Stewards/Confirm/2016/Avraham

Avraham

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: en, he-2
Personal info: It is again with pleasure that I note that the steward body has been able to support the Wikimedia family of projects. I once again request of you the privilege and opportunity to continue to serve Wikimedia as a steward. With my term on the m:Ombudsman commission coming to a close, I look forward to returning to checkuser and oversight duties together with permissions. As always, I appreciate your collective trust in allowing me this opportunity, and I hope to continue to be worthy of your trust in the coming year.

עברית:

שפות: en, he-2
מידע אישי: עוד הפעם, בהנאה גמורה אני מציין שגוף הדיילים הצליחו לתמוך את משפחת ויקימדיה. אני מבקש מכם את הזכות והזדמנות להמשיך לשרת ויקימדיה כדייל בשנה הבאה. כיוון שקדנציה שלי בm:Ombudsman commission מסיים בקרוב, אני מצפה לחזור לבדיקה והסתרה יחד עם הרשאות. כתמיד, יש לי הכרת הטוב על האמון הקולקטיבי שלכם שמפשר אותי ההזדמנות הזאת, ואני מקווה להמשיך ולהיות ראוי לאמון שלך בשנה הבאה.

italiano:

Lingue:
Informazioni personali: translation needed

español:

Idiomas:
Información personal: translation needed

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen:
Informationen zur Person: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid:
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

Comments about Avraham

Remove concerns about activity. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--6AND5 (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)>[reply]
Keep perhaps he will be more active next year since he is no longer an OC-member. Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Natuur12. RadiX ∞ 15:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Responded to concerns about activity by being more active, and by stepping down from the OC this next year. --Rs chen 7754 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Polimerek (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove concerns about neutrality -- Severino (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Severino: this is a serious allegation, which incident(s) are you referring to? --Vituzzu (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at Severino's edits at the English Wikipedia it becomes awfully clear to me that he has a bias regarding Israel and Africa related topics so I figure this has something to do with having different opinions in this topic. See also his vote here whixh is only one of 2 votes he has ever made at the English Wikipedia. Also note that he made the same unmotivated vote before and his other opposes / remove votes (his only votes) are made against Hebrew speaking users. Natuur12 (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Next year I should remember to pretend I can speak some Hebrew then, just for testing purposes. --Vituzzu (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the initial rendering: I remember comments of Avraham regarding the "CAMERA" campaign (2008), after the cover of the group was blown. And I remember having an edit conflict with him. Hence the DOUBTS. But actually I don't have to justify myself for my voting behavior. What is problematic here, is not my voting but your handling with it, your comments. Your attacks and accusations tell nothing about me - but a lot about you, and your standards. You only "analyze" MY voting and edits, comment only MY dissentient vote here (according to your allegations, my voting is "unmotivated" and/or motivated by the fact that candidates declare to speak hebrew...) - you show YOUR bias. I could also examine your edits, comments and votes for racial/religious/... aspects and bitch about it then. I understood that one of you two is steward and the other admin. Read WP:ASPERSION, WP:BULL ("False accusations are a common form of bullying on Wikipedia, although people do sometimes make honest mistakes. Accusations of misconduct made without evidence are considered a serious personal attack"), and WP:APR (Avoid personal remarks); and probably there are also guidelines regarding the voting rights on wikimedia which are relevant here.--Severino (talk) 10:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing tangible then? Just a pile of half-fluff? --Vituzzu (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Said he would become more active, became more active. Thanks for your continuing commitment to the role! Ajraddatz (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, hoping that activity will increase without OC obligations. Miniapolis 21:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep When he's around, he's a big help. Kurtis (talk) 22:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - every year he claims he would become active, he doesn't.. --Ste moc 01:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Can't say I noticed much of Avraham. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Most great! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and hoping for more activity next in the next year. — T. 06:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Less and less present. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep hoping that the activity does occur post OC — billinghurst sDrewth 13:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Billinghurst. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I understand that OC can take quite a lot of time, thus I would give a chance to increase activity this year — NickK (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (πῶς λέγεις; = che vuoi dire?) 16:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Steinsplitter--DCB (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Billinghurst.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove He isn't very active. --Uğurkent^talk 19:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gue rillero 05:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 18:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- per Steinsplitter - Richardkiwi (talk) 20:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Billinghurst too. Érico (talk) 00:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I trust this user. Altamel (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Should have more time this time around, good faith keep! --Charitwo (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 18:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Green Giant (talk) 01:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support worthy steward.--AryanSogd 11:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ✒ Bennylin 04:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 20:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Vadgt (talk) 01:41, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Steinsplitter--CaZeRillo (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Eleven contributions to Wikiversities is good but none to en.wikiversity in the past years. --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Might be less active, but is still valuable and around when you need him. Trijnstel_talk 22:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wikitanvir, trusted and around. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove As per Auvajs. --Kusurija (talk) 20:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--KTo288 (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A helpful steward who will hopefully now be able to spend more time as steward as he's no longer on the OC. -Barras talk 18:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Barras, hoping to see more activity --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 19:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active enough, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 15:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 04:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep while Avi is not the most active steward, he is active and his contribution to the steward team have been very valuable. He is a keen mediator and is always ready to offer advice when the opportunity arises. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is not good by others to put so much pressure on volunteers forcing them to work more, more, more and to never have a break. That is a form of harassment and damages our project. --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]