Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2017/Votes/Sjoerddebruin

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: nl-N, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello everyone,

    My name is Sjoerd de Bruin and I was born in the Netherlands. I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia since 2010 and became sysop on the Dutch Wikipedia in November 2013. Wikidata followed in 2013, where I've became sysop in February 2014 and oversighter in August 2015. I'm also helping on OTRS since January 2014. Also has been a member of the Arbitration Committee of the Dutch Wikipedia since March 2016. My main language is Dutch and I have advanced knowledge of English.

    In the last year, I have noticed a lack of active stewards on IRC in, for example, the European mornings. Urgent locks and oversights need to wait a long time for attention. I can complain about that, but I can also try to do something about it. This is one of main reasons why I've nominated myself this year. I'm always online to help people out, the same applies for international and local events in real-life! I have a decent amount of knowledge about LTA's and other situations on various Wikimedia projects.

    As steward, I would like to help with handeling (urgent) IRC requests and requests on the various pages on Meta. I hope the community will support me while I do the same to them.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2017/Questions#Sjoerddebruin


Yes

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Admin on two large wikis, and ArbCom experience on nlwiki (which shows dispute resolution experience - sometimes is useful in dealing with difficult issues), as well as experience handling private information. As far as the incident I mentioned on the questions page, that was two years ago and I think that the candidate has proven, both by what they have said subsequently, and by their work as an oversighter on Wikidata, that they have the right attitude in regards to privacy. Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  2. Milesjolly1997 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Milesjolly1997 (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  3. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  4. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   GZWDer (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  5. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Good to go! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  6. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Vituzzu (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  7. Lingveno (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Lingveno (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  8. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  9. Ks-M9 (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   --Ks-M9 [disc.] 14:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  10. Pearli (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017   Pearli (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  11. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017   Nuhaa (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  12. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2017   Miniapolis 15:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  13. -revi (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   — regards, Revi 15:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  14. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017   Mainly per Rschen7754. Jasper Deng (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  15. NickK (Eligible, checked by MBisanz)2017   While he is not the most experienced candidate, he has a rather diverse experience including Arbcom membership on Dutch Wikipedia and oversight rights on Wikidata. Answers are good as well. This is enough for me to support the candidate — NickK (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  16. Satnam S Virdi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Satnam S Virdi (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  17. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Stryn (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  18. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   He seems to understand the responsibilities, has the right attitude, has experience in some areas, has specific ideas of where he can and wants to contribute and has a surprisingly good command of English for a Dutchman. Thumbs up. Stevenmitchell (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  19. Sabri76 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Mainly per Rschen7754.--Sabri76 (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  20. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  21. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   --Hannes 24 (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  22. Ankry (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Ankry (talk) 17:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  23. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Luke081515 18:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  24. Kippenvlees1 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Kippenvlees1 (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  25. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Taketa (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Terry77 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Terry77 (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  26. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   AmaryllisGardener talk 19:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  27. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ferran Mir (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  28. 12345danNL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   12345danNL (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  29. Adog104 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Adog104 Talk to me 19:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  30. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Elvesham (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  31. Aledownload (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Aledownload (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  32. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Ascánder (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  33. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   StevenJ81 (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  34. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Mbch331 (talk) 21:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Lawrence142002 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   I'm not sure that inexperience should disqualify a candidate and all their answers were acceptable. Lawrence142002 (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  35. TheDragonhunter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   TheDragonhunter (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  36. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Hoo man (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  37. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Dostojewskij (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  38. Rxy (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   rxy (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  39. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   Make an all-out effort. Eager Lin (Message) 00:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  40. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Courcelles 01:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  41. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Jusjih (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  42. Mirer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Mirer (talk) 05:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  43. Mykola Swarnyk (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 05:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  44. Geagea (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Geagea (talk) 06:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  45. Rodejong (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Kind regards,  Rodejong  💬 ✉️  09:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  46. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Rzuwig 09:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  47. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017   Shizhao (talk) 09:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  48. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Jerrykim306)2017   I could not be less confident that this highly committed user will do an excellent job — TBloemink talk 11:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  49. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   спасибо за вашу помощь, в том числе на IRC Gryllida 11:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Openskye (talk) 12:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  50. Martix (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Martix (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  51. Xxmarijnw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Xxmarijnw (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  52. Sacha47 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Sacha47 (talk) 15:39, 09. Februar 2017 (UTC)
  53. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Joshualouie711 (talk) 17:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  54. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ghilt (talk) 19:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  55. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 19:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  56. Nutcracker100 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Nutcracker100 (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  57. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Per Rschen7754, he seems to be a good candidate. Syum90 (talk) 20:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  58. Kuuskinen (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Kuuskinen (talk) 20:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  59. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   -Xbony2 (talk) 21:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  60. Barras (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Barras talk 21:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  61. Quedel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Quedel (talk) 22:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  62. Endo999 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Endo999 (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Predatorix (Not eligible, checked by Ks-M9)   Predatorix (talk) 23:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  63. Stang (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Stang 01:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  64. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   lNeverCry 02:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Earthscent (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Earthscent (talk) 02:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  65. Yogwi21 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Yogwi21 (talk) 03:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  66. Esmost (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Esmost (talk) 04:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  67. OneMember (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017   Looks ready. OneMember (talk) 07:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  68. M-J (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   M-J (talk) 08:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  69. Moheen Reeyad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ~ Moheen (talk) 10:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  70. Bradipo Lento (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bradipo Lento (talk) 15:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  71. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   I'd like to support everyone. Wolverène (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  72. Superyetkin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Superyetkin (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  73. Lord Roem (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Lord Roem (talk) 00:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  74. David S. Hwang (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   David S. Hwang (talk) 00:55, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  75. Full Rune (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Full Rune (talk) 01:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  76. Fastily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   FASTILY 10:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  77. Nungalpiriggal (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Nungalpiriggal (talk) 11:31, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  78. MannMaus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   MannMaus (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  79. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   OK for me. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  80. Plasm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Plasm (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  81. Jbergner (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Jbergner (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  82. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Matanya (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  83. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   I support this candidate, although I would like to use this opportunity to speak out against computer games, which are vastly inferior to reasonable literature, music and, in particular, mathematics and science. Mathmensch (talk) 19:02, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  84. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Anatoliy (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  85. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --თოგო (D) 21:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC) I'd give him a chance, I guess.reply
  86. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Worth giving a chance. Dolotta (talk) 22:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  87. La Mantis (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Rocío Mantis (talk) 22:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  88. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   MZaplotnik (contribs) 00:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  89. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Mahir256 (talk) 03:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  90. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Legoktm (talk) 08:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  91. Howan Hansi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Howan Hansi (talk) 08:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  92. Buggia (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Buggia 09:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  93. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  94. Han-Jun Cho (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Thank you very much.Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Han-Jun Cho (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  95. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Arbnos (talk) 14:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  96. Naminsk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Naminsk (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  97. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bpierreb (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  98. Addshore (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ·addshore· talk to me! 21:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  99. Pnapora (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Pnapora (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  100. Min.neel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Min.neel (talk) 23:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  101. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Az1568 (talk) 03:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  102. Jklamo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Jklamo (talk) 08:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  103. Kiraroshi1976 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 08:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  104. ChristianKl (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ChristianKl (talk) 11:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  105. Ibra~28 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ibra~28 (talk) 11:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  106. Shivanarayana (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Shivanarayana (talk) 13:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Marumari (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Marumari (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  107. Subscriptshoe9 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Subscriptshoe9 (talk) 15:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Parvezahmed (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Wish you best of luck. Parvezahmed (talk) 15:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  108. Ladsgroup (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Amir (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  109. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   OlEnglish (Talk) 18:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  110. Dispe (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Dispe (talk) 22:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  111. ArisMethymna (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ArisMethymna (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  112. Sturgeontransformer (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017   Sturgeontransformer (talk) 02:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  113. Armineaghayan (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   ArmAg 05:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  114. Gts-tg (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gts-tg (talk) 06:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  115. Deb (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Deb (talk) 09:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  116. BuffaloBob (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   BuffaloBob (talk) 14:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  117. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   --Fenikals (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  118. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Centaur271188 (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  119. Muhraz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Muhraz (talk) 01:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  120. Dan D. Ric (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Dan D. Ric (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  121. Imeriki al-Shimoni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Imeriki al-Shimoni (talk) 07:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  122. Taivo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Taivo (talk) 08:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  123. Tobovs (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Tobovs (talk) 09:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  124. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Popo le Chien (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  125. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bff (talk) 16:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  126. HHubi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   HHubi (talk) 17:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  127. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Lepricavark (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  128. Ymnes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Ymnes (talk) 18:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  129. Odder (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017   odder (talk) 02:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  130. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Chris Troutman (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  131. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   CactusWriter (talk) 15:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Filipović Zoran (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Filipović Zoran (talk) 21:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
    Filipović Zoran (talk) 21:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC) Do not vote twice! Ankry (talk) 21:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  132. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 10:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  133. Ce Ele 415 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Ce Ele 415 (talk) 15:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  134. KHMELNYTSKYIA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   KHMELNYTSKYIA (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  135. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   cyrfaw (talk) 08:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  136. Giorgos ab1234 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Giorgos ab1234 (talk) 11:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  137. Deryni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Deryni (talk) 14:11, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  138. UaineSean (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   UaineSean (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  139. Sj (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Fine candidate and experience, especially on WD. SJ talk  19:11, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  140. Geraki (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Geraki TL 19:18, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  141. Miguu (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Miguu (talk) 20:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Marchy088 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Marchy088 (talk) 09:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  142. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  143. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Smile4ever (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  144. Edoderoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Edoderoo (talk) 14:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  145. Alan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Alan (talk) 19:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  146. Masti (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   masti <talk> 22:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  147. Foxj (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   — foxj 22:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Jvikings1 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Jvikings1 (talk) 04:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  148. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ArdiPras95 (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  149. Jonathan Groß (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Jonathan Groß (talk) 12:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Pngtblrs (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Pngtblrs (talk) 20:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  150. WiseWoman (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017   Helpful admin on Wikidata! WiseWoman (talk) 21:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  151. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Samuele2002 (talk) 21:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  152. Миша Карелин (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Good luck !! M.Karelin (talk) 05:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Artur Franca (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Artur Franca (talk) 12:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  153. Matticusmadness (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Tried to do this vote a few days ago, and can't seem to find it so I can only assume the mobile interface did mess it up. Anyway, after reading all of the candidate statements, this user seems to be the only one with one very important thing, previous experience with non-public data, as the positions in both an ArbCommittee and an Oversighter position (I believe) entail. As such, this is the only Election member that I can really stage a vote for. MM ("You called?") - ("He's over theeere!") 11:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  154. Gamebuster19901 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   Per above. Gamebuster19901 (talk) 13:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  155. Ooo86 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Ooo86 (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  156. Lotje (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Lotje (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  157. Kenzia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Kenzia (talk) 10:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  158. Mr.User200 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Very active at WP.With Experience. Mr.User200 (talk) 13:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  159. RickinBaltimore (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       T34 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   t34 16:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  160. Radlna15 (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017   Radlna15 (talk) 19:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  161. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Cbyd (talk) 22:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Patrickwooldridge (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Patrickwooldridge (talk) 00:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  162. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Wae35244 (talk) 09:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  163. Язев (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Язев (talk) 19:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  164. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   I think Sjoerddebruin can be trusted with stewardship. There is no glaring reason for me to oppose. Kurtis (talk) 20:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  165. Taweetham (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017   Taweethaも (talk) 01:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  166. Ukexpat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2017   ukexpat (talk) 02:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  167. Paul2 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Paul2 (talk) 05:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  168. Kelvin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Kelvin (talk) 08:56, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  169. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Wieralee (talk) 10:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  170. Cquoi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Cquoi (talk) 12:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  171. Pelz (Eligible, checked by QEDK)2017   Pelz (talk) 13:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  172. Krassdaniel (Eligible, checked by QEDK)2017   Krassdaniel (talk) 14:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Jelandstrom (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Jelandstrom (talk) 17:19, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  173. Zozoulia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Zozoulia (talk) 17:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  174. Agremon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Agremon (talk) 20:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  175. Mirinano (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Mirinano (talk) 04:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Ebear422 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Ebear422 (talk) 04:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Deadrat (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Deadrat (talk) 07:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  176. Dick Bos (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Dick Bos (talk) 14:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  177. Elkelon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Elkelon (talk) 20:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       PowerBUL (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   --PowerBUL (talk) 08:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  178. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Wiki13 talk 11:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  179. Fantafluflu (Eligible, checked by Lautaro 97)2017   Fantafluflu (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  180. Bob Burkhardt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  181. Gaeanautes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gaeanautes (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  182. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Timk70 question? 21:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  183. Ankax Hayastan (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Hayordi (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  184. Ptolusque (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017   Ptolusque (talk) 00:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  185. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Dash77 (talk) 04:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  186. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   This candidate has been on Wikimedia a long enough time to be a competent steward. Wpollard (talk) 05:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  187. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Melquíades)2017   Experienced functionary across multiple projects. Activity concerns about splitting time with the Arbcom roles are duly noted, but if Sjoerddebruin thinks they can make a contribution as a steward that's worth trying by me :) Snowolf How can I help? 10:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  188. Frettie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Frettie (talk) 10:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply

No

[edit]
  1. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Alchimista)2017   Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Unfortunately, I am not convinced about his aptitude for stewardship. It's hard to know from the statement and the questions whether he understood the role and its policies well or not (especially because he only gave one short answer to the interesting questions for all candidates, even though there was at least one week time for all of this). I have to say however that he handled the theoretical situation question I asked him well. --MF-W 14:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  3. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   KPFC💬 14:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  4. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   While trusted, I would like to see more involvement in cross-wiki activities. —Ah3kal (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  5. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Richardkiwi (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  6. DCB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   DCB (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  7. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Agree with above Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  8. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   No activity on Wikiversity! Sorry! --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  9. Alex Khimich (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Alex Khimich (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  10. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by NasssaNser)2017   MoiraMoira (talk) 09:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC) no trust in this candidates ethics. Also not very active as admin/cross wiki.reply
  11. Érico (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Per Ah3kal. Please, gain more cross-wiki experience and run again next year. Érico (talk) 13:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  12. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   No cross-wiki experience, and alegation for his candidature is absurd. Leon saudanha (talk) 14:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  13. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   The Banner (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC) No cross-wiki experience, not enough knowledge of other languagesreply
  14. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2017   Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  15. IJzeren Jan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   Sjoerd, I honestly think you are a very nice person and I'm sure you mean well. But since your activity both as a moderator and as an Arbcom member on nlwiki (can't speak for Wikidata/Commons) is minimal, I really don't see how taking yet another hat it going to improve that. IJzeren Jan (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  16. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Slowking4 (talk) 02:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  17. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Herby talk thyme 10:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  18. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   uses too many three (equivalent of English four) letter words. Besides ex[ects clear language from others while he is himself many times not clear enough to others. In few Latin words quod licet Iovi non licet bovi. The admin task is not a status symbol  Klaas `Z4␟` V16:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  19. Shotgun pete (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Shotgun pete (talk) 16:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  20. Whaledad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Whaledad (talk) 23:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC) - While I like Sjoerddebruin as a colleague and a person, I think I need to protect him against himself by voting against this. Sjoerddebruin already has too many positions to properly fulfill today, adding one more will only further jeopardize his functioning.reply
  21. Yscplus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Yscplus (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  22. Schnatzel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Schnatzel (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  23. Axpde (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   a×pdeHello! 10:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  24. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   close to a neutral; oversight is nice; not seeing much crosswiki work; and in the end with an arbcom vs stewardry positions ... ouch! focus on one or the other, both is going to be an internal conflict  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  25. Peter b (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   (talk) 13:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  26. Silraks (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Silraks (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Catmando999 (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Catmando999 (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  27. Edisonabcd (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Edisonabcd (talk) 11:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  28. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   JurriaanH (talk) 13:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  29. JustBerry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Per User:billinghurst. JustBerry (talk) 06:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  30. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Bestoernesto (talk) 07:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  31. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  32. Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Maria Sieglinda von Nudeldorf (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  33. Teles (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Looks like a good candidate, but I miss a little more experience. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       DHbdbdbdbdbdb (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   DHbdbdbdbdbdb (talk) 12:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  34. TmY e12 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --TmѰ e12 15:30, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  35. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Lsanabria (talk) 02:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  36. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gag0409 (talk) 13:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  37. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   After long consideration, and taking the above comments into account, I think it's better if Sjoerd focuses on his ArbCom work, especially since the lack of much steward work-related experience means he will probably need quite some time to get used to it. The European night/morning issue will hopefully be solved by Matiia who is usually around at the times in question. I may support next year provided Sjoerd becomes more active in the SWMT or helps out otherwise globally. --Vogone (talk) 22:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  38. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   The user has no cross-wiki experience. IMHO, that trait is a stewardship prerequisite, as one cannot even have "smaller" flags of global admin and global rollback without it, so no. Not this year. Base (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  39. African Hope (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   African Hope (talk) 01:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Wimmiden (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Wimmiden (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  40. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Thank you for your contributions. But no cross-wiki experience. --Uğurkenttalk 17:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  41. Tesser4D (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Not trustworthy Tesser4D (talk) 20:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  42. Akoopal (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Although he is motivated, I don't have the feeling he has time enough to do all the tasks he is picking up. I think it is better for him to first concentrate on the tasks he has now. Akoopal (talk) 09:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply

Neutral

[edit]
I do trust Sjoerd, but he is not the most experienced user in areas which concern steward work. The hypothetical situation on the questions was handled well, though. I'm undecided. Vogone (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  1. Emir of Wikipedia (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  2. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by 1233)2017  I have not seen the user enough cross-wiki patrolling work, however, I think it could equally be useful in some areas of stewards work. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 14:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  3. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   B20180 (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  4. Rogi.Official (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   Unknown Rogi 16:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  5. QEDK (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2017   QEDK (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  6. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2017   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 01:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  7. BDaniel (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2017   BDaniel (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
       Cpiebtanz (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   Cpiebtanz (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  8. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ~Cybularny Speak? 19:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  9. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Brateevsky (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  10. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   ysjbserver (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  11. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   eurodyne (talk) 08:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  12. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   VictorBrice (talk) 11:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  13. Rollingcontributor (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Rollingcontributor (talk) 06:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  14. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   I might change my mind if I have time to analyze the profile more deeply. So far i am probably not impressed by the language he knows (we have more nl-N than other languages) and by the platforms he is active. I personally value cross- and meta platform such as commons and wikidata a little bit less than "local" platforms.--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  15. Maynich (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   not enough knowledge of languages Maynich (talk) 16:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  16. Gridditsch (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Gridditsch (talk) 08:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  17. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Rberchie (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  18. Plagiat (Eligible, checked by Cameron11598)2017   Plagiat (talk) 21:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  19. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Not yet. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  20. ArthurPSmith (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Sjoerddebruin has been active in wikidata but with some significant gaps (for example why has no admin done anything on Properties for deletion recently?); I'd like to see more focus on fulfilling responsibilties this user already has rather than adding more. ArthurPSmith (talk) 21:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  21. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Bernd Bergmann (talk) 22:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  22. SM7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   --SM7 --talk-- 19:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  23. Varina (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Varina (talk) 13:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  24. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Onverwacht (talk) 09:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  25. Tvcccp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Tvcccp (talk) 02:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  26. Yohannvt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Yohannvt (talk) 07:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  27. Lomeno 24 (Eligible, checked by JustBerry)2017   Lomeno 24 (Contact me here) 20:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  28. ThePlatypusofDoom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  29. Gampe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Gampe (talk) 05:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  30. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Litlok (talk) 08:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  31. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   HMSLavender (talk) 17:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  32. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Samuele2002)2017   Freddy2001 talk 22:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  33. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Shanmugamp7 (talk) 03:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  34. Seven twentynine (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Seven twentynine (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  35. YaganZ (Eligible, checked by Melquíades)2017   YaganZ (talk) 08:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  36. Nan (Eligible, checked by Ks-M9)2017   Nan (talk) 09:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  37. Quiddity (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2017   Per confidence from many stewards, but also concerns per Teles/Vogone/Base. Quiddity (talk) 23:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  38. Nickrds09 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 10:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
  39. Ahmer Jamil Khan (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2017   Undecided. Ahmer Jamil Khan (talk) 12:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply