Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/BlackBeast

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

BlackBeast (Samuel Cirilo)

[edit]
ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: es-N, en-2, zh-2, jp-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, my name is Samuel Cirilo, also known as BlackBeast. I would like to serve you as Steward. First time I dare to posit here, because I regard it as a serious liability. Here my proof of eligibility.

    My career as wikipedian begins in March 2007, when I record the account but have little activity. However, shortly, whe I star to meet community and its policies, I become fond of with the project. Since 2011 I am Sysop and bureaucrat in the Spanish Wikipedia.

    Although my activity in the global manteinance is not very high, I'm fast learning and strive to meet the requirements and responsibilities of this tool. I'm running because I want to involve more in the project, given my support wiht tools available to it. You can contact by IRC, e-mail, even in my talk page, since I am constantly active in projects.

    In Wikipedia in Spanish, constantly attend requirements and requests as soon as possible. So participate in SRG, SRP and SRCU, would be a priority to me. I usually attend complicated cases, always looking for ways to remain calm and allowing the fellowship is maintained. I completely agree with Stewards policy. I like to find how we can improve, so I am willing to work together in several activities. Any questions you have, let me know. Thanks for the opportunity.- 我叫 BlackBeast Do you need something? 你问问什么? 04:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#BlackBeast


Yes

[edit]
  1. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --6AND5 (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  2. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  Support! TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  3. RomanLier (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --RomanLier (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  4. Oscar_. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Oscar_. (talk) · @ 15:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Long term and trusted sysop at w:es.reply
  5. Cárdenas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Cárdenas (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  6. Deryck Chan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Long-time Wikimedian, participates in Wikimedia conferences with enthusiasm. His grammar and vocabulary may not be up to expectations for en-4 but he communicates well, at least in person. I support his bid for a bigger challenge. Deryck C. 17:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  7. Dimadick (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Veteran Wikipedian with some experience with multiple languages and websites. Dimadick (talk) 18:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  8. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Why not? He is a trusted user. White Master (es) 18:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  9. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   OlEnglish (Talk) 19:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  10. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Taichi - (あ!) 19:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  11. SouthWillRiseAgain (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   SouthWillRiseAgain (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  12. JackTracker (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   JackTracker (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  13. Eclipsis Proteo (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Eclipsis Proteo (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  14. Work2win (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Work2win (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Farin12 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Farin12 (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  15. Fernando2812l (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Fernando2812l (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  16. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Eman235/talk 23:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  17. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Zeljko (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  18. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   SQLQuery me! 00:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Mashford (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Mashford (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  19. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Thanks Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  20. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  21. Jim Carter (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Jim Carter (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  22. Syced (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Syced (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Sigmundur (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   Sigmundur (talk) 08:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  23. Zbrnajsem (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Zbrnajsem (talk) 10:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  24. Assianir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Assianir (talk) 11:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  25. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Babymissfortune (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  26. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ellery (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  27. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Gimmy dd (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  28. Hamedvahid (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Hamedvahid (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Zakard (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   Zakard (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  29. ChocolateCherryNight (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   ChocolateCherryNight (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  30. Laura Fiorucci (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Laura Fiorucci (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  31. Mr.User200 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Support Mr.User200 (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  32. L736E (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   L736E (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Gasdine (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Gasdine (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Cd tenerife (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Cd tenerife (talk) 20:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  33. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Caligatus (talk) 22:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  34. Erne Mogilevich (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   I think you'll do a great work, despite of the big difference between votes, I think you still can made it. Erne る Mogilevich (ノート投稿記録) 23:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Katz191 (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983)   Katz191 (talk) 23:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  35. Kwangmo (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Kwangmo (talk) 23:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone)   Risk Engineer (talk) 00:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  36. VanEman (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2016   VanEman (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  37. Shangkuanlc (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016   We need more people to speak asian languages. Liang(WMTW) (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Jonnie d smith (Not eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)   Jonnie d smith (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  38. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Veleius
  39. Willicab (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Willicab (talk) 16:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  40. IrwinSantos (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Irwin アーウィン 18:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  41. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  42. Hashima20 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Hashima20 (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  43. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Kolega2357 (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  44. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Waka Waka (talk) 00:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  45. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Wae35244 (talk) 02:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  46. Morza (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Morza (sono qui) 08:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  47. 아름불휘 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Support! Bamtori Friends (talk/profile) 15:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  48. PetrohsW (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   petrohs (gracias) 20:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  49. ElGatoSaez (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Good user. Also very old so great experience. ElGatoSaez (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  50. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Ascánder (talk) 02:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  51. Hongqilim (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   keep it up. Hongqilim (talk) 09:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  52. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by )2016   Xoegki (talk) 12:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  53. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   DENAMAX (talk) 21:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Mcshadypl (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Mcshadypl (talk) 22:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  54. Janakacombank (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Janakacombank (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  55. B25es (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   B25es (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  56. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Wikibenchris (talk) 11:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  57. Geoide (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Geoide (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  58. Fixertool (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Fixertool (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  59. VR0 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   VR0 (talk) 03:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Xiiaowu97 (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Xiiaowu97 (talk) 08:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  60. Reception123 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   I have looked at contributions and global and this user seems good to be a Steward Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 09:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  61. Invertiert (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Invertiert (talk) 09:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  62. Ciell (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ciell (talk) 10:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  63. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Gag0409 (talk) 13:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  64. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  65. Helmy oved (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Helmy oved 18:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  66. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Wpollard (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  67. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Antoine.01 (talk) 14:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  68. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Interesting candidate, with some command of Asian languages. Fadesga (talk) 23:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   VisaBlack (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  69. Kew Gardens 613 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Srolanh (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   Srolanh (talk) 17:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Jordydanielss (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   Jordydanielss (talk) 17:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  70. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   AdiMind (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  71. Михаил Тум (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Михаил Тум (talk) 18:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  72. Yeni Üye (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Yeni Üye (talk) 20:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Hollingsworth (talk) 21:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  73. Ciberprofe (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Ciberprofe (talk) 01:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Rami75013 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Rami75013 (talk) 04:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  74. Qingchuer1980 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Qingchuer1980 (talk) 09:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  75. Catmando999 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Catmando999 (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  76. Euphoria42 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Euphoria42 (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Rocksanddirt (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Rocksanddirt (talk) 21:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  77. Nino Marakot (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   I'm a supportative in this election! Nino Marakot (talk) 22:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  78. Baiji (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   support to the beast Baiji --> (Opinión) 00:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  79. Robertiki (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Robertiki (talk) 04:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  80. Ocaso33 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ocaso33 (talk) 10:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  81. Dbastro (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Dbastro (talk) 12:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  82. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Leon saudanha (talk) 16:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Nizzi G (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Nizzi G (talk) 17:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Георгий Суворов (Not eligible, checked by Defender)   Георгий Суворов (talk) 18:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  83. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Mirer (talk) 18:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  84. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Shizhao (talk) 07:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  85. Nubifer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Nubifer (talk) 07:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  86. Soaper1234 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Soaper1234 (talk) 09:47, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  87. Nioger (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Nioger (talk) 10:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  88. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Octahedron80 (talk) 13:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  89. Sergio Andres Segovia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Sergio Andres Segovia (talk) 15:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  90. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Jusjih (talk) 00:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  91. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Full support for non-English stewards. Has some knowledge of en. zh is more like zh-1 I would say. Seems accountable. Have a go. New blood is good. Pratyeka (talk) 06:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Amaling (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Amaling (talk) 19:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  92. Wissenschaftler-Uni (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wissenschaftler-Uni (talk) 02:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  93. LucSaffre (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   LucSaffre (talk) 04:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Archi38 (Not eligible, checked by Defender)   Archi38 (talk) 07:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  94. Mjesfahani (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Mjesfahani (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  95. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   BluesyPete (talk) 17:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  96. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Arbnos (talk) 18:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  97. Loco085 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Trusted syspo at es.wiki. Loco085 (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  98. Roxyuru (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Roxyuru 22:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Abrikoss (Not eligible, checked by Syum90)   Abrikoss (talk) 08:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  99. Tyseria (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   <optional comments>. Tyseria (talk) 11:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  100. Davidstewartharvey (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Davidstewartharvey (talk) 14:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  101. Nachosan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Nachosan (talk) 15:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       BRPever (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   BRP ever 18:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  102. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Kadavr2000 (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Mar123ius (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Mar123ius (talk) 21:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  103. Ph03nix1986 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Pho3niX Discusión 01:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  104. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bogger (talk) 08:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  105. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   The Traditionalist (talk) 13:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  106. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Geoff Who, me? 22:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  107. Rpclod (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Rpclod (talk) 01:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  108. GMoyano (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   GMoyano (talk) 08:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  109. Виолетова (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   Виолетова (talk) 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  110. Bruno Rene Vargas (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Terry77 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Terry77 (talk) 20:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  111. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Aydinsalis (talk) 22:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  112. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   NoychoH (talk) 12:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  113. Edjoerv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Edjoerv (talk) 15:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  114. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   NeoLexx (talk) 18:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  115. MirkoS18 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   MirkoS18 (talk) 20:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  116. Tashi (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Tashi (talk) 00:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  117. Dimitra megest (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Dimitra megest (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Ming-Yang Chen (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Ming-Yang Chen (talk) 07:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Lawrencedepe (talk) 08:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  118. J7729 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   J7729 (talk) 08:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  119. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mazuritz (talk) 10:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  120. BeeCeePhoto (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   BeeCeePhoto (talk) 14:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  121. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Lutzv (talk) 22:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  122. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Defrenrokorit (talk) 05:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply

No

[edit]
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Answers to questions do not convince me, I have the feeling the steward role is not fully understood. --Vogone (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   No cross-wiki experience (95% of edits on eswiki), also only a sysop on one wiki (+bureaucrat, but every sysop on eswiki is automatically given bureaucrat). Additionally, the self-characterization as being en-4 certainly is too high; and while perfect English is not required, reading his statement and the answers to the questions, I am having a lot of difficulty understanding anything (e.g. "Work in maintenance in each project also is important, but is no esential."). And where I understand something, I am very concerned about the answer, e.g. in the question from Steinsplitter, his reply suggests that stewards can desysop people more or less at their own discretion. --MF-W 14:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  3. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per MF-W. Southparkfan 14:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  4. Maragm (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not convinced by his answers, also agree that level of English is quite deficient, certainly not en-4. --Maragm (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  5. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  6. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   As per users MF-W and Maragm. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  7. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Gereon K. (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  8. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  9. Andreas Werle (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   -- Andreas Werle (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  10. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Holder (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  11. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ulflarsen (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  12. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   His intentions are good but he lacks the requires skills. Perhaps in the future. And please update your babel since you are not en-4. Natuur12 (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  13. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  14. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Ganímedes (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  15. Sir Joseph (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Sir Joseph (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  16. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Herby talk thyme 16:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Sevimleribo (talk) 17:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  17. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   —Ah3kal (talk) 17:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  18. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Lacks experience in steward areas, and I am unconvinced by the answers to questions. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  19. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Widr (talk) 17:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  20. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Asav (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Lacks experience.reply
  21. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Flyingfischer (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  22. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Laberinto16 (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  23. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   per MF-Warburg Armbrust (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  24. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mscuthbert (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Andrewredk (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   Andrewredk (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  25. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Lsanabria (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  26. Riley Huntley (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Uninvolved in steward areas from what I've seen. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  27. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   No cross-wiki experience --Uğurkenttalk 21:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  28. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   ChristophThomas (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  29. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Not experienced cross-wiki Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  30. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  31. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Nrautava (talk) 00:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       WikiMichel (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   WikiMichel (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  32. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   lacks cross-wiki experience.. Stemoc 00:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  33. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I can't vote for the person who does not understand what "emergency desysop" means. I assume good faith that BlackBeast really wants to resolve these local conflicts but this is not what a steward should do — NickK (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  34. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Checkingfax (talk) 02:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  35. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   HalanTul (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  36. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Legoktm (talk) 03:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  37. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Yash! 04:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  38. Томич (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Томич (talk) 11:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  39. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ruthven (talk) 11:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  40. Jamesmcmahon0 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 11:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  41. Chamarasca (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Chamarasca (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  42. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   No. Conceptually not understanding the purpose of stewards.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  43. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Trijnsteltalk 13:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  44. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   per MF-W DCB (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  45. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   CLCStudent (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  46. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  47. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Ernstol (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       AirCombat (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983)   Sorry, as others have said, not enough experience, and fluency not nearly good enough. AirCombat (talk) 23:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  48. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gorlingor (talk) 01:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  49. The Photographer (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   I know Blackbest from several years, and my mother language is Spanish, the same as his, however, his answer to first question made by Steinsplitter show, IMHO a lack of basic understanding of what a Stewards is and what it can and can't do. The Photographer (talk) 04:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  50. Scriptartis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Language is indeed a barrier. -- Scriptartis | Parley 05:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  51. Pau Colominas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   He lies about his English level. Pau Colominas (talk) 08:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  52. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   --Buggia 10:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Gulnar Rehimli (Not eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)   Gulnar Rehimli (talk) 10:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  53. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Lacking cross-wiki experience. Infinite0694 (Talk) 11:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  54. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   No enough experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 11:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  55. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   cyrfaw (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  56. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Among his first edits is a defence of the practices of Jehova's witnesses. We do not need religious fundamentalists as stewards, since they are neither qualified nor morally sufficient. Mathmensch (talk) 12:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  57. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Lack of corss-wiki experience and limited understanding of steward role. — T. 13:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  58. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Holmium (talk) 14:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  59. Technopat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Technopat (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  60. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  61. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Answers provided were insufficient. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  62. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   MelanieN (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  63. Numbermaniac (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   Not too happy with some of the answers to the questions. Also definitely not en-4. -- numbermaniac 22:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  64. Obelix (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Obelix (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  65. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   I'm not happy with the answer to the first question, which is an important one for a steward who might have to actually make that call. I'm pretty sure that next go-round, he'll be a better candidate, and encourage him to study the guidelines until then. loupgarous (talk) 03:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  66. 레몬이 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   레몬이 (talk) 06:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  67. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Sorry, but I never noticed you in any relevant area. Furthermore, I doubt that you've a near-native knowledge of the English language. -Barras talk 12:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  68. Jmvkrecords (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Per Vogone Jmvkrecords (Intra talk) 13:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  69. Maferlona (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Maferlona (talk) 20:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  70. Cookie (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Anna (talk) 01:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC) No, far from neutral as a sysopreply
  71. AlaskanNativeRU (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   AlaskanNativeRU (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC) No doesn't seem qualified.reply
  72. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   FASTILY 08:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  73. Mediatus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   -- Mediatus (talk) 12:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  74. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Stang 16:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  75. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   No global rights, has not created an steward request as of feb 1.--Snaevar (talk) 19:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  76. ~Expresses life (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   No crosswiki experience. Sorry. まSan [TCES] 21:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  77. Aphillipsmusique (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Aphillipsmusique (talk) 05:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Jeff alef (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Jeff alef (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  78. Mar del Sur (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Mar del Sur (talk) 21:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC) Biased and partial sysop. Decaying contribution rate. Flag collector, a year ago he tried to do the same in Wikidata, requesting for adminship without much knowledge of the project. No crosswiki experience.reply
  79. Sparkyb10123 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Sparkyb10123 (talk) 23:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  80. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Hampcky (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  81. Beria (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   I was not going to vote, but given that he does believe that a Steward can remove and give flags at their discretion only proves that he never bothered reading the policies. Also being en-4 is not required, but since he lied about this, It gets me thinking about what else did he lied. Béria L. de Rodríguez msg 04:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  82. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Carlotm (talk) 04:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  83. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ferran Mir (talk) 07:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  84. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Doesn't seem to have a deep understanding of Stewards' role, per Vogone, MF-W. — regards, Revi 17:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  85. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   Fuxx (talk) 18:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  86. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Not enough cross wiki experience and not convinced with the answers to the questions Shanmugamp7 (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  87. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  88. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Az1568 (talk) 02:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  89. Antur (Eligible, checked by Melos)2016   --Antur (talk) 03:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  90. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   – Meiræ 12:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  91. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Magawla61 (talk) 13:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  92. Coffee (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Coffee // have a cup // 16:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  93. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Roland Kutzki (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  94. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Rax (talk) 20:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC) IMHO - considering your answers to questions - it will be better to review again the role and the conditions under which one may act as a steward - or may not.reply
  95. Woodcutterty (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   The candidate's level of English is deficient. Woodcutterty (talk) 20:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  96. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   თოგო (D) 23:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  97. UY Scuti (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Having gone through his talk page archives, there are a lot of unresponded messages. I believe this user will continue doing the same. And cross-wiki activity is too low. —UY Scuti Talk 05:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  98. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   --Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  99. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Sebleouf (talk) 08:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  100. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Hemeier (talk) 10:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  101. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   SPQRobin (talk) 11:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  102. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  103. Krett12 (Eligible, checked by )2016   Has too little cross-wiki work Krett12 (talk) 16:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  104. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ringbang (talk) 21:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  105. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Some wikis, like enwp, have clear requirements for an "emergency desysop" (Level I desysop on enwp); but most do not. The answer to the question shows little understanding of when an emergency desysop is required as a steward action (rather than, say, implementing a local arbcom or community decision). Courcelles 22:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  106. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Berlin-George (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  107. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   CaZeRillo (talk) 09:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  108. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Per some of the concerns cited Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  109. Krujoski (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   --Krujoski (talk) 18:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  110. Jschnur (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Jschnur (talk) 02:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  111. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   SideshowBob7 (talk) 12:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  112. Fessor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   The candidate considers age to be a sign of maturity... No further reading is required. Fessor (talk) 13:11, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  113. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   The candidate has made no effort to contribute to any Wikiversities. --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  114. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Xatian11968 (talk) 17:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   I vote no for BlackBeast Qewr4231 (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  115. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   MBurch (talk) 03:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Masonpatriot (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Masonpatriot (talk) 17:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  116. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   KTo288 (talk) 08:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  117. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Goombiis (talk) 00:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  118. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Answers to questions fail to sufficiently address issue in many cases other than to elaborately say variations of "that's a hard question". Ford MF (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  119. Tonton Bernardo (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Tonton Bernardo (talk) 09:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  120. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Not convinced with the answers. :( Pratyya (Hello!) 09:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  121. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Maleine258 (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  122. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  123. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016  --DerekvG (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  124. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   --Wetterwolke (talk) 19:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  125. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   DangSunM (talk) 20:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  126. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Höyhens (talk) 23:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  127. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Timk70 question? 21:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Tom29739 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Not convinced with this person's speech. His level of English is not very good, certainly not near native like it says on their userpage. Tom29739 (talk) 21:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  128. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   ~Cybularny Speak? 23:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  129. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Glaisher (talk) 16:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  130. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Styko (talk) 06:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  131. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   The Banner (talk) 14:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  132. Alexandru M. (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Alexandru M. (talk) 16:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  133. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   --DrTrumpet (talk) 23:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  134. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Hobbamock (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  135. Vvven (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   --Vvven (talk) 17:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  136. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Not convinced by the answers to questions --ContributorQ (talk) 18:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  137. TaqPol (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Lacks of proficiency in English and not convinced by answers. TaqPol (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  138. Iceandsnow (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Iceandsnow (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  139. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Vachovec1 (talk) 01:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  140. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Study the guidelines and improve your English level. Alexmar983 (talk) 02:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  141. Brejnev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Same opinion as MF-Warburg. Brejnev (talk) 14:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  142. Varina (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Varina (talk) 16:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Proektir (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  143. Imbericle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Imbericle (talk) 23:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  144. Base (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   No x-wiki activity. Base (talk) 12:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  145. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   not enough experience Ireas (talk) 13:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  146. .js (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   .js[democracy needed] 13:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not convinced by the constant diminution of activity on every wiki. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  2. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Jahaza (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  3. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Probably wouldn't do anything bad if elected, but not a lot of crosswiki experience and some of the answers to the questions are wrong. Rschen7754 15:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  4. Bobbyshabangu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I think you rather have written your response in Spanish, I feel you've got potential, just that you are not well articulate in the English language to convince us why we really need to vote for you. Bobbyshabangu (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  5. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Żyrafał (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  6. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Although your statement indicates that you're a native English speaker, that doesn't seem to be the case. Miniapolis 16:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  7. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not enough to support or oppose so I'm going to vote Neutral for now. Reguyla (talk) 17:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  8. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Alan (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       ZhengZhou (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   ZhengZhou (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  9. Kippelboy (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Kippelboy (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  10. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Deb (talk) 12:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  11. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   David1010 (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  12. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   I like this user, but concerns mentioned leaves me unsure Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  13. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Vinckie (talk) 12:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  14. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  15. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Never seen him before. Ghiutun 22:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  16. Caballero1967 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   I am also concerned with what MF-Warburg stated above. Would like to see how the candidate address these issues in the question section. Caballero1967 (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  17. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  18. WisiW (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   WisiW (talk) 08:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  19. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   Rberchie (talk) 11:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  20. Aledownload (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Aledownload (talk) Italian 16:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  21. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  22. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Nannadeem (talk) 07:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Ananth subray (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  23. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   GZWDer (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  24. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Magawla61 (talk) 13:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  25. POLNET55 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   POLNET55 (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  26. Boboseiptu (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Boboseiptu (talk) 12:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  27. I diaze1993 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   I diaze1993 (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  28. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016   Wikifreund (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  29. Sanmosa (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   I have nothing to ask, and I am confused of everyone and everything, so neutral. Sanmosa (talk) 00:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  30. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Yair rand (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Cysioland (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Cysioland - Talk with me 08:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  31. Bmhs823 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Bmhs823 (talk) 08:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Ananth subray (talk) 12:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  32. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   VictorBrice (talk) 20:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  33. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  34. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Bio06940 (talk) 12:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       AlvaroMolina (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   From what I read in the section questions, there are too many opinions, so it is difficult to decide specifically. AlvaroMolina (talk) 12:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  35. Tracouti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   --Tracouti (talk) 16:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  36. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bernd Bergmann (talk) 19:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  37. Banfield (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Banfield - Reclamos aquí 23:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  38. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ysjbserver (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  39. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Good afternoon (talk) 12:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  40. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Nnemo (talk) 13:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply