Steward requests/Permissions/2013-11

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in November 2013, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Contents

Administrator access

User Daniyar@kk.wikipedia.org

The user received 17 positive and 0 negative votes for admin role. The results had to be finalized on October 23. Unfortunately, bureaucrats at Kazakh Wikipedia are not active. Please help with granting the admin right. Qarakesek (talk) 18:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done and you may wish to remove some redundant rights (kk:Special:ListUsers/ipblock-exempt - admins are already exempted). Trijnsteltalk 15:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Arman musikyan@hy.wikipedia.org

User had unanimous support in the voting. --6AND5 (talk) 15:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Just want to confirm that user has full support in the mentioned voting. Thank you. --vacio 18:17, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Trijnsteltalk 14:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

chaojoker and Danny B.@hy.wikiquote

Danny B. and I have a chance to collaborate for two days, and are requesting local adminship on hy.wikiquote for two days to work on MediaWiki:common.css, which is urgent due to the limited time we have to work on it (as Danny B. has previously done on cs.wikiquote). I have already put in a request there. I have also been a temporary admin there in the past, and Danny B. is an admin on cs.wikiquote. Thank you, Chaojoker (talk) 14:25, 16 November 2013 (UTC) ( Confirming. — Danny B. 14:27, 16 November 2013 (UTC) )

I've get it - we will work live on WMCEE meeting. Granted temporary on 2 days. LeinaD (t) 18:18, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

They were removed by DerHexer. --MF-W 23:58, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, Chaojoker (talk) 11:27, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Кадыров, Элдос@ky.wikipedia

(I would continue sysop works, because in own wiki just to 2 sysop, but now they inactive viz. doesn't work. Thanks ) Кадыров, Элдос (talk) 05:53, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Please start a local discussion. --MF-W 07:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
No local discussion evident, please reapply if that is successful. — billinghurst sDrewth 15:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Lt2818@wuu.wikipedia

I apply for adminship at Wuu Wikipedia, but User:Hercule the only bureaucrat there isn't active since Oct 10.--Lt2818 (talk) 13:34, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg until 30 November. It is only a day past a week since you alerted that community to your interest. I am suggesting that the 'crat be given a week to action this before stewards impose any actions. — billinghurst sDrewth 15:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
I gave him the flag. Thank you for your message. --Hercule (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

JVRKPRASAD@te.wiktionary

Unanimous support for the proposal at local discussion. Please grant him admin rights. Thanks.--వైజాసత్య (talk) 09:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done wikt:te:Special:PermanentLink/451179 rights are permanent as per other allocations at that wiki, though wiki may not meet modern criteria for permanent allocation of rights. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

Кадыров, Элдос@kyproject

I want become Bureaucrat rights, because in our wiki no have Bureaucrat, we have lot requests to rename, sysop status. I active user in own wiki, i was sysop, i made lot works and i love works for wiki, I want to stay active user in wiki, but for this task me need Bureaucrat status. Also me support all other users Кадыров, Элдос (talk) 05:43, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done for lack of a local discussion. Additionally there are in reality not lots of rename and sysop requests, otherwise we would see them here. --MF-W 07:44, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Vituzzu@enwiki

Thank you, Risker (talk) 17:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -Barras talk 17:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Mathonius@enwiki

Thank you, Risker (talk) 17:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -Barras talk 17:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Matanya@enwiki

Thank you, Risker (talk) 17:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -Barras talk 17:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Tegel@enwiki

Thank you, Risker (talk) 17:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done -Barras talk 17:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Oversight access

Magalia@pl.wikipedia

I request oversight rights - there is a local community consensus. I have also provided identification to the foundation. Thank you! Magalia (talk) 08:57, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. If you use IRC, please let me know your nick and cloak so I'll give you access to the private channel #wikimedia-privacy. Also: make sure you can receive oversight requests via the email address rewizor.pl(_AT_)gmail.com. Good luck with the new tools! Trijnsteltalk 11:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Removal of access

Lymantria@nl.wikipedia

Please remove my sysop access from nl.wikipedia. Twelve days ago I posted a similar request, but withdrew it because some collegues on nl-wiki convinced me to. Since then, the negativity on nl-wiki has not been removed as much as I hoped for and there is still too much distrust. That does not feel good and makes me sad. In addition since last summer my job has become really busy with only little time (compared to before) to spend on nl-wikipedia. By this I feel that I have become too distant to take the responsabilities I think I have to or want to take on nl-wiki. I hope to refind my pleasure as a normal user and to remove the sadness I feel now. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 17:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm really, really sad about this request :-( You are a great colleague to work with in the vandalism channel and I really hope you can decide not to do this, and go on a wikibreak instead so you can come back and work on nl-wiki again as you did before... Best regards, — TBloemink talk 17:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Sadness. MoiraMoira (talk) 17:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm sad to hear this. You're one of the best mods we have. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - Thanks for your work! -Barras talk 17:07, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Lymantria (talk) 18:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Lymantria, I understand where you're coming from, but wiki needs mods like you. Hopefully you will reconsider after a few months, and with renewed energy you will help us, helping to protect and improve Wikipedia. Best regards, Metzujan (talk) 14:50, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Iste Praetor@wikidatawiki

per inactivity local policy. Does not appear to have made 10 administrator actions in the last six months.--DangSunM (talk) 00:20, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Done. -Barras talk 17:39, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Jon Harald Søby@wikidatawiki

per inactivity local policy. Does not appear to have made 10 administrator actions in the last six months.--DangSunM (talk) 00:20, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Done. -Barras talk 17:39, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Annabel@nlwiki

Please remove my sysop flag on the Dutch wikipedia. On the one hand trolls and POV-crusaders are protected. On the other hand an incompetent arbcom does not see the importance of trust and continues to treat me (and other admins aiming neutrality and high quality article standards) in a biased unfair way and hence my good name has become damaged. As a result I fail to feel any more responsibility in this unsafe environment to continue volunteering responsibly without proper protection. There is life beyond wiki, so thanks for your efforts. Annabel (talk) 19:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Thanks for all your efforts over the years. Sorry to see you go, I would think that the sister wikis would like someone of your experience. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Pecalux@lbwiki

On the page for candidatures for administrator-status on lb-wikipedia User:Pecalux informed the local community on 28th October 2013 of his wish to have no longer administrator status on lb-wikipedia. He stated that he could no longer identify himself with other administrators and therefor he would prefer to 'throw in the towel' concerning his administrator-status. Moreover he changed with this edit his userpage that way that he deleted there the reference to his administrator-status. So consequently I guess nothing prevents to take the logical consequence of removing the sysop flag from lb:user:Pecalux. Thanks in advance for your efforts on this --Robby (talk) 22:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC) (Bureaucrat on lb-wikipedia)

Yes check.svg Donebillinghurst sDrewth 10:33, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Swedish Wikipedia

On the Swedish Wikipedia all admins/bureaucrats/CU/OS are elected for one year at a time, see the policy document. There exists a possibility to be reelected, but some users choose not to apply for another period. To get reelected at least 75 percent support is required. --MagnusA (talk) 11:29, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Mathonius (talk) 11:55, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Janders@svwiki
Jopparn@svwiki
Njaelkies Lea@svwiki
Petter Strandmark@svwiki

Stepro@dewiki

There's an ongoing discussion on the talk page of the candidature whether 30 days or one month apply, as the reelection page itself only mentions the latter number. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Well, since there are two "Meinungsbilder" (votings of the germanspeaking community), one from 2009 which installed the "One-month-rule" and then one from 2011, which installed the 30-days-rule, imho the newer one should be applied since it reflects the "more current" wish of the community. --Odeesi (talk) 20:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Agreed. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
In the discussion, mentioned by DerHexer, the majority means that the reelection was started in time, even if we take the shorter term 30 days. So, let us go to do some more important things, mightbe to write the encyclopaedia. -jkb- 20:50, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, there is no majority either for one or the other possibility. Because the majority of the 200+ participants of the 2011-voting doesn't participate. And even in the discussion itself (btw... since no-one linked it yet: here it is) I don't see a majority stating that Stepro should keep his sysop-rights until the end of the election. Even he himself wrote: "Ansonsten ist mir die Einsortierung relativ egal. " (Anyways, for me the sorting [of the candidature (either new or reelection] doesn't matter.) So it would be the cleanest if Stepro gets his sysop rights revoked until the election participants vote for him as a renewed sysop. --Odeesi (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Well, the issue is Meta can't decide on your behalf which of two competing main readings the De.WP community has tabled should apply. However, the obvious way forward, it strikes me, is for Stepro to agree not to use the tools - at least not for potentially controversial actions - for the rest of the ongoing procedure and for this request to be postponed pending the community's final decision on either the actual vote or the deliberation whether it was started in time (or not). Reading the current debate and Stepro's statements in it, this solution should work out. Regards, --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 01:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Well, actually there is no issue which competing readings apply since the most current normally applies. I don't see any reason why in this case that wouldn't apply here. Unless there is another, new "Meinungsbild", up til today the one from 2011 is the valid one. --Odeesi (talk) 08:54, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Closed Closed Leaving this to be notified by deWP bureaucrats once the community has made a decision. This is not for stewards' determination. Please lodge a new request if required — billinghurst sDrewth 10:56, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Hercule@wuu.wikipedia

7 supports from autoconfirmed users between July 27 and August 29. --GZWDer (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

It seems that amongst those, in at least 4 cases the account was created specifically for the vote (noted by an IP on the page, confirmed myself for 守望者爱孟, Coolmanjackey , Fayhoo , JuneAugust). DarkoNeko (talk) 11:39, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
On hold pending an investigation into abuse of process (e.g., sockpuppets) and for the RfC to run its course QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:16, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Check completed. CheckUser evidence suggests the accounts are unrelated and therefore there is no evidence of sock puppetery vote stacking or other abuse. QuiteUnusual (talk) 23:45, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Request on hold for more than 2 months: please open a new request when confirmation vote is over. Elfix 08:06, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

עידו@hewiki

Please remove my sysop rights,עידו (talk) 14:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Anybody home? עידו (talk) 17:50, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done, thanks for your service. --MF-W 21:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. עידו (talk) 04:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

ebraminio@testwikidata

Please remove my sysop rights --ebraminiotalk 00:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I withdraw this request. --ebraminiotalk 15:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

ebraminio@testwikipedia

Please remove my sysop rights --ebraminiotalk 07:53, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

This can be done locally. Vogone talk 15:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw this request. --ebraminiotalk 15:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

ebraminio@wikidata

Please remove my sysop rights --ebraminiotalk 15:02, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I withdraw this request. --ebraminiotalk 15:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

ebraminio@commons

Please remove my sysop rights --ebraminiotalk 15:02, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I withdraw this request. --ebraminiotalk 15:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

ebraminio@fawiki

Please remove my sysop rights --ebraminiotalk 15:02, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't know whether It's right to comment here. But still commenting. As I know in commons, testwiki, wikidata, fawiki and testwikidata you have local bureaucrats. So I think you could ask a local crat rather than asking a steward. Cause as I knew stewards don't do this kind of action if there's local crat. I may be wrong. If I'm wrong the forgive my mistake.--Pratyya (Hello!) 15:14, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Whether communities have crats and whether they are capable of removing the right are two different matters. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw this request. --ebraminiotalk 15:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Stepro@de.wikipedia

Has not been re-elected in the Adminkandidatur linked above. Please remove admin bit. Regards, IW 18:07, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Ruslik (talk) 12:38, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Helga@no.wikipedia

Has not been re-elected in the re-election linked above. Please remove admin bit. – Cocu (d) 07:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. -- Mentifisto 08:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Lipothymia@no.wikipedia

Has not been re-elected in the Åremålsvalg linked above. Please remove admin bit. – Cocu (d) 07:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. -- Mentifisto 08:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

ZorroIII@no.wikipedia

Chose not to run for re-election in the Åremålsvalg linked above. Please remove admin and crat bit. – Cocu (d) 07:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. -- Mentifisto 08:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Frodese@no.wikipedia

Chose not to run for re-election in the Åremålsvalg linked above. Please remove admin bit. – Cocu (d) 07:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. -- Mentifisto 08:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Mali@no.wikipedia

Chose not to run for re-election in the Åremålsvalg linked above. Please remove admin bit. – Cocu (d) 07:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. -- Mentifisto 08:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Ssu@no.wikipedia

Chose not to run for re-election in the Åremålsvalg linked above. Please remove admin bit. – Cocu (d) 07:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. -- Mentifisto 08:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Adikhebat@ms.wikipedia

Community agreed to desysop Adikhebat due to inactivity. --...Aurora... (talk) 08:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --MF-W 17:10, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Hahc21@es.wikinews

I have done a lot of work for the Spanish Wikinews, but I have been inactive there for months now. Although I haven't completely left the site, I am not an active user for the time being anymore, and thus keeping the tools is unnecessary. It's a bit sad, but it's they way things go. — ΛΧΣ21 18:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Is it for both the sysop and bureaucrat flags? -- Mentifisto 04:37, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes. Since they are given together, they should be removed together :) — ΛΧΣ21 16:36, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done thanks for the time that you have given to the community. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:04, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Obersachse@ru.wikipedia

  • Please remove my bureaucrat flag in ruwiki. I left the project. --Obersachse (talk) 13:24, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

CASF@es.wikipedia

Regards Esteban (talk) 13:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done for admin and bureaucrat rights (noting that the request has been addressed by two 'crats from eswiki) — billinghurst sDrewth 22:50, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

User Tchoř@hsbwiktionary

Please prolong my temporary adminship. The only permanent sysop is unfortunately not active nowadays. Tchoř (talk) 21:29, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Please also make a local announcement. --MF-W 21:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Local announcement made. --Tchoř (talk) 11:11, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold until 1 May. Trijnsteltalk 13:59, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-11-01. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:00, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 15:25, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Joxemai@euwiktionary

I request permanent adminship. I have been for some times temporary administrator. I often make contributions in the project and other current administrators are inactive. My current adminship expired in 2013 April 11. Discussion has finished with agreement from some users. Thanks. - Joxemai (talk) 14:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-11-01. I am afraid that there is not enough community support taking into count past precedents to grant permanent adminship right now. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 15:25, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

chaojoker@hywikibooks

Armenian Wikibooks has had a very small community and no active admin in the last few years, as a result of which has become a hotbed for copyrighted content of some books to be copied there. Hereby I request temporary admin status to remove the copyrighted material and prevent more of it from being added. Thank you, Chaojoker (talk) 19:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-11-02. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 00:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 15:41, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Anson2812@hakwikipedia

Hakka Wikipedia has had a very small community and no active admin in the last few months, as a result of which many new users are not receiving any help or feedback on how to edit there and many of them have become disheartened now and have become inactive for many weeks now. (In contrast, Cantonese Wikipedia has 11 admins and Minnan Wikipedia has 8 admins.)

Hereby I request that User:Anson2812 be granted temporary admin status to help revive that wikipedia language edition, revert vandalism (for example: this edit), and help out new editors on how to properly create and edit articles there. He was the one who translated the interface messages into Hakka Chinese characters and helped renovate the Main Page of Hakka Wikipedia.

Thank you, --Hakka (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-11-02. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.. Duration will be longer for subsequent requests. --Bencmq (talk) 22:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 15:41, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Beko@hywikiquote

Armenian wikiquote needs an administrator, the old sysop already two years is not active. I am the administrator in the hywiki. I want and can to be helpful in wikiquote too.Beko (talk) 19:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-11-03. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. To note that I saw Vacio's vote was initally added here (since it's not in the history of the page you linked). --MF-W 05:27, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

removed--Jusjih (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Dekel E@hewikivoyage

as above — billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-11-06. -- Matanya (talk) 14:57, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

It was extended --MF-W 15:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Tzafrir@hewikivoyage

as above — billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-11-06. -- Matanya (talk) 14:57, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

It was extended --MF-W 15:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

ויקיג'אנקי@hewikivoyage

Dekel E (talk) 10:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

As above, waiting a few more days and then close them all together. Trijnsteltalk 13:32, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
but the voting was ended. Dekel E (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-11-06. -- Matanya (talk) 14:57, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

It was extended --MF-W 15:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Mnemonic kek@hakwikipedia

Wikipedia is often occasionally blocked on Mainland China and when this occurs, all Wikipedia editions including Hakka Wikipedia are also blocked for certain time periods. The current admin (User:Anson2812) is based in Mainland China, hence there will be times when he would have difficulty accessing Wikipedia to review new edits.

User:Mnemonic kek is a Malaysian Hakka and would be unaffected by the Great Firewall of China. For the above reasons, I humbly request that User:Mnemonic kek be granted temporary admin status to help revive that wikipedia language edition, revert vandalism and help out new editors on how to properly edit articles there. He was the one who created 80-90% of the current Hakka Chinese character articles of Hakka Wikipedia.

(I am well aware of the existence of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team in reverting vandalism. However on Hakka Wikipedia the 'vandalism' often comes in the form of inserrting mandarin chinese character articles/content without the use of any Hakka grammar and such edits typically go unnoticed. Such edits will increase in frequency as time passes). A native Hakka speaker will be able to both identify and rectify the problem in a more timely manner than non-native speakers.)

Thank you. --Hakka (talk) 07:36, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-11-05. --MF-W 16:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 21:10, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

בנימין@hewikivoyage

We not have any sysop. Dekel E (talk) 11:35, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

No immediate consensus, please wait a few more days. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Can anyone update the link please? I can't find the discussion anymore. --Bencmq (talk) 04:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done (the link) Dekel E (talk) 09:43, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-11-06. -- Matanya (talk) 14:57, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 21:13, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Sebranik@vep.wikipedia

Hi! Please renew my adminship. I'm constantly active and want to be more productive and useful for Vepsian Wikipedia. --Sebranik (talk) 04:56, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-11-06. --MF-W 12:50, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
What's wrong with Dagirov Umar's request that you didn't approved it for 5 days, but did it with Sebranik's request immediately?--Soul Train (talk) 13:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 21:13, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Chorobek@ky.wikipedia

See also the previous requests here and here. Temporary rights weren't extended. Trijnsteltalk 15:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2013-11-12. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Trijnsteltalk 15:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 21:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Umut@ky.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done--Shizhao (talk) 01:54, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2013-11-12. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 21:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Кадыров, Элдос@ky.wikipedia

Yes check.svg Done.--Jusjih (talk) 16:30, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2013-11-12. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 21:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

TuanUt@vi.wikivoyage

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-11-12. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Jusjih (talk) 02:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 21:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Cheers!@vi.wikivoyage

I'm a sysop at vi.wikipedia, a translator at translatewiki.net, I also active contributor at vi.wikivoyage (incubator). Can I apply for sysop right at vi.wikivoyage for some months to help technical relate to mediawiki? Best regards,--Cheers! (talk) 04:46, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Please allow at least a week for any consensus.--Jusjih (talk) 23:58, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
I would suggest that this could be granted earlier; just as the other temp. sysop requests were given on the basis of a voting imported from Incubator already. --MF-W 21:58, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I think this can go ahead. Putting the incubator question aside, the vote looks pretty much and solid in line with what I have seen while looking over the related Vi.WP patterns lately, too, and nothing but indications of consensus have turned up since the 12th on Vi.Voy itself. Regards, --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 02:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-11-12. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Trijnsteltalk 13:46, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks,--Cheers! (talk) 15:51, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 21:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

TRMC@vi.wikivoyage

X mark.svg Not done as TRMC is not even registered at Vietnamese Wikivoyage.--Jusjih (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
He was very active in Incubator, since Wikivoyage has just created, he can't open earlier. Please wait somedays.--Cheers! (talk) 15:45, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
OK, changed back to on hold. Trijnsteltalk 21:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
I change link to the right place.--Cheers! (talk) 02:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm here,Sorry for the delay. I just want to help the new Wikivoyage--TRMC (talk) 19:39, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-11-12. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Trijnsteltalk 13:46, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks--TRMC (talk) 09:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 21:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Tucoxn@fj.wikipedia

Please add the sysop bit. — ΛΧΣ21 21:33, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-11-16. –BruTe talk 10:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 16:57, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Simeondahl@dawikisource

No local crat, can you please give. Thanks --Simeondahl (talk) 09:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-11-23. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

It was extended --MF-W 17:00, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Подпоручикъ@bg.wikisource

Please, grant sysop rights to this user, who was accepted as a sysop after a discussion and a voting.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 08:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Because there was a strong objection and it was closed by anonymous, I'm putting this on hold until someone who's a trusted user close the voting page. Bennylin 10:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
I confirmed the results - here.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 11:07, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-11-25. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 23:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you but may I ask why not permanent? I provided a link to the local community approval or you think the community hasn't grown enough?--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 07:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 17:01, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Мико@bg.wikisource

Please, grant sysop rights to this user, who was accepted as a sysop after a discussion and a voting.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 08:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Because there was a strong objection and it was closed by anonymous, I'm putting this on hold until someone who's a trusted user close the voting page. Bennylin 10:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
I confirmed the resulst - here. By the way the "strong objection" is from a former vandal in bg wiki and a permanently blocked account there.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 11:10, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2013-11-25. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 23:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you but may I ask why not permanent? I provided a link to the local community approval or you think the community hasn't grown enough?--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 07:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
I gave 3 months temporary adminship based on the vote you linked. There are no strict rules about the requirements for when to give temporary and when to give permanent adminship, but generally a high number of supports from established users would be nice. Here, 3 of the 5 voters have less than 30 edits, so I thought it best to do this temporarily. --MF-W 03:17, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 17:01, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Espreon@angwiktionary

Temporary adminship, no opposes (two supports). Three or six months is okay. PiRSquared17 (talk) 01:29, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Done Granted for 4 months to expire on 2013-11-26. --MF-W 01:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

removed --MF-W 17:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Global editinterface for Tpt

Yes check.svg Done for one year to expire on 10 november 2013. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

It was extended. --MF-W 10:40, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests