Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2015/Votes/Jusjih

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
  • Languages: zh, en-3, fr-1, ko-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello. I was a steward from 2007 to 2014. I am an administrator on many wikis, namely Meta, Wikimedia Commons, Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikiquote, Wikisource, and Chinese Wikibooks. I speak Mandarin Chinese (native in traditional Chinese, also reading simplified), followed by English (advanced), then French (between basic and intermediate), and Korean (basic) as my fourth language, thanks to Wikibooks about Korean. Surprisingly, I see no Korean-speaking steward, not even user ko-1. Hopefully my return will encourage even more skilled and language-inclusive participation here. The fastest way to contact me is by email. Thanks so much.--Jusjih (talk) 03:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC)reply
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2015/Questions#Jusjih
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

⧼mwe-upwiz-dialog-yes⧽

[edit]
  1. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Did pretty well as a steward, and those language skills are a huge plus. Jasper Deng (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Welcome back. Also, Asian stewards are rare. Vogone (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  3. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Érico Wouters (msg) 18:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  4. George.Edward.C (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Sysop on many wiki, a great user with a lot of experience. I see no reason to oppose :) George.Edward.C (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  5. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Formerly inhabited experience is a guarantee that they will do it. --Uğurkenttalk 18:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  6. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Żyrafał (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  7. Yann (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Yann (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  8. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Eurodyne (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  9. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Emin • message 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  10. Green Giant (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Jasper Deng. Green Giant (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  11. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Jasper Deng –Davey2010Talk 18:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  12. BRUTE (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Very experienced. –BruTe talk 18:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  13. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rich Farmbrough 18:53 8 February 2015 (GMT). 18:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  14. Jeremy77186 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jeremy77186 (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  15. Mcoffsky (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Mcoffsky (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  16. Asav (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Has announced that s/he will cut back on some other activities. Also, having a zh steward is important. Asav (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  17. Herostratus (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Herostratus (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  18. Semso98 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Semso98 (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Fenikals (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fenikals (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  19. Emw (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Emw (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Fork me (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fork me (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  20. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  en:Chinese language says: ”Nearly 1.2 billion people (around 16% of the world's population) speak some form of Chinese as their first language.” According to the page Stewards/Confirm/2015 only current stewards who represent these people (Bencmq and Shizhao) are not going to continue as stewards. In my humble opinion, we need someone who is native-born Chinese speaker as a steward, and Jusjih is trustworthy and experienced enough for that role. –Ejs-80 19:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  21. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  22. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rzuwig► 20:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  23. Widr (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per Ejs-80. Widr (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  24. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rome2 (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  25. Jaumellecha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jaumellecha (talk) 20:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  26. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  PiRSquared17 (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  27. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  --Atcovi (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  28. -jkb- (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  -jkb- 21:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC) surereply
  29. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Armbrust (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  30. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Contributions to more than one Wikiversity are appreciated. --Marshallsumter (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  31. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Experienced former steward; and per Ejs-80 we must have at least one native Chinese speaker as steward. SPQRobin (talk) 22:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  32. NickK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I agree that it would be great to have a steward speaking East Asian languages, and Jusjih has necessary skills — NickK (talk) 22:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  33. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  34. Rax (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Rax (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Nannadeem (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Being the experienced person and rep of no 1 populous country of the world with his contributions for more than one wiki, Native chine’s speaking is most appropriate. Nannadeem (talk) 22:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  35. -revi (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  — Revi 22:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  36. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  DangSunM (talk) 22:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  37. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Courcelles 23:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  38. stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Based on the discussions, I think Jusjih will make a positive contribution to the role of steward. Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  39. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Anatoliy (talk) 23:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  40. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  But I think you can also CU some small wikis like cdowiki, cebwiki, etc. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  41. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  This person seems to like to be an admin. I am happy enough with their cross-wiki experience. I like that they give short answers. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  42. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  - tucoxn\talk 00:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  43. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  GZWDer (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  44. Woodshed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Woodshed (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  45. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Albertus Aditya (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  46. Inks.LWC (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Inks.LWC (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  47. QEDK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  QEDK (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  48. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Experienced and did good work in the past. Please be more active should you resume this role. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  49. JTdale (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  JTdale (talk) 05:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  50. Fenerli1978 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Fenerli1978 (talk) 07:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  51. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Ricknator (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Ricknator (talk) 07:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  52. Soul Train (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Soul Train (talk) 07:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  53. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Laurent Jerry (talk) 08:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  54. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  55. E8xE8 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  E8xE8 (talk) 09:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  56. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kggucwa (talk) 11:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  57. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  58. Alexey88 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Alexey88 (talk) 12:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  59. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Experienced user/former steward and being Asian is a plus for me. Trijnsteltalk 12:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  60. Maestro Ivanković (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Maestro Ivanković (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  61. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  62. Nastoshka (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Nastoshka (talk) 13:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  63. SzMithrandir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  -- SzMithrandir (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  64. Kroji (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kroji (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  65. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Glad to have you back hopefully! —DerHexer (Talk) 15:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  66. Otto ter Haar (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Otto ter Haar (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  67. Inkowik (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  IW 15:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  68. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  JurgenNL (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  69. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  ~ Nahid Talk 18:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  70. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Miniapolis (talk) 18:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  71. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Southparkfan 18:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  72. Hannes_24 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  73. Nezdek (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nezdek (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  74. Xania (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  A much need linguistic background and prior experience with the tools. Xania (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  75. Ray Van De Walker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Ray Van De Walker (talk) 20:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  76. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Has plenty of experience, being sysop on multiple wikis. I don't see thick gravy goodness in his candidacy. Good luck! Leon saudanha (talk) 22:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  77. Серега Спартак (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Серега Спартак (talk) 23:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  78. Bastique (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Good guy. Bastique ☎ call me! 01:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  79. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Shizhao (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  80. 책읽는달팽 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  책읽는달팽 (talk) 02:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  81. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  FASTILY 05:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  82. Peter2006son (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Come to support brother! (-: Peter2006son (talk) 05:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  83. Hint000 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Hint000 (talk) 06:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  84. Byfserag (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Byfserag (talk) 08:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  85. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Looks fine — TBloemink talk 10:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  86. Holder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Holder (talk) 11:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  87. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  CT Cooper · talk 14:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  88. Kantatiskiwa (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  des réponses convaincantes, notamment sur la juste place de la langue anglaise Kantatiskiwa (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  89. IJA (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  IJA (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  90. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 • , Inactivity is not a reason for me to oppose but a reason for me to remove on steward confirmation, hence I give Yes for this election. Just be more active this time.--AldNonymousBicara? 16:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  91. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Hat sich bewährt. ST ○ 22:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  92. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Tiptoety talk 00:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  93. DanielTom (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  DanielTom (talk) 00:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  94. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  95. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Az1568 (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  96. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  geo ») 06:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  97. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  This candidate has been active and answered all questions politely and thoughtfully. Wpollard (talk) 07:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  98. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Matanya (talk) 07:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  99. Torne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Torne (talk) 10:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  100. Y 6 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Y 6 (talk) 11:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  101. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Ghilt (talk) 12:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  102. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Jon Harald Søby (talk) 12:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  103. Adriano Morelli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Bonne chance. Adriano Morelli (talk) 13:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  104. Gonzolito (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Experienced, and language skills are a plus. Gonzolito (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  105. 콩가루 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  He can speak Chinese language. It is important. 콩가루 (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  106. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Abaddon1337 (talk) 16:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  107. 23artashes (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  23artashes (talk) 21:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  108. عثمان خان شاہ (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  UsmanKhann (talk) 22:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  109. Mardetanha (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  WB Mardetanha talk 00:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  110. Bybbisch94 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  111. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Lanwi1(Talk) 11:14, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  112. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Zeljko (talk) 12:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  113. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Ellery (talk) 12:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  114. Falkirks (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Falkirks (talk) 18:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  115. NativeForeigner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  NativeForeigner (talk) 00:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  116. Bxxiaolin (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Expected Bxxiaolin (talk) 05:18, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Reneman (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Reneman (talk) 13:01, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  117. S.Didam (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  S.Didam (talk) 10:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  118. LoupDragon42 (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  LoupDragon42 (talk) 10:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  119. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  Sebleouf (talk) 12:12, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Hazbulator (Not eligible, checked by Southparkfan) •  Hazbulator (talk) 15:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  120. Grind24 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Grind24 (talk) 15:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  121. Gakmo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Gakmo (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  122. Begoon (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Begoon (talk) 17:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  123. Matiia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Matiia (talk) 19:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  124. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Ankry (talk) 19:58, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  125. Artregor (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Artregor (talk) 23:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  126. Royalmate1 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Props to a Korean speaking candidate Royalmate1 (talk) 00:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  127. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2015 •  EKMK (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  128. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:53, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  129. Kathleen.wright5 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Kathleen.wright5 (talk) 13:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  130. LectriceDuSoir (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  LectriceDuSoir (talk) 13:01, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Mjesfahani (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Mjesfahani (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  131. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 15:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  132. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Alexmar983 (talk) 16:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  133. Heyrubengarcia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Heyrubengarcia (talk) 01:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  134. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Lt2818 (talk) 11:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  135. FDMS4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •     FDMS  4    16:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  136. Wnme (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  --Wnme 20:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  137. QueenCake (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  QueenCake (talk) 20:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  138. Johnbod (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Johnbod (talk) 18:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  139. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 18:46, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  140. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Wikit 18:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  141. Kossa b (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Kossa b (talk) 20:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  142. Torin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Torin (talk) 20:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  143. Base (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  I was concerned about low activity as a 'crat in some wikis but the reaction was adequate in my opinion so I'm positive about the candidate. Base (talk) 00:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  144. Kurykh (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kurykh (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  145. Challenger l (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Experienced, succinct. I find myself agreeing on the inclusion of more Korean-speaking stewards. Challenger l (talk) 05:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  146. DerFussi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  DerFussi 14:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  147. Steel1943 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  No concerns, former steward, trying to improve since "last time". My support is present. Steel1943 (talk) 19:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Legofan94 (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne) •  Legofan94 (talk) 03:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  148. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  John Vandenberg (talk) 11:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  149. Gregor Kneussel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Gregor Kneussel (talk) 12:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  150. Petrb (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Petrb (talk) 13:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  151. Conny (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Conny (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  152. Xinstalker (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Xinstalker (talk) 16:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  153. BD2412 (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2015 •  Experienced and trustworthy. BD2412 T 16:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  154. Wuyouyuan (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Wuyouyuan (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  155. Tracouti (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Tracouti (talk) 13:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  156. Andre S. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Andre S. (talk) 14:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  157. Tremonist (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Tremonist (talk) 14:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  158. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  159. Benoitlegrand (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Benoitlegrand (talk) 23:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  160. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 05:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  161. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Brateevsky (talk) 08:21, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Odannur (Not eligible, checked by Vituzzu) •  Odannur (talk) 11:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  162. StudiesWorld (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  StudiesWorld (talk) 13:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  163. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Bk1 168 (talk) 14:08, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  164. EuroCarGT (Eligible, checked by Vik-Thor)2015 •  ///EuroCarGT 02:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  165. Maleiva (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Maleiva (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  166. Altamel (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Altamel (talk) 06:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  167. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  suitably knowledgeable, tried and trusted  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  168. Sj (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Absolutely. –SJ talk  14:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  169. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  I am Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:11, 24 February 2015 (UTC) and I approve this candidate! Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:11, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  170. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 19:11, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  171. Jan Kovář BK (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Jan Kovář BK (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  172. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  MohandesWiki Talk 09:15, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  173. GJo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  GJo (talk) 14:23, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  174. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  FiliP ██ 00:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  175. Dinosaurioamarillo (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Dinosaurioamarillo (talk) 02:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Adirlanz (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne) •  Adirlanz (talk) 04:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  176. The Herald (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  The Herald 08:07, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  177. Avraham (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Avi (talk) 14:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  178. Helvetius (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Helvetius (talk) 15:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  179. Bistropha (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bistropha (talk) 08:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  180. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 11:31, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  181. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  An experienced editor. Good afternoon (talk) 13:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  182. Icarus of old (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Icarus of old (talk) 17:55, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  183. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Seems to have a good plan. —Gyaro–Maguus— 03:06, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  184. Sänger S.G (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  ♫ Sänger - Talk - superputsch must go 13:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  185. Kalki (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  I finally have had time to do some reviewing of the candidates here, and am voting for some whom I am familiar enough with to support. Kalki (talk) 14:17, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  186. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Trustworthy; a zh steward is surely beneficial AFBorchert (talk) 15:09, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  187. Kikuyu3 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Appreciate the presentation and motivation. --Kikuyu3 (talk) 17:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply

⧼mwe-upwiz-dialog-no⧽

[edit]
  1. Savh (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  I find the answers to the questions, and to my question in particular, rather disappointing. Savhñ 18:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I am, like Savh, not convinced by the answers to the questions. Especially I still don't understand the sentence in the statement I asked about. I don't think having e.g. a ko-1 steward can foster "even more skilled" participation (from who?). MF-W 19:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  3. Joachim Mos (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Joachim Mos (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  4. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Obelix (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  5. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Mirer (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  6. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Herby talk thyme 08:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  7. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  per above AmaryllisGardener talk 14:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  8. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Quite disappointed by the answers to the questions. Litlok (talk) 22:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  9. Be..anyone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  –Be..anyone (talk) 00:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  10. Hinnerk11 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Hinnerk11 (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  11. Gilc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  The answers aren't good at all, not enough information and probably too busy for this. Gilc (talk) 04:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  12. Congolandia.g (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Congolandia.g (talk) 21:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  13. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  KTo288 (talk) 22:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  14. Elcobbola (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Эlcobbola talk 00:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  15. Grest2000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Grest2000 (talk) 14:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  16. Bulldoc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  The answers aren't good at all, not enough information and probably too busy for this. Bulldoc (talk) 01:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Kehpp (Not eligible, checked by George.Edward.C) •  Kehpp (talk) 11:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  17. JoshuaKGarner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  JoshuaKGarner (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  18. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  თოგო (D) 14:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  19. Yopie (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Yopie (talk) 00:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  20. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Param Mudgal (talk) 12:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  21. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Ronhjones (talk) 21:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       SEWilco (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  SEWilco (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  22. Lssrn45 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Lssrn45 (talk) 07:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Glewe (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn) •  Glewe (talk) 11:24, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  23. Conlinp (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Conlinp (talk) 03:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  24. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Puffin (talk) 22:27, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  As I went around to other wikis during AAR I noticed that Jusjih was very active in past years. I had hoped that Jusjih got the message from the last confirmation, where he was removed mostly due to low activity levels. However, the answer to Savh's question indicates to me that perhaps he did not get the message, and was fairly disappointing too, which leaves me unable to support. Rschen7754 18:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  2. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mö1997 (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  3. Alan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Alan (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  4. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mazuritz (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  5. Barras (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Surely a good and experienced user, but I honestly think he won't be really active. -Barras talk 22:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  6. !dea4u (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  !dea4u  05:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  7. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  The Theosophist (talk) 18:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  8. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Ysjbserver (talk) 10:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  9. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  — Green Zero обг 12:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  10. Hirolovesswords (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  11. Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  12. Yogesh Khandke (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Yogesh Khandke (talk) 05:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  13. Wong128hk (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  J.Wong 10:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  14. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Niesy74 (talk) 05:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  15. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  --Berlin-George (talk) 21:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  16. Monopoly31121993 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  I'm not sure because I'm definitely in favor of having a Korean language steward but Ko-1 is probably not much help in that area. Also, I can't simply vote yes because Asian editors are rare. I don't want to help establish a situation where Asian editors are held to a different standard simply because we don't have the same quality of Asian candidates. I would like to see more information written by the candidate about what they have done over the past 7 years that they feel should permit them to serve again. Monopoly31121993 (talk) 09:15, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  17. Pavan santhosh.s (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I'm in favor of linguistic and geographical diversity in wikis and wiki organization but answers to the questions are unsatisfactory. So, finally I can't vote either yes or no because of above reasons. That's why I left no choice but being neutral. Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 07:52, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  18. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Poti Berik (talk) 09:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  19. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Much as we need representation in Asian languages, I don't think Jusjih is the right choice. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:52, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  20. Baycrest (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Baycrest (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  21. Alarob (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Alarob (talk) 21:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  22. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 17:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  23. Miniwark (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Past experience as a steward give me a Yes, but reponse to the questions do not confort me on this. Miniwark (talk) 19:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  24. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  I really like to see nice language skills (zh, en and some fr) but answers to questions leave me uncertain. Candidate seems very busy already, so I'm more neutral than yes. FeralOink (talk) 07:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  25. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 • --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  26. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Timk70 question? 11:08, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  27. MAyo (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  MAyo (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply