Stewards/Confirm/2014/Trijnstel

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | Confirm‎ | 2014
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: This will be my second confirmation round as I was elected at the end of 2011. And I'm still one of the most active stewards. I deal with almost everything where a steward is needed, the various request pages, on-line requests, RFCs etc. I can't promise to stay as active as I was, but I'll try to help out where I can. Trijnsteltalk 22:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
español:
  • Idiomas: nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  • Información personal: Esta será mi segunda ronda de confirmaciones, dado que fui elegida a finales de 2011. Y sigo estando entre los stewards más activos. Me encargo de casi todas las áreas en las que se requieren stewards, las diferentes páginas de solicitudes, peticiones en línea, RFCs, etc. No puedo prometer continuar con este nivel de actividad, pero intentaré ayudar donde pueda. Trijnsteltalk 22:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
português:
  • Línguas: nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  • Informações pessoais: Esta será a minha segunda rodada de confirmações, desde que fui eleita no final de 2011. E eu ainda sou um dos stewards mais ativos. Eu lido com quase tudo onde um steward é necessário, as várias páginas de pedidos, pedidos on-line, RFCs, etc. Eu não posso prometer ficar tão ativo como eu era, mas eu vou tentar ajudar onde eu posso. Trijnsteltalk 22:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
русский:
  • Языки: nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  • Личная информация: Это будет моим вторым подтверждением с тех пор, как я была избрана в конце 2011 года. И я по-прежнему одна из самых активных стюардов. Я имею дело почти со всем, где необходимы стюарды: различные страницы запросов, онлайн-запросы, RFC, и т. д. Я не могу обещать, что останусь так же активна, как раньше, но я постараюсь помочь чем могу.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  • Informationen zur Person: Dies ist meine zweite Wiederwahl, da ich bei den zweiten Stewardwahlen 2011 gewählt wurde. Ich bin immernoch einer der aktivsten Stewards. Ich bearbeite fast alles wozu ein Steward benötigt wird, die verschiedenen Anfrageseiten, IRC Anfragen, RFCs usw. Ich kann nicht versprechen weiterhin so aktiv zu sein wie ich es bisher war, aber werde versuchen zu helfen wo ich kann. Trijnsteltalk 22:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Dit is mijn tweede herbevestiging sinds ik eind 2011 ben verkozen en ik ben nog steeds een van de actiefste stewards. Ik doe ongeveer alles waar een steward bij nodig is, de verschillende verzoekpagina's, online verzoeken, RFCs etc. Ik kan niet beloven dat ik even actief zal blijven als ik was, maar ik zal proberen te helpen waar ik kan. Trijnsteltalk 22:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Trijnstel[edit]

Stewards' jobs are to implement community consensus and act in a capacity for local communities where users are not in position to do so themselves. Mentoring a user is completely irrelevant to stewardship. It is like opposing an Oversighter because they don't know how to use CheckUser. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So she can't simply leave a message on the user's talkpage about quick tips on becoming productive on a Wikimedia Project? --Goldenburg111 18:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That is her choice, but opposing her stewardship confirmation because she chose not to is wrong. TCN7JM 18:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Comment This vote most likely has something to do with this CU because of vote-stacking (see also this file made by someone else). Trijnsteltalk 18:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Likely, Trijnstel. Now, Goldenburg, drop the cudgel! I fact, I suggest you review Trinjnstel's Wikiversity contributions and consider changing your comment based on overall balance. Even if she made a mistake then -- and I don't agree she did -- there would then be the matter of how much work she has done to support Wikiversity. --Abd (talk) 19:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]