Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2015/Votes/Vodomar

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: English, Croatian
  • Personal info: (English)
    I hereby nominate myself as a Steward, my main project, focus and involvement has been allocated to the Croatian Wikipedia Project. I have been involved with the Croatian Wikipedia since 6th of May, 2004, and have been an administrator since 2006. As a user, editor and administrator I have made many contributions to the Croatian Wikipedia project, contributing a lot in writing articles, adding other digital content such as graphics, diagrams, photographs and the like. My approach is one of collaboration, respect and consensus which can be vouched by many editors and users of the Croatian Wikipedia and wider. Vodomar (talk) 22:07, 18 January 2015 (UTC)reply
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2015/Questions#Vodomar
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Yes

[edit]
  1. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Ejensyd (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Saileshpat (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Saileshpat (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  2. Birczanin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   --Birczanin (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  3. Chicbyaccident (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  4. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Mazuritz (talk) 22:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  5. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Kolega2357 (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  6. AnToni (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   --AnToni(Talk) 23:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  7. Daemon2010 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Daemon2010 (talk) 23:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  8. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   mnn Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  9. Woodshed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Woodshed (talk) 01:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  10. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Jusjih (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  11. stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Vodomar seems diplomatic enough to serve as a steward, in contrast to many of the admins (some of whom are voting on here) who have demonstrably less diplomatic skillsets. I think being able to navigate diplomatically is a key criteria for being qualified for some form of Wikipedia supervision. And by that, I don't mean being politically correct, but having a genuine sense of judiciousness. The candidate seems at least to want to possess that characteristic, so I vote yes.Stevenmitchell (talk) 04:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  12. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  13. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Kggucwa (talk) 10:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  14. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   I think the applicant is fully qualified Rberchie (talk) 11:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  15. DariaPolonia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   DariaPolonia (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  16. Austral blizzard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Austral blizzard (talk) 14:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  17. Maestro Ivanković (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   I respect and support his willingness to contribute globally to the Wikimedia projects. Maestro Ivanković (talk) 15:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  18. Nezdek (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Nezdek (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  19. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Zeljko (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  20. Ray Van De Walker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Ray Van De Walker (talk) 20:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  21. Серега Спартак (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Серега Спартак (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  22. Hint000 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Hint000 (talk) 06:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  23. IJA (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   IJA (talk) 15:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Elektracentrum (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   O.K. Elektracentrum (talk) 18:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  24. VS6507 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   VS6507 (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Jacky50412 (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Jacky50412 (talk) 03:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  25. Torne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Torne (talk) 10:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  26. Y 6 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Y 6 (talk) 11:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  27. Bybbisch94 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  28. Rovoobo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015  Rovoobo Talk 10:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  29. Leyth (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Leyth (talk) 11:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  30. Scalhotrod (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Scalhotrod (talk) 17:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  31. Endo999 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   Endo999 (talk) 04:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  32. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   --Berlin-George (talk) 20:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  33. Royalmate1 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   -- It's a weak support from me, solely because Croatian expertise is needed in the mainspace - Royalmate1 (talk) 01:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  34. Bff (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Bff (talk) 10:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  35. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Bpierreb (talk) 12:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  36. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Chris Troutman (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  37. Rhatsa26X (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Rhatsa26X (talk) 23:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  38. Benoitlegrand (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Benoitlegrand (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  39. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015   Brateevsky (talk) 08:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  40. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Bk1 168 (talk) 14:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  41. Kubura (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Excellent and profound in the mediating and with the resolving of issues. Kubura (talk) 15:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  42. Maleiva (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Maleiva (talk) 05:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  43. 1AnuraagPandey (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Anuraag Pandey (Leave a message) 05:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  44. Ammartivari (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Ammar Tivari Talk! 16:16, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  45. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015   With cross wiki experience, would be a strong yes, as Vodomar seems to have a temperate attitude, patience and decent much-needed language skills. FeralOink (talk) 06:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  46. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   MohandesWiki Talk 09:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  47. Dinosaurioamarillo (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Dinosaurioamarillo (talk) 02:58, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  48. Washuotaku (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Washuotaku (talk) 15:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply

No

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Even if his role in the systemic issues on the Croatian Wikipedia is minor (and this is not some sort of a judgment on that) it would be better for Wikimedia that he tried to fix the problems on his own wiki before trying to fix those on others. Rschen7754 18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
    Also, comments like [1][2] make me very uncomfortable. --Rschen7754 04:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  2. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Crosswiki experience is required. Érico Wouters (msg) 18:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Steinsplitter (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  4. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Vogone (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  5. Alan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Alan (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  6. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Per Rschen. Eurodyne (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  7. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   There must be more active in cross-wiki. Per Rschen. --Uğurkenttalk 18:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  8. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   No crosswiki activity MF-W 18:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  9. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   No crosswiki experience. –Davey2010Talk 18:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  10. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Mh7kJ (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  11. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   I'd like to see some activities on xwikis ~ Nahid Talk 19:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Fenikals (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Fenikals (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  12. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Legoktm (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Fork me (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Fork me (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  13. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Don't know you. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  14. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Obelix (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  15. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Rzuwig 20:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  16. C3r4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   --C3r4 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  17. Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Per Rschen7754. Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Dlambe3 (Not eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)   Dlambe3 (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  18. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   No contributions to any Wikiversity. --Marshallsumter (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  19. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Armbrust (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  20. Igorwindsor (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Per Rschen7754. Igor Windsor (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  21. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Per others, more crosswiki experience is needed. SPQRobin (talk) 22:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  22. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Courcelles 22:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  23. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   lack of experience DangSunM (talk) 22:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  24. NickK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   No crosswiki experience and sole local experience is in a project facing some problems — NickK (talk) 23:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  25. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   I would really like someone from Croatian Wikipedia here and better connected to the international community but I expect to see a little more interest in any other Wikimedia project where there is more interaction with any other language. Global Contributions outside of Croatian only are low. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  26. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   - tucoxn\talk 01:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  27. Inks.LWC (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Inks.LWC (talk) 05:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  28. Soul Train (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Soul Train (talk) 08:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  29. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  30. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Too early Laurent Jerry (talk) 08:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  31. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   No crosswiki experience.[3] Nemo 08:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  32. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Herby talk thyme 09:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  33. Ethically Yours (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Ethically Yours (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  34. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   NaBUru38 (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  35. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Not enough experience. AmaryllisGardener talk 14:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  36. Dweller (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Focus currently too narrow. Sorry. Dweller (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  37. Dean72 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   I am a contributor to Croatian Wikipedia and my experience tells me that despite his accommodating tones Vodomar always bows decisions of the most problematic admins on CW. In praxis, he has not shown himself as an impartial user. Dean72 (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  38. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   —DerHexer (Talk) 15:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  39. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  40. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   The Theosophist (talk) 18:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  41. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Southparkfan 19:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  42. Xania (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Not satisfied by experience, candidate statement (that's one of the most important things, like the advertisement to sell yourself, yet many candidates seem not to have bothered) and some responses. Just the two languages? What about Serbian? Bosnian? Given the more-or-less mutual intelligibility within these South Slavic languages why weren't they included in your list of language skills? (removed following comments by candidate on my talk page which make sense. I still stand by my comments about candidate statement though) ( Xania (talk) 20:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  43. Kroji (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Kroji (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  44. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Litlok (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  45. Be..anyone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   –Be..anyone (talk) 02:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  46. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   From a war torn Wikipedia, a good steward candidate are local Administrator who able to lead their communities on their own home wiki into a good communities.--AldNonBicara? 18:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC). (Changed to NO from Neutral) I just found out your theil index is 0.86 and only edit on 13 wikis See here truly embarrassing for a steward candidate.--AldNonymousBicara? 04:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  47. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   FASTILY 05:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  48. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   JurgenNL (talk) 09:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  49. Holder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Holder (talk) 11:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  50. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   — Green Zero обг 13:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  51. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Ruthven (talk) 14:08, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  52. Hirolovesswords (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  53. Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 20:31, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  54. Congolandia.g (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Congolandia.g (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  55. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   ST 23:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  56. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Low cross wiki experience. I'm another who'd like to see an attempt at fixing the problems at hr first. KTo288 (talk) 23:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  57. Elcobbola (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Эlcobbola talk 23:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  58. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Tiptoety talk 00:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  59. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  60. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Az1568 (talk) 06:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  61. Widr (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Widr (talk) 06:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  62. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Matanya (talk) 08:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  63. 23artashes (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   23artashes (talk) 21:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  64. Mardetanha (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   maybe next year Mardetanha talk 00:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  65. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Sorry, but I do not see a real reason for his application for Steward, since you have little or no activity on other wikis than your wiki source. In addition, the Croatian Wikpedia, where you are administrator, has serious problems of conflicts between publishers, which makes your work there more important than here Leon saudanha (talk) 14:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  66. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Niesy74 (talk) 05:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  67. User:Hafspajen (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Crosswiki experience is required Hafspajen (talk) 06:36, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  68. GregorB (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Per Rschen7754, with an important correction: not being able to fix problems of CW is fine (that would be a tall order by any standard), but not being able to recognize them at all is not. GregorB (talk) 09:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Uchup19 (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Uchup19 (talk) 09:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  69. Grest2000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Grest2000 (talk) 14:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  70. Grind24 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   per above and I don't see any cross-wiki activity . Grind24 (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  71. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015   Sebleouf (talk) 12:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  72. Aspiriniks (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015   Aspiriniks (talk) 14:50, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  73. Matiia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Matiia (talk) 19:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  74. JoshuaKGarner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   JoshuaKGarner (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  75. Gilc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   One of the worst candidates. Gilc (talk) 00:57, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  76. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2015   EKMK (talk) 11:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  77. LectriceDuSoir (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   LectriceDuSoir (talk) 13:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  78. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015   Per Rschen MZaplotnik (contribs) 15:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Mjesfahani (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Mjesfahani (talk) 15:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  79. Heyrubengarcia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Heyrubengarcia (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  80. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   No way! If you can't even keep the Croatian Wikipedia up to the basic principles of WMF projects, how could you ever do that with projects in languages you don't speak? თოგო (D) 15:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  81. FDMS4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Very limited (not only crosswiki) experience.    FDMS  4    16:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  82. Sturmjäger (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Sturmjäger (talk) 19:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  83. Wnme (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   --Wnme 20:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  84. Yopie (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Yopie (talk) 00:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  85. Şeyx Şamil (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Şeyx Şamil (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  86. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   The denial of hr.wiki's problems is even worth losing sysop rights. Vituzzu (talk) 18:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  87. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   lol Wikit 18:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  88. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Vachovec1 (talk) 19:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  89. Torin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Torin (talk) 20:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  90. Vik-Thor (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Vik-Thor (talk) 21:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  91. Kurykh (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Kurykh (talk) 01:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  92. Stolengood (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Stolengood (talk) 07:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  93. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Param Mudgal (talk) 12:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  94. Steel1943 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Get some more cross-wiki experience. Steel1943 (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  95. Base (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Literally zero cross-activity is way too little to become a steward. Base (talk) 00:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  96. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   John Vandenberg (talk) 11:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  97. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   I am not familiar with the "issues" about hr.wiki but I see that your cross-wiki acitvity is quite low. it is true that we don't have a lot of hr-N/hr-3 users with flags on the "meta" level and that is sort of a gap, but I think that more cross-wiki activity should be required. Alexmar983 (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  98. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Timk70 question? 23:31, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  99. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   The Banner (talk) 00:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  100. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Harlock81 (talk) 17:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  101. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Ronhjones (talk) 21:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  102. Vitek (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2015   Vitek (talk) 00:17, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       SEWilco (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf)   SEWilco (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  103. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015   Hkjacksonhk (talk) 05:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  104. Coekon (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Coekon (talk) 02:36, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Glewe (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn)   Glewe (talk) 11:30, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  105. StudiesWorld (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   StudiesWorld (talk) 13:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  106. Miniwark (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Miniwark (talk) 20:39, 22 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  107. EuroCarGT (Eligible, checked by Vik-Thor)2015   ///EuroCarGT 02:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  108. Challenger l (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Challenger l (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  109. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Not certain of motivation for nomination, or what looking to do. Little xwiki experience, no global roles, though does hold CU rights so presumably knows how to use tools, though no participation in such discussions.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  110. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:17, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  111. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 19:18, 24 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  112. Conlinp (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Conlinp (talk) 03:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  113. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   MohandesWiki Talk 09:25, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  114. Conquistador (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   As an administrator at CW where there were (is?) heavy admin misconduct, he should have been able to explain his negative votes at the last two admin elections even more eagerly than the positive ones. Furthermore, to add to GregorB's comment, his view on the whole CW situation is very selective and in some aspects even misleading. His cross-wiki activity is rather poor for a steward candidate, but I do not call for him to fix this. What it needs to be fix is just in front of him, at his home wiki. Conquistador (talk) 18:32, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Adirlanz (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne)   Adirlanz (talk) 05:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  115. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  116. Avraham (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Avi (talk) 14:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  117. Helvetius (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Helvetius (talk) 15:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  118. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Puffin (talk) 22:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  119. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Not now. Low cross-wiki activity/experience, also per Rschen7754 and Conquistador statements. Zerabat (discusión) 00:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  120. Bistropha (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Bistropha (talk) 08:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  121. Wlodzimierz (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   --Wlodzimierz (talk) 10:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  122. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015   Good afternoon (talk) 13:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  123. Icarus of old (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   Icarus of old (talk) 18:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  124. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   The latest edits of this user mainly concern commercial projects or celebrities (he for instance created the article on Wii remote on the croatian Wikipedia). I would like to see a steward who has a background in science and hence is qualified to go for the right decisions. Mathmensch (talk) 22:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  125. Tiller54 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Tiller54 (talk) 11:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  126. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   While this user seems to mean well, I share other's concerns about hrwiki and do not see enough cross-wiki contributions to assuage that worry. Snowolf How can I help? 17:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Mö1997 (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  2. Zivax (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Zivax (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  3. George.Edward.C (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Per Rschen7754's concerns. George.Edward.C (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  4. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Żyrafał (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  5. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Emin message 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  6. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Rich Farmbrough 18:49 8 February 2015 (GMT). 18:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  7. Jeremy77186 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Jeremy77186 (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  8. Green Giant (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Per the answer to Billinghurst's question. Green Giant (talk) 20:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  9. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Mirer (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  10. !dea4u (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   !dea4u  05:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  11. Zunter (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Zunter (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  12. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Being a Croatian user among the stewards isn't a bad thing imo, but with the answers Vodomar gave I'm not sure he's the right person for this task. Trijnsteltalk 12:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  13. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Miniapolis (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  14. Hannes_24 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015  --Hannes 24 (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC) I´m not fully convinced. Sorry. Dobra večer.reply
  15. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   GZWDer (talk) 04:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  16. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Ysjbserver (talk) 11:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  17. Kantatiskiwa (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Kantatiskiwa (talk) 14:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  18. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Not enough to oppose, but doesn't give me enough confidence to support either. CT Cooper · talk 14:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  19. Yogesh Khandke (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Yogesh Khandke (talk) 06:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  20. Talmid3 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Talmid3 (talk) 12:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  21. Adriano Morelli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   I don't know. Adriano Morelli (talk) 13:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  22. Dispe (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Dispe (talk) 22:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  23. Bjoertvedt (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Bjoertvedt (talk) 22:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  24. Bulldoc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Bulldoc (talk) 02:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
       Kehpp (Not eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)   Kehpp (talk) 11:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  25. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 00:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  26. Pablo000 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   Pablo000 (talk) 06:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  27. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   The only concern I have is that this candidate has little experience outside the Croatian language Wikipedia. However, I must commend him for working in a very difficult Wikipedia and doing his best to make things better.. I encourage him to get more experience in other areas. Wpollard (talk) 07:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  28. Boboseiptu (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Boboseiptu (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  29. Tremonist (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Tremonist (talk) 14:47, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  30. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  31. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 17:11, 21 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  32. Iich1960 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Iich1960 (talk) 11:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  33. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Poti Berik (talk) 18:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  34. MAyo (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   MAyo (talk) 14:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply
  35. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Would be an able steward but not enough cross-wiki activity. GyaroMaguus 14:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)reply