Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2018/Votes/Cyberpower678

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki


  • Languages: en, de
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi, I'm Cyberpower678. I didn't initially plan on running for stewardship, but after some words of encouragement, I decided to throw my name into the hat. I am an administrator on the English Wikipedia, as well as a global renamer. While I haven't been very active in global renaming lately, I have been very active developing InternetArchiveBot, and moving to deploy it cross wiki. I've started picking up on my renaming activities, however. My development of IABot and engaging with different language communities have definitely broadened my understanding of different cultures on different language Wikipedias, as well as partially learn new languages.  :-)

    My activity is mostly on the technical side things, so if elected, I will of course continue work on rename requests, and carry out more complex requests that requires a steward to perform. In addition to that, I will also monitor the requests to globally lock and/or unlock accounts. The rename queue has been getting abused by an LTA. Obviously my steward experience is limited, but I'm not one to hastily push buttons when I'm new to something, and will of course work with other stewards to ensure I don't end up locking everyone. :-)—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 18:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Cyberpower678


  1. My name is not dave (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Can certainly be trusted. Was thinking crat, but this is good enough. My name is not dave (talk) 14:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   A bit of an unconventional candidate, but in the process of getting their bot approved crosswiki they likely have more crosswiki experience than some past successful steward candidates. I've gone through some of their recent enwiki admin actions and liked what I saw. Rschen7754 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -revi (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   — regards, Revi 14:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Stïnger (会話) 14:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]
  5. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TonyBallioni (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --cyrfaw (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. WQL (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   WQL 14:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   The comments of MF-Warburg are worrisome, but in any case, I would prefer to assume good faith. He has done a good job as a global renamer and I do not think there are any problems while doing things with caution and asking questions before doing anything. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Trusted, knowledgeable user. Miniapolis 14:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Ferran Mir (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Rxy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   per Rschen7754's comment. rxy (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   demonstrates unwavering commitment to the free content model, operating the InternetArchiveBot and working with the Internet Archive to make content more readily available and accessible to our users. There is a long and extensive track record of competence in undertaking +sysop level tasks on English Wikipedia and in undertaking global renaming functions. Nick (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Wischmat (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 15:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17. SQL (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   SQLQuery me! 15:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18. SoWhy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   SoWhy 16:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Known user, enough expierence to be a stew Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Despite the lack of cross-wikiness I like what I see, can trust the user and agree that the bot is something Kostas20142 (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Cameron11598 (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22. BU Rob13 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   ~ Rob13Talk 19:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Zoranzoki21 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Zoranzoki21 (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I trust him to do the job. Lepricavark (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  25. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Fanjiayi (Not eligible, checked by MacFan4000)   --Fanjiayi (talk) 03:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Shizhao (talk) 03:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Csyogi (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Csyogi (talk) 05:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Thanks for your efforts on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 06:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Probably will be a fine steward. I do worry about them over-extending their commitments though. Legoktm (talk) 09:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Gereon K. (talk) 10:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  31. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   strong yes! --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Faendalimas (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 11:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  33. LIVE NIEUWS (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Friendly, helpful and very active user. Also does good technical work cross-wiki. Livenws (talk) 11:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Pelz (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Pelz (talk) 12:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  35. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TomášPolonec (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Jon Kolbert)2018   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  37. KrakatoaKatie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Katietalk 15:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Winged Blades of Godric (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Enough trusted, competent and helpful.Why not?! Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  39. FriedhelmW (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   FriedhelmW (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Luke081515 20:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Holder (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   His technical skills might be very helpful to our steward team. Furthermore he's trusted and competent, so I see no reason to oppose. Trijnsteltalk 22:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  44. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Vermont (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Vermont (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Quickfingers (talk) 01:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Apap04 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Apap04 (talk) 04:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Premeditated Chaos (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Premeditated Chaos (talk) 06:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Siddiqsazzad001 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Nice explained to new users Siddiqsazzad001 (talk) 13:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Very technical editor, Easy support. –Davey2010Talk 15:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  51. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   DENAMAX (talk) 20:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Great floors (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Steinsplitter (talk) 20:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Wikifreund (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  55. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Govindaharihari (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   trust this user with the advasnced permissions Govindaharihari (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Lanwi1(talk) 22:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Rzuwig 22:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Elvesham (talk) 22:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Fanjiayi (Not eligible, checked by MacFan4000)   --Fanjiayi (talk) 02:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Trusted user. Wolverène (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Ankry (talk) 07:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Darylgolden (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Darylgolden (talk) 08:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wae35244 (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  64. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Eddie891 (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   It appears that the candidate is qualified and will make a contribution to the responsibilities and duties of a steward, so I vote Yes. Stevenmitchell (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Bff (talk) 14:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Bluemel1 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Bluemel1 (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Filipović Zoran (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  70. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  71. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MZaplotnik(talk) 16:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Sigma'am (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ar sog 16:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  73. CambridgeBayWeather (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  74. SlimVirgin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   SarahSV talk 16:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Chrisaliv (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Chrisaliv (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I voted neutral but I would like to change this to support. This person is an organized communicator. They pulled reams of documentation from the either to address an issue I raised. I had an isolated hiccup of an experience connecting with them which I described below but we just had a far-ranging conversation that convinced me that this person can deliver complicated feedback on short notice. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  77. DHeyward (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   --DHeyward (talk) 19:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Carlsrator (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Carlsrator (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Ciao • Bestoernesto 22:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  80. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Telaneo (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Telaneo (User talk page) 00:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Stüard olması üçün mövcud fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edərək, onu dəstəkləyirəm. Düşünürəm ki, faydalı işlər görəcək. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Yeza (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Yeza (talk) 08:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  84. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 09:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  85. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Absolutely YES. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  86. NickK (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Weak support, good technical skills and did not see any obvious red flags — NickK (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Kojie (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Kojie (Tell me) 17:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  88. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Seems a good candidate, minor concerns aside, with a lot of potential that Stewarship should provide opportunities for: should be encouraged! --YodinT 20:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Kein Einstein (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Kein Einstein (talk) 21:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Atsme (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Atsme📞📧 03:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Ansumang (Not eligible, checked by علاء)   Encountered him many times in the past. Very Helpful. -- ɑηsuмaη «Talk» 13:33, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  92. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   TJH2018talk 16:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  93. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   GZWDer (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  94. MaynardClark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MaynardClark (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Airbornemihir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Airbornemihir (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  97. UpsandDowns1234 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Cyberpower678 is pretty good with code, is an admin on English Wikipedia, and is obviously one who has an understanding of global policies. Ups and Downs () 02:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  98. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Trustworthy. Being a Steward will not be bad for him. 1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Amortias (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Amortias (talk) 11:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Alioreks (Not eligible, checked by Defender)   Alioreks (talk) 16:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Debenben (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Debenben (talk) 21:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Yes, by all means! Dolotta (talk) 22:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  102. BD2412 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   An excellent Wikipedian. BD2412 T 00:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Liridon (talk) 12:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   –Ammarpad (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Gripweed (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Complainer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Complainer (talk) 16:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   The cross-wiki experience is good. Anbans 585 (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Zabia (talk) 19:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Fish and karate (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Fish and karate (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  111. ThePlatypusofDoom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ghilt (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vachovec1 (talk) 01:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   a×pdeHello! 06:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Frīheidasliova (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Per Trijnstel. Jules78120 (talk) 13:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Biplab Anand (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   per Rschen7754 Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Superyetkin (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Superyetkin (talk) 16:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Weslam123 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Weslam123 (talk) 06:50, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Schlurcher (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Schlurcher (talk) 21:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Enik (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Enik (talk) 06:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Пацифист (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Пацифист (talk) 11:27, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Smile4ever (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Natuur12 (talk) 15:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Barras (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   - Yup! -Barras talk 18:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Coffee (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   I believe this candidate will be a reliable steward. Coffee // have a cup // 01:27, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Fernando2812l (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Fernando2812l (talk) 06:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Winner 42 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Winner 42 (talk) 11:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Steindy (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Steindy (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   FASTILY 06:26, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  130. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   HMSLavender (talk) 06:37, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  131. InsaneHacker (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Seems experienced, and I find their answers to questions satisfactory. While they have made mistakes in the past, they don't try and avoid responsibility and explain how they have learned from them. InsaneHacker (talk) 09:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Syced (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Syced (talk) 10:54, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Zakawer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Zakawer (talk) 11:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Minoo (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67)   Minoo (talk) 13:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Samee (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   - samee- talk    18:42, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       AfroThundr3007730 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   — AfroThundr (talk) 08:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Armbrust (talk) 15:51, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Mostafameraji (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Mostafameraji (talk) 01:19, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Anatoliy (talk) 20:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Jusjih (talk) 04:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Feminist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Feminist (talk) 06:46, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Fenikals (talk) 07:11, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  141. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   —DerHexer (Talk) 09:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Miguelucas (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   My vote is of support. I encourage you to learn and be a great steward! Miguelucas (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  143. S.Didam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   S.Didam (talk) 18:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Jjjjjjdddddd (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ronhjones (talk) 00:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Ciszema (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ciszema (talk) 08:24, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Popo le Chien (talk) 09:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Zyephyrus (talk) 13:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  149. FN Markus (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   FN Markus (talk) 17:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Fadesga (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Ramboj95 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ramboj95 (talk) 09:44, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  152. John Cline (Eligible, checked by Stang)2018   John Cline (talk) 11:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Stang (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Stang 11:56, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Artix Kreiger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Artix Kreiger (Message Wall) 12:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Yes indeed, a delightful (online, at least!) personality and possessing precisely the qualities required in such a global role. Serial Number 54129 (talk) 13:49, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  156. علاء (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   --Alaa :)..! 17:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wiki13 talk 18:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Matanya (talk) 23:03, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Tapered (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Tapered (talk) 02:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Courcelles 02:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Snowolf How can I help? 05:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vituzzu (talk) 11:41, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Masti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   masti <talk> 13:14, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   In the statement, I don't see a reason why Cyberpower678 is candidating as steward. I also don't see a reason why I should support him. Even though he is a global renamer, he is not really active cross-wiki - surprisingly, 92% of his edits are on enwiki; of the rest, several of course come from page moves effected by global renames or edits related to the bot he mentions in his request. This bot does not have much relationship to stewards' work however. What is more, I perceive Cyberpower as a quite immature person. Often I see supposedly funny jokes from him (e.g. on the global-renamers mailing list) which do not serve any purpose except making people cringe. MF-W 14:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC) Addition: Supporting the proposed removal of an oppose vote against him in an ongoing election is really bad taste. --MF-W 13:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I'm not really convinced by this nomination, nor are there any significant xwiki contributions besides some bot requests and performed global renames, as far as I can see. —Vogone (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. KPFC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I can neither recognize a sufficient cross-wiki activity nor does his nomination per se convince me – KPFC💬 14:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Thank you for your volunteer work, but I don't think you have enough cross-wiki experience. Érico (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I would like to see more cross-wiki experience. Eurodyne (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Would like to see more administrative experience first (~1 year sysop experience on 1 project so far) — xaosflux Talk 15:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Leaky caldron (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Continues to demonstrate absolute commitment, but I fear over-stretching ability and just a hint of seeking to collect qualifications Leaky caldron (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Insufficient cross wiki experience Herby talk thyme 18:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Milad A380 talk 20:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ibrahim.ID (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   he is very active global renamer and trusted user, but his admin activity in Enwiki is too small (236 in 2017!) and that make a concern, his contributions is 23k only since 2011 (~91% in Enwiki only) with low activity in other project, I think it's early to be steward, bot developing isn't enough Ibrahim.ID 20:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Jcc (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per my question, where he disclosed private information on en.wiki; his reply was that "I wasn't the only one to do it". Given that stewards are expected to handle private content on a daily basis, I have to oppose. Additionally- little admin experience as pointed out by others. Jcc (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I personally find it unfair that from my answer to you, all you took from it were the last two sentences, and then using that as a justification to oppose. I can accept your reasoning of little admin experience, and I respect it, but I do wish my answer wasn't being taken out of context.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 21:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Cyberpower678: Not unfair at all- in fact, had you stopped your answer at "yes, I messed up", I would be on the other side right now. But no, instead, you wrote "I messed up...but someone else did it too!". I'm happy to discuss this more on my talk page. Jcc (talk) 11:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Cyberpower has clarified that it wasn't obvious that the public didn't have access to rename requests. Jcc (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Not enough cross-wiki[ness] for me, sorry. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Lack of cross-wiki behaviour, despite the ongoing development of IABot. hiàn 22:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Az1568 (talk) 04:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   --Krd 08:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   per MF-W DCB (talk) 11:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Need more experience... Alex Pereira falaê 13:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Alex Shih (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   One of the most highly skilled technical user on en.wiki, but I am not too sure if their temperament is suitable to be steward, sorry. Alex Shih (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Bbb23 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Helpful technically on en.wiki but too green to become a steward.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Sagaciousphil (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Sagaciousphil (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   —Ah3kal (talk) 13:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   <comment was removed as disruptive and offensive> Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hhhhhkohhhhh (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 04:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ~ℳɑrio (talk) 07:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Per MF-Warburg. No (explicit) need for steward access stated. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Not cross-wiki enough. (However, I must note that I saw him "grow" a lot by operating his InternetArchiveBot on multiple languages, interacting with the respective communities and working hard to meet their needs. So I can understand why the fact is mentioned in the statement.) Nemo 11:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Little cross-wiki experience. Though the potential here is great as because of IA user does deal with other wikis, so this situation where only in 4 wikis user has 100 edits might change. --Base (talk) 13:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Base (talk) 13:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       TheDoormouse (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   TheDoormouse (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Howan Hansi (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Howan Hansi (talk) 19:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  29. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Per MF-W. SPQRobin (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Dennis Brown (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Per xaosflux and others. Nice enough guy, good tech guy, but little experience using the tools with actual people and not a lot of crosswiki experience. I can see supporting in the future but this is a bit soon. Dennis Brown (talk) 01:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Informationswiedergutmachung (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 03:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Freddy2001 talk 16:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  33. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Per MF-W above. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Slowking4 (talk) 13:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Power~enwiki (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   There's no compelling need for the tools, and limited administrative experience. In particular, I think being a steward will be a hindrance to rolling out IABot on other projects. power~enwiki (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Eks-istifadəçi (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Per MF Warburg Eks-istifadəçi (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Widr (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Too early, unfortunately. Widr (talk) 17:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   This isn't a "never", but a "not now". The statement here needs work - the candidate doesn't have much experience in steward areas, and doesn't specify what they bring to the table as it pertains to this role. Most of what they discuss can be done with their existing global renamer permission. I think that after a year of being active in cross-wiki work, and continuing to gain administrative experience on their home project, Cyber would be in a position to use the steward tools well. – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Risk Engineer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Risk Engineer (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Allforrous (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Allforrous (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  40. LindsayH (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Too early, unconvincing rationale; sorry. LindsayH (talk) 11:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Karora (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Karora (talk) 11:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Mojoworker (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Still a bit callow and not yet seasoned enough. Perhaps in the future after additional administrative and cross-wiki experience. Mojoworker (talk) 19:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Touzrimounir (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mounir Touzri (talk) 20:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Begoon (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Sorry, too inexperienced. Begoon (talk) 00:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mélencron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Mélencron (talk) 02:49, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  45. DeltaQuad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Not yet. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  46. NH (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   From what I have seen at the Swedish (sv) Wikipedia, where Cyberpower678 runs the Internet archive bot, it seems Cyberpower678 does not quite communicate in the low affective way required by a steward. NH 10:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Your technical abilities probably are great for the job, and I would especially thank you for the XTools improvements, but I think you're too less invested on « main » contributions on wikies. Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    We do work as a team, but I have to butt in with [1]. Please forgive me :) — MusikAnimal talk 18:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   English wiki people should not be allowed to mess up Wiki Media too. Stemoc 22:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Kudpung (talk) 17:25, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   --Wetterwolke (talk) 05:45, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Did not answer all questions. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Taivo: Thank you for pointing out that I had not answered all the questions. I have indeed missed a question, while all this time I was under the impression had answered them all. I have answered the remaining questions.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 14:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Caliburn (Eligible, checked by Stang)2018   Too little cross wiki experience for my liking. Caliburn (talk) 11:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahir256 (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per both side. I couldn't make a strong decision. *Youngjin (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   To much doubt, but I don't vote 'no'. Richardkiwi (talk) 20:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahveotm (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
       Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Openskye (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I am a huge fan of this person's work with the IABot but in the past I had some questions about their projects and they declined to talk. I do not mind anyone delaying discussion or even if they heard me out saying that they would take my comments but be unable to act. Instead the user just said that talking is not an option even on their wiki page. I was a bit confused by the exchange but in any case, I am sure that for a steward I want people who are like beacons for communication. Talking to the general public, including people like me who might be clueless and asking dumb questions, is part of the steward role. Not sure what is on Cyberpower's mind in wanting to be steward but obviously this person has lots of talent which might be better spent with something other than newbie and clueless user requests. I see in their statement that they have identified a category of technical problems which they think they can manage, and which others might not manage. I do trust that if Cyberpower wants steward rights to be able to do that, then they would be a benefit and a success in that role. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Come back after more experience and a bit more cross-wiki collaboration. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Simplexity22 (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 13:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Andyboorman (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Communicate more and try next year Andyboorman (talk) 22:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Alzinous (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  10. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   BugWarp (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  11. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   B20180 (talk) 14:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Potatornado (talk) 15:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   per user Richardkiwi. Garam (talk) 08:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Storkk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Lacking in xwiki experience, but not enough for me to oppose. Storkk (talk) 13:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Stephan1000000 (talk) 19:58, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   -Xbony2 (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   DePlusJean (talk) 00:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hma969 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Hma969 (talk) 10:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Joshualouie711 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Joshualouie711 (talk) 00:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Candidate has xwiki experience in global renaming, but I don't know if has experience in more controversial issues solving. Statement didn't convince me. Zerabat (discusión) 20:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  22. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   VictorBrice (talk) 13:38, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Centaur271188 (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Arjayay (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Arjayay (talk) 12:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Serious editor. Not sure he/she is fitted for the position yet. Joalpe (talk) 15:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]