Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Cekli829

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Cekli829 (Tərxan Paşazadə)

[edit]
ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: az-N, tr-N, cek-N, kjj-3, crh-3, gag-3, ru-2, en-2, kk-1, tt-1, tk-1 and etc.
  • Personal info: (English)
    Greetings all. Respecting tradition, I stand as a candidate again this time because the current rules allow me to become a candidate. I can assure you that after the election my action will be just as effective. You know me from previous elections. Once again I would like to inform you briefly about myself:

    I am Tarkhan Pashazade jachly, from Azerbaijan and origin from Jack village in the Quba Rayon. I’m living in Sumgait city. Date of birth: 29 November 1982.

    First time I registered in Wikipedia on 21 December, 2006 as Tərxan Paşazadə. But currently it’s inactive. Afterwards I registered on February 8, 2009 at Azerbaijani Wikipedia in the username of Cekli829. Since March 27, 2009 I have remained an active on wiki projects.

    My account is active in about 835 sites of project - almost in all of the sites. Generally, I have more than 278 000 editing on the project. Currently I'm a member of at least 19 local groups (sysop/rollbacker/test-admin/reviewer/patroller/rollbacker/editor/etc...) in the wiki-project. I made more than 44 000 sysop actions only on Azerbaijani Wikipedia. I participated to the translation project translatewiki.net as well. Especially if you notice, the Turkish Wikipedia Collaborations project, where I was an active participant in this project in 2011, 2012 and I became the winner of the year. In 2015, I became the completed of the 100wikidays (video-slide) and I be honored as Wikipedia Asian Ambassador.

    I'm also a member of the Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group and Small Wiki Monitoring Team. I have a great practice in global struggling against vandalism. I’m initiator and participant of Azerbaijani Wikinews, Khinalig Wikipedia projects in Incubator. One of my biggest contribution from the projects was the Commons project (11.000+ file); also Wikidata.

    Wikiness is my lifestyle. I am busy on wiki projects from 1 to 5 hours in a day. I think wiki projects are the great common human worth. I want to be more helpful in this sphere. That is why I would like to serve as a Wikimedia steward. This is already the seventh time of my candidacy. Actually to be a candidate for the previous 6 elections was a great experience for me. Thus, further the elections has an important role in the improvement of my activity, forming as a professional wiki...

    Please support with your vote all of candidates who you like! I wish only the useful result. Doubtless if wikisociety will support me, I am ready to assume the responsibility. I hope wikisociety will support and will give me this honorable responsibility. Because I’m truly a hard working user. You can trust me. Thank you for your consideration!

    Additional user pages: Azerbaijani WikipediaTurkish WikipediaCommons
    Outside the project: Facebook (profile)Facebook (page)YouTube (channel)
    Note: You can also see the presentation I am preparing: Wikipedia: The perfect venue!
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Cekli829


Yes

[edit]
  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I keep don't seeing the “problem”. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  2. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  3. Serkanland (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Serk@nl@nd 14:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  4. Shahrux (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Shahrux (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  5. Keete 37 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Keete 37 (Farid Aliev) (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  6. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Support! TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  7. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Holder (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  8. Farsizabon (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Farsizabon (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  9. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  10. Sefer azeri (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Sefer azeri (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  11. Araz Yaquboglu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  12. Yusif Sərrac (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Yusif Sərrac (talk) 15:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  13. Sabuhi from Baku (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Sabuhi from Baku (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  14. axpde (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   a×pdeHello! 16:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  15. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Arbnos (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  16. Kopiersperre (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Kopiersperre (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  17. Akil13 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Akil13 (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  18. Okanfan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   -- Okanfan (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Sevimleribo (talk) 17:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  19. Deryck Chan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Sure, why not. Go ahead. Deryck C. 17:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  20. Namikilisu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Namikilisu (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  21. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Nrautava (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  22. LavaBaron (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   LavaBaron (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  23. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ejensyd (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Crispus (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   Crispus (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  24. Mecnun112 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Mecnun112 (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  25. Samral (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Samral (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Aguzer (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   Azerbaycan ve Türkiye Vikileri için iyi bir köprü olur. --This unsigned article written by: User:Aguzer 19:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  26. Touzrimounir (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Touzrimounir (talk) 19:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  27. Mar del Este (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Mar del Este:)안녕하세요 (talk) 22:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  28. Sortilegus (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Sortilegus (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  29. Әмир (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Әмир (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  30. Prof tpms (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Good candidate Prof tpms (talk) 23:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  31. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Eman235/talk 23:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  32. HakanIST (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   HakanIST (talk) 00:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  33. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Zeljko (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  34. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   SQLQuery me! 00:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  35. Omerlaziale (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Omerlaziale (talk) 01:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  36. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   HalanTul (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  37. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Kindly, block should not be a reason to oppose Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  38. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Yash! 04:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  39. Azerifactory (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Azerifactory (talk) 04:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  40. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  41. Gokhantig (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Azerbaijan candır.. Gokhantig (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  42. Henky Yoga (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Henky Yoga (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  43. OSMAN4466 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   --OSMAN4466 (talk) 10:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  44. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Babymissfortune (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  45. Jamesmcmahon0 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 11:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  46. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Deb (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  47. Fil211 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Fil211 (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  48. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ellery (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  49. Ochilov (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Ochilov (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  50. KediÇobanı (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   KediÇobanı🐈 17:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  51. Sodeif (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Sodeif (talk) 18:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  52. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   CLCStudent (talk) 18:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  53. Erne Mogilevich (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   I think your various knowledge of languages matches perfectly with the Steward flag. Erne る Mogilevich (ノート投稿記録) 23:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Katz191 (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983)   Katz191 (talk) 23:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone)   Risk Engineer (talk) 00:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  54. VanEman (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2016   VanEman (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Vago (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Vago tp 06:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  55. Rutulec (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Rutulec (talk) 07:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  56. Fikir Mühendisi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Fikir Mühendisi (talk) 10:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Gulnar Rehimli (Not eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)   Gulnar Rehimli (talk) 10:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Chairmanbka (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   Chairmanbka (talk) 12:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  57. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Veleius
  58. Zotezangu (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Zotezangu (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  59. Alp Er Tunqa (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Alp Er Tunqa (talk) 16:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  60. Demidenko (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Demidenko 17:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  61. Bdscvr (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Bdscvr (talk) 17:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  62. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Drzewianin (talk) 19:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  63. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  64. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   MelanieN (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  65. Obelix (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Obelix (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  66. Olsi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Olsi (talk) 23:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  67. Melikov Memmed (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   He is an experienced Wikipedia editor Melikov Memmed (talk) 05:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Omarali1212 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Omarali1212 (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  68. Aabdullayev851 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Aabdullayev851 (talk) 06:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  69. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   İncelemeelemani (talk) 14:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  70. 아름불휘 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Not Problem! Areumbulhwi (talk/profile) 15:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  71. Tyytoo (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Tyytoo (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  72. Qolcomaq (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   Qolcomaq (talk) 05:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  73. Clivemacd (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Clivemacd (talk) 10:54, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  74. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   I think he should be given a chance since this is his second time Rberchie (talk) 11:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  75. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  76. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by )2016   Xoegki (talk) 04:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  77. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Wikibenchris (talk) 11:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  78. Munci (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   Munci (talk) 14:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Nick2crosby (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   <optional comments>. Nick2crosby (talk) 16:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  79. Walber (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Walber (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  80. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Hampcky (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       PokestarFan (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   PokestarFan (talk) (My Contribs) 01:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  81. SEVEREN (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   SEVEREN (talk) 03:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  82. Invertiert (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Invertiert (talk) 09:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  83. Rusty1111 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Rusty1111 (talk) 10:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  84. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Gag0409 (talk) 13:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  85. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  86. Азербайджан-е-Джануби (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Азербайджан-е-Джануби (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  87. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  88. Spasage (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Spasage (talk) 06:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  89. Zaur Turan(1994) (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Zaur Turan(1994) (talk) 08:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  90. Nassauer27 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Nassauer27 (talk) 10:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  91. Fraxinus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Fraxinus (talk) 12:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  92. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Magawla61 (talk) 13:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  93. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Antoine.01 (talk) 14:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  94. Liridon (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Liridon (talk) 21:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  95. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Very interesting profile! Fadesga (talk) 23:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       WikiHelper2134 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   WikiHelper2134 (talk) 02:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       LordHello1 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   LordHello1 (talk) 06:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  96. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Sebleouf (talk) 08:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  97. Kaftaj (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Kaftaj (talk) 09:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  98. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Dear colleagues. Wikipedia in the Azerbaijani language, in poor condition. Many complaints had not been dealt with. Meta also does not address our complaints ([1], [2] ). There must be at least 1 steward. Disgrace, how long will it last? --Idin Mammadof 14:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  99. Elmeddin82 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Elmeddin82 (talk) 15:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  100. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Emin message 15:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  101. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   AdiMind (talk) 18:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Hollingsworth (talk) 21:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  102. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Kolega2357 (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  103. WiseWoman (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   --WiseWoman (talk) 10:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  104. ITPRO.UZ (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   ITPRO.UZ (talk) 11:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  105. Boboseiptu (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Boboseiptu (talk) 12:33, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  106. Taigatrommel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Taigatrommel (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  107. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 20:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Kapohogrrl (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Kapohogrrl (talk) 05:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Hawajez (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Hayır olsun.. Paşazade :) Hawajez (talk) 08:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  108. Yoldasso (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   His contributes that in turkic languages will be helpful. Go ahead cekliYoldasso (talk) 09:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  109. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   SideshowBob7 (talk) 12:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  110. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Xatian11968 (talk) 17:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Георгий Суворов (Not eligible, checked by Defender)   Георгий Суворов (talk) 18:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  111. Şeyx Şamil (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   --Şeyx Şamil (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  112. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Mirer (talk) 19:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  113. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Octahedron80 (talk) 13:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  114. YALIN BALTA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Yes. YALIN BALTA (talk) 14:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Nebydlogop (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Nebydlogop (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Vusal1981 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   --Vusal1981 (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  115. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Jusjih (talk) 00:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  116. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Stang 05:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  117. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Good work. Pratyeka (talk) 06:27, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  118. Csisc (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   --Csisc (talk) 10:43, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       FirstDrop87 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   FirstDrop87 (talk) 13:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  119. Billytanghh (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016   Billytanghh (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  120. Coolland (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Coolland (talk) 18:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Amaling (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Amaling (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  121. Gilthuanas (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gilthuanas (talk) 22:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Proger (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983)   Proger danış 23:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  122. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Goombiis (talk) 00:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Archi38 (Not eligible, checked by Defender)   Archi38 (talk) 07:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  123. Aussie Oc (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Aussie Oc (talk) 11:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  124. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   BluesyPete (talk) 17:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  125. Nhfflkh (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Nhfflkh (talk) 18:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  126. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Höyhens (talk) 23:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       BRPever (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   BRP ever 18:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  127. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Kadavr2000 (talk) 18:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Öterbülbül (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Öterbülbül (talk) 22:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  128. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   ~Cybularny Speak? 23:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  129. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bogger (talk) 08:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  130. Mhj973 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Mhj973 (talk) 01:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  131. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  132. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Lutzv (talk) 11:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  133. La femme de menage (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   --La femme de menage (talk) 09:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  134. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   NoychoH (talk) 12:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  135. Eltargrim (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Eltargrim (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Romayan (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Romayan (talk) 21:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  136. Dimitra megest (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Dimitra megest (talk) 01:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  137. J7729 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   J7729 (talk) 08:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Proektir (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  138. BORGATO Pierandrea (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   BORGATO Pierandrea (talk) 18:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Bigs7 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Bigs7 (talk) 18:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  139. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bernd Bergmann (talk) 19:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  140. Jaumellecha (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Jaumellecha (talk) 23:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  141. Çalıştay (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I know that Cekli829 is a hardworking Wikipedians. Çalıştay (talk) 08:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  142. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 12:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply

No

[edit]
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not this year. --Vogone (talk) 14:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   It is impossible to solve the problem. It's too early. --MF-W 14:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  3. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Herby talk thyme 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  4. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   You are our WikiCaprio. Please continue. — T. 14:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  5. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   This is the 7th time, right? Southparkfan 14:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  6. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not at all convinced by the users' answers to the questions. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  7. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Gereon K. (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  8. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   No, no and no.--Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  9. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   No. --geo ») 14:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  10. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ulflarsen (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  11. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   No. This is becoming more and more of a face. Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  12. Mahdy Saffar (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   No. Mahdy Saffar (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  13. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  14. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ran as a candidate in the last six elections unsuccessfully, and still gives evasive and incorrect answers to voter questions. No way I would trust them with private information. Rschen7754 15:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  15. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Seems to be getting POINTy --Jahaza (talk) 15:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  16. Vadgt (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Or no or neutral. I choose no. Vadgt (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  17. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Clear no. And this is not just about Armenian/Azerbaijani problem, but also about answers to the questions. For instance, being asked about data stored in CUwiki he answered I am in favor of open information. But with respect to security issues, I think it is imperative to remain confidential for a certain period. This means that he either did not understand the question (which is a big problem for a steward) or could not write a meaningful answer in English (which is a big problem either). I don't even know which of these two options is worse — NickK (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  18. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  19. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Ganímedes (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Per NickKreply
  20. மதனாஹரன் (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Mathanaharan (talk) 17:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  21. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Widr (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  22. ArthurPSmith (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Seems like an active user but I don't see a clear case made for this particular position. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  23. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   per Rschen7754 and NickK Armbrust (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  24. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Lsanabria (talk) 20:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  25. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Per Rschen7754 Wolmar (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  26. Murma174 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Murma174 (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  27. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   ChristophThomas (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  28. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Round and round and round and around we go... Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  29. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   White Master (es) 22:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  30. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   User still has several and serious problems of understanding our processes. Cannot handle his own requests for sysop rights. And that does not change with time. Could never properly address the canvassing accusations raised on previous candidacy. Actually, I could never see a question properly addressed by him, whose answers are close to sarcasm. Terrible reasoning to become a steward on statement. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  31. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hubertl (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       WikiMichel (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   WikiMichel (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  32. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Checkingfax (talk) 02:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  33. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   eurodyne (talk) 02:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  34. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Legoktm (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  35. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Concerns over the past few elections are unfortunately still present Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  36. MarchHare1977 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   MarchHare1977 (talk) 05:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  37. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   The seventh time in a row. Really?! Jasper Deng (talk) 07:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  38. Albero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   --Albero (talk) 09:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  39. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   David1010 (talk) 12:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  40. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Gimmy dd (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  41. ԱշոտՏՆՂ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   thank you for your interest to serve as a steward ԱշոտՏՆՂ (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  42. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Trijnsteltalk 13:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  43. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  44. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   DCB (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Banaticus (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Banaticus (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  45. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Ernstol (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  46. Bikarhêner (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Bikarhêner (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  47. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Taivo (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       AirCombat (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983)   sorry... en-2 not quite good enough. Some parts seem auto-translated. AirCombat (talk) 23:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  48. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gorlingor (talk) 01:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  49. OrbiliusMagister (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   His skill in English has improved indeed in the last four years, but his answers to the questions are still too worrying. If it is impossible to solve the problem... it's too early. - εΔω 07:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  50. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Sorry, after more than 5 years, still no improvement or experiences has been made. You need to solve your own problems first very seriously before you can run again. cyrfaw (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  51. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   one of the creations of this user Mathmensch (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  52. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Insufficient answers and overly broad statements. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  53. Gomada (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gomada (talk) 21:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  54. Numbermaniac (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   -- numbermaniac 22:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  55. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Waka Waka (talk) 00:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  56. Jonathunder (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Perennial candidate Jonathunder (talk) 03:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  57. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   — regards, Revi 03:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  58. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   I don't think the answers in azerbaijani were helpful to me or other English-language editors who needed to know what the answers to the English-language questions were. And I'm worried about the nationalism question, too, and evasive answers to progress since last candidacy. loupgarous (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  59. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   –Ejs-80 08:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  60. Technopat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Technopat (talk) 09:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  61. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   I personally consider your ongoing and failing candidatures for stewardship a waste of the valued time of our community. I don't think you really understand the steward business at all. It looks to me like you are not actually learning from your past failed requests. -Barras talk 13:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  62. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   FASTILY 08:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  63. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   no global rights, answers to questions from the steward election last year indicate lack of knowledge when it comes to policies.--Snaevar (talk) 19:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  64. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   No enough experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 05:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  65. B25es (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   B25es (talk) 09:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  66. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Carlotm (talk) 04:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  67. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   Fuxx (talk) 18:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  68. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Shanmugamp7 (talk) 19:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  69. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   NaBUru38 (talk) 19:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  70. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Az1568 (talk) 02:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  71. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   – Meiræ 12:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  72. POLNET55 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   POLNET55 (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  73. Pgallert (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Pgallert (talk) 18:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  74. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Rax (talk) 20:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC) your answers on the question page don't seem adequatereply
  75. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   თოგო (D) 23:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  76. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   --Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  77. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Hemeier (talk) 10:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  78. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 11:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  79. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Looking forward to your next year's candidacy. SPQRobin (talk) 11:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   You must have the Rick Perry problem. So many elections, so many loses. Have to go with the past voters on this one. VisaBlack (talk) 13:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  80. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   While being the xth candidature is not a problem for me, the issues raised by others (e.g NickK) are bothersome. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  81. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ringbang (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  82. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Courcelles 22:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  83. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Berlin-George (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  84. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   CaZeRillo (talk) 09:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  85. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   ● Mehran Debate 11:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  86. Avraham (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   I remain uncomfortable with the statement and the answers to the questions. Avi (talk) 21:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  87. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   While the candidate has made some 15 edits to Wikiversities in the past, there's none in more than a year. --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Qewr4231 (talk) 21:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  88. VIGNERON (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Still not convinced... Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 12:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  89. P.T. Aufrette (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   P.T. Aufrette (talk) 18:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  90. Kumkum (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   "Respecting tradition". Kumʞum quoi ? 20:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  91. NicatronTg (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   NicatronTg (talk) 03:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  92. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   KTo288 (talk) 08:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  93. Ex13 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Ex13 (talk) 13:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  94. 콩가루 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   콩가루 (talk) 14:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  95. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016   --Wikifreund (talk) 16:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  96. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Atcovi)2016   Mathonius (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  97. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Timothycrice (talk) 20:43, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  98. Tonton Bernardo (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not very active lately. Let's better say No Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  99. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Not impressed by the answers given. Sorry. Maybe next time ^^ Popo le Chien (talk) 10:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  100. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Maleine258 (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  101. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  102. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   --DerekvG (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  103. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Wetterwolke (talk) 19:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  104. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   DangSunM (talk) 20:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  105. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   —Ah3kal (talk) 08:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       CrazyD (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   CrazyD (talk) 10:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  106. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Timk70 question? 21:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Tom29739 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   You weren't successful in past years, and I don't think you've improved enough to become a steward yet. Tom29739 (talk) 22:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  107. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   again your answers don't result persuasive Harlock81 (talk) 22:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  108. Tegel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Tegel (Talk) 08:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  109. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   The Traditionalist (talk) 13:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  110. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Glaisher (talk) 16:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  111. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Geoff Who, me? 22:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  112. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Styko (talk) 06:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  113. Bmhs823 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Bmhs823 (talk) 08:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  114. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   The Banner (talk) 14:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  115. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Hobbamock (talk) 14:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  116. Deinocheirus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Edits in Russian Wikipedia are not particularly convincing. Deinocheirus (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  117. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Too shallow motivations --ContributorQ (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  118. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Vachovec1 (talk) 01:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Lawrencedepe (talk) 08:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  119. Brejnev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Same opinion as Rschen7754 and NickK. Brejnev (talk) 14:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  120. Varina (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Varina (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  121. Imbericle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Imbericle (talk) 23:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  122. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Defrenrokorit (talk) 05:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  123. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I am still uncertain about Cekli's interest in Stewardship, as his answers to questions and highlighting of numerical data in his statement leave me with much the wrong impression. Snowolf How can I help? 07:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  124. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   I'm afraid that user still needs time. Cause his answers are not "good" to become a steward and with this knowledge of him, I would fear him with the steward tools. Maybe next time..... Pratyya (Hello!) 12:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  125. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   Ireas (talk) 13:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  126. .js (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   .js[democracy needed] 13:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Żyrafał (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  2. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I appreciate diversity, but the five previous unsuccessful elections put me here. Miniapolis 16:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  3. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Reguyla (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  4. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Alan (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  5. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Flyingfischer (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  6. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   OlEnglish (Talk) 19:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  7. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mscuthbert (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Derekitou (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Derekitou (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  8. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Vinckie (talk) 12:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  9. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   I believe that candidate's efforts are best served outside of stewardry, though not enough to vote against.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  10. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   He isn't much active globally. --Uğurkenttalk 16:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  11. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Ghiutun 22:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  12. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   I appreciate your persistency, but I don't think it's the right time yet, I'm afraid. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 02:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  13. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Infinite0694 (Talk) 11:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  14. Shangkuanlc (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016   Liang(WMTW) (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  15. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  16. Fernando2812l (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Fernando2812l (talk) 19:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  17. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   This is the best way for his candidature Nannadeem (talk) 06:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  18. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ferran Mir (talk) 07:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  19. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   GZWDer (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  20. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   This candidate is active, but I am not sure how qualified he is. Wpollard (talk) 02:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  21. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Not sure. Maybe in next election? --Kusurija (talk) 20:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Pradeepabk (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Pradeepabk (talk) 11:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  22. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Ford MF (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  23. Titodutta (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Tito Dutta (talk) 00:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  24. Euphoria42 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Euphoria42 (talk) 02:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Ananth subray (talk) 12:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  25. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   VictorBrice (talk) 20:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  26. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Bio06940 (talk) 12:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  27. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   NeoLexx (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  28. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mazuritz (talk) 10:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  29. Dbastro (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Dbastro (talk) 15:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  30. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ysjbserver (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
  31. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Nnemo (talk) 13:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply