Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Richwales

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Richwales (Rich Wales — no relation to Jimbo)[edit]

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: en, fr-2, ro-2, es-1, de-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    I'm Richwales, and I am volunteering to serve as a steward.

    I've been a Wikipedian since 2005. Most of my work has been in the English Wikipedia, where I have created two Featured Articles and nine Good Articles. On the English Wikipedia, I am currently an administrator (since 9/2011) and an oversighter (since 11/2014). Additionally, I served on the Audit Subcommittee from 5/2013 to 8/2014 — during which time I had checkuser and oversight rights on the English Wikipedia.

    In addition to my native English, I can read and write French and Romanian, and I have basic proficiency in Spanish and German. I helped rewrite an article in the Romanian Wikipedia in 2007. I understand there are not currently any stewards who admit to knowing Romanian, so hopefully I can be of use there.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Richwales


Yes[edit]

  1. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  Support! TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. MannMaus (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016  --MannMaus (talk) 15:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   While Richwales does not have that much crosswiki experience, having personally worked with him during his time as a English Wikipedia sockpuppet investigation clerk, I believe that he would be a good steward and pick up the necessary knowledge quickly. Rschen7754 15:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Jahaza (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Sevimleribo (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Silenzio76 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Silenzio76 (talk) 17:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mscuthbert (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Competent OlEnglish (Talk) 20:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Again, per Rschen7754; I've seen their good work on en-WP, and they've been around a long time. Miniapolis 20:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Work2win (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Work2win (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Wolmar (talk) 21:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Farin12 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Farin12 (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. NE Ent (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   NE Ent (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Prof tpms (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Very positive and potential candidate. Prof tpms (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Zeljko (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Fanchb29 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2016   Fanchb29 (talk) 00:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       CaptainPiggles (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   CaptainPiggles (talk) 02:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   per Rschen7754. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Yash! 04:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Babymissfortune (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Assianir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Assianir (talk) 11:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Deb (talk) 12:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Vinckie (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ellery (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Perhaps he lacks a bit cross-wiki experience, but I fully trust him and I think he could be a good steward. Trijnsteltalk 13:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Suitably trusted, and knowledgeable in complex cases at enWP, and the tools. Not understanding why the role is wanted. Happy to see how it goes for a year and review  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Bff (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Bff (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kormoran (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Kormoran (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone)   Risk Engineer (talk) 00:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Jrt989 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jrt989 (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Gmcbjames (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2016   Gmcbjames (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Timothycrice (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   His editing of a Star Trek episode and of the Verhoeff algorithm provides evidence that he's a moral and qualified individual Mathmensch (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Bluemel1 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Bluemel1 (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Holmium (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Zotezangu (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Zotezangu (talk) 15:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   In a field of poor candidates, he's good enough. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Kolega2357 (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hawkeye7 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Zezen (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   I read his answers, sounds sensible. Zezen (talk) 00:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Waka Waka (talk) 01:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. White whirlwind (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   White whirlwind (talk) 01:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Thatonewikiguy (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   Thatonewikiguy (talk) 03:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   loupgarous (talk) 04:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Павел Петро (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Павел Петро (talk) 06:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Technopat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Technopat (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Chiumbi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Chiumbi (talk) 09:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   - tucoxn\talk 13:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Charles01 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Informative user page and good track record as far as I can fathom it... Charles01 (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Scott Illini (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Scott Illini (talk) 01:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. VMS Mosaic (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   Rberchie (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by )2016   Xoegki (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Aphillipsmusique (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Aphillipsmusique (talk) 05:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Wikibenchris (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Esmatly (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Esmatly (talk) 14:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Geoide (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Geoide (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Hampcky (talk) 22:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Carlotm (talk) 04:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Doctorhawkes (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Invertiert (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Invertiert (talk) 09:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Ciell (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ciell (talk) 10:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Redgwan (Not eligible, checked by Melos)   Rezwan (talk) 12:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Bluehotel (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Bluehotel (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   Fuxx (talk) 17:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Half past (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Half past (talk) 23:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Magawla61 (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Antoine.01 (talk) 15:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Coffee (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   No concerns here. Coffee // have a cup // 15:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Rax (talk) 22:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   OK, let's support a steward who knows Romanian. Fadesga (talk) 23:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       LordHello1 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   LordHello1 (talk) 06:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. PsychoticSpartan123 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   PsychoticSpartan123 (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Prestonmag (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Prestonmag (talk) 11:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ster3oPro (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   Ster3oPro (talk) 17:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Quinto Simmaco (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Quinto Simmaco (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   As a Romanian myself, I appreciate to have a Romanian speaker among stewards. AdiMind (talk) 18:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Hollingsworth (talk) 21:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   This candidate has a good range of experience. He may not have a great deal of global experience; that is my only concern. Wpollard (talk) 06:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Aydinsalis (talk) 13:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Hamedvahid (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Hamedvahid (talk) 18:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Rocksanddirt (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Rocksanddirt (talk) 21:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Avraham (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Having worked with Rich for many years on EnWiki, I am very comfortable with his knowledge of the stewardry tools, especially as relates to CU and OS. I agree that his cross-wiki experience is rather light; possibly too light. I was going to vote neutral, and request that he expand his cross-wiki work over the coming year, but I decided that since I really think he would be a benefit to the stewards, and the only reason not to support would be to let him demonstrate his commitment to Wikimedia as a whole and not just EnWiki, I am willing to trust him with the tools now and let him demonstrate that commitment over the coming year. I have no concern that he would abuse the tools or the access to private information (which he has had for years) and I expect him, if he is successful, to demonstrate that commitment to cross-wiki protection and support. I think that having him on the team now would be more of a benefit to the Wikimedia projects as a whole than having him wait a year. Avi (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Robertiki (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Robertiki (talk) 04:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. The ed17 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Per Avi Ed [talk] [en] 06:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Ale2006 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   make way for keen people Ale2006 (talk) 12:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. LP Martin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   LP Martin (talk) 17:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Xatian11968 (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   MBurch (talk) 03:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Denisarona (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Denisarona (talk) 07:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Shizhao (talk) 07:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Nioger (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Nioger (talk) 10:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Winterysteppe (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   I believe this person can contribute positively. Winterysteppe (talk) 16:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Jusjih (talk) 00:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   +1 multilingual, +1 first in a language, +1 concise writing style Pratyeka (talk) 06:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Pradeepabk (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Good one Pradeepabk (talk) 11:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Oefe (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Oefe (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016   Wikifreund (talk) 16:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Rich Farmbrough 18:02 20 February 2016 (GMT). 18:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Ealdwulf (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ealdwulf (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ruhrfisch (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983)   Ruhrfisch (talk) 23:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Goombiis (talk) 00:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. FrankyLeRoutier (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 01:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   I liked what I read, FWIW. Popo le Chien (talk) 10:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Trusted and capable. Taketa (talk) 10:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Aussie Oc (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Aussie Oc (talk) 11:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   MZaplotnik (contribs) 13:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Maleine258 (talk) 13:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   BluesyPete (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Roxyuru (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Roxyuru 22:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Rsocol (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Rsocol (talk) 06:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --6AND5 (talk) 11:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Nordic Dragon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Nordic Dragon (talk) 14:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       DracoEssentialis (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   He's an en-wp admin, but that shouldn't be held against him. :) DracoEssentialis (talk) 16:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Cirflow (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Cirflow (talk) 02:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bogger (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Drmies (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Drmies (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Geoff Who, me? 22:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Yakifahmi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Yakifahmi (talk) 02:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Kadavr2000 (talk) 10:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Mick Knapton (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Good luck in the election. You'd be a good steward. Mick Knapton (talk) 19:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Somercet (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   "ELECTION TOMORROW! VOTE GOAT!" Somercet (talk) 05:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Hobbamock (talk) 14:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. VTgrinchenko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   VTgrinchenko (talk) 05:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Eltargrim (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Eltargrim (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Lutzv (talk) 16:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   NeoLexx (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kellyprice (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Kellyprice (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Antidiskriminator (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. MirkoS18 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   MirkoS18 (talk) 20:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Cbyd (talk) 22:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Vachovec1 (talk) 01:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Lawrencedepe (talk) 09:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Proektir (talk) 16:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Tracouti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   --Tracouti (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Imbericle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   For the English Wikipedia. Imbericle (talk) 23:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Muso (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Muso (talk) 04:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Defrenrokorit (talk) 05:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Christoph Franzen (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   --CHF (talk) 05:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 11:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No[edit]

  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   No cross-wiki experience (97% of edits on enwiki). From the statement, we also do not get to know why he wants to be a steward ("I am ro-2" seems to be the only reason"). The answer to the question from Steinsplitter also shows a severe lack of knowledge (claiming that global blocks and locks do not apply "to the Meta project"). --MF-W 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   For my feeling way too enwiki-centric and does not seem to be very experienced outside of that wiki either. --Vogone (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Insufficient global experience --Herby talk thyme 14:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Sorry, not enough cross-wiki experience and too much “specialized”. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Holder (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Sorry but user doesn't have the right skillset and doesn't have enough cross wiki experience. Also per Vogone. Natuur12 (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Far to little cross-wiki experience, and the answer to Steinsplitter's question makes me even more doubtful. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  10. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ulflarsen (talk) 15:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Too confrontational on ENWP. Also not enough crosswiki experience. Reguyla (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I have no idea why you want to be a steward, or what relevant experience you have. Telling me how many good and featured articles you have on enwiki, and what strange sub-units of ArbCom you might have served on there would be useful on an enwiki RfA, but not on a steward request where we are trying to evaluate your potential to work on cross-wiki issues that extend well beyond the two languages that you speak. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Widr (talk) 17:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Hypergio (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 17:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Alan (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   lacking crosswiki experience Nrautava (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Asav (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Laberinto16 (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Armbrust (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   ChristophThomas (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Riley Huntley (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Per Ajraddatz Riley Huntley (talk) 22:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   No cross-wiki experience Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   White Master (es) 22:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hubertl (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   SQLQuery me! 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Checkingfax (talk) 02:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. SSTflyer (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   not enough cross-wiki experience. SSTflyer (talk) 02:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   HalanTul (talk) 02:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per MF-Warburg, stating that global locks do not apply to Meta shows that the user does not understand the process well enough — NickK (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Legoktm (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Gimmy dd (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   No cross-wiki experience. --Uğurkenttalk 16:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   per MF-W DCB (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not enough cross-wiki experience imo. The nomination statement doesn't really mention why they want to be a steward or what they wish to do as a steward. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Ernstol (talk) 19:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   cyrfaw (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Veleius
  44. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per MF-W. — T. 13:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   --Buggia 15:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Érico (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   No cross-wiki experience sadly. Érico (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Might be a good candidate, however, he clearly misses the needed crosswiki experience. -Barras talk 13:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Omerlaziale (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Omerlaziale (talk) 06:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   per above unfortunately. Limited x-wiki experience FASTILY 09:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   no global rights, has not created an steward request and has contributions on few wikis compared to other candidates as of feb 1.--Snaevar (talk) 19:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   No enough experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 05:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ferran Mir (talk) 07:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Gag0409 (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Not enough xwiki experience. — regards, Revi 17:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Az1568 (talk) 02:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Pgallert (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Pgallert (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Fdssdf (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Per others; not enough cross-wiki experience Fdssdf (talk) 23:39, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   თოგო (D) 23:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Hemeier (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ringbang (talk) 21:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   CaZeRillo (talk) 09:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   SideshowBob7 (talk) 13:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   ZERO contributions to any Wikiversities for someone whose been around so long! Disappointing! --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Candidate statement doesn't say much Qewr4231 (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Octahedron80 (talk) 13:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   You need to broaden your experience cross-wiki, especially in terms of anti-abuse activities. Consider helping out with SWMT in the meantime. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Stang 05:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Needs some more balanced crosswiki activity. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not enough cross-wiki experience KTo288 (talk) 13:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   VisaBlack (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Ford MF (talk) 06:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Tonton Bernardo (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Optional comment: I looked at some of his edits: there are some open questions on them, and I prefer to vote No. Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:43, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   --DerekvG (talk) 16:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Arbnos (talk) 18:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   per MF-W and Vogone DangSunM (talk) 20:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Timk70 question? 21:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   The Traditionalist (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Glaisher (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Styko (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   The Banner (talk) 14:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Just one reason. "No cross-wiki experience" Pratyya (Hello!) 12:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Base (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   359 edits out of enwiki. Sorry it's an absolute no for now. I would be happy to vote in the section above in a couple of years when the candidate becomes active x-wiki. Base (talk) 12:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Nnemo (talk) 13:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral[edit]

Neutral Neutral --6AND5 (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Żyrafał (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Flyingfischer (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Zunter (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Zunter (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   eurodyne (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ruthven (talk) 11:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   David1010 (talk) 12:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Lsanabria (talk) 13:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   CLCStudent (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Never seen before. Ghiutun 22:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (talk) 11:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Drzewianin (talk) 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   GZWDer (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Non-existent cross-wiki activity, however, I am comfortable with the candidate having access to tools, per seeing him work on the now-disbanded AUSC. Normally I'd oppose for this little cross-wiki experience, but I trust him enough to land here instead. Courcelles 22:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Berlin-George (talk) 00:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Mirer (talk) 20:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Shanmugamp7 (talk) 13:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Chrism (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Chrism (talk) 00:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   —Ah3kal (talk) 08:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Per Courcelles. Yair rand (talk) 20:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   ~Cybularny Speak? 23:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Ananth subray (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   VictorBrice (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Need to increase crosswiki activity first Bennylin 04:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   NoychoH (talk) 12:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bernd Bergmann (talk) 20:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   ysjbserver (talk) 07:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   Ireas (talk) 13:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]