Stewards/Elections 2012/Votes/Elfix

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Elfix (Felix M.)[edit]

ContentsYesNoNeutral

Elfix talkcontribsSULutil (accounts) / stalktoyglobalcontribscrosswiki-nessconfirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: fr-N, en-3
  • Personal info: Hello everyone. After 4 years of activity on Wikimedia projects, I have decided to run for the current elections. I have been admin on frwiki since 2008, and OTRS volunteer since 2009.

    My more recent activity as a checkuser on frwiki (appointed in 2010) has led me to helping out with various crosswiki issues, and I would really like to able to go further on providing this assistance, using steward tools. I have been hanging in the IRC channel #wikimedia-stewards (from which I make a lot of requests regarding long term crosswiki vandals) for more than 3 years so I'm already in the swing of things. Over time, I have become familiar with most of the steward policies, and I think my crosswiki experience has gotten good enough now. Thanks, Elfix 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC).

    My user pages: @frwiki@commons
български:
  • Езици: fr-N, en-3
  • Лична информация: Здравейте всички! След 4 години дейност в проектите на Уикимедия, реших да се кандидатирам за текущите избори. Администратор съм на френската Уикипедия от 2008 година и доброволец в екипа по имейл кореспонденцията (OTRS) от 2009 година.

    Покрай наскорошните ми дейности като чекюзър в Уикипедия на френски (избран през 2010 г.) често помагам за решаването различни проблеми, касаещи много уикита, и бих искал да продължа да оказвам помощта си, използвайки и инструментите на стюардите. Вече повече от 3 години редовно вися в IRC канала #wikimedia-stewards (в който отправям много от заявките си към стюарди, свързани с кросуики вандали), така че вече съм напълно наясно с нещата. С времето се запознах с почти всички политики, които стюардите спазват, и мисля, че опитът ми с работата в различни уикита е достатъчно задълбочен. Благодаря ви, Elfix 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC).

    Моите потребителски страници: @ френската Уикипедия@ Общомедия
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: fr-N, en-3
  • Informationen zur Person: Hallo an alle. Nach vier Jahren Aktivität auf Wikimedia-Projekten habe ich mich entschieden, bei der aktuellen Stewardwahl anzutreten. Ich bin seit 2008 Admin in der französischsprachigen Wikipedia und OTRS-Mitarbeiter seit 2009.

    Meine neuere Aktivität als Checkuser-Berechtigter auf frwiki (seit 2010) brachte mich dazu, bei verschiedenen projektübergreifenden Problemen zu helfen, und ich wäre wirklich sehr gerne in der Lage, dies durch Gebrauch der Steward-Knöpfe auszubauen. Meine seit mehr als drei Jahren regelmäßige Präsenz im IRC-Kanal #wikimedia-stewards hat mir ermöglicht, im Laufe der Zeit die meisten Regeln für den Gebrauch der Steward-Funktionen kennenzulernen und hat meine „Crosswiki-Erfahrung“ gesteigert.

    Meine Benutzerseiten: @frwiki@commons
español:
  • Idiomas: fr-N, en-3
  • Información personal: ¡Hola a todos! Después de cuatro años de actividad en proyectos de Wikimedia, he decidido por lanzarme en las elecciones actuales. Incluyo de los administratores de frwiki después de 2008, y voluntario por OTRS después de 2009.

    Mi actividad más reciente como checkuser en frwiki (después de 2010) ha me dirigido, a muchos repuestos, proporcionar mi contribución de solucionar varias problemas crosswiki (es decir, tocando muchos proyecots Wikimedia), y amaría mucho poder continuar a entregar esta ayuda (más incluso) con los útiles de steward. Continua mi presencia al canal IRC #wikimedia-stewards por más de 3 años ha me prometido, con tiempo, conocerme con mucha de las reglas de uso de útiles de steward y me incremento experiencia crosswiki.

    Gracias. Elfix 22:40, 23 de enero de 2012 (UTC).

    Páginas de usuario: @ frwiki - @commons
فارسی:
  • زبان‌ها: fr-N, en-3
  • اطلاعات شخصی: سلام بر همگی. پس از چهار سال فعالیت در پروژه‌های ویکی‌مدیا، تصمیم گرفتم در انتخابات جاری ثبت نام کنم. من از سال ۲۰۰۸ در ویکی فرانسوی مدیر بوده‌ام و از سال ۲۰۰۹ یک داوطلب OTRS.

    فعالیت‌های اخیر من به عنوان یک بازرس کاربر در ویکی فرانسوی (منصوب به سال ۲۰۱۰) موجب شده در مسائل مختلف میان‌ویکیایی دخیل شوم، و بسیار مایلم تا بتوانم با استفاده از ابزارهای ویکی‌بدی کمک‌هایم را گسترش دهم. من در کانال آی‌آرسی #wikimedia-stewards برای بیش از سه سال حضور مداوم داشته‌ام؛ بنابراین کاملاً درگیر آن هستم. با گذشت زمان، من با اکثر سیاست‌های ویکی‌بدی آشنا شده‌ام، و گمان می‌کنم که هم‌اکنون تجربهٔ میان‌ویکیایی من به اندازهٔ کافی خوب شده باشد. متشکرم، Elfix 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC).

    صفحات کاربری من: در ویکی فرانسویدر انبار
suomi:
  • Kielet: fr-N, en-3
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Hei kaikki. Neljän vuoden aktiivisuuden jälkeen Wikimedia-projekteissa olen päättänyt asettua ehdolle näissä vaaleissa. Olen ollut ylläpitäjä frwikissä vuodesta 2008 ja OTRS-vapaaehtoinen vuodesta 2009.

    Viimeaikainen aktiivisuuteni osoitepaljastajana frwikissä (nimitetty 2010) johdosta olen auttanut myös erilaisissa wikienvälisissä asioissa, ja haluaisin todella pystyä avustamaan näissä asioissa paremmin ylivalvojatyökalujen avulla. Olen käyttänyt IRC-kanavaa #wikimedia-stewards yli 3 vuotta, joten olen jo perillä asioista. Ajan myötä olen tullut tutuksi useimpien ylivalvojakäytäntöjen kanssa, ja luulen saaneeni tähän mennessä tarpeeksi wikienvälistä kokemusta. Kiitos, Elfix 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC).

    Käyttäjäsivuni: @frwiki · @commons
français:
  • Langues : fr-N, en-3
  • Renseignements personnels : Bonjour ! Après 4 ans d'activité sur les projets Wikimédia, j'ai décidé de me lancer pour les présentes élections. Je fais partie des administrateurs de frwiki depuis 2008, et je suis volontaire OTRS depuis 2009.

    Mon activité un peu plus récente en tant que vérificateur d'adresses IP depuis 2010 m'a mené, à plusieurs reprises, à apporter ma contribution pour solutionner divers problèmes crosswiki (c'est-à-dire, touchant plusieurs projets Wikimedia), et j'aimerais beaucoup pouvoir continuer à fournir cette aide (voire plus) avec les outils de steward. Ma présence continue sur le canal IRC #wikimedia-stewards depuis plus de 3 ans m'a permis, avec le temps, de connaître la plupart des règles d'utilisation des outils de steward et a accru mon expérience crosswiki.

    Merci. Elfix 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
magyar:
  • Nyelvek: fr-N, en-3
  • Személyes információk: Személyi információ: Hello mindenki. Után 4 éve tevékenységnek Wikimedia terv, Nekem van eldöntött futni az aktuális választás. Vagyok admin frwiki óta 2008, és OTRS önkéntes óta 2009.

    több modern tevékenységem mint egy checkuser frwiki (kijelöl 2010BAN) vezetett engem segítség kinn változatos crosswiki problémaval, és Én volna valóban szeret tudni menni későbbiekben feltéve ez segítség, használ pincér eszközök. Vagyok akasztás az IRC csatorna #wikimedia-stewardsban (-ból melyik csinálok rengeteg kérés illetően hosszú időszak crosswiki vandál) több mint 3 év így Vagyok már a hintázik of dolgokban. Felül idő, Nekem van lesz járatos legtöbb a pincér politikanak, és gondolom crosswiki tapasztalatom be klassz most. Kösz, Elfix

    Pages utilisateur : sur frwikisur commonswiki
italiano:
  • Lingue: fr-N, en-3
  • Informazioni personali: Ciao a tutti! Dopo 4 anni di attività nei progetti Wikimedia, ho deciso di concorrere per questa elezione. Sono amministratore di fr.wiki dal 2008 e volontario OTRS dal 2009.

    La mia recente attività come checkuser su fr.wiki (assegnatami nel 2010) mi ha permesso di far fronte a varie questioni crosswiki e mi piacerebbe davvero essere in grado di fornire ancora questa assistenza, usando gli strumenti degli steward. Sono stato attaccato al canale IRC #wikimedia-stewards per più di 3 anni e so già come vanno le cose. Nel corso del tempo, sono divenuto familiare con la maggior parte delle policy degli steward e penso che la mia esperienza crosswiki ora sia abbastanza buona. Grazie, Elfix 22:40, 23 gennaio 2012 (UTC).
    Pagine d’utente: @frwiki@commons

Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: fr-N, en-3
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Hallo allemaal. Na vier jaar activiteit op Wikimedia-projecten heb ik besloten deel te nemen aan deze verkiezingen. Ik ben sinds 2008 een moderator op frwiki en sinds 2009 een OTRS-vrijwilliger.

    Mijn meer recente bezigheden als checkuser op frwiki (aangesteld in 2010) brachten mij in de gelegenheid om te helpen met allerlei crosswiki-zaken, en ik zou heel graag door willen gaan met het verlenen van deze hulp, met gebruik van steward-tools. Ik ben meer dan drie jaar te vinden op het IRC-kanaal #wikimedia-stewards, dus ik ben reeds bekend met de gang van zaken. In de loop der tijd heb ik het stewardbeleid grotendeels leren kennen, en ik denk dat ik nu voldoende crosswiki-ervaring heb opgedaan. Bedankt, Elfix 22:40, 23 januari 2012 (UTC).

    Mijn gebruikerspagina's: op frwikiop commonswiki
Tiếng Việt:
  • Ngôn ngữ: fr-N, en-3
  • Thông tin cá nhân: Chào mọi người. Sau 4 năm hoạt động tại các dự án Wikimedia, tôi đã quyết định góp một chân ứng viên trong cuộc bầu cử này. Tôi đã là bảo quản viên tại frwiki từ năm 2008, và làm tình nguyện viên OTRS từ năm 2009.

    Các hoạt động gần đây của tôi, với vai trò kiểm định viên trên frwiki (bổ nhiệm năm 2010), đã dẫn tôi đến trợ giúp nhiều vấn đề liên wiki khác nhau, và tôi thực sự muốn tiến xa hơn qua những trợ giúp này bằng cách sử dụng công cụ tiếp viên. Tôi trực kênh IRC #wikimedia-stewards đã hơn 3 năm nay vì vậy tôi quan sát được nhiều việc. Theo thời gian, tôi đã trở nên quen thuộc với hầu hết các quy định dành cho tiếp viên, và tôi nghĩ rằng kinh nghiệm liên wiki mà mình nhận được đã đủ tốt. Xin cảm ơn, Elfix 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC).

    Trang cá nhân của tôi: @frwiki@commons

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2012/Questions#Elfix


Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   strong support, helpful, experienced user! Good candidate! —DerHexer (Talk) 00:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
       Man2fly2002 (Not eligible, checked by axpde)   No reason why not. [Man2fly2002 ܐܫܘܪܝܐ] 00:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
  2. Barras (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   No reason why not. Barras 00:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  3. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Vituzzu 00:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  4. Jcaraballo (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Jcaraballo 00:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  5. MBisanz (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   MBisanz talk 00:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  6. Katarighe (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Katarighe (Talk) 00:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  7. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Wikit 00:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  8. Alexander Doria (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Alexander Doria 00:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  9. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Jon Harald Søby 00:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  10. Thehelpfulone (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   The Helpful One 01:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  11. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Courcelles 01:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  12. Borovv (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Yes! Borovv 01:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  13. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Shizhao 03:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  14. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Érico Júnior Wouters 03:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  15. FrankyLeRoutier (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Yes. FrankyLeRoutier 04:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  16. محمد الجداوي (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   M.Gedawy Talk 04:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  17. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Matanya 06:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  18. Addihockey10 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Addihockey10 06:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  19. Filzstift (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Pourquoi pas? Filzstift 06:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  20. Nixón (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Nixón 06:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  21. Vago (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Vago 06:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  22. Nihonjoe (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  23. Philippe (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   --Philippe 08:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  24. Americophile (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   AMERICOPHILE 09:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  25. Binabik155 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Binabik155 09:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  26. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Bonne chance Laurent Jerry 10:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  27. Reder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Reder 10:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  28. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   -- Good candidate. Wagino 20100516 11:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  29. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   of course TBloemink talk 12:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  30. Guillom (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Elfix is a smart, dedicated and trustworthy Wikimedian doing excellent work on the French Wikipedia and on cross-wiki vandalism. He has handled many sensitive issues with great care and success, and his good work has naturally rewarded him with a few grudges from trolls and coteries of disgruntled users. He'll make an excellent addition to the team and an outstanding steward. guillom 12:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  31. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Don't see why not Mátyás 12:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  32. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Although he doesn't have a lot cross-wiki experience (besides his work on the French Wikipedia), I see progression and I'm sure he'll be very helpful from now on for the current group of stewards. Trijnstel 12:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  33. Marc-André Beauchamp (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Je suis totalement pour, conaissant l'utilisateur - Parfait pour le statut! Marc-André Beauchamp 13:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  34. Totodu74 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   And I certainly don't agree with defamations by Suprememangaka. Totodu74 13:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  35. Xic667 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Xic667 13:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  36. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Elfix is a really good wikimedian and a nice guy. He deserves to become a steward. Sebleouf 13:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  37. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Wpollard 14:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  38. Udufruduhu (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   The comments of Suprememangaka below are totally biased and only based of some personal vendetta against the candidate Udufruduhu 14:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  39. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Cbyd 14:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  40. Vdkdaan (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Vdkdaan 14:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  41. Theoliane (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   of course Theoliane 14:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  42. ILJR (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   ILJR 14:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  43. Ca$e (Eligible, checked by bennylin)2012   Ca$e 15:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  44. Trollhead (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Trollhead 15:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  45. Gdgourou (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Gdgourou 15:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  46. Arkanosis (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   for sure — Arkanosis 15:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  47. Égoïté (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   yes, yes and yes. Of course. --Égoïté 15:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  48. Indeed (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Indeed 16:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  49. Kropotkine 113 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Kropotkine 113 16:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  50. Ben76210 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Ben76210 16:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  51. Barbe-Noire (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Barbe-Noire 16:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  52. Defeder (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   of course Defeder 16:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  53. Mike Coppolano (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   And I certainly don't agree with defamations by Suprememangaka. Elfix will make an excellent addition to the team and an outstanding steward. Mike Coppolano 16:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  54. Alcide talon (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Alcide talon 16:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  55. Bzh-99 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Bzh-99 16:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  56. Mmenal (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Manuel Menal 17:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  57. Alchemica (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Has been a trustworthy user on FR for years, and does a great job. Alchemica 17:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  58. Pundit (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   good luck! :) Pundit 18:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  59. Olivier Bommel (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   18:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  60. Pucesurvitaminee (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Pucesurvitaminee 18:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  61. Darkoneko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   I have in unconditional trust in that person. DarkoNeko 18:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  62. VonTasha (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Trustworthy VonTasha 18:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  63. Remi Mathis (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Remi Mathis 18:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  64. JohnThorne (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   JohnThorne 19:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  65. Ofol (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   bonne chance ! Ofol 19:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  66. Bouchecl (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Good candidate. Bouchecl 19:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  67. Chaoborus (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Chaoborus 19:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  68. Pixeltoo (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Pixeltoo 19:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  69. Moez (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   I believe Elfix will be of great help to the actual pool of stewards. He is completely trustworthy, as his many years as a CU testifies. Moez talk 20:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  70. Edhral (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Without a doubt. Elfix is very committed with his check-user and sysop responsabilities on fr:WP. Elfix, bravo de t'être lancé ! --Edhral 20:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  71. Hégésippe Cormier (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Comments. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 20:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  72. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   JurriaanH 20:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  73. Ask21 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Ask21 20:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  74. Akeron (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Akeron 21:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  75. Narayan89 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Narayan89 21:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  76. Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   - @lestaty discuţie 21:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  77. Grondin (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012    Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 22:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  78. VIGNERON (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   VIGNERON * discut. 22:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  79. Gribeco (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Gribeco 01:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  80. Wgfinley (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Wgfinley 07:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  81. Manoillon (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Manoillon 07:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  82. ONaNcle (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   ONaNcle 09:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  83. Mediatus (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Mediatus 09:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  84. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   trusted by community, willing to help billinghurst sDrewth 10:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  85. Lukasz2 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Lukasz2 11:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  86. Micki (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   mickit 12:46, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  87. PierreSelim (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   Very good candidate IMO PierreSelim 13:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  88. Bserin (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   No restriction Bserin 13:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  89. Thesupermat (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   Thesupermat 13:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  90. Kiran Gopi (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   Kiran Gopi 13:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  91. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   --Zeljko 13:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  92. Shivanarayana (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Shivanarayana 14:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  93. Kikuyu3 (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   Rather agree with Guillom than the systematically opponent gang + already met this thrustworthy gentleman. Confident that he will do a good job, once more. Kikuyu3 15:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  94. Yodaspirine (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   Yodaspirine 15:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  95. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   Pharaoh of the Wizards 16:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  96. Mirgolth (Eligible, checked by Wiki13)2012   Mirgolth 17:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  97. VasilievVV (Eligible, checked by Wiki13)2012   vvvt 17:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  98. GLec (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   GLec 18:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  99. Anthere (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Anthere 21:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  100. Cantons-de-l'Est (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   He is a good contributor and he is willing to learn. Cantons-de-l'Est 22:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  101. Romaine (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Romaine 00:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  102. Windchaser (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Windchaser 01:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  103. Slon02 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Slon02 02:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  104. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Taichi - (あ!) 02:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  105. Bruno2wi (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   --Bruno2wiau zinc ♫ 07:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  106. Alexanderps (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Alex Pereira falaê 09:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  107. Vive la Rosière (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Let's see. V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 12:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  108. Wikinade (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Wikinade 13:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  109. Kyah117 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Trustworthy Kyah117 14:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  110. Acer11 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   experienced user + good willing = strong support Acer11 16:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  111. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Pmlineditor)2012   French & English + checkuser in FrWiki + 4 years of activity on Wikimedia projects - so, I support. Brateevsky 17:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  112. Fuucx (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Fuucx 19:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  113. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Diligent user, yes FiliP ██ 20:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  114. Toto Azéro (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Toto Azéro follow the guide ! 20:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  115. Lebrouillard (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Lebrouillard 00:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  116. Sj (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Yes, please. SJ talk | translate   00:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  117. Mikhailov Kusserow (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Mikhailov Kusserow 07:21, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  118. Henryk Borawski (Verification pending)  
  119. Asav (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Asav 11:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  120. Taweetham (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Taweethaも 13:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  121. (:Julien:) (Eligible, checked by Shizhao)2012   trusted and competent. (:Julien:) 13:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  122. Ngagnebin (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Ngagnebin 15:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  123. Erdrokan (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Erdrokan 15:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  124. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Armbrust 16:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  125. Duffyduck97 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Duffyduck97 21:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  126. Fr33kman (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   fr33kman 22:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  127. Xania (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Xania 22:48, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  128. Theking17825 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Theking17825 01:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
  129. Bhawani Gautam (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Bhawani 05:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
  130. Deu (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012  . Deu. 10:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
  131. M 93 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   M 93 11:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
  132. Floflo (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   I know Elfix and know he can be trusted. Floflo 14:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
  133. Esprit Fugace (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Esprit Fugace 16:55, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
  134. FlügelRad (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   ok FlügelRad 18:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
  135. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Geoff Who, me? 23:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
  136. Serein (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Serein 01:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  137. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   B20180 04:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  138. Wjalves (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Jardel @lves msg 04:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  139. Eric.LEWIN (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Eric.LEWIN 04:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  140. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Puffin)2012   Jules78120 07:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  141. Mihewag (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Mihewag 08:55, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  142. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   good trust in this contributor Abaddon1337 09:55, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  143. Lucasbfr (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   -- lucasbfr talk 11:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  144. Zivax (Eligible, checked by Puffin)2012   Zivax 16:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  145. Baba Tabita (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Baba Tabita 17:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  146. Hurricanefan25 (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Hurricanefan25 19:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  147. Rax (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   ok Rax 23:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  148. Alanscottwalker (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Alanscottwalker 00:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
  149. Tranminh360 (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Tranminh360 (talk) 01:50, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
  150. J7729 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   J7729 05:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
       Mrko7853 (Not eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)   Mrko7853 17:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
  151. Hoff1980 (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012   Hoff1980 17:27, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
  152. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012   Wiki13 18:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
  153. Bua333 (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012   Bua333 20:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
  154. Aytrus (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Aytrus 01:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  155. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   OlEnglish (Talk) 08:08, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  156. O.Taris (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   O.Taris 10:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  157. Odisha1 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   --Srikant Kedia 12:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
       Rink-hockey44 (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Rink-hockey44 13:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  158. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Pratyeka 16:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  159. ChristianT (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   ChristianT 21:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  160. Gjue (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Gjue (talk) 04:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
  161. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Albertus Aditya (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
       Mmistmurt (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Mmistmurt (talk) 16:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
  162. Roberto Mura (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
  163. Pjoef (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   pjoef (talkcontribs) 19:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
  164. emes (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Emes (talk) 22:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
  165. Salvidrim (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Salvidrim (talk) 03:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
  166. Wholle (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Wholle (talk) 06:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
  167. Gormo (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Gormo (talk) 13:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
  168. Bapti (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   trustworthy user Bapti (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
  169. Padawane (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   bonne chance. P@d@w@ne 09:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
  170. Phe (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Phe (talk) 10:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
  171. Cobra bubbles (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Cobra bubbles (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
  172. Bazj (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Bazj (talk) 17:56, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
  173. Varnent (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Varnent (talk) 19:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
  174. Samir (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Samir 02:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
  175. Doc103 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Doc103 (talk) 08:52, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
  176. Sail over (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Sail over (talk) 10:55, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
  177. Sokac121 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Comments. Sokac121 (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
  178. GastelEtzwane (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   GastelEtzwane (talk) 15:21, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
  179. Jastrow (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2012   Sound and reliable. Jastrow (talk) 18:53, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
  180. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Obelix (talk) 23:58, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
  181. Asram (Eligible, checked by Ankit Maity)2012   Why not ? Seems to be involved. Asram (talk) 00:57, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
  182. Perditax (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Perditax (talk) 23:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
  183. OohBunnies! (Eligible, checked by Ankit Maity)2012   OohBunnies!Not just any bunnies... 11:17, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
  184. Jmex (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   excellent candidate Jmex (talk) 17:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
  185. Gede (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Diligent and dedicated to the project. Gede (talk) 00:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
  186. Cedalyon (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Cedalyon (talk) 06:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
  187. Ludo29 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Ludo29 (talk) 12:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
  188. Beria (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   Béria Lima msg 18:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
  189. Avraham (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   Avi (talk) 20:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
  190. Piotr967 (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012  . Piotr967 (talk) 11:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
  191. Chandres (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   still zen ... Chandres (talk) 14:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
  192. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Works for me. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 19:24, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
  193. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Blanket Support Support for all candidates as opposition to the blanket opposition by User:Riffic, in support of open balloting. Yair rand (talk) 01:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
  194. Jewbask (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Comments. Jewbask (talk) 01:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
  195. Night of the Big Wind (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Night of the Big Wind (talk) 02:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
  196. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Zyephyrus (talk) 18:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
  197. Mandeville (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Mandeville (talk) 16:48, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
  198. seewolf (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   Harald Krichel (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
  199. Ceradon (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Definitely. Ceradon (talk) 01:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  200. SeoMac (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   SeoMac (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  201. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Hoo man (talk) 19:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  202. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   --Bk1 168 (talk) 23:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  203. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Is okay. And per Yair_rand. Bennylin 14:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  204. Indif (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   --Indif (talk) 18:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  205. MuZemike (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   MuZemike (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  206. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   πr2 (tc) 22:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   I think that the user should become a member of the SWMT, and as fr.wiki has lots of counter-vandalism members, let the others when appropriate. Other than that, no problems. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 00:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  2. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Not much xwiki experience, and not enough counter-vandalism past language barriers for someone who wants to be globally blocking and locking users. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  3. Suprememangaka (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   The multiple missuses of the CheckUser tools at fr.wikipedia and the constant violation of the privacy and checkuser policies really prevent me from supporting you. Indeed you've many time published sensible informations, even when clearly not necessary. There are dozens of recent exemples : 11 January 2012 (diff), 9 January 2012 (diff), 26 December 2011 (first handled correctly, but the IP is finally published without any reason), etc. -- SM ** =^^= ** 00:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
    This statement is untruthful, and I've responded to the accusations on the talk page. I've also asked the ombudsmen to look into them and leave their findings here. Elfix 12:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
    There is an ongoing discussion related to this vote or comment which can be found on the talk page.
    This is an Election Committee action made by Wikitanvir because potential long discussion is not allowed on the vote page and should be moved to the respective talk page.
  4. Jeffwang (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   MORE LANGUAGES NEEDED Jeffwang 01:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
    I was first inclined to support you as I know you're helping a lot on frwiki and your answers to the questions were quite good. But the facts mentioned above are not compatible with having the steward tools. Stewards have to respect the policies literally. Sorry, Quentinv57 (talk) 06:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC) temporarily moved to neutral, waiting the answer of the Ombudsman Commission
  5. Vugar 1981 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   N KOziTalk 07:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  6. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Ul1-82-2 07:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  7. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   FASTILY (TALK) 08:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  8. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Inadequate cross wiki experience - get that then steward Herby talk thyme 08:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
    I join the opinion of Quentinv57. No respect of policies literally. User:Superjuju10
  9. Coyote du 86 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Per Suprememangaka and Quentinv57 Coyote du 86 10:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  10. Craig Rzayev (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Craig Rzayev 10:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  11. Morphypnos (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   I prepared to vote for you but what I have just seen on behalf of him and him makes me change opinion. I find that totally stunning and incompatible with the function of steward. However, I have nothing against you, but I think that these carelessnesses do not correspond chargeable to steward. Good continuation.
  12. Wvk (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Not much interwiki experience Wvk 13:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  13. Meodudlye (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   impossible for me to trust this user for such a sensitive role. And guillom, could you refrain from considering that people who do not agree with you are trolls ? Meodudlye 13:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Addendum : Elfix does some CU without any request made (see here) and is not shy to admit it. CUs have access to information considered as private, and users can expect their privacy to be respected. Elfix proves that he does not care about it. What will happen when, as stewart, he has CU rights on small wikis? Will the privacy of their users be protected? Not with him I'm afraid. Meodudlye (talk) 16:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
    No rule was broken here (otherwise I am still waiting for you to point it to me I hadn't noticed that you were blocked for 8 months on fr.wikipedia.org. I encourage you then to point it to me directly on meta), and no one's privacy was violated. Once again, with your weak activity on fr.wikipedia and this allegation, you are proving that you are seeking reasons to vote against me, but without actually particularly caring about them (as long as you can draw some negative opinions from the others to me). Elfix (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 16:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
    Maybe you haven't read en:WP:NPA ? I advise you to read it, as a stewart, you may need it. And you answer proves that you do not mind answering people's concern, when they point to mistakes you did when using your quite sentitive tools. Since you are well underway to get elected, I wish good luck to the contributors all across wikipedia who will have to deal with you weird view on your own responsibility. Meodudlye (talk) 18:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
  14. Nemoi (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Nemoi 15:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  15. Hatonjan (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Hatonjan 19:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  16. Pic-Sou (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   per SM --Pic-Sou 19:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  17. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   NaBUru38 21:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  18. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   20000 edits on French, 100 on English, and 400 on Commons. There is not enough cross Wiki experience. Blue Rasberry (talk) 05:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  19. Anne-theater (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Anne-theater 00:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  20. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Tiptoety talk 01:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  21. Striker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   I'd like to see more cross-wiki experience. Striker talk 13:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  22. Odder (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   odder (talk) 16:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  23. WizardOfOz (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Not much crosswiki experience. WizardOfOz talk 20:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  24. Thompson.matthew (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Thompson.matthew 09:57, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  25. Mercy (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Not enough experience. Mercy 11:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  26. Anacleto 00 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   I wish he had a little bit more x-wiki experience! Anacleto 00 16:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  27. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Beyond My Ken 10:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  28. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   due to CU accusations, otherwise + Hedwig in Washington 02:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
  29. Begoon (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Begoon 08:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
  30. Guido den Broeder (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012   Guido den Broeder 20:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
  31. X-Fi6 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   I feel you need more cross-wiki experience X-Fi6 07:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  32. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   same as above. —MZaplotnik (contribs) 08:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  33. Paramecium (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   not enough crosswiki experience Paramecium 12:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  34. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Per Blue Rasberry. Mehran Debate 05:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
  35. Tgeairn (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Local (potentially) unresolved issues at -fr. We need our Stewards clean of noise. Tgeairn (talk) 00:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
  36. Trongphu (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Trongphu (talk) 04:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
  37. riffic (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates to protest open balloting. riffic (talk) 08:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
  38. Alia 2005 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Alia 2005 (talk) 15:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
  39. Smartcom5 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   The way he (re-) acts disqualifies him – at least in my opinion. And since he didn't got my unquestionable confidence, i say 'no'. Smartcom5 (Any thoughts ?) 17:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
  40. Salvio giuliano (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
  41. Ooswesthoesbes (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   not enough cross-wiki experience OosWesThoesBes (talk) 11:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
  42. Epbr123 (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   Epbr123 (talk) 10:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
  43. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Regretfully I must vote no because of the overly defensive tone of the replies to the possible issue under investigation. A Steward needs to be able to explain hir actions without coming across as thinking that they were probably wrong. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 23:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
    I have been accused a lot of times - for years - by that person (and only that person) to abuse my checkuser tools. Those accusations were never founded, no diffs had ever been given. I hope this helps you understand why I get to be a bit aggressive over time - mostly since this is the first time - on this voting page - that I see diffs coming along with the accusations. Elfix 23:25, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
  44. Orsb (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Orsb (talk) 08:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   minhhuy (talk) 02:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  2. Fetchcomms (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   fetchcomms 02:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
       Eddyghazaley (Not eligible, checked by Geitost)   Has all the requirements for a well-established user. Regardless, he/she still requires more experience. Eddyghazaley 07:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  3. Martin1978 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Martin1978 08:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  4. Przemub (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Przemub 08:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  5. Morning Sunshine (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Morning Sunshine 11:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  6. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Guerillero 13:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  7. Kelam (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Kelam 16:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  8. Superjuju10 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Superjuju10 17:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  9. T137 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   T137 02:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  10. U.Steele (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   never seen U.Steele 06:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  11. Bidgee (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Bidgee (Talk) 08:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  12. Extra999 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Extra999 13:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  13. Saga City (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Saga City 09:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  14. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Puffin 21:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  15. AGK (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   I'm not familiar enough with the candidate's work to determine if he is suited to this role, but he appears to be a great contributor. AGK [•] 22:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
  16. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Insufficient language. Equivalents are not accepted İncelemeelemani 22:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
  17. Don4of4 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Don4of4 03:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  18. GatoSelvadego (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012   GatoSelvadego 14:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
  19. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   more content work on projects other than frwiki John Vandenberg 14:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
  20. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   CT Cooper · talk 15:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  21. Sammyday (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   I'm waiting for the Ombudsman commission's results. Sammyday (talk) 01:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
  22. Reade (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Reade (talk) 00:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
  23. Briegers (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Briegers (talk) 11:14, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
  24. Njaelkies Lea (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Njaelkies Lea (talk) 17:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
       mmovchin (Not eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)   --Mmovchin (talk) 19:46, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
  25. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Finally I will vote neutral. During these three weeks of elections, I've discussed with Elfix and I'm more and more convinced that he is working in good faith. However, as for me some things were done (even not intentionally) out of the privacy policy and the Ombudsman Commission did not say me yet that there is no violation of the policy. So I can't support at this stage. Sorry, Quentinv57 (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)