Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2018/Votes/Ciell

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: nl-N, en-3, de-1, fr-1, af-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    I'm a Dutch Wikipedia admin since October 2006 and a Commons admin since 2008. Member of the Dutch OTRS team since 2007. As an OTRS-member and former member of the Arbitration Committee I have experience with confidentiality. I have some more time on my hands for 2018 and would like to pick up another task for the movement, for instance fighting vandalism on small wiki's.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Ciell


Yes

[edit]
  1. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  TonyBallioni (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  2. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Wischmat (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  3. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Ciell has extensive experience in handling sensitive information, being +sysop on the Dutch Wikipedia, in addition to showing experience and competency in handling OTRS e-mails, and handling Arbitration Committee material. They would make an excellent addition to the stewarding team. Nick (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  4. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 16:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  5. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  --Cameron11598 (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  6. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Has a lot of experience, as you can see in the personal information, but Ciell didn't mention it all. (I'm not gonna fill that in, but I know it) If anyone would be a good steward, Ciell would be. My vote is a big YES. Richardkiwi (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  7. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Ciell will do just fine. I'm sure off it. The steward team needs more then people who know how to revert LTA's. The team also needs people with fresh idea's, hart for the project and experience helping people. That is what Ciell has to offer. Natuur12 (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  8. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Ciell does great in OTRS which is a trusted, off-wiki, private, multilingual platform. The skillset Ciell uses for OTRS matches the need as a steward. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  9. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  10. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018 •  Shizhao (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  11. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Mbch331 (talk) 06:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  12. Edoderoo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  I know Ciell as a long term, friendly and dedicated volunteer. Edoderoo (talk) 06:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  13. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  +Experience, +activity, +trust, no issues. --Krd 07:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  14. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Legoktm (talk) 09:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  15. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018 •  Gereon K. (talk) 10:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  16. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018 •  --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  17. De Geo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Long time experience on Dutch wiki The Geo (talk) 11:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  18. Pelz (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018 •  Pelz (talk) 12:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  19. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  20. 隼鷹 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  隼鷹 (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  21. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Great floors (talk) 20:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  22. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Elvesham (talk) 22:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  23. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018 •  Trusted user. Wolverène (talk) 03:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  24. SQL (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  SQLQuery me! 03:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  25. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Wae35244 (talk) 09:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  26. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  27. Csisc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Csisc (talk) 11:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  28. JoostB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  JoostB (talk) 12:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  29. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  BugWarp (talk) 13:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  30. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Nuhaa (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  31. Bluemel1 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Bluemel1 (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  32. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Filipović Zoran (talk) 15:08, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  33. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 22:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  34. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Stüard olması üçün mövcud fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edərək, onu dəstəkləyirəm. Çünki uzun müddətli təcrübəsi var. Düşünürəm ki, faydalı işlər görəcək. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  35. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Potatornado (talk) 15:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  36. NickK (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Weak support. I believe Ciell would be a good steward, she might lack some experience but she is trusted enough and I hope she will be able to deal with it — NickK (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  37. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  StevenJ81 (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  38. Ecritures (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Ecritures (talk) 17:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  39. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Heart seems in the right place, worth giving the benefit of the doubt. --YodinT 20:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  40. Sj (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Humble, effective. –SJ talk  21:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  41. Wthjmkuiper (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Wthjmkuiper (talk) 21:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  42. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  TJH2018talk 16:51, 13 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  43. MaynardClark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  MaynardClark (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  44. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Trustworthy user given the amount of access he has. 1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  45. Kukkaspoika73 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Kukkaspoika73 (talk) 11:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  46. Sänger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Grüße vom Sänger ♫(Reden) 17:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  47. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Liridon (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  48. Litev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Litev (talk) 12:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)reply
       Manusurmars (Not eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger) •  Manusurmars (talk) 14:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  49. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018 •  Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  50. JanB46 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  JanB46 (talk) 16:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  51. Chefallen (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Chefallen (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  52. RonnieV (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Enough trust in this person to give him this function. Is willing to do a lot for Wikipedia and has experience in Arbcom, mod, OTRS. RonnieV (talk) 00:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
       Phirun (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne) •  Phirun (talk) 06:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  53. M.Tarnowski (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  M.Tarnowski (talk) 12:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  54. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  -Xbony2 (talk) 14:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  55. Cyberpower678 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 17:48, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
       Antoine2711 (Not eligible, checked by Xaosflux) •  I think she has the qualities required to be a good arbitrator. She is a dedicated wikipedian and a very competent person. Antoine2711 (talk) 23:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  56. CreativeC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  CreativeC (talk) 09:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  57. Vit Koz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Vit Koz (talk) 11:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC)reply
       Karora (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Karora (talk) 11:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  58. BernardP (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  BernardP (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  59. KlaasZ4usV (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Klaas `Z4␟` V:  16:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC) one of the greatest admins Netherlands ever hadreply
  60. Effeietsanders (Eligible, checked by Defender)2018 •  I know Ciell well from the Dutch Wikipedia - and she definitely has the patience, thoroughness, investigative interests and skills that would be needed for a good steward. Effeietsanders (talk) 22:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)reply
       Enik (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Enik (talk) 06:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  61. Odder (Eligible, checked by Defender)2018 •  odder (talk) 10:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  62. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Smile4ever (talk) 20:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  63. JB82 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  JB82 (talk) 01:36, 20 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  64. Steindy (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Steindy (talk) 21:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)reply
       Minoo (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67) •  Good feeling Minoo (talk) 13:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  65. Savh (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018 •  Some interesting experience for the steward role, though lack in some other fairly important areas. Could be suited at a later date. Savhñ 11:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  66. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Jusjih (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  67. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018 •  Fenikals (talk) 07:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  68. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  —DerHexer (Talk) 09:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  69. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Popo le Chien (talk) 09:44, 26 February 2018 (UTC)reply
       Shakkimatti (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Shakkimatti (talk) 15:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  70. FN Markus (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  FN Markus (talk) 17:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  71. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Dolotta (talk) 03:15, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  72. Otto ter Haar (Eligible, checked by Stang)2018 •  Otto ter Haar (talk) 11:59, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  73. Ellywa (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Ellywa (talk) 22:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
       Jack86mkII (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Jack86mkII (talk) 09:49, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply

No

[edit]
  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  So far I don't see a good reason to support. It seems to me that fighting vandalism in small wikis can also be started without steward tools, as many SWMT people do. --MF-W 14:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  2. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 • Not experienced cross-wiki. --Stïnger (会話) 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC).reply
  3. KPFC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 • missing cross-wiki experience, also I see no need of steward rights for SWMT – KPFC 💬 14:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  4. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 • --cyrfaw (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  5. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Insufficient crosswiki experience, would consider supporting when the candidate gains more experience. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  6. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  7. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  I remain unconvinced, if you have time to focus on a new task like fighting vandalism on small wikis you are very welcome to help in the SWMT, but this mostly does not require you to be a steward. I would certainly be willing to reconsider if you reapply next year with some more SWMT (or similar xwiki countervandalism) experience, though. —Vogone (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  8. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  9. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  The statement is so short which I don't think he/her has fully understood for what is applying for. Moreover, he/her is one of the less active administrators of Commons, a bad sign for someone who is running for steward. Érico (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  10. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Eurodyne (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  11. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  — xaosflux Talk 15:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  12. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  13. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018 •  Herby talk thyme 17:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  14. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Not convinced by statement; steward rights are not necessary for fighting vandalism on small wikis. I suggest that you gain some more relevant experience and apply in a future election. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  15. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  *Youngjin (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  16. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Milad A380 talk 20:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  17. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Tools are not necessary in order to fight vandalism. Unconvinced by the statement provided. Nihlus 20:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  18. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Question answers don't convince me, sorry. hiàn 21:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  19. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Little to no cross-wikiness. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  20. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Az1568 (talk) 04:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  21. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Need more training for cross-wiki experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 08:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  22. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  lack of cross wiki experience and lack of activity as admin worries me MoiraMoira (talk) 09:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  23. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  missing cross-wiki experience DCB (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
       Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Need more xp. Alex Pereira falaê 13:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  24. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  missing cross-wiki experience Holder (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  25. Wizard-Lizard (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018 •  Wizard-Lizard (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  26. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Simplexity22 (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  27. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  missing cross-wiki experience, no need of steward rights for SWMT The Banner (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  28. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Fails my criteria. KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  29. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  30. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  You can fight vandalism without the steward tools, Like above I see no valid reason to support at this present time. –Davey2010Talk 15:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  31. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  <comment was removed as disruptive and offensive> Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  32. Athaenara (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  If Ciell needs something to keep busy, there's always editing more articles, finding and formatting citations, etc. Athaenara (talk) 06:15, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  33. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  No case made for steward access in particular, as opposed to other positions. Cross-wiki anti-abuse experience is a (de facto) prerequisite for this role. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  34. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Not experienced xwiki enough, neither represents any exotic language family for this to be considered a boon. --Base (talk) 13:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Base (talk) 13:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  35. ToastButterToast (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  ToastButterToast (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  36. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 15:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  37. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Maleine258 (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  38. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Freddy2001 talk 16:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  39. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  40. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Without taking anything away from your actions. I believe that more croos-wiki experience is needed Samuele2002 (Talk!) 21:06, 13 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  41. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  42. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Slowking4 (talk) 13:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  43. Power~enwiki (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  power~enwiki (talk) 03:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  44. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Despite being here for long time and holding several advanced permissions/roles; the candidate seems to fundamentally misunderstood Stewardship. –Ammarpad (talk) 10:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  45. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018 •  Zabia (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  46. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Non convincing statement, neither their answers (some questions wasn't even answered). Doesn't seem to have experience and there's no need for the tools per MF-Warburg. Zerabat (discusión) 12:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  47. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Ghilt (talk) 16:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  48. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 01:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  49. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018 •  a×pdeHello! 06:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  50. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Frīheidasliova (talk) 09:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  51. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Statement a bit short to understand why Ciell wants to be Steward. Kind regards. Jules78120 (talk) 13:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  52. Risk Engineer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  Risk Engineer (talk) 18:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  53. Allforrous (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  Allforrous (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  54. Barras (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  -Barras talk 18:05, 20 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  55. Touzrimounir (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Mounir Touzri (talk) 20:43, 20 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  56. DeltaQuad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Don't see a convincing reason for the tools. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  57. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Joshualouie711 (talk) 00:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  58. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  per above. Steward bit not needed for SWMT FASTILY 06:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  59. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  HMSLavender (talk) 06:38, 22 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  60. Zakawer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Zakawer (talk) 11:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  61. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Incorrect answer to Rschen's question. Did not answer all questions. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  62. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Armbrust (talk) 15:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  63. Miguelucas (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Your speech is so short to be a candidate. If you change your speech and tell us why you want to be a steward I could re-examine my vote. sorry Miguelucas (talk) 15:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  64. Jjjjjjdddddd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 21:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  65. Caliburn (Eligible, checked by Stang)2018 •  Demonstrate some crosswiki experience, and go for global sysop first. Caliburn (talk) 11:54, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  66. Stang (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Sorry, but maybe not now. Stang 11:55, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  67. Arjayay (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Arjayay (talk) 12:28, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  68. Artix Kreiger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  --Artix Kreiger (Message Wall) 17:23, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  69. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Courcelles 02:56, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply

Neutral

[edit]
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 • Does have some relevant experience (sysop on multiple wikis, ArbCom) but no evident "mission statement" for their candidacy and vague answers to the questions make me hesitate. Rschen7754 14:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  2. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 • Based on your answers to the questions, I think you are a good candidate, however I think you still need to demonstrate more experience with the work area of the stewards. —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 14:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina) •  Openskye (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  3. Devraj poudel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Devraj poudel (talk) 02:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  4. My name is not dave (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Sitting here for now. Awaiting an answer to my question. My name is not dave (talk) 19:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  5. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  Quickfingers (talk) 01:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  6. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  7. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  FeralOink (talk) 10:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  8. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  per Rschen7754 —Ah3kal (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  9. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018 •  DENAMAX (talk) 20:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  10. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018 •  Rzuwig► 22:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  11. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Stevenmitchell (talk) 11:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  12. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Alzinous (talk) 12:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  13. Xxmarijnw (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018 •  Xxmarijnw (talk) 13:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  14. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018 •  Eddie891 (talk) 13:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  15. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  B20180 (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  16. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  17. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018 •  స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  18. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 09:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  19. Adithyak1997 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Adithyak1997 (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  20. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 22:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  21. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  GZWDer (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  22. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  The user Ciell didn't answer Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Ciell for a long time. Garam (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  23. Storkk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Storkk (talk) 13:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  24. Complainer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Complainer (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  25. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Anbans 585 (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  26. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Ankry (talk) 10:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  27. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  Stephan1000000 (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  28. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018 •  DePlusJean (talk) 00:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)reply
       Weslam123 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Weslam123 (talk) 06:46, 18 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  29. Hma969 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Hma969 (talk) 10:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  30. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Lepricavark (talk) 14:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  31. InsaneHacker (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  I'm concerned about some questions that have been left unanswered for 20< days by this candidate. However, I won't stand in the way if others want to support them. InsaneHacker (talk) 09:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  32. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018 •  Maybe a little young (meaning, in the Wikimedia project) for the job ? Laurent Jerry (talk) 13:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  33. Samee (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  - samee- talk    18:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  34. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  VictorBrice (talk) 13:38, 24 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  35. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  36. DARIO SEVERI (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  DARIO SEVERI (talk) 00:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC). Insufficient crosswiki experience.reply
  37. Feminist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Well-intentioned, although I can't see how steward would be more useful than, say, global sysop. Feminist (talk) 07:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  38. Astronomi06 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018 •  Astronomi06 (talk) 20:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  39. John Cline (Eligible, checked by Stang)2018 •  John Cline (talk) 11:00, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  40. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Unconvinced that the best way of "fighting vandalism on small wikis" is to become a global steward; why not just...err... go and fight vandalism on smaller wikis??? Serial Number 54129 (talk) 13:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  41. علاء (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  per AlvaroMolina --Alaa :)..! 17:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  42. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  Per AlvaroMolina mostly. Does have experience with administrator bits on several wikis but lacks experience in areas where most requests come from (for example, anti-vandalism) Wiki13 talk 18:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  43. Tapered (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018 •  Tapered (talk) 04:58, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  44. Masti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018 •  masti <talk> 13:13, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply