Stewards/Confirm/2013/Luckas Blade

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | Confirm‎ | 2013
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

  • Languages: pt, en-4, es-3, fr-1
  • Personal info: I was not one of the most active stewards but helped with emergency tasks on IRC, cross-wiki issues and bot requests mainly. After one year, I enjoyed the work and if the community support me it would be nice to serve another year as a steward. --Luckas msg 23:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Idiomas: en
  • Información personal: translation needed
  • Lingue: pt, en-4, es-3, fr-1
  • Informazioni personali: Non sono stato lo steward più attivo, ma ho aiutato con le richieste di emergenza in IRC, le questioni cross-wiki e principalmente nelle richieste per Bot. Dopo un anno, mi è piaciuto il lavoro, e se la comunità mi supporta, sarebbe bello poter servire come steward per un altro anno. --Luckas msg 23:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Языки: en
  • Личная информация: translation needed
  • Sprachen: pt, en-4, es-3, fr-1
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich gehörte nicht zu den aktivsten Stewards, half aber hauptsächlich bei Notfällen auf IRC, wiki-übergreifenden Angelegenheiten und Bot-Anfragen. Ich habe die Arbeit im letzten Jahr genossen und sofern die Community mich unterstützt, wäre es schön eine weitere Amtszeit lang als Steward dienen zu dürfen. --Luckas msg 23:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Línguas: pt, en-4, es-3, fr-1
  • Informações pessoais: Eu não foi um dos stewards mais ativos, mas ajudei com as tarefas de emergência no IRC, questões cross-wiki e pedidos de bot, principalmente. Depois de um ano, eu gostei do trabalho e se a comunidade me apoiar seria bom servir mais um ano como steward. --Luckas msg 23:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments about Luckas Blade[edit]

  • I love you! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 00:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral. I remain unconvinced by the refusal to answer questions regarding his granting of checkuser to himself on his homewiki, even when the user finally apologized after several days, he has not yet provided an explanation of my question of why he thought proper for him to do so. Since then, he has however done only good work and I've had no issues with any of his actions, so I don't think I should vote for a removal, yet I don't feel comfortable enough to fully support. Snowolf How can I help? 00:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Iste (D) 00:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove homewiki CU issue and failure to communicate effectively afterwards was a bit concerning. --Rschen7754 01:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Who never made a mistake? I consider Luckas quite apt for the function. Moreover, after the error, Luckas was elected checkuser in Portuguese Wikipedia (I believe that is relevant mention this). Also do I consider the responses were appropriate to the incident, but still believe him. Érico Wouters msg 01:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral, User talk:Luckas Blade#Using steward tools in your homewiki. --Makecat 03:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove As said above, everybody can make a mistake. But refusing to communicate and explain your actions in this situation is a clear lack of transparency. Sorry, but I can't renew the support I gave you last year, even if you've done some good work on the SRB page. Regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 09:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral for the concerns voiced above. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral with a tendency to remove. I have no problems when someone makes an error. We all are humans and by far not perfect. However, I wish the communication afterwards would've been better. -Barras talk 13:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep Anyone can make a mistake, and Luckas, in my opinion, has improved since his beginning. --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 13:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove based on failure to respond to concerns raised over the use of his tools. Stewards should be able to recognize their mistakes, and communicate well with people who complain about their actions. Ajraddatz (Talk) 16:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral: Like others, I was surprised by your use of checkuser on ptwiki. It is one of the core principles of steward activities not to do such things on home wikis. Your failure to answer for it was equally concerning, but your actions since have been good enough for me not to vote for removal. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --Jyothis (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral Not sure what to vote ... I was surprised as well about the use of CU on ptwiki, but since you improved since then I can't vote for removal. Trijnsteltalk 22:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:25, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral A great user and a great steward. Yet, privacy policy and general stewardship policies cannot be treated lightly and without proper explanation as soon as concerns arise. Pundit (talk) 17:30, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:51, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep The situation on pt.wp is complex, which means that regular reasoning can't be applied strictly. At the other side, I would like to hear the explanation for the actions on stewards list, at least. --Millosh (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove I have to agree with Quentinv57 and Ajraddatz. Anyone can make a mistake, especially when you're just starting out in a new role, but I would certainly expect a steward to respond to concerns about their tool use. Sorry. Jafeluv (talk) 18:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove. Sorry. Bennylin 16:06, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep well, time for a second chance. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:36, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep próxima chance. --►Safir yüzüklü Ceklimesaj 05:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Remove Remove per Jafeluv. -Djsasso (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment Comment [1]'. Has already removed local steward rights and several others. πr2 (t • c) 02:49, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Now he has removed his global steward group membership; this can be considered a withdrawal. πr2 (t • c) 05:13, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    That settles it, then. I see no reason why he had to remove his local rights, but I suppose it is his decision. :( --Rschen7754 05:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thanks, enjoy parole — billinghurst sDrewth 14:12, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep You shouldn't abstract from remarks/reproaches on your talk page. Please do communicate with your colleagues. Since ptwiki is a special case (elected CU on ptwiki shortly after this issue), I won't blame you for that. However I don't understand your resignations, a few "remove" comments on your confirmation page doesn't imply you are persona non grata on Wikimedia projects. Elfix 09:53, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep I'm sure Luckas has learned a lot from the CU issue and still deserves our trust. --ThiagoRuiz talk 18:43, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 13:32, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]