Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2012/Votes/MBisanz

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

MBisanz (Matthew Bisanz)

[edit]
ContentsYesNoNeutral

MBisanz talkcontribsSULutil (accounts) / stalktoyglobalcontribscrosswiki-nessconfirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: Hi, my name is Matt and I've been a Wikimedian since 2004, active since 2007. Over the years, I've been active at the English Wikipedia, Commons, WMF Wiki, Meta, and OTRS, as well as serving on the Audit Committee to the WMF Board. I've been an administrator and bureaucrat on the English Wikipedia, an administrator on Commons and a member of the volunteer response team for several years. I am a former administrator on Meta, former member of the Audit Subcommittee of the English Wikipedia (the group tasked with review and monitoring of the Checkuser and Oversight functions on that project) and former candidate for the WMF board. I also have been involved in the bot approvals function on English Wikipedia (see also commons:User:MBisanzBot) and serve as an Oversighter on that project. My primary cross-wiki work has been with Commons, including OTRS tagging, and I have also helped implement the use of categories on the WMF wiki.

    My approach is to work as a neutral implementer of processes. I believe that this makes me suited for the role of Steward in that I can remain uninvolved in the substance of the communities' decisions and instead ensure they are implemented in a fair and transparent matter that accords with their local policies and our global policies. Further, I believe that as a bureaucrat, volunteer response team member and monitor of non-public tool use, I have shown an ability to remain professional when dealing with sensitive matters. While I lack language skills beyond English, I am confident in my ability to use online translation and will rely on other stewards and trusted users in reviewing discussions and decisions that I do not fully comprehend. Thank you for your time in reviewing my statement and record. MBisanz talk 03:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Additional user pages: Commons, English Wikipedia, WMF wiki
български:
  • Езици: en
  • Лична информация: Здравейте. Казвам се Мат и съм уикимедианец от 2004 година, активно допринасящ след 2007 година. С течение на времето съм бил активен в Уикипедия на английски, Общомедия, уикито на Фондация Уикимедия, Мета, в системата за имейл комуникация, а съм и в комитета, одитиращ Фондация Уикимедия. От няколко години съм администратор и бюрократ в Уикипедия на английски, администратор в Общомедия и доброволец в OTRS екипа. Бивш администратор на Мета, бивш член на комитета изслушващ жалбите срещу потребители с Checkuser и Oversight привилегии в английската Уикипедия. Бил съм и кандидат за член на Управителния борд на Фондация Уикимедия. Участвал съм и в процеса на одобряване на ботове в Уикипедия на английски ( вижте и commons:User:MBisanzBot) и в този проект съм член на групата на наблюдаващите (Oversighter). Основната ми кросуики активност е свързана с Общомедия, в това число отбелязване на изображения с OTRS шаблони, а съм помагам и да се внедри употребата на категории в уикито на Фондацията.

    Към работата си подхождам, като безпристрастно изпълнявам процедурите. Вярвам, че това ме прави подходящ за ролята на стюард, тъй като съм способен да се абстрахирам от естеството на решенията на отделните общности, за да осигуря изпълнението им по справедлив и прозрачен начин, който е в съзвучие както с локалните политики, така и с нашите глобални политики. Нещо повече, смятам, че като бюрократ, доброволец в OTRS и наблюдател на употребата на непубличните инструменти, вече съм демонстрирал способността си да запазвам професионалното си отношение и в деликатни ситуации. Макар че езиковите ми умения не се простират отвъд английския език, умея добре да използвам онлайн инструменти за машинен превод и ще разчитам на други стюарди и потребители, ползващи се с доверието на общностите, при разглеждане на обсъждания и решения, които не разбирам напълно. Благодаря ви за времето, което отделихте да разгледате моята кандидатура. MBisanz talk 03:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Допълнителни потребителски страници: Общомедия, Уикипедия на английски, сайт на Фондация Уикимедия
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en
  • Informationen zur Person: Hi, ich heiße Matt und bin seit 2004 Wikimedianer, aktiv seit 2007. Im Laufe der Jahre war ich in der englischen Wikipedia, auf Commons, im Wiki der Wikimedia-Stiftung, auf Meta und im OTRS aktiv, auch war ich Mitglied des Rechnungsprüfungsausschusses beim Kuratorium der Stiftung. Ich bin seit einigen Jahren Administrator und Bürokrat in der englischen Wikipedia, Administrator auf Commons und Mitglied des OTRS-Teams. Ich bin ehemaliger Administrator auf Meta, war Mitglied im „Audit Subcommittee“ der englischen Wikipedia (= Ausschuss zur Kontrolle der Checkuser- und Oversight-Einsätze) und habe auch schon für das Kuratorium der WMF kandidiert. Auch war ich bei der Botgenehmigung in der englischen Wikipedia tätig (siehe auch commons:User:MBisanzBot) und bin dort Oversighter. Meine hauptsächlichen Crosswiki-Aktivitäten fanden auf Commons statt, zum Beispiel das Hinzufügen von OTRS-Hinweisen, und ich habe auch bei der Einführung des Gebrauchs von Kategorien im Foundation-Wiki mitgeholfen.

    Mein Ansatz ist, als neutraler Umsetzer von Prozessen zu arbeiten. Ich glaube, dass mich das für die Steward-Rolle passend macht, insofern ich bezüglich des Inhalts von Entscheidungen der Communitys unbeteiligt bleiben kann und nur sicherstellen werde, dass diese [Entscheidungen] in einer fairen und transparenten Weise, die den lokalen und unseren globalen Richtlinien entspricht, umgesetzt werden. Weiterhin glaube ich, dass ich als Bürokrat, OTRS-Mitarbeiter und Überprüfer des Gebrauchs nicht öffentlich geloggter Funktionen die Fähigkeit, auch beim Behandeln sensibler Angelegenheiten professionell zu bleiben, gezeigt habe. Obwohl ich keine anderen Sprachen außer Englisch spreche, vertraue ich auf meine Fähigkeit, Übersetzungsprogramme zu nutzen und werde bei der Durchsicht von Diskussionen und Entscheidungen, die ich nicht vollends verstehe, auf andere Stewards und vertrauenswürdige Benutzer vertrauen. Danke für eure Zeit beim Lesen meiner Vorstellung. MBisanz talk 03:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Weitere Benutzerseiten: Commons, Englische Wikipedia, Stiftungs-Wiki
فارسی:
  • زبان‌ها: en
  • اطلاعات شخصی: سلام، اسم من Matt است. من از سال ۲۰۰۴ کاربر ویکی‌مدیا بوده‌ام و از سال ۲۰۰۷ فعال شدم. در طول این سال‌ها، در ویکی‌پدیای انگلیسی، ویکی‌انبار، ویکی بنیاد ویکی‌مدیا، فراویکی، و OTRS فعال بوده‌ام و همچنین در هیئت ممیزی بنیاد ویکی‌مدیا خدمت کرده‌ام. برای چندین سال، مدیر و دیوان‌سالار ویکی‌پدیای انگلیسی، مدیر ویکی‌انبار و عضو تیم داوطلب پاسخ به ای‌میل بوده‌ام. سابقاً در فراویکی مدیر بودم، همچنین عضو پیشین هیئت ممیزی ویکی‌پدیای انگلیسی (گروهی که مسئول بررسی و نظارت بر کارایی بازرسی کاربر و پنهان‌گری در آن پروژه بود) و نامزد پیشین برای هیئت امنای بنیاد ویکی‌مدیا. همچنین درگیر کار تأیید مجوز ربات‌ها (همچنین بنگرید به commons:User:MBisanzBot) و یک پنهان‌گر در ویکی‌پدیای انگلیسی بوده‌ام. فعالیت اصلی میان‌ویکیایی من در ویکی‌انبار بوده، شامل برچسب زدن‌های OTRS، و علاوه بر این‌ها من در استفاده از رده‌ها در ویکی بنیاد ویکی‌مدیا کمک‌هایی کرده‌ام.

    روش من اجرای بی‌طرفانهٔ امور است. بر این باورم که این خصیصه مرا برای ایفای نقش ویکی‌بدی مناسب می‌کند که طی آن من می‌توانم در ماهیت تصمیم‌های جوامع دخالت نکنم و تنها اطمینان حاصل کنم که آن‌ها این تصمیمات را به صورتی منصفانه و شفاف و به نحوی که منطبق بر سیاست‌های محلی و جهانی باشد اجرا می‌کنند. علاوه بر این، اعتقاد دارم که به عنوان یک دیوان‌سالار، یکی از اعضای تیم داوطلب پاسخ به ای‌میل و یکی از ناظران بر استفاده از ابزار غیرعمومی، در مواقع حساس حرفه‌ای عمل کرده‌ام. من مهارت زبانی دیگری ورای انگلیسی ندارم، با این وجود نسبت به توانایی‌ام در استفاده از ترجمهٔ برخط اطمینان دارم و در بررسی مباحث و تصمیماتی که کاملاً متوجه آن‌ها نمی‌شوم بر روی کمک سایر ویکی‌بدان و کاربران مورد اعتماد حساب می‌کنم. سپاسگزارم برای وقتی که گذاشتید تا اظهارات و سابقهٔ مرا بررسی کنید. MBisanz talk 03:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    سایر صفحات کاربری: ویکی‌انبار، ویکی‌پدیای انگلیسی، ویکی بنیاد ویکی‌مدیا
suomi:
  • Kielet: en
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Moi, nimeni on Matt ja olen ollut Wikimediassa vuodesta 2004, aktiivinen vuodesta 2007. Vuosien varrella olen ollut aktiivinen englanninkielisessä Wikipediassa, Commonsissa, WMF:n wikissä, Metassa ja OTRS:ssä, minkä lisäksi olen WMF:n johtokunnan tarkastuskomiteassa. Olen ollut ylläpitäjä ja byrokraatti englanninkielisessä Wikipediassa, ylläpitäjä Commonsissa ja OTRS-vapaaehtoinen useita vuosia. Olen entinen ylläpitäjä Metassa, entinen englanninkielisen Wikipedian Audit Subcommitteen jäsen (ryhmä vastaa osoitepaljastin- ja häivytysoikeuksien käytön valvonnasta ja tarkastamisesta) sekä entinen ehdokas WMF:n johtokuntaan. Olen osallistunut bottien hyväksymisprosessiin englanninkielisessä Wikipediassa (katso myös commons:User:MBisanzBot) ja palvelen myös häivyttäjänä projektissa. Pääasiallinen wikienvälinen työni on Commonsissa, mukaan lukien OTRS-merkintöjen tekeminen, ja olen myös auttanut luokkien käyttöönotossa WMF:n wikissä.

    Lähestymistapani on toimia prosessien neutraalina toimeenpanijana. Uskon, että tämän ansiosta sovin ylivalvojan rooliin, koska voin pysytellä neutraalina yhteisöjen päätöksissa ja varmistaa, että ne toteutetaan reilulla ja avoimella tavalla joka vastaa heidän paikallisia käytäntöjään ja meidän globaaleja käytäntöjämme. Lisäksi uskon, että byrokraattina, OTRS-vapaaehtoisena ja ei-julkisten työkalujen käytön valvojana olen osoittanut kykyä toimia ammattimaisesti arkaluontoisissa asioissa. Vaikka en puhu muita kieliä kuin englantia, luotan kykyyni käyttää käännöstyökaluja ja pyrin turvautumaan toisiin ylivalvojiin ja luotettuihin käyttäjiin tutkiessani keskusteluja ja päätöksiä joita en ymmärrä täysin. Kiitokset lausuntooni tutustumiseen käyttämästänne ajasta.MBisanz talk 03:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Muut käyttäjäsivut: Commons, englanninkielinen Wikipedia, WMF:n wiki
magyar:
  • Nyelvek: en
  • Személyes információk: Személyi információ: Üdv, az én nevem Matt és I've lesz egy Wikimedian óta 2004, aktív óta 2007. Felül az év, I've lesz aktív az Angol Wikipedia, A nép, WMF Wiki, Meta, és OTRS, valamint szolgálat az Audit Bizottság a WMF Deszka. I've lesz egy ügyintéző és bürokrata az Angol Wikipedia, egy ügyintéző A nép és egy tagja a az önkéntes válasz csapat több év. Én vagyok egy előző ügyintéző Meta, előző tagja a az Audit Albizottsága az Angol Wikipedianak (a csoport feladat áttekint és felügyeléssel a Checkusernek és Tévedés függvények az terv) és előző jelölt a WMF deszka. Én szintén van lesz bonyolult a bot jóváhagyás funkcióban Angol Wikipedia (lásd még a nép:Felhasználó:Mbisanzbot) és szolgál mint egy Oversighter az terv. elsődleges cross-wiki munkám lesz A néppel, beleértve OTRS tagging, és Nekem van szintén segített végrehajt a használ kategóriáknak a WMF wiki. Enyém megközelít dolgozni mint egy semleges implementer of feldolgoz. Úgyhiszem, hogy ez készít engem kíséret a szerepe Pincérnek az tudok maradni uninvolved a lényegben a communities'nak döntésben és helyett biztosít ők végrehajtott egy korrekt és átlátszó dologban az kiegyezés helyi politikájukkal és globális politikánk. További, Úgyhiszem, hogy mint egy bürokrata, önkéntes válasz csapat tag és monitora non-public eszköznek használ, Nekem van mutatott egy képesség maradni hivatásos amikor viselkedés érzékeny dologgal. Mialatt Én hiány nyelv ügyesség felett Angol, Én vagyok biztos képességemben használni online fordítás és fog bízik benne egyéb pincér és megbízható felhasználók felülvizsgáló tárgyalás és döntésben az Én nem teljesen megért. Köszönöm időd felülvizsgáló állításomban és feljegyzés.
italiano:
  • Lingue: en
  • Informazioni personali: Ciao, mi chiamo Matt e sono un Wikimediano dal 2004, attivo dal 2007. Negli anni sono stato attivo sulla Wikipedia in inglese, su Commons, su meta, su OTRS e sulla wiki di WMF, oltre ad essere stato membro dell'Audit Committee del Board di WMF. Da molti anni sono amministratore e burocrate su Wikipedia in inglese, amministratore su Commons e volontario OTRS. In passato sono stato amministratore su Meta e membro della Audit Subcommittee di Wikipedia in lingua inglese (il gruppo di utenti con funzione di controllo sulle attività di checkuser e di oversight su quel progetto), nonché candidato al Wikimedia Board of Trustees. Mi sono occupato anche dell'approvazione dei bot su Wikipedia in inglese (vedi anche commons:User:MBisanzBot), dove ho anche funzioni di oversighter. Le mie principali attività cross-wiki riguardano Commons, compreso il lavoro legato a OTRS, e ho anche collaborato a implementare l'uso delle categorie sulla wiki di WMF.

    Il mio approccio al lavoro consiste nella gestione neutrale dei processi interni. Credo che questo mi renda adatto al ruolo di Steward, consentendomi di mantenere un certo distacco dalle decisioni comunitarie e di assicurarmi che siano applicate in maniera corretta e trasparente, in accordo con le policy locali e con quelle globali. Infine credo, nell'attività di burocrate, volontario OTRS e di controllo su funzionalità non pubblicamente visibili, di aver dimostrato la capacità di trattare dati sensibili in maniera professionale. Pur non padroneggiando altre lingue oltre all'inglese, confido nelle mie capacità di utilizzare i traduttori automatici e mi affiderò agli altri steward e ad utenti fidati per delucidazioni su discussioni e decisioni, qualora non dovessi comprenderle appieno. Grazie per il vostro tempo e per l'attenzione nel leggere questo mio programma. MBisanz talk 03:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Additional user pages: Commons, English Wikipedia, WMF wiki
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: en
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Hoi, mijn naam is Matt en ik ben een Wikimediaan sinds 2004, actief sinds 2007. In de loop der jaren ben ik actief geweest op de Engelstalige Wikipedia, Commons, de WMF-wiki, Meta en OTRS. Ik heb ook gediend in de Auditcommissie voor het WMF-bestuur. Ik ben al enkele jaren moderator en bureaucraat op de Engelstalige Wikipedia, moderator op Commons en lid van het 'volunteer response team'. Ik ben een voormalig moderator op Meta, voormalig lid van de Audit-subcommissie van de Engelstalige Wikipedia (de groep met als taak de beoordeling en controle van de Checkuser- en Oversight-functies op dat project) en voormalig kandidaat voor het WMF-bestuur. Ook was ik betrokken bij de functie voor de goedkeuring van bots op de Engelstalige Wikipedia (zie ook commons:User:MBisanzBot) en ik fungeer als Oversighter op dat project. Mijn crosswiki-werk doe ik hoofdzakelijk op Commons, waaronder het toevoegen van OTRS-labels, en ik heb ook geholpen met het invoeren van het gebruik van categorieën op de WMF-wiki.

    Mijn uitgangspunt is om te werken als een neutrale uitvoerder van processen. Ik geloof dat dit mij geschikt maakt voor de rol van Steward, doordat ik afzijdig kan blijven van de inhoud van gemeenschapsbesluiten en in plaats daarvan ervoor kan zorgen dat ze ingevoerd worden op een eerlijke en transparante wijze die overeenstemt met hun lokale beleid en ons globale beleid. Daarnaast geloof ik dat ik als bureaucraat, lid van het 'volunteer response team' en controleur van niet-publiek tool-gebruik heb laten zien dat ik in staat ben om professioneel te blijven bij de omgang met gevoelige kwesties. Hoewel ik weinig taalvaardig ben buiten het Engels om, ben ik ervan overtuigd gebruik te kunnen maken van online vertaalprogramma's en ik zal vertrouwen op andere stewards en vertrouwde gebruikers in de beoordeling van discussies en besluiten die ik niet geheel begrijp. Bedankt voor uw tijd om mijn verklaring en staat van dienst te beoordelen. MBisanz talk 03:00, 26 januari 2012 (UTC)

    Overige gebruikerspagina's: Commons, Engelstalige Wikipedia, WMF-wiki
Tiếng Việt:
  • Ngôn ngữ: en
  • Thông tin cá nhân: Xin chào, tên tôi là Matt và tôi là thành viên Wikimedia từ năm 2004, hoạt động từ năm 2007. Trong những năm qua, tôi đã hoạt động tại Wikipedia tiếng Anh, Commons, WMF Wiki, Meta và OTRS, cũng như phục vụ trong Ủy ban Kiểm toán của Ban quản trị WMF. Tôi có quyền bảo quản viên và hành chính viên tại Wikipedia tiếng Anh, bảo quản viên tại Commons và là thành viên của nhóm trả lời thư tình nguyện trong nhiều năm. Tôi là một cựu bảo quản viên tại Meta, cựu thành viên của Tiểu ban Kiểm toán của Wikipedia tiếng Anh (nhóm được giao nhiệm vụ xem xét và giám sát các chức năng kiểm định viên và giám sát viên tại dự án này) và từng là một ứng viên vào Ban quản trị WMF. Tôi cũng tham gia chức năng phê duyệt bot trên Wikipedia tiếng Anh (xem thêm commons:User:MBisanzBot) và phục vụ với vai trò giám sát viên tại dự án này. Công việc liên wiki chính của tôi là tại Commons, bao gồm gắn thẻ OTRS, và tôi cũng giúp sắp xếp thể loại trên WMF wiki.

    Cách làm việc của tôi là xử lý các yêu cầu một cách trung lập. Tôi tin rằng điều này là thích hợp với vai trò tiếp viên, từ đó tôi có thể thực hiện đúng tính chất những quyết định của cộng đồng và đảm bảo chúng được giải quyết một cách công bằng và minh bạch, phù hợp với quy định của các dự án địa phương và chính sách toàn cục của chúng ta. Hơn nữa, tôi tin rằng vì bản thân là một hành chính viên, thành viên nhóm trả lời thư tình nguyện và người giám sát các công cụ sử dụng không công khai, tôi đã thể hiện được khả năng chuyên nghiệp khi phải đối mặt với nhiều vấn đề nhạy cảm. Mặc dù không biết ngôn ngữ nào ngoài tiếng Anh, tôi tin vào khả năng của mình khi sử dụng các công cụ dịch thuật trực tuyến, cũng như nhờ cậy các tiếp viên và thành viên đáng tin cậy khác khi xem xét các cuộc thảo luận và những trường hợp mà tôi không hoàn toàn hiểu. Cảm ơn các bạn vì đã xem xét và ghi nhận bài phát biểu của tôi. MBisanz talk 03:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Trang cá nhân bổ sung: Commons, Wikipedia tiếng Anh, WMF wiki

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2012/Questions#MBisanz


Yes

[edit]
  1. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   —DerHexer (Talk) 00:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC) strong support, a very experienced and helpful user![reply]
  2. Techman224 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Techman224Talk 00:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Barras (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   No reason why not. Barras 00:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Vituzzu 00:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Jcaraballo (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Jcaraballo 00:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I was going to neutral on this one, but your response to my question shows me that you know what you are getting yourself in to. One word of advice - we usually look for contributions over many wikis and languages when considering a user for global rollback. Other than that, no worries here. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Remove my support, require further consideration before making up my mind here. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Very experienced and active user, would be an asset especially on renames and SUL. Snowolf How can I help? 00:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 00:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Katarighe (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   No problems Katarighe (Talk) 00:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Lord Roem (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Lord Roem 00:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Wikit 00:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Jon Harald Søby 00:35, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Pedroca cerebral (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   PcTalk 01:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Courcelles 01:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Borovv (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Yes! Borovv 01:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   minhhuy (talk) 02:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Magister Mathematicae (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   es:Magister Mathematicae 02:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Fetchcomms (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   fetchcomms 02:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Shizhao 03:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Miss Manzana (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   мιѕѕ мαηzαηα (let's talk) 03:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Érico Júnior Wouters 03:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. محمد الجداوي (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   M.Gedawy Talk 04:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. 7 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   user:7 (talk) 05:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Matanya 06:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Addihockey10 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Addihockey10 06:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Morning Sunshine (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   No reason why not Morning Sunshine 06:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Filzstift (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Filzstift 06:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Martin1978 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Martin1978 07:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Nihonjoe (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Petrb (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Good candidate Petrb 07:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   FASTILY (TALK) 08:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Philippe (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   --Philippe 08:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Has good judgment and plenty of experience in various roles. Jafeluv 08:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Binabik155 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Binabik155 09:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Ansumang (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 09:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. QuiteUnusual (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Very familiar with his work, will make a good Steward. QU TalkQu 10:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Reder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Reder 10:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   -- Good candidate. Wagino 20100516 11:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. M7 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Trusted and experienced user M/ 11:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Jan eissfeldt (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   i value his judgement, not just regarding on wiki stuff Jan eissfeldt 11:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Bencmq (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Bencmq 11:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Cobi (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Support. Cobi 12:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   has the skills, can learn the rest, and one language is enough with so much work to do billinghurst sDrewth 14:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Wpollard 14:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Gitartha.bordoloi (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Gitartha.bordoloi 14:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Ca$e (Eligible, checked by bennylin)2012   Ca$e 15:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Trollhead (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Trollhead 15:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 15:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Pundit (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   good luck! :) Pundit 18:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Guerillero 18:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. JohnThorne (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   JohnThorne 19:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   JurriaanH 20:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Gomada (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Gomada 21:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Narayan89 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Narayan89 21:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   - @lestaty discuţie 21:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   NaBUru38 21:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Hallows AG (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Hallows AG 22:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Gribeco (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Gribeco 01:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Bdell555 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   discloses his COI, willing to be recalled, gives us his real name Bdell555 02:43, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Lukep913 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Lukep913 04:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Grondin (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012    Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 05:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Wgfinley (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Wgfinley 07:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Σ (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Σ 07:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. ONaNcle (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   ONaNcle 09:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Tinucherian (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   -- Tinu Cherian - 10:36, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. MithrandirAgain (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   MithrandirAgain 10:51, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Dipankan001 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   I've seen this user around, and I know that this user won't misuse the additional tools. Dipankan001 11:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Theo10011 (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   Strong support- Matt has won my heart! Theo10011 13:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Inadequate cross wiki experience, but good answers to questions Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:39, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   --Zeljko 13:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   Great Crat and Admin Pharaoh of the Wizards 15:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Acather96 (Eligible, checked by Wiki13)2012   Acather96 (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  72. VasilievVV (Eligible, checked by Wiki13)2012   vvvt 17:50, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Juliancolton (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   –Juliancolton | Talk 19:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Captain-tucker (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Captain-tucker 21:04, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  75. DCI2026 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Your hard work on the English Wikipedia demonstrates your ability to be a Wikimedia steward. Good luck. dci | TALK 23:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Windchaser (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Windchaser 01:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Tiptoety talk 01:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Slon02 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Slon02 02:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Lecen (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Lecen 11:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Vive la Rosière (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 14:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Stanqo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Stanqo 14:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Mailer Diablo 15:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Experienced enough to be a steward. Mehran Debate 16:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Tarheel95 (Eligible, checked by Pmlineditor)2012   Tarheel95 17:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  85. King of Hearts (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   King of 19:46, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Experienced and wise FiliP ██ 20:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Steven Zhang (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   On reflection, Matt does a lot of good work as a crat. He should do fine as a steward. If this isn't successful, try doing more cross wiki work. Cheers. Steven Zhang 01:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Magog the Ogre (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Magog the Ogre 07:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Mikhailov Kusserow (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Mikhailov Kusserow 07:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Saga City (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Saga City 09:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Master&Expert (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Master&Expert 11:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Taweetham (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Taweethaも 13:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Openbk (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Openbk 15:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Armbrust 16:36, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Kalan (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Kalan ? 17:26, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Baseball Watcher (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Baseball Watcher 17:34, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Fr33kman (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   fr33kman 21:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  98. AGK (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   I don't know many of the candidates because I'm primarily active only on the English Wikipedia. However, I do know that Matt is a competent, diligent, and reliable contributor; he is well-suited to this role. AGK [•] 22:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Ottava Rima (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Solid candidate with a strong background across Wiki, good technical knowledge, and probably the most respectable candidate in a while. Ottava Rima (talk) 03:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Bhawani Gautam (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Bhawani 05:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Lumos3 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Lumos3 10:11, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Erzbischof (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Erzbischof 10:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Deu (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012  . Deu. 10:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Rsloch (Eligible, checked by Wiki13)2012   Rsloch 13:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Floflo (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   I'm ok, seems to be reliable. Floflo 14:08, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Lele giannoni (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Lele giannoni 15:58, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  107. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   very good and sufficient İncelemeelemani 21:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  108. ThurnerRupert (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   ThurnerRupert 02:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  109. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   B20180 04:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Wjalves (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Jardel @lves msg 04:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  111. My76Strat (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   My76Strat 05:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Mihewag (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Mihewag 08:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Beyond My Ken 10:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Lucasbfr (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   -- lucasbfr talk 11:18, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Gwen Gale (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Gwen Gale 14:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Baba Tabita (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   obviously experienced enough despite language handicap Baba Tabita 17:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Rubin16 (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   rubin16 18:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Hurricanefan25 (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Hurricanefan25 19:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Rax (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   ok overall - and very conclusive answers on questions page Rax 23:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Alanscottwalker (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Alanscottwalker 00:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Sergey WereWolf (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Based on confident answers Sergey WereWolf 00:50, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Tranminh360 (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Tranminh360 (talk) 01:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   clear as mud. Hedwig in Washington 02:41, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Begoon (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Begoon 08:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Gavin.collins (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Fine upstanding contributor. Gavin.collins 13:50, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Beetstra (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012   Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 16:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Bua333 (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012   Bua333 21:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Tryptofish (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012   I acknowledge the English-only concerns, but I can vouch for his excellent work on the English WP. Tryptofish 22:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  129. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   OlEnglish (Talk) 08:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Rink-hockey44 (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Rink-hockey44 13:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  130. WilliamH (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   In terms of renames/usurping, Matt is probably one of the most experienced individuals across all WMF projects. His anglocentrism has never been an issue when considering crosswiki perspectives there, and I have no reason to think it would be as a steward. WilliamH 14:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Pratyeka 16:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Russavia (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   All good here Russavia 20:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Greyhood (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   looks ok Greyhood 20:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  134. DragonflySixtyseven (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   DS (talk) 02:49, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Albertus Aditya (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Meno25 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Meno25 (talk) 13:42, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Roberto Mura (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:11, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  138. SoWhy (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Very experienced user. Regards SoWhy 18:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Pjoef (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   pjoef (talkcontribs) 20:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Department of Redundancy Department (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   DoRD (talk) 21:12, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  141. VMS Mosaic (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:08, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Diannaa (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Diannaa (talk) 05:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       HovhannesKarapetyan (Not eligible, checked by Vituzzu)   HovhannesKarapetyan (talk) 10:17, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Ankit Maity (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Ankit Maity (talk) 11:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Gormo (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Gormo (talk) 14:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Modernist (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Modernist (talk) 14:59, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  146. BrownHairedGirl (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Highly experienced BrownHairedGirl (talk) 18:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Gilderien (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Of course Gilderien (talk) 21:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Spencer (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Spencer (talk) 03:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Maxim (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Maxim(talk) 04:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Joe Watzmo (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Joe Watzmo (talk) 09:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 16:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Bazj (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Bazj (talk) 17:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  153. CharlieEchoTango (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   CharlieEchoTango (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Varnent (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Varnent (talk) 05:34, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Sokac121 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Comments. Sokac121 (talk) 12:00, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  156. GastelEtzwane (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   GastelEtzwane (talk) 15:23, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  157. KFP (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   KFP (talk) 16:52, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Versageek (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Versageek (talk) 17:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Pablo X (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2012   pablo 19:40, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Atlasowa (Eligible, checked by Ankit Maity)2012   Atlasowa (talk) 20:40, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Obelix (talk) 00:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Man2fly2002 (Not eligible, checked by axpde)   No reason why not. [Man2fly2002 ܐܫܘܪܝܐ] 00:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Royalbroil (Eligible, checked by Ankit Maity)2012   Royalbroil 05:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Locke Cole (Eligible, checked by Ankit Maity)2012   —Locke Coletc 07:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  164. FalconL (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   FalconL ?! 14:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Alia 2005 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Alia 2005 (talk) 15:45, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Tom Morris (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Generally reasonable and helpful. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Njaelkies Lea (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Njaelkies Lea (talk) 17:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Jehochman (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   He seems to be reliable. Jehochman (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Ronhjones (talk) 00:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  170. PhilKnight (Eligible, checked by Ankit Maity)2012   Well suited to the role. PhilKnight (talk) 03:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Alpertron (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Alpertron (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Trödel (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Trödel (talk) 16:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Ruslik0 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2012   Ruslik (talk) 18:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   I'm not swayed by the opposes, plus I think that a monolingual steward could do some great work. Let's give him a chance :-) Quentinv57 (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Piotr967 (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012  . Piotr967 (talk) 11:33, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  176. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Generally I don't support monolingual candidates. But I know this user's work and I'm confident in their ability, which for once overcomes my view on languages. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 19:31, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Avraham (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   Avi (talk) 22:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Ruhrfisch (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   Ruhrfisch (talk) 00:00, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Blanket Support Support for all candidates as opposition to the blanket opposition by User:Riffic, in support of open balloting. Yair rand (talk) 01:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Timotheus Canens (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   T. Canens@en.wp (talk) 03:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Porchcorpter (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Porchcorpter 07:24, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Warofdreams (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   Warofdreams (talk) 11:03, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Zyephyrus (talk) 18:48, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Harej (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   Would make a good member of a "team". harej (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  185. It Is Me Here (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   It Is Me Here t / c 17:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  186. RP459 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   RP459 (talk) 19:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  187. seewolf (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   Harald Krichel (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Thehelpfulone (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   The Helpful One 00:48, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Ceradon (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Definitely. Ceradon (talk) 01:19, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  191. DarkFalls (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   —Dark talk 05:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  192. DDima (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Good contributor on Wikipedia, no issues here. --ddima (talk) 18:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   trusted, experienced... although more languages would be better Hoo man (talk) 19:19, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Vago (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012  Vago (talk) 09:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Nolispanmo (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   --Nolispanmo (talk) 11:00, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Kero (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Kero (talk) 11:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Waithamai (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Waithamai (talk) 13:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  198. MuZemike (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   MuZemike (talk) 20:26, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Jalexander (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Experienced and grounded user who would be helpful for the team. This vote does not represent an official staff position but my personal opinion. Done from staff account only because volunteer account is not eligible because of a lack of recent edits. Jalexander (talk) 20:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Memorino (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   --Memorino (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  201. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   πr2 (tc) 21:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  202. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   TBloemink talk 23:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]
  1. Vugar 1981 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   N KOziTalk 05:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Ul1-82-2 07:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   No real participation on other wikies (french, espanol, italian and even german) Laurent Jerry 10:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   One language is just not enough. Mátyás 12:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ralf Roletschek (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   only english --Ralf Roletschek 13:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Wvk (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Languages? Wvk 13:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Vdkdaan (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   only en Vdkdaan 14:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Obviously competent en wp user however cross wiki work is not enough for me to support as steward Herby talk thyme 16:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. VonTasha (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Not enough crosswiki activity, and only en speaking VonTasha 18:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Hégésippe Cormier (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Not enough crosswiki work. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 20:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. MZMcBride (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Hat-collecting. --MZMcBride 23:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Dream Focus (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   I don't trust him with the powers to block/ban people. I was recently blocked for a week without any prior warning or discussion over something minor which was clearly not a blockable offense according to the rules, and MBisanz supported this block. [1] Dream Focus 04:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Here is a link to the entire discussion. Blue Rasberry (talk) 05:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   I am voting no only because this user only works on English Wikipedia and Commons. I appreciate that this user often has 50-100 edits on other projects, but a tour of the projects is not sufficient. Blue Rasberry (talk) 05:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Bidgee (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Bidgee (Talk) 08:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   KTo288 12:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Hatonjan (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   en-centered Hatonjan 18:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Stefan Knauf (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Stefan Knauf 21:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Bruno2wi (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Same as blue Rasberry --Bruno2wiau zinc ♫ 07:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Odder (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Inadequate cross-wiki experience — sorry. odder (talk) 16:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Pmlineditor)2012   Brateevsky 17:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Thompson.matthew (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   I'm sorry, I'd like more cross-wiki experience Thompson.matthew 10:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Asav (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   English only user Asav 11:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Puffin 21:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Xania (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   no language skills. sounds like a career-Wikipedian. Xania 22:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Blurpeace (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Blurpeace 01:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Theking17825 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Theking17825 01:36, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. M 93 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   just one language M 93 11:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   One language; low xWiki-ness. Sorry. John Vandenberg 11:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Guido den Broeder (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012   Guido den Broeder 20:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   same as above. — MZaplotnik (contribs) 21:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. X-Fi6 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Opaque decisions, in a subjective direction, sometimes need to be made too. X-Fi6 07:08, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Cobaltcigs (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   cobaltcigs 08:11, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Paramecium (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   doesn't speak any foreign language Paramecium 12:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   I would like to see better language skills. CT Cooper · talk 15:08, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Gjue (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   He can not speak another language except English. Gjue (talk) 04:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Nicob1984 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   Monolingual. Nico (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Trongphu (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   1 language = unacceptable! Trongphu (talk) 04:15, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Man77 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   Fåis's a Programm gem tuad, des wås da de Begrindung üwasetzn kina tuad, kunt i ma nu amåi s'Üwaleng ãnfãnga. → «« Man77 »» [de]·[bar] 10:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Wholle (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Wholle (talk) 03:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. riffic (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates to protest open balloting. riffic (talk) 08:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Samir (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Only concern is that he is monolingual. Would have been a very good choice otherwise. Samir 02:54, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Sven Manguard (Eligible, checked by Ankit Maity)2012   Concerned with him running for this and en.wikipedia AUSC at the same time Sven Manguard (talk) 04:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Andrea.gf (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   doesn't speak any foreign language. Andrea.gf (talk) 17:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Ooswesthoesbes (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   hardly any editing outside of his own domains OosWesThoesBes (talk) 11:14, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. AleXXw (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Just english is not enough for me... AleXXw (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Night of the Big Wind (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   language problem Night of the Big Wind (talk) 02:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Epbr123 (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   Epbr123 (talk) 10:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   Can't support this, sorry. Too little xwiki experience. Ajraddatz (Talk) 23:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Orsb (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Orsb (talk) 08:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Saibo (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012   Saibo (Δ) 16:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

[edit]
  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012   not as convinced as Ajraddatz, so I'm voting neutral here. MF-W 00:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jeffwang (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012   Even though you only know English, you have clearly proven yourself. But, I voted neutral because I have some deep thoughts. Jeffwang 01:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Przemub (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   as Jeffwang. Przemub 08:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Per MF-Warburg. Trijnstel 12:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. VIGNERON (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   Per VonTasha : not really X-wiki and en only. VIGNERON * discut. 23:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. T137 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   T137 02:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Micki (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012   mickit 12:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Kiran Gopi (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012   Kiran Gopi 13:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Anne-theater (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Anne-theater 00:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. WizardOfOz (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   En only. WizardOfOz talk 20:05, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Hazard-SJ (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   I'm sorry, but in addition to the "minor" language problem I currently have, I am not pleased with the number of cross-wiki contributions made. Otherwise, the user is in good standing as a candidate.  Hazard-SJ  ±  03:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mercy (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Active and experienced, but lacks language skills. Mercy 11:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. O.tacke (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   O.tacke 13:38, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ngagnebin (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012   Ngagnebin 15:21, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Anacleto 00 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012   Anacleto 00 16:04, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Duffyduck97 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012   Duffyduck97 21:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. GatoSelvadego (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012   GatoSelvadego 14:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Aytrus (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Aytrus 01:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Tgeairn (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012   Per Mercy above. Tgeairn (talk) 23:49, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   I can't decide. While his preparation and answers seem mostly (very) good, even if I studied them thouroughly they wouldn't be enough to judge; being English-only with a lot of involvement (including flags) on other projects and not very active on Meta add to doubts. Nemo 19:26, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Reade (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012   Reade (talk) 00:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Sail over (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012   only English? Sail over (talk) 11:00, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Beria (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012   Béria Lima msg 18:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. SeoMac (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012   He'll be good. Tech-savvy. I don't see a cross-culture/language sensitivity. SeoMac (talk) 02:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]