Stewards/Confirm/2016/MarcoAurelio

MarcoAurelio[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: es, en-2, fr-2, la-1 (can understand written an, ca, pt, it, gl, ext)
Personal info:

Dear community,
It is for me a pleasure to address you all again in which is my fourth steward confirmation, the first after my re-election last year, the third since I became a steward in 2010.
This year, and as before, my activities were focused on providing assistance at the steward requests pages and dealing with cross-wiki issues such as vandalism and spam, and also have performed general cross-wiki maintenance. As a creature of habit myself, you can see I stick to the same activities I’ve been doing in my previous terms, with the addition that this year and with the implementation of the global rename tool, I’ve also handled some renaming and usurp requests. While not strictly related to my steward duties, I've also became active in MediaWiki development, uploading patches to gerrit, for fixing small bugs for wikis such as permissions and extension setup; which I think it is also a good way to assist the projects on a technical side. I'd like to thank those who helped me in getting started in that area. In general and to sum up, I think I’ve been reasonably active as steward this year too.
Speaking as of incidents, I've recently performed a global bot flag cleanup on inactive global accounts according to the global bot policy, however and due to a mistake on my part, operators were not warned in advance before global bot flag removal. To fix that, I've sent notices later and a period of two weeks were given to operators to regain bot flags. I acknowledge my error and I'm sorry for any issue caused. Aside from this incident, I humbly think that I've performed my duties correctly.
If the community pleases I’d love to serve the communities for another term in this role. Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
—Marco Aurelio

español:

Idiomas: es, en-2, fr-2, la-1 (puedo entender textos escritos en an, ca, pt, it, gl y ext)
Información personal: Estimada comunidad,
Es para mí un placer poder dirigirme a todos vosotros nuevamente en la que es mi cuarta confirmación como steward, la primera tras mi reelección el año pasado y la tercera desde que fuese elegido originariamente en el año 2010.
Este año, y como en tiempos pretéritos, mis actividades se han centrado en dar asistencia y ejecutar todo tipo de solicitudes a los stewards, así como gestionar incidencias cross-wiki tales como vandalismo o spam. También he realizado cierto mantenimiento genérico en aquellos proyectos sin personal local. Como hombre de costumbres que suelo ser, podéis ver que sigo apegado a la realización de las mismas actividades a las que he dedicado mi tiempo en años pasados, con la única excepción de que este año y tras la entrada en funcionamiento de la herramienta de renombramiento global de cuentas, he dado curso a algunas de dichas peticiones para cambiar el nombre o usurpar cuentas. En general, creo que he estado razonablemente activo este año. También y como nota adicional considero importante señalar que me he interesado por el desarrollo de MediaWiki y he colaborado subiendo parches a la plataforma gerrit, sobre todo errores minúsculos y cosas sencillas como activar o desactivar permisos locales, cambiar logos de proyectos o traducir espacios de nombre. Aunque no sean tareas estrictas de los stewards, considero que ha sido también un buen modo de ayudar a las comunidades desde el punto de vista técnico.
Si la comunidad consiente y está contenta con mi trabajo, me gustaría continuar por otro año más. Muchas gracias por vuestro tiempo.
Un cordial saludo. —Marco Aurelio 19:00, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about MarcoAurelio[edit]

Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep definitely --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Maragm (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Off course, one of our best stewards.--Syum90 (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Por supuesto!--Yeza (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support The best steward in Wikimedia Foundation )))--6AND5 (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, estupendo usuario. Tiene toda mi confianza. Laura Fiorucci (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep absolutely. Always a pleasure to work with! Ajraddatz (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted —Ah3kal (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sí. Raystorm (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Petronas (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 19:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active and taking care of maintenance tasks (wikisets, etc.) that are often ignored. --Rs chen 7754 19:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (msg) 21:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
¡Claro!--White Master (e s) 23:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the actively noticed stewards. — T. 07:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 09:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with stars — billinghurst sDrewth 13:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep One of the best few stewards. Why not? Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Epìdosis 16:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, one of the best stewards — NickK (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --L736E (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of our more active stewards, especially in discussions and decisions. -- Avi (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sciking (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seen him mostly on Phab, but seems fine elsewhere as well.-- Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 16:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Bernard (talk) 20:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rocío Mantis (talk) 22:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant false statement. —Marco Aurelio 12:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 09:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jan Kovář^BK (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 19:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aude (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trustworthy. –Ejs-80 16:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trustworthy imo.--Snaevar (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ¡desde luego! Green Giant (talk) 01:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support--AryanSogd 10:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krenair ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rax (talk) 23:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ciberprofe (talk) 01:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Only one contribution to en.wikiversity and that in 2011 - bad! --Marshallsumter (talk) 17:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That for sure is a missuse of my steward tools! —Marco Aurelio 22:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Perhaps one of the best stewards.... I'm very happy he decided to return last year. Trijnstel_talk 22:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nioger (talk) 10:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. He declined legitimate requests for checkuser[1]. I also agree with Auvajs that there are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it.--MariusM (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Legitimate because you asked for it? CheckUser is not for fishing and certainly not to settle disputes among users nor to apply pressure to editors. Everyone is able to see that CU request you link and see there was no reasons for running it, and as former ro.wp CU Strainu said, there was no serious reasons to invade the privacy of the users. Your assert that I or my fellows support harassment is a plain personal attack. Stewards do deal with a lot of harassment everyday, both on others and to ourselves; but that we have more buttons than other users does not convert us in arbitrators, super(wo)mens or the Foundation's Sheriff Department. Our role is clearly defined in the policy and we will stick to it, unless changed. —Marco Aurelio 22:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
According the rules of both English and Romanian Wikipedia, attempted outing is a form of harrasment. You are doing nothing to stop it. In fact, you are OK with it. For you, attempted outing is only a „dispute among users”.--MariusM (talk) 15:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's not true at all. I refer to my reply above. If you do not wish to understand the policies governing both, stewards and checkuser tools, that's fine; but please stop insulting me and other stewards because we didn't resolve the requests in the way you'd have liked. I've also declined CU requests on you on that very page that threw to you "the other side" of the dispute. If you have problems with admin misconduct on rowiki I think Wikipedia:Destituiri is the page you're looking for. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio 15:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The checkuser request against me is a second example of a legitimate request that you declined.--MariusM (talk) 15:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC) Sure.[reply]
Keep - No idea what I should say. MA is just a great steward and I really appreciate is input in various areas. It's just enjoyable to work together with him! -Barras talk 18:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Great steward, active on multiple areas --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 02:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Excellent user. Theo10011 (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep please, Have seen him around a lot. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pafsanias (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 22:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Turbojet (talk) 17:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, with no doubt. einsbor _talk 08:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elmie (talk) 20:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course! ✒ Bennylin 04:23, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- active and +ve person--Biplab Anand (Talk) 17:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 19:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely - experienced, active and helpful. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I was incredibly delighted that MarcoAurelio rejoined the steward team, and I'm even more delighted to see that he's seeking confirmation! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 08:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]