Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2015/Votes/Avjoska

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: et-N, en-3, fiu-vro-2, ru-2, de-1, fi-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    • a link to my user account on Meta, and a link to a second active account that meets the prerequisites.
    • a list of languages I can read and write: et-N, en-3, fiu-vro-2, ru-2, de-1, fi-1
    • a short summary of my participation in the Wikimedia Foundation: admin on etwiki since April 2007.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2015/Questions#Avjoska
  • The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

    Yes

    [edit]
    1. Sabbathbloodness (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Sabbathbloodness (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    2. StarDeg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   StarDeg (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    3. Nickispeaki (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Nickispeaki (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    4. Hardenacke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Hardenacke (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    5. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Mazuritz (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    6. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Kolega2357 (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    7. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Anatoliy (talk) 22:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    8. Visem (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Visem (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    9. Daemon2010 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Daemon2010 (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    10. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    11. Maerzaries1985 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Maerzaries1985 (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    12. PointsofNoReturn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   PointsofNoReturn (talk) 01:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    13. 장영재탐험단 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Jangyeongjae Tamheomdan (張榮在探險團) (talk/profile) 02:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    14. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Jusjih (talk) 03:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    15. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   ChristophThomas (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    16. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    17. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    18. Ardiedan1995 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Ardiedan1995 (talk) 08:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    19. A1 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   A1 (talk) 10:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    20. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Kggucwa (talk) 11:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    21. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Rberchie (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Gotty14 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   Gotty14 (talk) 12:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    22. Fil211 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Fil211 (talk) 16:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    23. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Miniapolis (talk) 18:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    24. Nezdek (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Nezdek (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    25. Ray Van De Walker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Ray Van De Walker (talk) 20:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    26. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Zeljko (talk) 20:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    27. Серега Спартак (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Серега Спартак (talk) 23:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    28. Hint000 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Hint000 (talk) 06:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    29. Bookvaedina (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Bookvaedina (talk) 09:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    30. Coldcakes22 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Coldcakes22 (talk) 10:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    31. Orienomesh-w (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Orienomesh-w (talk) 11:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    32. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   — Green Zero обг 12:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    33. א.פ עריכות (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   this seens like the Rational Option א.פ עריכות (talk) 12:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    34. IJA (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   IJA (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Jacky50412 (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Jacky50412 (talk) 03:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Maestroso simplo (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Maestroso simplo (talk) 08:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    35. Velirand (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Velirand (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    36. Talmid3 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Talmid3 (talk) 12:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    37. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   She seems to be ok. Abaddon1337 (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    38. Kuuskinen (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Kuuskinen (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         WordSeventeen (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   WordSeventeen (talk) 22:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    39. The Winter's Tale (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   The Winter's Tale (talk) 01:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    40. 符环宇 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   符环宇 (talk) 06:30, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    41. Bybbisch94 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    42. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   MohandesWiki Talk 15:07, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    43. Biel1000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Biel1000 (talk) 23:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Ochilov (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   Ochilov (talk) 07:44, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Reneman (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf)   Reneman (talk) 13:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    44. Exx8 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Exx8 (talk) 01:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    45. Bulldoc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Bulldoc (talk) 01:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    46. Royalmate1 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Royalmate1 (talk) 00:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    47. WikiOriginal-9 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    48. Nrgullapalli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Looks committed Nrgullapalli (talk) 07:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    49. Flixtey (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   I think the candidate possesses an experience which may compliment the role he or she is standing for Flixtey (talk) 10:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Mjesfahani (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Mjesfahani (talk) 14:56, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    50. Seven twentynine (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Seven twentynine (talk) 00:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    51. Mehdi ghaed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Mehdi ghaed (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Jaredzimmerman (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67)   Jaredzimmerman (talk) 05:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    52. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   స్వరలాసిక (talk) 06:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    53. Dthomsen8 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Dthomsen8 (talk) 17:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    54. Torin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Torin (talk) 20:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    55. Robert the Devil (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Robert the Devil (talk) 00:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    56. Hamedvahid (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Hamedvahid (talk) 04:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    57. Obaid Raza (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Obaid Raza (talk) 04:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    58. Jaceksoci68 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   Jaceksoci68 (talk) 10:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Caro L (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Caro L (talk) 18:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    59. Cesaro2012 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Cesaro2012 (talk) 23:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    60. Openskye (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Openskye (talk) 03:53, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    61. K.A.Gesell (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   K.A.Gesell (talk) 17:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    62. Boboseiptu (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Boboseiptu (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    63. StudiesWorld (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   StudiesWorld (talk) 00:27, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    64. Lisek94 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Lisek94 (talk) 12:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    65. Benoitlegrand (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Benoitlegrand (talk) 23:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    66. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015   Brateevsky (talk) 08:16, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    67. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015   HalanTul (talk) 09:51, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    68. Pittsburgh Poet (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Pittsburgh Poet (talk) 17:56, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    69. Dfrr (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015   I just want to vote. Dfrr (talk) 08:52, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    70. Archolman (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Dick (talk) 11:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    71. Kubura (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Kubura (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    72. Maleiva (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Maleiva (talk) 05:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    73. 1AnuraagPandey (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Anuraag Pandey (Leave a message) 05:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Hoccachhoc (Not eligible, checked by Alan)   good Hoccachhoc (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Claudre (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne)   Claudre (talk) 20:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Rmb009 (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Rmb009 (talk) 14:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    74. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   TeriEmbrey (talk) 21:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    75. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   DrTrumpet (talk) 22:37, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    76. Dinosaurioamarillo (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Dinosaurioamarillo (talk) 02:43, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply

    No

    [edit]
    1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   No serious effort made to convince the voters why they should get our support. Rschen7754 18:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    2. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Nomination statement and lack of answers to questions do not inspire much confidence in ability to be a good steward. Furthermore, your cross-wiki experience is very limited. Érico Wouters (msg) 18:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    3. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Vogone (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    4. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015  , If I don't apply AGF I would think this is a joke nomination.--AldNonBicara? 18:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    5. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Based of of the questions page, this user has no desire to become a steward. Eurodyne (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    6. Alan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Alan (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    7. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Mh7kJ (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    8. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Steinsplitter (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    9. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   To write what you can not show how much you care this job. --Uğurkenttalk 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    10. Freshman404 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Freshman404 (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    11. Lixxx235 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   --L235 (talk) enwiki 18:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    12. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Has not been active on Meta since posting the candidature; did not answer the questions (also not after being informed of them on her home wiki). MF-W 18:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    13. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   There's no statement nor has this editor bothered to answer any questions at all, Quite frankly it's a joke. –Davey2010Talk 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    14. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   No serious/convincing statement. ~ Nahid Talk 18:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    15. Green Giant (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Long delay in answering questions. Stewards are human but a fairly quick response time is expected. Green Giant (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    16. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   If you're not answering questions, then you don't seem to take this election serious Mbch331 (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    17. Asav (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   As of above statements. Asav (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    18. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Ejensyd (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    19. Iooryz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   as above Iooryz (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Fenikals (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Fenikals (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    20. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Legoktm (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Fork me (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Fork me (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    21. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    22. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Obelix (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    23. Emptywords (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Emptywords (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    24. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Mirer (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    25. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Too little contribution to any Wikiversity. --Marshallsumter (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    26. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Armbrust (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    27. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   You're not taking this election seriously. --Atcovi (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    28. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   SPQRobin (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    29. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   The lack of a more in-depth nomination statement as well as the unresponsiveness to questions lead me to oppose this candidate, especially as the user has been active on their homeproject in the meantime :( Snowolf How can I help? 22:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    30. stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   As others have mentioned above, the lack of a statement by Avjoska (who contends she can speak English well) seems to imply by her silence that either she does not care about the election, or cannot, in fact, speak English very well. From this I also am lead to believe that she has no opinion on why she should be selected or what she can contribute to the forum, and if that is the case, that she has no opinion, then she does not belong here. Stevenmitchell (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    31. Barras (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   While I clearly like short statements, it should at least give a basic idea of the candidate. -Barras talk 22:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    32. Moony22 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Doesn't seem to be taking this seriously. Moony22 (talk) 22:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    33. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   DangSunM (talk) 22:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    34. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Courcelles 23:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Laberinto16 (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Laberinto16 (talk) 23:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    35. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   I see no attempt to provide an election statement or answer questions. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    36. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   - tucoxn\talk 00:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    37. Woodshed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Woodshed (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    38. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Albertus Aditya (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    39. Inks.LWC (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Inks.LWC (talk) 05:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    40. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Limited cross-wiki involvement and experience. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    41. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   No convincing statement Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    42. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   No crosswiki experience.[1] Nemo 08:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    43. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Herby talk thyme 09:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    44. Nastoshka (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   I'm sorry but I see you've not answered to questions about your candidacy. Furthermore your statement is too short to convince me voting for you. Nastoshka (talk) 12:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    45. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   No answers to the questions and imo this user doesn't have enough experience either. Trijnsteltalk 12:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Tombo208 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   Tombo208 (talk) 13:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    46. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   NaBUru38 (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    47. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   No nom statement, didn't answer questions AmaryllisGardener talk 14:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    48. Dweller (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Lack of effort to make a proper statement is a bad augury. Dweller (talk) 14:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    49. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   —DerHexer (Talk) 15:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    50. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   JurgenNL (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    51. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    52. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   --Kusurija (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    53. Hannes_24 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC) no time for a statement?? no vote from me!reply
    54. Kroji (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Kroji (talk) 21:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    55. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   The candidate has not shown commitment not to answer the questions so far he made, nor clarifies its purpose in becoming steward, which in my opinion shows that he would have difficulty in performing the functions that he would be assigned, if elected Leon saudanha (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    56. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   -- Litlok (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    57. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Might be convinced to change my vote if the user answers the questions, but the delay is a bad sign. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 22:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    58. Hinnerk11 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   --Hinnerk11 (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    59. Gilc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Gilc (talk) 02:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    60. Be..anyone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   –Be..anyone (talk) 02:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    61. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   FASTILY 05:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    62. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   ● Mehran Debate 06:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Kevin12xd (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Kevin12xd (talk) 08:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    63. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Wpollard (talk) 08:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    64. Visdaviva (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   If you are not responsive during your own election, then you are either seriously caught up IRL or too lazy for the job. Visdaviva (talk) 10:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    65. Tom Morris (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   No nomination statement. Stewards are given a significant amount of power across all the Wikimedia projects. The least the community can expect in granting such a right is a statement from the candidate. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    66. Holder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Holder (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    67. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   CT Cooper · talk 14:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    68. Hirolovesswords (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    69. Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 20:31, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    70. Congolandia.g (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Congolandia.g (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Atcan (Not eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)   Atcan (talk) 21:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    71. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   No attempt at even answering the questions. Cross-wiki activity better than average but not impressive either. Jasper Deng (talk) 21:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    72. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   KTo288 (talk) 22:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    73. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Hat mich in ihrer Stellungnahme nicht überzeugt. ST 22:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    74. Elcobbola (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Эlcobbola talk 00:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    75. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Tiptoety talk 00:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    76. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    77. Bzweebl (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 04:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    78. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Az1568 (talk) 05:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    79. Widr (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Per other comments. Widr (talk) 07:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    80. Pavan santhosh.s (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   candidate has not shown any interest to attempt questions till now and seems to be not so concerned over the elections and candidature too. --Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 07:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    81. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Matanya (talk) 07:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    82. Torne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Not even answering questions. Torne (talk) 10:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    83. Gorpik (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Does not provide much info and does not even answer questions. Gorpik (talk) 11:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    84. Gonzolito (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Not very convincing nor talkative. Gonzolito (talk) 12:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    85. A wild Rattata (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   A wild Rattata (talk) 05:55, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    86. Kaganer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   No answers to questions :( Kaganer (talk) 17:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    87. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Niesy74 (talk) 05:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Uchup19 (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   more experience is needed. Uchup19 (talk) 09:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    88. محمد عصام (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   محمد عصام (talk) 09:58, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    89. Grest2000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Grest2000 (talk) 14:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Eric schreiner (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Eric schreiner (talk) 15:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Kehpp (Not eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)   Kehpp (talk) 11:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    90. JoshuaKGarner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   JoshuaKGarner (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    91. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   The edits on estonian Wikipedia are not very convincing. The candidate created many redirects to pages which were created by IPs or 'one-article users', i. e. users whose only edit was to create one article. All the articles I checked were celebrity stubs or articles depicting a particular organisation. Mathmensch (talk) 18:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    92. Matiia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Matiia (talk) 19:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    93. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   --Berlin-George (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    94. Artregor (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Artregor (talk) 23:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    95. Luizpuodzius (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Dr. LooLets talk about it 23:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    96. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2015   EKMK (talk) 11:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    97. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015   MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    98. Heyrubengarcia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Heyrubengarcia (talk) 01:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    99. Pablo000 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   No answers to the questions is disqualifying. Pablo000 (talk) 06:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    100. Macdonald-ross (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Out of the question because replies to questions were lacking or inadequate. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    101. Don-kun (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Don-kun (talk) 11:27, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    102. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   თოგო (D) 14:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    103. FDMS4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Statement, questions, crosswiki experience.    FDMS  4    15:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    104. Sturmjäger (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Sturmjäger (talk) 19:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC) see Érico Júnior Wouters' votereply
    105. Rabbabodrool (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Rabbabodrool (talk) 20:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    106. Wnme (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   --Wnme 20:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    107. QueenCake (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Being inactive in the election stage does not bode well for the future. QueenCake (talk) 20:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    108. Yopie (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Yopie (talk) 00:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    109. MusikAnimal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   Unresponsive. I'd consider that a must for stewardship. They appear to be active on etwiki, where another user attempted to make them aware of the question brought up here yet no effort has been made to respond to them. — MusikAnimal talk 01:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    110. The powder toy (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   不重视。 The powder toy (talk) 06:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    111. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015   This user did not even respond to the questions raised. Good afternoon (talk) 10:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    112. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Vachovec1 (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    113. Vik-Thor (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015  lack of response--Vik-Thor (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    114. TCN7JM (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   The candidate isn't really giving me any good reasons why I should vote yes. TCN7JM 23:36, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    115. Base (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Not answering questions is not a good start. Base (talk) 23:36, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    116. Kurykh (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Kurykh 01:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    117. Challenger l (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Linguistically skilled, but leaves absolutely no impression whatsoever. Challenger l (talk) 06:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    118. Hmich176 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   Hmich176 (talk) 09:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    119. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Param Mudgal (talk) 11:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    120. Jamesmcmahon0 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Lack of engagement with some questions doesn't bode well Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 15:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    121. IPadPerson (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   You have a lack of time being active and you did not bother to answer a thing. IPadPerson (talk) 17:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    122. Steel1943 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   The candidate's lack of answering the questions, although having over a month to do so, is troubling to me. Steel1943 (talk) 19:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    123. Coekon (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   answers are not completed Coekon (talk) 22:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    124. విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (talk) 11:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    125. Gregor Kneussel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Gregor Kneussel (talk) 12:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    126. Zhaofeng Li (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Lack of engagement Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 12:49, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    127. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Failure to answer questions Chris Troutman (talk) 20:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    128. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Timk70 question? 23:31, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    129. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   The Banner (talk) 00:45, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    130. Kemuer (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2015   Kemuer (talk) 02:46, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    131. Hasteur (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Ditto to lack of response to questions.Hasteur (talk) 14:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    132. Tomitomtom62 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Tomitomtom62 (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    133. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Harlock81 (talk) 18:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    134. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Ronhjones (talk) 21:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    135. Alarob (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Alarob (talk) 21:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    136. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         SEWilco (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf)   SEWilco (talk) 00:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Glewe (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn)   Glewe (talk) 11:30, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    137. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   No credible answers to the questions asked Bk1 168 (talk) 13:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    138. Miniwark (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   No reply to questions Miniwark (talk) 18:17, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    139. EuroCarGT (Eligible, checked by Vik-Thor)2015   ///EuroCarGT 02:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    140. Iich1960 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Iich1960 (talk) 11:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    141. FocalPoint (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   --FocalPoint (talk) 11:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    142. Liz (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015  No statement and didn't response to questions Liz (talk) 19:52, 23 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    143. KuboF (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015  eo: La petanto faris nur minimuman klopodon klarigi kial li volas esti stivardo kaj eĉ ne respondis mesaĝojn dum longa tempo. --KuboF (talk) 20:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    144. Avraham (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   I understand that answering the questions is voluntary, but not answering a single one indicates that Avjoska may not be willing to engage in the internal steward discussions necessary to determine consensus and apply policy and guideline properly. Avi (talk) 23:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    145. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   No. I don't understand their reasoning to put their candidacy forward.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    146. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Mailer Diablo (talk) 17:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    147. Conlinp (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Conlinp (talk) 03:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    148. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Shanmugamp7 (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    149. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015   FeralOink (talk) 07:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    150. Touzrimounir (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Touzrimounir (talk) 19:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    151. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   FiliP ██ 00:07, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Adirlanz (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne)   Adirlanz (talk) 03:21, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    152. Helvetius (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Helvetius (talk) 15:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    153. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Puffin (talk) 22:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    154. Bistropha (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Bistropha (talk) 08:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Cpl Syx (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn)   User is non-responsive on questions page; does not appear to be overly interested in the election process. Cpl Syx (talk) 14:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    155. Icarus of old (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   Icarus of old (talk) 17:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    156. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Zyephyrus (talk) 21:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    157. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   No statement and no answered questions places doubt as to why this candidate should be promoted. GyaroMaguus 02:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    158. Tiller54 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Tiller54 (talk) 11:25, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    159. MAyo (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   inactiv MAyo (talk) 13:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    160. Kikuyu3 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Not involved ? --Kikuyu3 (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply

    Neutral

    [edit]
    1. George.Edward.C (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Pending response to questions on talk page, despite the fact the candidate has had quite a while to answer them, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt :) George.Edward.C (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    2. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Mö1997 (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    3. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Emin message 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    4. Jeremy77186 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Jeremy77186 (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    5. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Rich Farmbrough 18:53 8 February 2015 (GMT). 18:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    6. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Rome2 (talk) 20:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    7. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   I'm not know this user(s). Poti Berik (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    8. NickK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   I would be glad to see a new female steward, but do not see any serious effort from the candidate — NickK (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    9. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Per George.Edward.C and NickK. PiRSquared17 (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    10. Xania (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   The answering to questions thing. Xania (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    11. !dea4u (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   !dea4u  05:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    12. QEDK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   QEDK (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    13. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Ysjbserver (talk) 05:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    14. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Żyrafał (talk) 11:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    15. Kyat02 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Kyat02 (talk) 12:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    16. Suriyaa Kudo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Suriyaa Kudo (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    17. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Per PiRSquared17. Southparkfan 18:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    18. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   The Theosophist (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    19. Andre S. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Andre S. (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    20. Doctree (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Doctree (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    21. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Shizhao (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    22. Kantatiskiwa (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Kantatiskiwa (talk) 15:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    23. Yogesh Khandke (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Yogesh Khandke (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    24. Y 6 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Y 6 (talk) 10:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    25. Adriano Morelli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Never seen outside of user's home wiki. Adriano Morelli (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    26. 23artashes (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   23artashes (talk) 21:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    27. Bjoertvedt (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Bjoertvedt (talk) 22:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    28. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015   Sebleouf (talk) 12:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    29. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 00:25, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    30. Jcl6543 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Jcl6543 (talk) 23:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    31. Hngt1996 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Hngt1996 (talk) 06:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    32. Bobherry (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Bobherry (talk) 02:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    33. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Wikit 19:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    34. RonnieV (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Though I'd like a big diversity of languages among our Stewards, your lack of interest in your own selection doesn't give much confidence. RonnieV (talk) 23:10, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    35. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Waiting on answers to questions. John Vandenberg (talk) 10:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    36. Tremonist (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Tremonist (talk) 14:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    37. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 17:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    38. Trassiorf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Trassiorf (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
         Arshi1234 (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Arshi1234 (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    39. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   GZWDer (talk) 09:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply