Wikimania have asked me to ask for Bureaucrat permissions for User:Ashina, as they are in the midst of very accelerated growth and would like to easily appoint new admins to handle the flow. Thanks. Ijon 08:12, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Please, start a local discussion on the wiki. Ruslik 08:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Discussion has started here. Will end this week. Ijon 15:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
However, won't be done as the local crat on this project is active. -Barras 16:05, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Marking as X mark.svg Not done as there is no further reply here and I don't see a local vote. -Barras 16:35, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Barras@meta

Uncontroversional removal, please give the flag back. WizardOfOz talk 20:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Restored (checkuser-l-owner informed). PeterSymonds (talk) 21:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Dferg@meta

Uncontroversional removal, please give the flag back. Thanks WizardOfOz talk 18:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done fr33kman 19:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Antime@arwikipedia

Consensus on granting Checkuser access to Antime with more than 30 votes is here. I belive Antime is already and OTRS member, so he is already identified to the Foundation. Ciphers 01:31, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

OTRS access doesn't necessitate identification; Antime is not listed on Identification noticeboard, so this would remain on hold for now. -- Mentifisto 01:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
As identification has been received this is Yes check.svg Done. -- Mentifisto 17:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. --Ciphers 23:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Chatama@jawiki

I request checkuser access on the Japanese Wikipedia for the user as per the discussion above. The user has already been identified to the foundation [5]. Thanks in advance. --Penn Station 14:24, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done -- Avi 16:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Barras@simplewiki

Hello, I am a crat on the Simple English Wikipedia. Please restore access on Simple English Wikipedia, for user User:Barras for his local oversight flags and checkuser flags on that project. Community confirmations (links to thereof) is located here. Very best, NonvocalScream 22:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done after discussion --Jyothis 22:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Oversight access

User Ks aka 98@jawiki

I request oversight access on the Japanese Wikipedia for the user as per the discussion above. The user is identified to the foundation [6]. Thanks in advance. --Penn Station 11:36, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done for now - As per Oversight policy a wiki must have a minimum of 2 oversighters or none at all. I can't see any oversighters in jawiki so until you elect at least another one we can't turn this user the oversight flag on. Thanks for your understanding. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
2 users now. -- Dferg ☎ talk 11:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Matanya 12:34, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

User Vigorous action@jawiki

I request oversight access on the Japanese Wikipedia for the user as per the discussion above. The user is identified to the foundation [7]. Thanks in advance. --Penn Station 11:51, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 12:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Barras@simplewiki

Hello, I am a crat on the Simple English Wikipedia. Please restore access on Simple English Wikipedia, for user User:Barras for his local oversight flags and checkuser flags on that project. Community confirmations (links to thereof) is located here. Very best, NonvocalScream 22:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done after discussion --Jyothis 22:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

アイザール@jawiki

I request oversight access on the Japanese Wikipedia for the user as per the discussion above. The user has not yet been identified the foundation, but I'll send notification to the user via email soon. So the user will be identified in a few days, I believe. Thanks in advance. --Penn Station 12:46, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

On hold pending identification. Ruslik 13:38, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello! I sent my identification.--アイザール 13:59, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Identification was received, so Yes check.svg Done. Jafeluv 14:05, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Removal of access

Swedish Wikipedia

On the Swedish Wikipedia all admins/bureaucrats/CU/OS are elected for one year at a time, see the policy document. There exists a possibility to be reelected, but some users choose not to apply for another period. To get reelected at least 75 percent support is required. --MagnusA 06:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Bounce1337@svwikipedia

The admin flag should be removed --MagnusA 06:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 07:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
J 1982@svwikipedia

The admin flag should be removed --MagnusA 06:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 07:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Jlundqvi@svwikipedia

The admin flag should be removed --MagnusA 06:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 07:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Kildor@svwikipedia

The admin and bureaucrat flags should be removed --MagnusA 06:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 07:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
MikaelLindmark@svwikipedia

The admin flag should be removed --MagnusA 06:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 07:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Moberg@svwikipedia

The admin flag should be removed --MagnusA 06:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 07:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Skistar@svwikipedia

The admin flag should be removed --MagnusA 06:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 07:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Sten André@svwikipedia

The admin flag should be removed --MagnusA 06:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 07:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Ulner@svwikipedia

The admin flag should be removed --MagnusA 06:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 07:53, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Alchemica@fr.wikipedia

Just fed up with the status lately, I think I need a long break. Thanks in advance, Alchemica 20:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your help! --Mercy 20:50, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

CERminator@bs.wikipedia

It's time for rent (4 years active editing) cannot fulfill duties on wiki, but I will remain as ordinary user as long as can. Thanks in advance. --CERminator 09:53, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your time and help! --Mercy 09:57, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

JGC@da.wikipedia

On 2011-07-03 in a vote on DaWiki (link above) it was concluded, that an administrator who hasn't been active on the Danish Wikipedia for 210 days would be eligible to a warning for inactivity on their discussion pages, and if they didn't respond within 30 days would have their sysop-bit removed. On 2011-07-03 da:User:Masz posted a warning on this users page (diff) and the user hasn't responded. Both da:User:Masz and I are sysops on DaWiki (verify Masz, verify me). --Heb 12:36, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Dferg ☎ talk 13:31, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Byrial@da.wikipedia

On 2011-07-03 in a vote on DaWiki (link above) it was concluded, that an administrator who hasn't been active on the Danish Wikipedia for 210 days would be eligible to a warning for inactivity on their discussion pages, and if they didn't respond within 30 days would have their sysop-bit removed. On 2011-07-03 da:User:Masz posted a warning on this users page (diff) and the user hasn't responded. Both da:User:Masz and I are sysops on DaWiki (verify Masz, verify me). --Heb 12:36, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Dferg ☎ talk 13:31, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Wegge@da.wikipedia

On 2011-07-03 in a vote on DaWiki (link above) it was concluded, that an administrator who hasn't been active on the Danish Wikipedia for 210 days would be eligible to a warning for inactivity on their discussion pages, and if they didn't respond within 30 days would have their sysop-bit removed. On 2011-07-03 da:User:Masz posted a warning on this users page ([8]) and the user hasn't responded. Both da:User:Masz and I are sysops on DaWiki (verify Masz, verify me). --Heb 12:36, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Dferg ☎ talk 13:31, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Onkel Tuca@da.wikipedia

On 2011-07-03 in a vote on DaWiki (link above) it was concluded, that an administrator who hasn't been active on the Danish Wikipedia for 210 days would be eligible to a warning for inactivity on their discussion pages, and if they didn't respond within 30 days would have their sysop-bit removed. On 2011-07-03 da:User:Masz posted a warning on this users page (diff) and the user hasn't responded. Both da:User:Masz and I are sysops on DaWiki (verify Masz, verify me). --Heb 12:36, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Dferg ☎ talk 13:31, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Mark Jensen@da.wikipedia

On 2011-07-03 in a vote on DaWiki (link above) it was concluded, that an administrator who hasn't been active on the Danish Wikipedia for 210 days would be eligible to a warning for inactivity on their discussion pages, and if they didn't respond within 30 days would have their sysop-bit removed. On 2011-07-03 da:User:Masz posted a warning on this users page (diff) and the user hasn't responded. Both da:User:Masz and I are sysops on DaWiki (verify Masz, verify me). --Heb 12:36, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Dferg ☎ talk 13:31, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Rasmus81@da.wikipedia

On 2011-07-03 in a vote on DaWiki (link above) it was concluded, that an administrator who hasn't been active on the Danish Wikipedia for 210 days would be eligible to a warning for inactivity on their discussion pages, and if they didn't respond within 30 days would have their sysop-bit removed. On 2011-07-03 da:User:Masz posted a warning on this users page (diff) and the user hasn't responded. Both da:User:Masz and I are sysops on DaWiki (verify Masz, verify me). --Heb 12:36, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Dferg ☎ talk 13:31, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Allano@da.wikipedia

On 2011-07-03 in a vote on DaWiki (link above) it was concluded, that an administrator who hasn't been active on the Danish Wikipedia for 210 days would be eligible to a warning for inactivity on their discussion pages, and if they didn't respond within 30 days would have their sysop-bit removed. On 2011-07-03 da:User:Masz posted a warning on this users page (diff) and the user hasn't responded. Both da:User:Masz and I are sysops on DaWiki (verify Masz, verify me). --Heb 12:36, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Dferg ☎ talk 13:31, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Juan de Vojníkov@cswiktionary

I request removing sysop rights for Juan de Vojníkov on cs.wiktionary because of inactivity. We adopted the rule for removing rights of inactive users last year that says that Any sysop who hasn't made any logged action in past half year can have his rights revoked automatically (without discussion). („Správci, který po dobu půl roku neprovede žádnou zaznamenanou akci, mohou být automaticky odebrána práva správce.“ in Czech) His last logged action on the project is from January. I am bureaucrat on the project. --Reaperman 19:57, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done by Jyothis. Ruslik 20:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Grillo@svwikipedia

I would like my sysop rights removed please. --Grillo 19:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done thanks for your work. Matanya 19:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Redux@enwikipedia

Redux has been inactive since July 2009, and qualifies for de-cratting per the new policy linked above. They were notified a month ago, and again several days ago, and have not returned. --Hersfold (talk) 05:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. -- Mentifisto 06:03, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

TUF-KAT@enwikipedia

TUF-KAT has been inactive since September 2009, and qualifies for de-cratting per the new policy linked above. They were notified a month ago, and again several days ago, and have not returned. --Hersfold (talk) 05:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. -- Mentifisto 06:03, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Bothnia@svwikipedia

The admin flag should be removed -- Lavallen 06:14, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Done; please thank them for their work. PeterSymonds (talk) 07:01, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Restu20@itwikipedia

More than six months of inactivity he hopes to be back on Sept. . --Vituzzu 23:51, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 00:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

MagnusA@svwikipedia

Please remove my checkuser flag @sv.wikipedia. There are still the minimum of 2 checkusers left, see the user list. Best regards --MagnusA 03:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done thanks for your work. Matanya 08:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Adziura@plwiki

Due to our rule, introduced after voting, in the name of Polish Wikipedia community, I hereby request for removing sysop access, due to their inactivity for over a year. Adziura had been notified according to the procedure, but failed to reply. JDavid 09:43, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 09:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

KoRnholio8@slwikipedia

The user requested removal of his administrator status due to inactivity on another bureaucrat's talk page (see "discussion" above) a couple of months ago. I pointed him in this direction with a message on his user page to which he didn't reply, so I'm now making a request on his behalf (there is no policy for removal of sysop status due to inactivity on sl:). If this is insufficient, let me know and I'll try to contact him again. — Yerpo Eh? 13:45, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:00, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Pedroca cerebral@pt.wikipedia

I clicked on the wrong button and I made a mistake on pt.wiki. I've granted a crat flag to an user when I should have granted the deleter flag per this discussion. So, please, remove the crat flag. Sorry about it and thanks.--” Teles (T @ L C S) 01:38, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. -- Mentifisto 01:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Joystick@test.wikipedia

No logged action/edit for more than 2 years. a×pdeHello! 15:28, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --Jyothis 15:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Roosa@test.wikipedia

No logged action/edit for more than 2 years. a×pdeHello! 15:35, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --Jyothis 15:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Manticore@test.wikipedia

No logged action/edit for more than 2,5 years. a×pdeHello! 15:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done by Jyothis. Ruslik 17:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Joystick.pl@test.wikipedia

No logged action/edit for more than 2,5 years. a×pdeHello! 16:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done by Jyothis. Ruslik 17:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Fran Rogers@test.wikipedia

No logged action/edit for more than 1,5 years. Last log was own rename ... a×pdeHello! 17:31, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Ruslik 17:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Purodha@ksh.wikipedia

Admin flag and Bureaucrat flag should be removed. There has been e vote on desysoping an decrating Purodha. He has been informed. --Holder 04:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Done. Please than him for his help. --Mercy 06:57, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Note: Long discussion moved to the talk page. Please follow it there as this page is not intended for lengthy discussions. Thanks for your understanding. Best regards, -- Dferg 20:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Jack Phoenix@test.wikipedia

No logged action at all! No edit for more than 1,5 years. a×pdeHello! 16:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Ruslik 17:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
The local policy says "sysop access may not be removed to MediaWiki developers due to inactivity", and both Jack Phoenix and Fran Rogers are developers. They probably don't particularly care, but please keep this sort of thing in mind when making (and acting upon) future requests. Emufarmers 01:25, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
I actually did not remove sysop access, I removed bureaucrat access. Sysop access was removed locally by Axpde. Ruslik 08:10, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
I've locally granted both of them the admin right back. -Barras 09:39, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Actually I wasn't aware that Jack and Fran are developers – is there an "official" list somewhere?
And as said before test.wikipedia.org is a testwiki, if some erstwhile admin still needs his flag I'll reset it! On the other hand I see no sense in having dozens of inactive admins/crats, any user who sees all those admins/crats will expect quick responses but won't get it ... a×pdeHello! 12:32, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Ugur Basak@tr.wikipedia

He's a checkuser who is inactive for a year. Local policy is same with English policy; "Any user account with CheckUser status that is inactive for more than a year will have their CheckUser access removed.". Have a nice day --Koc61 18:51, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

He had edits in 2011. Ruslik 18:53, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Well, i don't know your policy about that. 4 edits make him active? Koc61 18:55, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
I see, inactive means no edits or logged actions. Thank you. Koc61 19:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
It is only about local policy, which does not specify any minimum number of edits/actions. Ruslik 19:03, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done User has edits this year, so is not "inactive". -- Avi 21:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
I've opened a thread regarding CU-inactivity.
Discuss this
-- Dferg 09:24, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Davin@nlwikipedia

Request to dismiss me of my administrator rights / moderator rights Davin 18:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Dferg 18:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Purbo_T@ksh.wikipedia

Admin flag should be removed. This is a bot created by, and granted admin rights by, Purodha who has just been de-adminned. Dbach 15:17, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Invalid request. There is no evidence that the bot did anything it was not supposed to do, and there is nothing on the bot in the article presented as "discussion" above. --Miss van der Roehe 15:46, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment Comment I can confirm that there is no discussion about the bot, but if we take a look at the discussion below, the bot was misused against the community opinion. Such bot with sysop flag is more than questionable if the operator was desysoped. --WizardOfOz talk 15:59, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
True, we did not discuss the bot yet. But in fact, Purodha - as a real person - will continue to be an admin if his bot has sysop rights; so there is hardly any point in de-sysop'ing the "real" username and leave the bot with admin rights. Dbach 16:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
The bot was never used against community consensus, and I would never do so. The whole idea of misuse is bogus. It is only a false insinuation by Dbach aka ksh:User:Düüvelskääl, not the first one by the way. Makes it hard to assume good faith, but I keep trying. --Purodha Blissenbach 17:51, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done I have read the discussions relating to this request and it is clear that the community has deadmined a member and that member is operating an admin bot. Clearly this means the person retains admin and this is clearly not the desire of the community. Whether or not further discussion should happen is strictly for the ksh community to decide, locally. Therefore, admin is removed, bot is left. fr33kman 03:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

J. 'mach' wust@alswikipedia

--Terfili 22:04, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done fr33kman 03:14, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Mike.lifeguard@testwiki

Yes check.svg Done Thank you for your micro service :) fr33kman 03:00, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Vardion@miwikipedia

I received administrator and bureaucrat rights at the Māori Wikipedia back in 2004, mainly for the purposes of working with the interface. However, my activity there has been minimal, bordering on non-existent. Additionally, I was appointed (without my requesting it) by the unilateral judgement of another bureaucrat (who has since lost his status there anyway). I'm not aware of any specific policy on that wiki against inactive bureaucrats, but I would prefer not to keep either my bureaucrat or admin permissions if I'm not using them. (The notice at the top of this section says I should be "logged in to a global account". I hope that means "(if you have one)" — I don't, and if I created one right now, I'm told that my Māori Wikipedia account would become my "home wiki", even though I hardly use it. This is part of the reason I'd rather not just let my permissions on the Māori Wikipedia sit.) --Vardion 05:33, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your help! --Mercy 06:54, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

ArséniureDeGallium@fr.wiktionary

Please remove me from the list of bureaucrats (*not* the sysops) of this project. ArséniureDeGallium 20:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Dferg 20:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. --ArséniureDeGallium 20:11, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Sinnierer@barwiki

Failed reelection (2/3 approval by community) --Matthias Klostermayr 20:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -Barras 21:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

IgorTurzh@uk.wikipedia

Please remove my sysop access. I will apply for a new RFA at an appropriate time. --IgorTurzh 07:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Thank you for your service. Jafeluv 07:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

la goutte de pluie@en.wikipedia

Please remove my sysop access. I will apply for a new RFA at an appropriate time. La goutte de pluie 03:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

En.wiki has local bureaucrats that can remove sysop access. Try posting a request at en:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard. Jafeluv 05:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Just saying that nothing forbids us to remove sysop access on wikis with local crats able to do so if the user is requesting that here. A matter to discuss I think. -- Dferg 13:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Agreed. If someone asks here, I think we can still remove it. That's one of our tasks, no matter if local people can do it. -Barras 14:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Self-requested removals are of course uncontroversial and it doesn't really make much difference who flips the bit, except that the log entry is made on meta instead of the local page. However, we generally decline steward requests, even uncontroversial ones, if there are active local people available to perform the same task. That's why the bolded text at the top does say that this page is intended only for wikis which have no local procedure for the task. Jafeluv 15:30, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Indeed one of the motivating factors in giving enwiki bureaurats the ability to remove administrator permissions was to move the logs onto the local side (see w:WP:DESYSOP/TECH, w:WP:DESYSOP/POL, previous discussion on subject). That doesn't necessarily translate into 'stewards should send people to local venue except in urgent or emergency situations' and Dferg is correct that there is nothing "forbidding" non-urgent removal on request, nor has there been any kind of request to stewards from the enwiki community asking them to refrain from doing so. That being said, processing non-urgent requests in two different locations means that people may still be required to check both local and meta rights logs when looking into removals that were carried out after 2011 August 11. –xeno 13:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
FWIW, I believe there are two of us who are also local EnWikiP 'crats, if someone wants to ping us directly. -- Avi 20:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Removal of rights on nl.wikinews

There are eleven sysops+crats on nl.wikinews (see here). This project is closed in February 2010 and according to this the rights should be removed. Trijnstel 12:22, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. --Mercy 12:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Kurac@bswiki

Ahm... Our crat granted a sysop flag for a user with an more than abusive name by mistake. Could please someone remove this, before the whole world lough about :D The right user has become the flag here. Was a typo. Thanks --WizardOfOz talk 19:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:29, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks... This will be left for the history I supose :D --WizardOfOz talk 19:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Nishkid64@enwiki

Please remove my checkuser/oversight privileges. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 17:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done thanks for your service. Matanya 17:44, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

HerculeBot@frwiki

Please remove the sysop flag of my bot. Thanks --Hercule 09:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Done. -- Dferg 09:38, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Giancarlodessi@itwiki

please remove my sysop privileges. thanks --Giancarlodessi 21:33, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Dferg 21:37, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Moyg@frwiki

Please remove my sysop flag on the French wikipedia. Thank you. Moyg 21:36, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Dferg 21:37, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Артем В. Коновалов@ukwikipedia

Thank you. --Tomahiv 08:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

The link to Ukrainian Wikipedia removal of access policy does not point to any policy. Ruslik 10:20, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
the policy: should be at least 51% percent of votes support (in this nomination we have 55%).--Anatoliy (talk) 10:29, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
As mentioned on the page: For unsysoping user must have at least 51 % (fifty-one percent) of votes «Support». The term of voting is one week. 1 week and 55% — clearly desysopping — NickK 10:47, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done. Jafeluv 11:43, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Giancarlodessi@itwiki

please remove my sysop privileges. thanks --Giancarlodessi 21:33, 27 August 2011 (UTC)


I'm resubmitting this user request (see diff), as flag has been restored in good faith by one of it.wiki bureaucrats. Please remove sysop bit again, the request has been confirmed via mail. --M/ 11:19, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Done. Please thank him for his work. -Barras 11:28, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

方洪渐@zhwiki

The user wants to have his sysop flag removed and posted on local resignation page and asked for assistance in submitting the request on meta for him. Please refer to the diff above. (Account not unified and he mentioned that he's forgotten about the account details at meta)--Bencmq 12:48, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Done. Please thank them for their help! --Mercy 12:51, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

aawiki

Status:    Done

Following Closing projects policy#Definition of actions I've removed the admin rights of the following user: Aeæ (sysop). Bots still needs to be removed. -- Dferg 17:30, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Bots also done. -- Dferg 17:42, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

qualitywiki, advisorywiki, wikimania2005wiki

Status:    Done

I removed all local userrights on these locked projects. Ruslik 18:57, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

rohit rawat@hiwiktionary

Hi, I am a sysop on hiwikipedia and now I have started contributing on hiwiktionary. I applied for the post of admin on local wiki community page but probably because nobody is active on hiwiktionary my request has been pending for more than 5 months. But I have got support from four members for hiwiktionary and that can be seen here under the heading क्र ३. I am asking for sysop/admin rights because lots of changes need to be done on hiwiktionary and hiwikiquote like there is no Devanagari input facility, and texts on many buttons and labels is incorrect and so on and these changes are not possible without becoming sysop/admin. Looking at my contributions on hiwiktionary, hiwikipedia, and hiwikiquote I think I'm eligible for this post. Thanks. रोहित रावत 19:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

please wait at least a week for a clear community response. Thanks--Nick1915 - all you want 10:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Granted for 6 months, will expire on 09 August 2011--Nick1915 - all you want 09:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
change to permanent due to election as local crat. Matanya 09:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Removed expired administrator flag, but how about the bureaucrat flag?--Jusjih 09:41, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
@Jusjih, should be removed too. The admin and crat flag are linked to eachother. You can't just be a crat without having the admin flag. Trijnstel 09:47, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
He was elected locally as a crat, moving the flag was redundant. He may grant it locally to himself. Crat flag shouldn't be removed. Matanya 09:50, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Matanya 09:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the replies. Technically a user might be a bureaucrat but not an administrator, though this rarely happens. Therefore, I am leaving the bureaucrat flag for now as there are two other bureaucrats. This request is ready to be archived if no one has anything else to say.--Jusjih 10:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Bhawani Gautam Rhk@newikibooks

Sir, I want to contribute on ne.wikibooks but there was no template (just i am doing), no Devanagari writing tools, There is no transliteration system, no one can type phonetic Devanagari to edit or add new articles, If it is not corrected no one will edit or add new articles in future also. There is no sysop to manage this project. I am a sysop on ne.wikipedia and have experience in doing that. I need a sysop flag on this project.I have applied at request page for admin, you can see the local policy there. Thanks - Bhawani 02:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

please wait at least a week for a clear community response. Thanks--Nick1915 - all you want 10:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
i have gained consensus as there are only 10 active users-Bhawani 15:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
I believe you need to wait a week irrespective of the size of the wiki. Regards, Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Granted for 6 months, will expire on 09 August 2011--Nick1915 - all you want 09:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
removed Matanya 09:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Already removed by Matanya.--Jusjih 09:45, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Reder@sg.wikipedia

In the past I've been administrator of this wiki, and then I am reapplying to get Admin status. On this wiki there is a very small community, and they need someone to control vandalism and make a bit of order. I would like to request an admin access on this basis for 1 year if it is possible. Thanks, --Reder 21:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

please wait at least a week for a clear community response. Thanks--Nick1915 - all you want 10:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Granted temporary sysopship until 09 August 2011, come before august for extending your temporary adminship if you want- thanks--Nick1915 - all you want 10:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
removed Matanya 09:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Already removed by Matanya.--Jusjih 09:45, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Gazeb@rue.wikipedia

Hello, I would like to be temporary administrator at Rusyn wiki for 6 months. There are some things to do (protect pages, corrections in namespaces ...). I created most of the Rusyn pages in the Incubator where I am test administrator. --Gazeb 19:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I see one opposition against your local request. I am putting this on hold for a while.Jusjih 10:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Please consider that this opposition is against any request for administrator. The user does not want any administrator. I do not see any relation directly to my person. --Gazeb 11:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Indeed, I've seen opposes from that user to adminship requests on numerous wikis (e.g. here). --MF-W 18:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
So, what we are waiting for? --Gazeb 21:32, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done, expires Aug 12, 2011. I do recall that user as well... Shanel 21:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
removed. Matanya 15:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Ciphers@arwikinews

Hello. I am a checkuser on ar.wp and admin on some other ar projects. Ar.Wikinews has been abandoned for a while and i need the admin tools to maintain the project. There is a nomination page in the above link, but i do not expect much people will vote!. Ciphers 12:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold till 18 May, as it seems you've created the vote page today. Regards, -- Dferg ☎ talk 12:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
The nomination has been there for more than a year, though it is true i added a note for voting today. Anyway there is no rush we could wait till 18th. Thank you for your prompt reply. --Ciphers 12:28, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 22:15, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Fixed: removed the bot flag set by Mav and added the sysop one, that will expire in 3 months as of today. That is 18/08/2011. Please upload the images to commons and translate the interface at betawiki only. Regards, -- Dferg ☎ talk 22:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
removed. Matanya 11:22, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Ashina@kk.wikipedia

I am applying for adminship at kazakh wikipedia. There is only one admin, however he doesn't respond at least month. Also to increase activity of users our community needs more admins. The group of enthusiastic people started process to create a chapter in Kazakhstan. We are communicating with Sj (member of the Board of Trustees and Asaf Bartov). At the moment we need to organize the main page of Kazakh Wikipedia and further promotion among students. --Ashina 06:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

On hold until 19 May. Ruslik 07:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
The only bureaucrat there GaiJin is inactive after October 2010. I am asking to get any response. If no response, I will locally propose to de-flag.--Jusjih 17:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done for three months. Expires on 21 August 2011. Ruslik 06:45, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
removed. Matanya 06:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

hanberke@tk.wikipedia

Please grant me 6-month temporary sysop status which expired on 23 February 2010. I had four temporary terms up to now. I was the only sysop there. Thanks in advance. --Hanberke 11:08, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done to expire on 2011-08-23.Jusjih 17:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Removed.--Jusjih 07:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

hanberke@tk.wiktionary

Please extend my 6-month temporary sysop status for another 6 months. --Hanberke 11:08, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done to expire on 2011-08-23.Jusjih 17:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Removed.--Jusjih 07:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Mike.lifeguard@testwiki

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you.  – mike@meta:~$  23:51, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Innocent iwbot@ptwiki

I hope I will be helped by a temporary confirmed-flag, until the account is autoconfirmed or a bot-flag is granted. Since the nature of the autoconfirmed-flag looks different than other projects, I do not know how long I need it. -- Lavallen 12:15, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

bot are auto-confirmed with the flag. request a flag and the problem will end. Matanya 00:20, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Did you follow my link above? -- Lavallen 04:29, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Comment Comment: Autoconfirmed flag might be necessary for this account start with test edits, which are done 'before' the bot flag is given. However, as I could understand, the owner does not want his bot to be flagged as bot. Note: On pt.wikipedia, an account is confirmed when it does ten edits and has 4 days of creation. Non-confirmed accounts are subject to captcha.” Teles (T @ L C S) 04:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Then I have reached sv:Moment 22 and I withdraw my bot-request on ptwiki. - Consider this case as closed. -- Lavallen 07:06, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
I would have granted this request. The permission is a low level one, and it is just pity that this request can not be handled by local administrators. I probably should file a bug report asking for local administrators being given an ability to assign and remove this usergroup on all Wikimedia projects. Ruslik 08:26, 10 August 2011 (UTC)