Stewards/Confirm/2020/Sjoerddebruin

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | Confirm‎ | 2020
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sjoerddebruin[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: nl-m, en-3
  • Personal info: Hello everyone! In the beginning of the last year I've started working on a Wikimedian-in-Residence project, which took a lot of my time. After the end of the project there were some issues in my personal life that required my attention, so this wasn't a very active year. I did try to join conversation with the other Stewards and communities in the little spare time I've had by attending real life events and conference calls. I hope my personal life will become more stable soon so I can devote myself to the community again.
italiano:
  • Lingue:
  • Informazioni personali: translation needed
español:
  • Idiomas:
  • Información personal: translation needed
русский:
  • Языки:
  • Личная информация: translation needed
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen:
  • Informationen zur Person: translation needed
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid:
  • Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed
বাংলা:
  • ভাষা:
  • ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Comments about Sjoerddebruin[edit]

  • Remove Remove Sorry but activity is too minimal: 1 action in March, 5 actions early April, April->August no activity, then using oversight on fawiki (a wiki with local oversighters - and no explicit claim of an emergency), then 1 more action, and then nothing from August->now. (In fact, he could be automatically removed on February 22 if he does not make any more steward actions, under Stewards policy#Inactivity - depending on whether we count his Meta blocks made under MSR as steward actions). Rschen7754 14:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC) Slight correction 03:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Way too inactive, but competent enough. Hope can see him more if confirmed.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • I'm going to vote keep because we all have had ups-and-downs in our lifes. It looks Sjoerd's activity this year is indeed low, but he's competent and has been active in discussions as well, so he's not been totally inactive. I'm willing to trust his statement that this year he'll have more time to do more on-wiki stuff. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral per Camouflaged Mirage. -- CptViraj (📧) 14:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Per Rschen7754. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per MarcoAurelio. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - Richardkiwi (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC) - (almost) not active
  • Remove Remove per above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove--Turkmen talk 15:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Marco. I have no problem with inactivity so long as they try to stay abreast and aren’t jerks. I don’t see that as an issue here. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per MarcoAurelio. I'm willing to give him a chance. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove--Herby talk thyme 16:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Marco. Mahir256 (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove as I said elsewhere, I don't generally like opposing for a lack of activity but someone who's barely used the tools this term doesn't show a need or use for them. So I agree with Rschen's analysis. Praxidicae (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Some concerns are raised here, but mostly per MarcoAurelio, I'm undecided. --Stïnger (会話) 18:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC).
  • Remove Remove Gdarin | talk 18:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Marco stwalkerster (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Per Rschen7754. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Minorax (talk) 04:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Per inactivity. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Eatcha (talk) 11:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 12:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per Rschen7754. Armbrust (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Linedwell [talk] 19:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Marco and others. Functionaries are still volunteers, and RL shouldn't be punished. Miniapolis 20:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Give him a chance. Ankry (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Per MarcoAurelio. Trijnsteltalk 20:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Doesn't appear to have been that active in 2018 either. ST47 (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Marco and Miniapolis. --Kostas20142 (talk) 02:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Inactively. --Wright Streetdeck 04:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.--HakanIST (talk) 06:00, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Per MarcoAurelio. I think we should give him a chance. --eldarado 12:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Kippenvlees1 (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral - like every1 else he's not perfect & per Camouflaged Mirage Klaas `Z4␟` V:  18:57, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove La coince (talk) 20:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Luke081515 22:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 18:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I think that inactivity is not a good reason to remove any user right. --Garam talk 21:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral --Geonuch (talk) 04:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Taivo (talk) 08:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral - Maybe it is wiser to first get your personal life sorted out and than go for new steward rights. Keep the honours to yourself. RonnieV (talk) 11:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Bart Versieck (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Remove Remove -Mardus (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.--Jusjih (talk) 20:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral per Camouflaged Mirage. --Poti Berik (talk) 08:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral I hope this year You will find more time for the project. There is no reason to remove as long as You would ike to come backmasti <talk> 19:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I asked Sjoerd de Bruin to name three substantial things he had done last year. Sjoerd de Bruin's answer came back in a timely manner, with a ping as requested, and included enough to show me he is still committed to the Wikimedia movement which is the most important trait any steward should have. –MJLTalk 20:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral per concerns above --DannyS712 (talk) 04:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Sorry, not very active. --Uğurkenttalk 13:52, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Zyephyrus (talk) 14:19, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove for inactivity. * Pppery * it has begun 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your service. Keep; Inactivity shouldn't be the reason to remove. Any help is good help. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:05, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove due to inactivity. GFJ (talk) 14:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 00:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)