Steward requests/Permissions/2012-01

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in January 2012, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Contents

Administrator access

Sbblr0803@sawikisource

This user has community consensus at s:sa:Wikisource:समुदायद्वारम्#Extension_of_admin_rights to continue as an admin. Thank you John Vandenberg 08:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for nomination John. Sbblr0803 08:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Ruslik 17:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Fadli Idris@ace.wiki

I have previously admin access for ace.wiki but temporary remove for This case and we have decision now. (see this). ace.wiki no more local sysop now, hope i can be one to manage ace.wiki. Thanks --Fadli Idris 14:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Please start a new local discussion about your adminship there. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 14:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Why is 2009?--Shizhao 13:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
He applied for the status in 2009. He was then emergency desysopped for abuse in 2010 (see Requests for comment/ace.wikipedia and Prophet Muhammad images). PeterSymonds (talk) 14:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Comment Comment There is no decision on ace.wiki to apply sharia law. 3 supports and 2 oppose is not a consensus...
Fadli Idris opened a local consultation have opened a local consultation.
--Hercule 15:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold until 7th January. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done. Ruslik 08:51, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Comment Comment Only one voter why My request rejected? I Think need more times for local discussion. Hercule have sentiment with me, so it is not fair if only heard one person that even He does not understand Acehnese. But if this is my final decision would not mind or I allowed to ask again as admin next time? Thanks --Fadli Idris 20:25, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
You're welcome to keep the local request open and post here if there is a change. But with such a small community, I doubt such consensus will be attained. For now, this particular request is closed and will be archived as not done. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Rosenquist@da.wikiquote

I hereby requests admin access for the the Danish Wikiquote. Currently there are no bureaucrats and only one admin, who doesn't seem to have been active since 2009-10-16. Thanks in advance. --Rosenquist 20:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold until 9th January, to give a full week for comment. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Not done; no consensus locally. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Bellavista1957@fa.wikisource

Hello, I have been Admin since 16 July 2011 in Wikisource Farsi. I revitalized the Wikisource Project created main page, category system, translated guidance and help system, developed templates, guided new users, corrected pages with mistakes and uploaded thousands of new pages with scans. I would like to further develop Wikisource Farsi. I would like to change my temporary position to permanent. Thank you.----Bellavista1957 12:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold until 15th January, to give a full week for comment. In the event of no opposition, the number of people active on the request will determine whether your adminship is to be temporary or permanent. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but according to previous consensus in our small community, only temporary adminship is permitted on Persian Wikisource. AMERICOPHILE 14:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
ps: User:Mardetanha, User:Pedram.salehpoor, User:Bellavista1957 himself, User:Huji, and me voted in favor of temporary adminship unanimously. AMERICOPHILE 14:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Comment: Citation of this vote is completely misinterpreted. Firstly, I have to inform that Mardetanha and Pedram Salehpoor have a permanent Adminship on Wikisource Farsi. Huji gave up his Adminship on Wikisource Farsi, as he has not been active more than three years and had only 69 edits. Huji is permanent Admin in Wikipedia Farsi. We agreed that concerning Adminship in Wikisource Farsi that inactive admins should be removed from the Admin list as it is in Wikipedia Farsi. Americophile is giving as usual false information, and misuses the language barrier. --Bellavista1957 15:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

I asked a third party, User:Mehran who is a sysop on Persian Wikipedia, to confirm my statements. You can also use Google translate. I know that it sucks but easy to decipher key information. AMERICOPHILE 15:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Can you please explain why you deleted the request? As I said above, the numbers would determine whether the request would be permanent or temporary, so if it is as you say, it wouldn't have been permanent. It only seems fair that this request is restored and the discussion continues for its full duration. Please consider restoring it. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 14:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
I have deleted nothing, but just put his RfA into a collapsible box temporarily. User:Bellavista1957 has made a request to "extend his Adminship and change its duration from temporary to permanent" while he is not currently an admin and permanent adminship is not allowed on our community. Only decisions made by our community are legitimate and our community has prohibited permanent adminship. Thanks for monitoring the RfA. AMERICOPHILE 15:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

┌─────────────┘
Here is where the stewards stand on this issue. Essentially we have to act on what local users decide, which is why our role is somewhat limited. However, we can also act as neutral third parties, and it seems to me that this discussion isn't being conducted in the best way. I would advise that the discussion is uncollapsed, and allowed to run its full course; after its full duration, we can judge consensus. If consensus is in favour, we can grant Bellavista1957 temporary admin rights until the community has a full discussion about allowing permanent adminship. Please consider doing that. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 16:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

I did what you wanted. AMERICOPHILE 17:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

I was asked to comment here. On the above link, in confirming Americophile, Mardetanha have suggested the temp sysop idea (he have said: "We could generalize the Wikipedia rules here. I oppose to permanent administration. We have two permanent semi-active sysop & one temp sysop here now.") and going on, Pedram.salehpoor and Bellavista1957 and Huji supported that. I have no idea if it's a kind of consensus or not, the project have already two permanent admins and no 'crats notwithstanding. I also think it's better to let the stewards submit the result. With all best. Mehran Debate 17:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

The title of above mentioned translations is Removal the Access of Inactive Admins. The discussion was about removal Admin access from inactive admins. There has never been a consensus about permanent or temporary Adminship. In fa.Wikipedia as well as in fa.wikisource there are permanent admins. The whole discussion shows the concentrated hate of Americophile against me. Please look at comments Americophile and Hootandolati made in scriptorium fa.wikisource, this Americophile has exceeded all borders of seriousness and respect. I would like to mention both Americophile and Hootandolati have only one single contribution made in Wikisource Farsi, the rest of their time and edits is spent to terrorize me. Have you ever experienced such a voting process? Permanently the Americophile and Hootandolati redesigning the structure and look of the voting page. The page is full of defamation and slander. --Bellavista1957 10:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, the title is "Remoavl of access of inactive admins" but the content is about both the removal of access of inactive admins and prohibiting permanent adminship. I translated the whole discussion so that the stewards can easily understand who is lying.
"User:Americophile: It's better to leave a message on the talkpages of inactive admins (User:Kaveh and User:Huji) and ask them to give their admin right back in case they don't need it anymore. If they did not respond to this request within a month, We ask Meta stewards to remove their accesses.
User:Mardetanha: We can generalize the Wikipedia policy to here. Furthermore, I oppose to permanent adminship. We have two permanent semi-active admins and one temporary avtive admin in this project now. Regards
User:Pedram.salehpoor: I agree with Mardetanha.
User:Bellavista1957: I agree with Mardetanha and Pedram.salehpoor too.
User:Americophile: I left a message on Huji and Kaveh talkpages about this issue. I hope they respond to my request.
User:Huji: I made a request to remove my admin right. In my opinion, Persian Wikisourec is such a small community that doesn't need permanent admins. If User:Kaveh agrees with this fact too (or not respond to the request on his talkpage within the due date), We can get his crat access back and grant admin rights only for certain periods of time (e.g. three-month periods) that can be extended if the temporay admin keeps contributing."
How can you say that it's not a consensus while according the above discussion I made a request to remove adminship and crat accesses of User:Kaveh and it was accepted and nobody (neither the stewards nor the Persian Wikisource users) objected. AMERICOPHILE 23:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

A full week passed. Could you please judge the consensus? AMERICOPHILE 12:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done; there is currently no consensus locally. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Would you please explain why there is no consensus? User Aghesna had not a single edit in Wikisource Farsi when he voted me against me, he is not the member of Wikisource Farsi Community. There are 5 votes pro and two votes against me, it means that clearly the majority is in favor of my request. Please EXPLAIN YOUR DECISION.--Bellavista1957 15:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
I see three in opposition as far as I can see, which is no consensus. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
No need to mention that User:Sansoorchi who appeared on Persian Wikisource yesterday is not an established user and therefore not eligible to vote. User:Mehran, while he is an admin on Persian Wikipedia, has no contributions on the main namespace and therefore is not qualified to vote. There are three votes in favor of your adminship and two votes against your adminship that means a simple majority of 60% which is definitely not enough. AMERICOPHILE 16:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

You should look at the consensus a bit more carefully. Americophile and Hootandolati are in opposition. Aghesna as I wrote, voted against me without even been registered in Wikisource Farsi at the time voted against me. Aghesna's vote does not count. There are many people from other projects of Wikimedia Foundation who support me, but they say they can not participate because they do not edit in Wikisource Farsi. One can not just pass by and vote, this is manipulation of the vote. To avoid such manipulations the rules and regulations has foreseen a minimum of editing to become part of a community. I wrote on the top of the consensus that the active members of Wikisource Farsi should vote, not by passers. PLEASE RECONSIDER YOUR DECISION. --Bellavista1957 15:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Again user Americophile comes up with false information. User Sansoorchi registered 1 December 2011 and made more 30 edits, user Mehran has registered on 5 January 2012 and made technical changes in Wikisource Farsi, as administrator of Wikipedia Farsi, he knows that his own vote is correct and is based on rules and regulations. Americophile intervened several times in the election process. In my view he is not qualified to vote because he is a known harasser and blocked in Wikipedia Farsi due to his aggressiveness and misusing more than 30 accounts. Please do not make a mockery out of this voting. With this permanent attack of Americophile against me and making political allegations against me, it was courageous from these Users to participate in consensus and vote in my favor. PLEASE RECONSIDER YOUR DECISION--Bellavista1957 16:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Manipulation in Wikisource Farsi: I just looked at the contributions of Sansoorchi, I am surprised that in the list of contributions there are only edits of 14 January 2012. But look at the discussion page of Sansoorchi you will see that Pedram Salehpoor has welcomed Sansoorchi on 1 December 2011, UTC 18:32. On 1 December 2011, UTC 18:32 Pedram Salehpoor wrote to Sansoorchi that Dear Colleague, for the authors whose works are not in public domain, page can not be created. Pedram Salehpoor deleted all uploads of Sansoorchi, I opposed his decision and wrote emails to both Mardetanha and Pedram Salehpoor against these deletions (emails can be provided on request). How come that there is no trace of the activities and the contributions of Sansoorchi in his activity lists. One must ask what is going on, in this project? Please investigate this matter. --Bellavista1957 16:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

krishnaprasaths@ta.wikiquote

Hi, I would become temporary administrator of Tamil-Wikiquote, because now here is since a long time that there are no users who contributing regularly, and furthermore there are no admins, the contrary there is much work and a lot of cleaning to do. There are pages to be deleted, others to move, and the first page has need to be Revised, etc... Then it is important to prevent the first page from other spam editors. Thank-you --krishnaprasath (talk) 16:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Leave a note on the community page for that wikiquote (village pump, tavern or whatever is called). Wait for a couple of weeks for opinions, and then post it here. We check that community was informed and then may grant the sysop. es:Magister Mathematicae 16:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I posted a notice here. Thank you. --krishnaprasath (talk) 02:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold until 15th January, to give a full week for comment. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Done. To expire on 15 April 2012. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 03:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Daniel Mayer :) --krishnaprasath (talk) 01:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

ПешСай@mhr.wiki

Hello! I'm asking sysop permission for mhr wiki, because there is no admin in our wiki at the moment. All 4 users with temporary access became inactive in our Wikipedia and there sysop access has expired. I have proposed myself as candidate in local discussion page, but nobody has answered for or against. Our community had some conflict half a year ago, for now the conflict has been exhausted.--ПешСай 20:07, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done sorry but you lost your rights for serious issues and abuses by you. --Vituzzu 20:17, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Could you, please, explain what are the issues and abuses so that I can fix them?--ПешСай 06:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Дагиров Умар@ce.wiki

Здравствуйте. Прощу присвоить мне временный флаг администратора в чеченской википедии для удаление масового вандализма обрашаюсь к вам потому что на чеч вики нет ни одного активного администратора. -- Дагиров Умар 21:16, 19 January 2012 (UTC) (transferred from Revision History of Steward requests/Permissions by --Ymblanter 21:40, 19 January 2012 (UTC). Sorry, it was my fault, I gave a wrong link.)

  • My translation: Hello! I request a temporary adminship in Chechen Wikipedia to fight persistent vandalism. I write here since there are no active administrators in Chechen Wikipedia.--Ymblanter 21:42, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
    • Please leave a notice in a prominent place on ce.wiki about your request. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 00:27, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
    • Дайте, пожайлуста, ссылку на локальный запрос. Ruslik 09:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Я не понял что за ссылка вот моя заявка на статус. -- Дагиров Умар 15:10, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Done for 3 months till 20 April 2012. Ruslik 15:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Огромное спасибо за помощь. С уважением. -- Дагиров Умар 18:46, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Riemogerz@bjn.wiki

rieMOGerz 10:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Please start a discussion locally about this, on a community page such as the village pump or the local equivalent. If there are no objections after a week, we will grant you temporary adminship. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Well, i try it. rieMOGerz 00:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Progress report? If you've opened the request locally, would you mind linking us to the discussion? That would help when the time comes to determine the result of this request. Otherwise we will have to close it as not done. Many thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 01:05, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Please provide a link before Monday 23 January or this request will be archived as not done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 00:29, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done. If a local discussion / vote is complete, please open another request. --Bencmq 04:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Vacio@hywiki

Please grant sysop access in view of the community consensus. --Beko 07:52, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Granted permanent sysop access. --Bencmq 08:01, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

JinJian@warwiki

Same as above. IluvLovato123 12:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

indeed. Seb az86556 12:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
The requesting user is a known cross-wiki troublemaker, or better said, one account more of him and as such has already been blocked. There's no vote, no community notice, nothing. This request is X mark.svg Not done. Please stop wasting the comunities' time. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 20:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Comp1089@ba.wikipedia

Hello, after we have accepted the new local policy (requirements, ba only) about bureaucrats of Bashkir Wikipedia, the community suggested that I should be promoted to bureaucrat. You can see the voting link above. Comp1089 09:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Vituzzu 14:38, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Aidabishkek@kywiki

This wiki has no bureaucrats, we cannot help this wiki without bureaucrats and request page is not exist on that wiki, the request is being filed here. I nominated him for bureaucratship because there are no administrators to be hired. IluvLovato123 12:13, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

? Where is the discussion? Who voted and when? Have you even asked the user whether they want the flag? Seb az86556 12:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
This user is sometimes logged in, and s/he is a native Kyrgyz speaker, you may contact him and wait for the reply. --IluvLovato123 14:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
The requesting user is a known cross-wiki troublemaker, or better said, one account more of him and as such has been blocked. There's no vote, no community notice, nothing. This is {{not done}}. Please stop wasting the comunities' time. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 20:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Request page Aidabishkek 20:36, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Now that the interested user has just opened a discussion page, status changed to "on hold" until 14.01.2012; to allow for community comments. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 20:43, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done only two voters. Matanya 22:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Arjunaraoc@tewiki

As the current Bureaucrats of Telugu Wikipedia are inactive for close to an year and attempts to contact them are not successful, the request is being filed here. I request similar Bureaucrat access to all Telugu Wiki projects, as I am working to improve the Telugu Wiki Community. Arjunaraoc 11:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

It seems you have 6 votes in favor and none to oppose. But currently stewards do not grant bureaucrat access to users who have less than 15 supports in favor. Of course, if the local bureaucrat wants to promote an user, it's up to him or her and the community. But for stewards its different. This thing is being discussed on Meta now. If the community is small stewards are always here to assist for bureaucrat help. Regards, — Tanvir | Talk ] 11:17, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I have extended the voting deadline till Jan 22 2012 to get additional support votes. I will revert once the deadline is completed.--Arjunaraoc 12:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold till January 22, 2012. — Tanvir | Talk ] 09:33, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Can this support, which was made by an IP but signed by a user be re-signed by that user when s/he is logged in? Otherwise, the count of supports falls below 15. -- Avi 06:35, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Current consensus is that it should be about 15 support votes, but 15 is only a soft limit. In this case there is no opposition and almost all supporters have significant number of contributions to the project. So, it is easily passes. Ruslik 08:35, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
The last two votes were by an IP and a recently registered user! a×pdeHello! 11:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
The last voter has few edits, but is technically over a year old. -- Avi 22:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
User:Chaitanya_bhanu on the other hand is brand new with a handful of edits. -- Avi 23:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done The response on TeWiki demonstrates a consensus to allow Arjunaraoc access to the bureaucrat maintenance toolset. Many, if not most, of the respondents have over 500 edits on TeWiki or are of a year or older vintage, and there is no opposition to Arjunaraoc's volunteerism. -- Avi 23:09, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for approving me as Bureaucrat for Telugu Wikipedia.--Arjunaraoc 03:59, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

CheckUser access

SilkTork@en.wiki

Thank you. Risker 00:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 00:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Hunyadym@huwiki

The preceding unsigned comment was added by Malatinszky (talk • contribs) 13:17, 9 January 2012 (UTC).

Time2wait.svg On hold pending identification. PeterSymonds (talk) 13:20, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
I've sent the required information via e-mail. – Hunyadym 21:02, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Ok, when Philippe will add your username here you'll be given with checkuser access. --Vituzzu 21:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Can I just confirm that you sent an e-mail to secure-info-at-wikimedia.org? PeterSymonds (talk) 11:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes. I sent it on Monday at 17:39 UTC. – Hunyadym 14:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Folks, I don't know what to say - I'm sorry. This email went into my spam folder and I totally missed it. That's not supposed to happen, so evidently I have a filter rule set up wrong. Hunyadym, I apologize, and I'm processing your ID right now. Philippe (WMF) 18:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done. Phillipe was so late, but I was so fast. :-P — Tanvir | Talk ] 18:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! – Hunyadym 18:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

User Triglav@jawiki

I request checkuser access on the Japanese Wikipedia for the user as per the discussion above. The user has not yet been identified by the foundation, but I'll send notification to the user via email soon. So the user will be identified in a few days, I believe. Thanks in advance. --Penn Station 14:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold pending identification. Matanya 14:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Done, per identification. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Octahedron80@th.wikipedia

As an arbitrator, Octahedron80 has his identity verified by the foundation. (See diff.) --Taweethaも 01:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Avi 06:42, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Taweetham@th.wikipedia

As an arbitrator, Taweetham has his identity verified by the foundation. (See diff.) --Taweethaも 01:24, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Avi 06:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Ask21@itwikipedia

Please give to Ask21 his new bit :D Vituzzu 11:58, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Grazie! --Vituzzu 12:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Oversight access

Hersfold@en.wiki

Thank you. Risker Risker 00:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 00:37, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

SilkTork@en.wiki

Thank you. Risker Risker 00:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 00:37, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Removal of access

Bangin@kuwiki

This user is inactive for 2 years. Please remove administrator/bureaucrat flags from this user. We notified him 2 weeks ago. Thanks in advance--Gomada 17:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - Please thank him for his work. -Barras 17:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Cool Hand Luke@en.wiki

Thank you. Risker Risker 00:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 00:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Coren@en.wiki

Thank you. Risker Risker 00:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -- Quentinv57 (talk) 00:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Bookofjude@en.wikisource

Inactive, failed annual reconfirmation. --Hesperian 02:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done es:Magister Mathematicae 04:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

EVula@simple.wiki

Our wiki removes inactive admin on Jan. 1st each year as such Evula has been removed as admin. Part of the criteria of being an OS is to be an admin so we need a Steward to remove any flags except rollbacker please. --Djsasso 14:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

I see no user named "Evula" on simplewiki. Any correction? ‍‍‍‍— Tanvir | Talk ] 14:31, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
EVula. Done (conflicted). --M/ 14:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Jamesofur@simple.wiki

Our wiki removes inactive admin on Jan. 1st each year as such Jamesofur has been removed as admin. Part of the criteria of being an CU is to be an admin so we need a Steward to remove any flags left except rollbacker please. --Djsasso 14:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Thanks for all your services.
All hail to James! — Tanvir | Talk ] 14:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Vector@simple.wiki

Our wiki removes inactive admin on Jan. 1st each year as such Vector has been removed as admin. Part of the criteria of being a Crat is to be an admin so we need a Steward to remove any flags left except rollbacker please. --Djsasso 14:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Thanks for all your services. — Tanvir | Talk ] 14:34, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Panterka@plwiki

Due to our rule, introduced after voting, in the name of Polish Wikipedia community, I hereby request for removing sysop access, due to their inactivity for over a year. Panterka had been notified according to the procedure and replied that she confirm her inactivity and requests rights removal; see: OTRS ticket#2012010210004315). Masur 09:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. --Mercy 09:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Salamat@ptwiki

Please remove my sysop status. Thanks. Salamat msg 13:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done thanks for your work. Matanya 13:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Tostadora@eswiki

This user is inactive for two years and according to the policy, its sysop and bureaucrat flags must be removed. Thank you. Nixón 21:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Trijnstel 21:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Patrol110@pl.wiki

I've recently had no time to do my admin duties, so I want to ask for removal of my sysop rights at pl.wikipedia. Thank you :) Patrol110 00:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done thanks for your service. --Vituzzu 00:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Ozymandias@pt.wikiversity

Please, remove my sysop tools on pt.wikiversity.org.Ozymandias 20:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg DoneMarco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 20:08, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Ozymandias@br.wikimedia

Please, remove my sysop tools on br.wikimedia.org.Ozymandias 20:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg DoneMarco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 20:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Popo le Chien@fr.wiki

I'm totally moving to Knol - I hear it's the new black ^^ --Popo le Chien 07:57, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Just to clarify, which rights of yours you want us to remove? Both the bureaucrat and administrator rights? Please mention it. Have a nice time in Knol. :-) — Tanvir | Talk ] 08:00, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Let's do a full package thing - strip all of it! Thanks, Popo le Chien 08:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done. Thanks for all your services. — Tanvir | Talk ] 09:12, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Dolledre@nl.wiki

User requested here for removal of his sysop bit on 8 January 2012 23:00 (UTC). Wiki13 17:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. I apologise; I missed the datestamp specifying 23:00 because it blended in with the date. The user has said it isn't a problem. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Elerium@ro.wiki

Inactive for a year. --Strainu 22:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

This user has edited recently. Have they been informed? PeterSymonds (talk) 22:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, still in 2011 mode. Silly me. Done now. PeterSymonds (talk) 23:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Peter b@nl.wiki

User requested here for removal of his sysop bit. Thanks, JetzzDG 09:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:48, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Pybalo@eswiki

This user is inactive for two years and according to the policy, its sysop and bureaucrat flags must be removed. Thank you. BetoCG 16:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Hiuppo@pl.wiki

Please remove me from admin list. I don't care about wiki any longer. --Hiuppo 22:34, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done, thank you for your contribution to the community anyway. Bencmq 03:33, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Wengier@zh.wiki

Not active for more than 6 months. According to local project rule should be de-sysoped. --Wing 08:19, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:02, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

R.O.C@zh.wiki

Not active for more than 6 months. According to local project rule should be de-sysoped. --Wing 08:24, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:02, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
This user was notified on 5th Jan. According to the policy, the user can be de-sysoped if they do not come back after a month. I told Wing about it so he can revert this. Bencmq 11:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Fdcn@zh.wiki

Not active for more than 6 months. According to local project rule should be de-sysoped. --Wing 08:26, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Done PeterSymonds (talk) 10:02, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
This user was notified on 5th Jan. According to the policy, the user can be de-sysoped if they do not come back after a month. Bencmq 11:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

XiaoZhou@zh.wiki

Not active for more than 6 months. According to local project rule should be de-sysoped. --Wing 08:40, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:02, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
This user was notified on 5th Jan. According to the policy, the user can be de-sysoped if they do not come back after a month. Bencmq 11:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

several@de_labswikimedia

Some users have resigned their admin rights after requesting de-admin because of inactivity, see project page. I'm going to remove the rights. a×pdeHello! 21:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Does it make sense to remove sysops on test wikis? Ruslik 14:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
IMHO extended rights and always connected to extended duties, and there are two main reasons for deadministration:
  1. If an account with extended rights is not observed it might be hacked. With those extended rights the hacker is able to do a lot more havoc than a standard account. And testwikis have only very little to no users checking recentchanges!
  2. Any user on those testwikis might be in need of help. They find dozens of admins and expect to get quick answers to their requests and might be disappointed if there's no response.
Regards a×pdeHello! 12:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
There are another 13 users who didn't even react to the request for more than one week. I'm going to remove the rights. a×pdeHello! 19:45, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Koc61@tr.wiki

Please, remove my sysop rights. Duke ϡ»» message ^^ 15:35, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done, thanks for your work. Matanya 15:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

GastelEtzwane@fr.wiki

Could you please remove my temporary sysop statut on fr.wikipedia as I no longer need it. The sysop status was granted so that I could work with my students on wikipedia articles, and they are now mostly done. --GastelEtzwane 15:40, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg FaitMarco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 15:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

several@en_labswikimedia

Six users didn't react for more than one week after requesting de-admin because of inactivity, see project page. I'm going to remove the rights. a×pdeHello! 20:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

P-e@fr.wiki

Can you please remove my sysop tools on fr wikipédia ? --p-e 10:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your work! --Mercy 10:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you ! p-e 10:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Viki@tr.wiktionary

Viki doesn't active about 3,5 years. Community decided to take back authority. Thank you.--Reality006 13:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

13:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Bobcats@tr.wiktionary

Bobcats doesn't active about 2,5 years. Community decided to take back authority. Thank you.--Reality006 13:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

13:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Ender@tr.wiktionary

Viki doesn't active about 2 years. Community decided to take back authority. Thank you.--Reality006 13:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 13:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Evanherk@nl.wikipedia

Annual confirmation for admins on nlwiki is finished and Evanherk did not receive the mandatory support of 75% and loses his sysop status per local policy - TBloemink talk 10:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 10:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Husky@nl.wikipedia

Annual confirmation for admins on nlwiki is finished and Husky did not receive the mandatory support of 75% and loses his sysop status per local policy - TBloemink talk 10:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Matanya 10:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Maximillion Pegasus@global

Since I currently don't have time to be active in this role, I'd like my global sysop rights to be removed. I thank the community for its trust, and I hope that I might have more time to contribute in the future. Regards, --Maximillion Pegasus 00:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. Please note that you can request it back uncontroversially at any time. Thanks for your good work. PeterSymonds (talk) 00:18, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Alexsh@zh.wikinews

Per local unactive policy, all permission granted may be removed after 6 months since last edits. HWChat - zhwp 12:26, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done I've also removed bureaucrat bit, poke me if there's any problem. --Vituzzu 12:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

R.O.C@zh.wikinews

See above. HWChat - zhwp 12:26, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Vituzzu 12:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

BrockF5@zh.wikinews

See above. HWChat - zhwp 12:26, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Vituzzu 12:30, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Ludo29@fr.wiki

Please, can you remove my sysop tools on fr.wikipedia.org. Ludo29 13:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

You also have oversight rights there. Do you want them also removed? —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 15:28, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
If you can juste remove the sysop tools, it's right. If not, remove all them. Ludo29 15:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Reading the oversight policy I see no mentions that an oversighter must be a sysop in the relevant project. Having read fr:Wikipédia:Masqueur de modifications I can't see that either. So Yes check.svg Done - but I bet your work would be a bit difficult w/o the hability of viewing deleted revisions and so on. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 15:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Note: just to be sure I've consulted the French Wiki ArbCom. Waiting for its answer. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 17:00, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Can be archived now. Noting here that I've just received the response from the French ArbCom, and their interpretation is that Ludo29 should loose too his oversight rights as oversight is attached to sysop on French Wikipedia. The ArbCom, having notificated that to Ludo29, has decided to request sysop rights back, which has been done; so the French Wikipedia ArbCom decided that he should keep his oversight rights too. If any fellow steward has a question I may share the reply, conditioned on getting the approval of the author of the reply first of course. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 04:51, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Steinninn@is.wikipedia

Steininn has reqested to resign as an bureaucrat, at the discussion link given above. Please grant his wish.--Snaevar 21:42, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:47, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Саша Стефановић@sr.wikipedia

This user has not used his sysop and bureaucrat rights since the end of June 2010. By our policy rights will be removed if he or she doesn't have at least one admin and/or bureaucrat action during 18 months. Furthermore, the user himself requested the removal of these rights four months ago. --FriedrickMILBarbarossa 14:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Shizhao 15:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Team OTRS@it.wikipedia

Please remove temp admin rights I gave (as a local bureaucrat) to this account. --Vituzzu 15:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:49, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Merci mr. Peter. --Vituzzu 22:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

odder@several

Please remove all rights from the account of Odder (talk · contribs); these are as follow:

Thank you! odder (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Can I ask if there's a particular reason? --Vituzzu 22:36, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold for 24 hours because of this (to prevent actions which he could regret later). Trijnstel 22:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
I was going to ask a favour of 48h hold-back time, but 24 seems sufficient. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 22:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Stewards are definitely lazy, so don't worry ;) --Vituzzu 22:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, people, for holding this one — my head was definitely too hot, and I wish to cancel that request. I'm sorry for the inconvenience :-) Cheers, odder (talk) 13:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done wb Odder. --Vituzzu 13:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Where's the goddam "Like" button? Thanks folks for holding this back. Odder, I've always believed in ya! Wojciech Pędzich Talk 17:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
👍2 users like this. Trijnstel 17:27, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Siechfred@de.wikipedia

Please remove my sysop-flag in de.wikipedia. --Siechfred 18:45, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. Thank your for your service. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:53, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

yanshoof@he.wikipedia

please remove my sysop rights. no wikitime, for a long time. sorry --Yanshoof 14:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Thanks for you service. Matanya 14:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Otm@skwiki

I request to remove sysop flag of Otm. Reason: inactivity as admin for 4 months, per rule about admins. --Bubamara 18:49, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I see edits from January, 23 - Mind clarifying the inactivity guideline? Thanks. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 20:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi, the Slovak policy on admins says that if the administrator does not perform any sysop action in a four months time, their rights will be removed by stewards. Since the user's last sysop action was performed on May 27 / deletion, protect, block. --Bubamara 20:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done - Administrator rights removed. Thanks for the clarification. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 21:21, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Aristote2@fr.wikipedia

Aristote2 wants his sysop flag to be removed. I am asking it for him as he asked for, because he doesn't speak English. Udufruduhu 16:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Moved to correct section. The Helpful One 16:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done. -- Mentifisto 18:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

User Dvh@he.wikipedia

Please remove my sysop rights. The power is meaningless if it cannot be used against trolls. Dvh 18:25, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done thanks for your service. Matanya 18:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Moez@frwiki

Yes check.svg Done, Matanya 20:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Kronin@itwikisource

After a long discussion it.source community decided that admins who have been totally inactive for a year should have their admin bit removed, a fortnight after an unanswered warning message in their talk page. That happened at the end of October 2011... - εΔω 11:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done — Tanvir | Talk ] 11:26, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Qualc1@itwikisource

After a long discussion it.source community decided that admins who have been totally inactive for a year should have their admin bit removed, a fortnight after an unanswered warning message in their talk page. That happened at the end of October 2011... - εΔω 11:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done — Tanvir | Talk ] 11:26, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Snark@itwikisource

After a long discussion it.source community decided that admins who have been totally inactive for a year should have their admin bit removed, a fortnight after an unanswered warning message in their talk page. That happened at the end of October 2011... - εΔω 11:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done — Tanvir | Talk ] 11:26, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Torredibabele@itwikisource

After a long discussion it.source community decided that admins who have been totally inactive for a year should have their admin bit removed, a fortnight after an unanswered warning message in their talk page. That happened at the end of October 2011... - εΔω 11:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done — Tanvir | Talk ] 11:26, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Team OTRS-Bot@itwikipedia

Please remove the temporary sysop flag I gave to this bot. --Vituzzu 17:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done — Tanvir | Talk ] 17:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

LeeGer@nl.wikipedia

Please remove my sysop rights --LeeGer 23:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

You seem to be quite active, are you sure you don't want to be longer a sysop? --Vituzzu 00:03, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
@LeeGer, I have no idea why you want to quit, but could you please reconsider your decision? You're a great admin... Trijnstel 00:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Trijnstel. At the moment I believe all the crap isn't worth it. But I'll give it an extra day or two. LeeGer 06:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
So Time2wait.svg On hold --Vituzzu 11:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Good. I wholeheartedly agree with the observation. Please stay and don't take the whole world on your shoulders alone. MoiraMoira 19:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
I would ask for the request to be closed/declined for now. When LeeGer really wants to quit he knows where to turn to (first to his caring colleagues and then make up his mind). He needs some time. MoiraMoira 12:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done Moira explained me the situation and I decline the request for now. --Vituzzu 12:35, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Жељко Тодоровић@sr.wikipedia

After the voting, our community decided to remove this user's sysop rights. mickit 21:43, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:46, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Sterio@is.wikipedia

The Icelandic Wikipedia has an inactivity policy for it´s admins and bureaucrats. Admins and bureaucrats who have not made any edits for one year are notified on their talk pages. If they don´t respond within one month or don´t express any interest in keeping their rights, they will lose them. The notification on Sterio´s talk page has been there since 2008, so I am requesting removal of both his admin and bureaucrat rights.--Snaevar 22:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Capaci34@de.wikipedia.org

Please remove my admin right in the de.WP. Thank you. --Capaci34 07:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your help! --Mercy 08:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Trivelt@pl.wikipedia

Due to our rule, introduced after voting, in the name of Polish Wikipedia community, I hereby request for removing sysop access, due to their inactivity for over a year. Trivelt had been notified according to the procedure, but failed to reply. Tar Lócesilion 20:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

AndrzejzHelu@pl.wikipedia

On behalf of the Polish Wikipedia Arbitration Committee I hereby request an immediate removal of sysop rights from the account of pl:User:AndrzejzHelu on the said project in accordance with the Committee’s decision concerning the user (9 Committee members voted in favour, 0 against, 0 abstained). The Committee’s verdict in the recently heard case against the said user includes an enforcement in the form of removing sysop rights for AndrzejzHelu due to his misuse of administrator tools and violation of project's rules. The verdict is enforceable immediately. Thank you in advance, Sebk. 22:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:26, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

Olsi@sqwikinews

Hello! I request to become administrator at Albaninan Wikinews because there are no local admins and I am an active user there. --Olsi 17:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold until 3.7.2011 Matanya 17:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Only two of the six respondents meet the local project's requirements of >50 edits, so permanent adminiship should not be applied. However, as there was unanimity in the respondents and a lack of administrators on the project, I think that temporary adminship of six months duration is appropriate, subject to becoming permanent if and when Olsi has a successful local RfA. -- Avi 09:14, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
removed. Matanya 06:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

odisha1@orwiktionary

hello, today we got the approval for or.wiktionary, for some mediawiki, i request steward to grant me sysops rights for some days, or a week --Srikant Kedia 16:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello. Can you please link to the local request? Thank you. —Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 12:43, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold until 6 October 2011, because the local discussion was started today and should last at least one week. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 17:20, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2012-01-06. To prolong your adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Matanya 09:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
removed. Matanya 07:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

psubhashish@orwiktionary

--Srikant Kedia 13:18, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold I just need to check a thing. --Vituzzu 13:21, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2012-01-12. --Vituzzu 13:36, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
removed. Matanya 15:33, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Ukabia@igwikipedia

I want to renew my administrator access, I have been the only active admin on the Igbo wikipedia for years, and I need access to maintain the pages that I restricted to admins. There's nobody there tending the wiki. Ukabia 17:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Please, post a note on an appropriate page in this wiki. Ruslik 18:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
If I post a note nothing will happen, this is what happened last time I applied for administrator access. http://ig.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Nz%E1%BB%8Dr_ogbako Ukabia 17:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold until July 17. Jafeluv 08:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done until 17 January 2012. Ruslik 06:11, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Removed.--Jusjih 02:39, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Kilavagora@xmfwikipedia

Wiki just launched. I want to request temporary admin rights, until community will be settled down. Kilavagora 16:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC) (Edited as we already started discussion for permanent adminship. Kilavagora 06:15, 23 July 2011 (UTC))

I'd recommend permanent amidships to you and მარგალონა. Also, amidship for Alsandro would help you a lot.--George M. 18:01, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Please start a local discussion. Matanya 07:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
On hold until 23 July 2011. Ruslik 18:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done for six months. Expires on 23 January 2012. Ruslik 12:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
removed. Matanya 08:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Reder@kywiktionary

Hi, I would become temporary administrator of kyrgyz wiktionary (six months if it is possible) because now here is since a long time that there are no users who contributing regularly, and furthermore there are no admins, the contrary there is much work and a lot of cleaning to do. There are pages to be deleted, others to move, and the first page has need to be reorganized, etc. ... Then we need someone to give a bit look at this wiktionary to prevent that is abandoned at herself and at the vandals. --Reder 11:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold for a week. fr33kman 22:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done, to expire 10.1.2012 Matanya 06:40, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you very much --Reder 11:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Removed. Please re-apply if you need an extension. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 02:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

maax@sowikipedia

Hi, my temporary sysop permission have expired, I would like to request loong time steward access or unlimited Thanks. Maax 09:29, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

please start a local discussion. Matanya 09:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi I can't start local discussion, I was the only active sysop in somali wiki Maax 14:08, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
But I guess there are other active users, you may ask them. --Vituzzu 14:10, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
The discussion link above points to w:so:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship, so I guess that would do it (without understanding the content). So Time2wait.svg On hold since it was started yesterday. --Bencmq 14:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2012-01-18. To prolong your adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.--Jusjih 10:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Jusjih , but i still can't change user rights and groups,we need more administrators so the community grows! Maax 12:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Only bureaucrats can manage bot/sysop rights. For bureaucrat access you have to get a local vote ongoing. We unfortunately do not approve temporary bureaucrat access. (Hope this is what you were saying.) --Bencmq 12:17, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Extended today by Bencmq until 18 July 2012. Trijnstel 12:57, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Reza1615@fa.wiktionary

Time2wait.svg On hold until 26 October. Trijnstel 18:17, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2012-01-26. To prolong your adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Matanya 18:20, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Removed by Matanya. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 15:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

BarkingFish@tpi.wp

Per my previous request here I am reapplying to get Admin status. Since we're still a very small community, local RFA is still not possible, and I would like to request a grant on this basis for 1 year. During this time, should our community grow to a usable size, I will instigate a local RFA and submit for this temporary right to be removed during the process. Vandalism is on the decrease, so this is purely for maintenance and running of the day to day stuff. BarkingFish 23:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Renewed until 01 February 2012. —Pathoschild 01:23:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Already removed some months ago. -- Mentifisto 22:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


Miscellaneous requests

Ooswesthoesbes@zeawikipedia

I request import rights. OosWesThoesBes 14:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you :) --OosWesThoesBes 12:52, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

ZQheert@sly.wikipedia.org

I request editor rights to work on the project wikipedia selayar language (sly),, thanks zQheert 01:59, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

I can not find such a user group on the incubator. Ruslik 10:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
are in place does not exist yet because this group is the wikipedia project in a language that has never appeared (just like in the proposed) and to edit the pages I sometimes can not do much.. thanks zQheert 15:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Actually you don't need editor rights for Incubator. Boleh tahu yang ingin dilakukan apa? Bennylin
saya mau mengganti tulisan yg diseblah kiri seperti Halaman Utama, Portal komunitas dsb yg ada di incubator bahasa selayar.. salam zQheert 15:29, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Seems there is nothing for us to help, so Closed. Bencmq 10:45, 19 January 2012 (UTC)