Steward requests/Miscellaneous

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Requests and proposals Steward requests (Miscellaneous) Archives
This page is for requesting that a specific administrative action (such as page deletion) be performed by a steward or global sysop on a Wikimedia wiki having no active administrators. (If the wiki does have active administrators, file the request with one of them.) If the wiki has an active editor community, any potentially controversial action (deletion of actual content, edit to a protected page, renaming of a protected page, etc.) should receive consensus from the wiki community before being requested here, and a link should be provided to that consensus in the request.

To add a new request, create a new section header at the bottom of the page (just above the categories) of the form:

=== Very brief description of request here ===

{{Status|In progress}}
Your request --~~~~

Then describe your request more fully below that. It is helpful if you can provide a link to the wiki (or the specific page on the wiki) in question, either in the header or in the body of your request.

To report vandalism issues, please use Vandalism reports instead.

To request approval of OAuth consumers please use {{oauthapprequest}} (see the documentation before using).

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Manual requests[edit]

Please see a list of pages nominated for speedy deletion via {{Delete}} and/or the local equivalent. You can also filter by wikis whose admins are less than X or have not delete since Y.

All local mediawiki messages on should be deleted[edit]

Status:    In progress

We have a problem because translations done in translatewik aren't correctly viewed. The problem is countless incorrect local mediawiki messages, which can be viewed in green:

Is it possible to remove all messages in green and keep the ones in yellow? Bokareis (talk) 19:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

I now at least deleted the ones that had content identical to the default (translatewiki) message. The remaining ones are those with a different version. Some of the local ones however have a translation where the default is still English, but I of course have no idea whether they are correct. SPQRobin (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The problem is that our local messages overwrite the Translatewiki ones. The remaining ones with a different version should be deleted too, that means wht's in yellow should be removed and what's in green kept. Bokareis (talk) 13:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Yes, I understand. However, what makes the local ones incorrect? I have no idea of knowing other than based on your request, so that's why I did only the identical ones; I'd like to be somewhat certain before going ahead and deleting all of them. SPQRobin (talk) 16:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Non-free content[edit]

Status:    In progress

Does anyone have an interest in Non-free content at wikis that have no exemption doctrine policy or that do not seem to be enforcing it properly? As an example of the latter, w:id:Wikipedia:Penggunaan media nonbebas#Kebijakan gambar tokoh yang masih hidup appears to prohibit non-free images for BLPs, but w:id:Istimewa:Daftar_berkas seems to have more photos of BLPs than one might expect under such a policy. (Please ping me.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:50, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Sure, you can/should tag such violations with {{delete}} and if the requests are not acted upon in a month or so you can ping global sysops/stewards here, as with #Speedy deletions on as/ms. Nemo 12:09, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

@WhatamIdoing: You mentioned id.wikipedia, which is a larger project and stewards can probably not edit there. There are 295 Wikipedias and of these there are ~85 Wikipedias [1] having more than 1000 local files. In 2012 Nemo claimed 76 [2]. These Wikipedias often 1) have upload open for any logged-in user 2) host dozens of unused files 3) have lots of unfree files among the unused files, i.e. they are not EDP-files, since they lack an applicable rationale. Some Wikipedias have more than 1000 unused files, some more than 5000 - the counter stops then. Some have 20% of all files unused.

Local files in Wikipedias
Date 1 Qty of projects 2 Qty of projects w/o local files
(100% Commons)
3 Qty of projects having local files 4 Qty of local files 4/3 Reference
2013-01-01 285 36 249 2 038 148 8185 [3]
2014-01-01 287 30 257 2 208 750 8594 [4]
2015-01-01 288 30 258 2 311 679 8959 [5]
2016-01-01 291 37 254 2 405 486 9470 [6]
2017-01-01 295 140 155 2 430 156 15678 [7]
2017-04-14 295 140 155 2 436 730 15720 [8]

In the last ~4 years (2013-01-01 to today) the number of local files in Wikipedias increased by 391 925 from 2 038 148 to 2 430 073 [9], i.e. ca. 100 000 per year. At the same time, the number of Wikipedias using local files decreased. The major part of the increase comes from the aforementioned 85 Wikipedias. Some are out of scope for stewards and SRM.

To stop the problem with non-free content in small, open-upload Wikipedias and the workload for stewards to become worse, one could restrict the upload to admins. That is not fixing current violations, but reducing chance for new violations and freeing steward resources.

Candidates for restriction are the following 40 Wikipedias, each has 9 or less admins and uploads still open: ksh, pfl, rm, wuu, nv, frr, als, vec, bar, zh-yue, an, mt, pa, km, ga, oc, bcl, as, ps, scn, eml, mn, ba, be-tarask, am, be, sw, wa, lb, ky, hi, kn, tt, my, si, jv, br, fy, ka, bs. 01:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

This is the problem we currently face on id.wp, most of those files were PD-Gov, can be seen from the source links, but we are currently muddling if we should just transfer them to commons or just tag and add pd-gov license to it, but then again, there are thousands file need to be handled, we don't have enough hand. As for Stewards and GS, can close this request as this cannot be actioned by stewards or GS, whatamdoing can just come to id.wp to make this announcement/comment (again).--AldNonymousBicara? 19:34, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Just a heads up, I'm one of the admin in id.wikipedia. I've worked up a Quarry script to detect those violating images and I've deleted all of them. There was around 2,000 of them but I suspect that it didn't cover all fairuse BLP images yet. Feel free to fork and/or improve the Quarry script. Kenrick95 (talk) 10:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm amazed at how much you've already achieved there.
But idwiki is just one example (and perhaps one that is more capable of addressing it than average). Is there a desirable general approach to this issue, e.g., for a wiki with no (or many fewer) local admins? WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

For remove the user pages[edit]

Status:    Not done

Hello. I want to remove the all my user pages (include talk pages and subpages) of all wiki projects, because of I don't want korean puppets to know this user name change. (If username change is finished, I hope to undelete of talk pages that contains at least one content does not contain only template welcome at all wikis, using the copy & paste or others─if possible; I don't know that deletion of history log in mediawiki is possible or not─) So is this possible? Thanks. --Idh0854 (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Please see Synchbot and, if in doubt, contact Pathoschild. He can do that all at once. Thanks, —MarcoAurelio 18:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Can somebody Delete all pages and categories in this category[edit]

Status:    In progress

Please delete all pages and categories in this this category. It's candidates for speedy deletion. tgwiktionary has not active administrators year - 18:40, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Unless they are obvious spam or vandalism I am not sure we can delete them. Ruslik (talk) 18:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete List of spells in Harry Potter[edit]

Status:    Done

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of spells in Harry Potter. > 5,000 revisions. Postdlf (talk) 16:31, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Ruslik (talk) 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Page history merge at htwiki[edit]

Status:    Done

Please merge the page history of w:ht:Matris and w:ht:Uterus. The desired content is at "Uterus" and the desired page title is at "Matris". "Uterus" should be kept as a redirect. There are no overlapping edits, so it should be an easy merge. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Regards.--Syum90 (talk) 06:50, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you so much! WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:40, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Pages marked for deletion at knwikisource[edit]

Status:    Done

Can a steward please delete the pages created by 2602:306:cff3:e900:28dc:b57e:9bbd:1ac4 at knwikisource? They were all marked for speedy deletion on June 7th by a user who used to be a former temporary admin on that wiki (now no admins over there). Might also want to look through s:kn:Category:ಅಳಿಸುವಿಕೆಗೆ ಹಾಕಲಾಗಿರುವ ಲೇಖನಗಳು, where other pages marked for deletion are listed; a few seem like no-brainers and others probably require a steward who knows the language to make a judgment call. (Or perhaps an admin from knwiki can be pressed into service to make those judgments?) - dcljr (talk) 17:42, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

What is the reason for deletion? Ruslik (talk) 19:47, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
"ಖಾಲಿ ಪುಟ" means "Empty page", according to Google Translate. All of the IP editor's contributions are tagged with the same reason. (Among the "no-brainers", the most obvious is s:kn:ವಿಜ್ಞಾನ ಮತ್ತು ತಂತ್ರಜ್ಞಾನ, which consists entirely of the word "Hi".) - dcljr (talk) 01:20, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
BTW, the title of the article s:kn:ವಿಜ್ಞಾನ ಮತ್ತು ತಂತ್ರಜ್ಞಾನ means "Science and technology". It is linked to from the Main Page, but clearly a redlink would be preferable in this case. - dcljr (talk) 01:24, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
All Yes check.svg Done--Infinite0694 (Talk) 16:06, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

See also[edit]