Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/Lionel Scheepmans

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Lionel Scheepmans[edit]

ContentsYesNoNeutral
Lionel_Scheepmans talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: fr-N, pt-3, en-3, es-2, it-1, de-1, nl-1, bm-1, ta-1, vi-1.
  • Personal info: (English)
    Dear wikimedian people,

    My real name is my user name : Lionel Scheepmans. I am a French native speaker Belgian guy borns in 1969. I can easely communicate in English and Portuguese and I also have some basic capacities in Spanish, German, Dutch and also Malinké, Tamil and Vietnamese language. Finally, I'm also a good user of Deepl for European languages and Google translate for other one Face-smile.svg.

    All my background is displayed on my Meta-Wiki user page and all my curriculum and academic works on my French Wikiversity user page. My complete CV is also available on this page. In summary, I am very active on Wikimédia Movement on line since 2011 and off line since 2014. I am one of the founding member of Wikimedia Belgium chapter, and I'm actually in the board since two years with cumulative function of administrator in our wiki-site. I've started to be administrator in fr.wikiversity in 2015 and more recently, I've took back the interface administration. All statistical information about my online activities can be check on the Wikiscan tool.

    Actually PhD student in anthropology making my thesis about Wikimedia movement, I feel very confident about what I can bring to the Wikimedia movement as a steward. If I'm selected, my knowledge of minority cultures and my experience of living in the "Global South" (Africa, India, South America) will certainly help me in my interventions on Wiki projects created in minority languages than we all want, I think, see developing.

    A nice end of the day to all! Lionel
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#Lionel_Scheepmans


Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. Eggishorn (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   Eggishorn (talk) 19:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
       MarieVirtuElle (Not eligible, checked by NahidSultan)   MarieVirtuElle (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  2. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  3. Gotanda (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020   Gotanda (talk) 00:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  4. Sg7438 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Sg7438 (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  5. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Gereon K. (talk) 16:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  6. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Ruthven (msg) 17:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  7. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Dostojewskij (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  8. LH7605 (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2020   LH7605 (talk) 01:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  9. Gharouni (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Gharouni 03:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  10. SickManWP (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   I think he can be do this very need job--SickManWP (talk) 05:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  11. Authueil (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Authueil (talk) 06:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  12. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Veracious (talk) 14:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  13. La coince (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   ok La coince (talk) 19:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  14. Bwag (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Bwag (talk) 09:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  15. SHISHIR DUA (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   SHISHIR DUA (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  16. Ccmarathe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Ccmarathe (talk) 04:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
  17. Axel xadolik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Axel xadolik (talk) 11:36, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
  18. Jfblanc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Jfblanc (talk) 14:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
  19. Frettie (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Frettie (talk) 18:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  20. Omondi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Omondi (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  21. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Arbnos (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  22. Rjelves (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Rjelves (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  23. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Thanks for your contributions to the WikiJournals and Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  24. Omondi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Omondi (talk) 10:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  25. LilyKitty (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   I hope multilingual development of Wikimedia icluding on monority language. LilyKitty (talk) 16:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  26. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Onverwacht (talk) 07:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
  27. Dmehus (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Why not? Smart + collegial and friendly + clue = global mop Dmehus (talk) 21:27, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
  28. Matarimi1 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   Matarimi1 (talk) 11:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
  29. Fernando de Gorocica (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Fernando de Gorocica (talk) 12:03, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
  30. Cedalyon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Cedalyon (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
  31. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020  --Caligatus (talk) 22:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
  32. Jeffrey Kim (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Jeffrey Kim (talk) 05:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
  33. Hyperdieter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Hyperdieter (talk) 14:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
  34. MJL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Solely voting yes to counteract Mardus's no vote based on bad grammar which I just find absurd. –MJLTalk 17:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
  35. Cabeza2000 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Cabeza2000 (talk) 17:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
  36. WikiLester (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   WikiLester (talk) 18:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
  37. Boobarkee (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Boobarkee (talk) 10:01, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
  38. LPS and MLP Fan (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 21:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
  39. Zbrnajsem (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   There are good reasons to vote for him, even if there is almost no hope now that he will prevail. Zbrnajsem (talk) 11:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
  40. Dravinia (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Dravinia (talk) 13:02, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
  41. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Jusjih (talk) 03:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
  42. Chipermc (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Chipermc (talk) 04:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
  43. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   --Ferran Mir (talk) 11:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
  44. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Ameisenigel (talk) 19:30, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
       Fatih Demirci (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Fatih Demirci (talk) 16:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  45. Stephan Tournay (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Stephan Tournay (talk) 22:57, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
       Dany Crash (Not eligible, checked by xaosflux)   Dany Crash (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  46. Comte0 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Comte0 (talk) 10:01, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
  47. Zervim (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Zervim (talk) 20:47, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
  48. Epicgenius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   epicgenius (talk) 21:27, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
  49. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  50. Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (talk) 07:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
  51. 游魂 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   07:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   Oppose. Reading through the questions I just get the sense they think being a steward is being on a global Arbitration Committee or Governing Committee, which it is not. I mean, I get that not all stewards are countervandalism fighters, but then I would expect some more involvement in things like Meta RFCs or on policy discussions on Meta (or even serving as a bureaucrat) - and I don't see that. I just don't think this is a good fit overall - maybe something like the Language committee would be better. Rschen7754 14:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  2. 5LZ (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Excuse my offense, but stewards are no Wikimedia politicians, and we are not electing a congressman. 5LZ 14:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
    Hi user:Stryn, why did you accept this offensive vote coming from a non registered user ? Stewards are not Wikimedia politicians ? But this election is purely a political affair, and I wonder to see how to deal when an illegitimate offensive vote had probably influence the point of view of all next votes. What are thinking the rest of the electoral comity ? @DerHexer, Linedwell, Mardetanha, and RadiX: Lionel Scheepmans Contact French native speaker, sorry for my dysorthography 10:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
    @Lionel Scheepmans: They underwent a varnishing. When Stryn checked the vote, they are still called 5LZ. As of validity of varnished user votes, some projects like commons still count them as valid votes. No comments with regard to other aspects of your question. Best Regards,--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:38, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
    Thanks Camouflaged Mirage, is that possible in this case to know the new user accompt of the reformed 5LZ ? Lionel Scheepmans Contact French native speaker, sorry for my dysorthography 14:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
    They didn't have a new account, just renamed to Renamed user 9ff13960de57f6ee9b1a65311efbb0be. @Lionel Scheepmans:--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
    Ok Camouflaged Mirage ! Thanks again, It's look more like a IPV6 adresse than a user name. That's why I didn't understood the rename. I've change the user name of the vote to avoid other misunderstood and keep the transparency on the process. Lionel Scheepmans Contact French native speaker, sorry for my dysorthography 14:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
  3. -revi (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020   User:-revi/SEV; fails 1, 2, 3 — regards, Revi 14:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  4. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   CptViraj (📧) 14:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  5. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   TonyBallioni (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  6. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   From answers to questions it does looks like they don't know what this role is about. Plus lack of crosswiki experience. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  7. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   I think stewards should have a longer tenure in administration functions first, while you have been active in fr wikiversity, I'd prefer to see tenure in larger projects first. — xaosflux Talk 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  8. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Minorax (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  9. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Poor answers to questions, I expect slightly more. Regretful, I know you are in good faith. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  10. Turkmen (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020  --Turkmen talk 14:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  11. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   KPFC💬 14:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  12. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Not going to pile on with a lengthy oppose but I agree with Rschen. Praxidicae (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  13. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   stwalkerster (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  14. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020   Inadequate experience Herby talk thyme 16:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  15. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Misunderstanding of the steward role. Esteban16 (talk) 17:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  16. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Not suitable. Trijnsteltalk 17:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  17. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   The answers to the questions doesn't convince me. Also, cross-wiki experience for me is little. --Stïnger (会話) 18:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  18. RhinosF1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Per others RhinosF1 (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  19. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Ankry (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC) To be clear: my vote is based on responses to the questions, not suggested by anything else or anybody else. Ankry (talk) 15:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
  20. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   *Youngjin (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  21. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Unconvincing statement and answers Sintakso (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  22. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   per Rschen7754 Klaas `Z4␟` V:  00:48, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  23. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Not seeing enough cross-wiki experience to support a candidate like this. Hiàn (talk) 02:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  24. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   as per Rschen7754 Vermont (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  25. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  26. Hégésippe Cormier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  27. Grasyop (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Défaut de confiance. Lack of confidence. Grasyop 09:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  28. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   User of good will, but I'm not convinced at all by answers to questions. — Jules Talk 10:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  29. Thibaut120094 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Like Jules78120 said, user of good will, but not enough cross-wiki and technical experience. Thibaut (talk) 11:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  30. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020   Mostly per Rschen's reasons, but I hope Lionel will try again next year 1ForTheMoney (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  31. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Per reasons given above. Daniuu (talk) 14:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  32. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  33. ST47 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Does not appear to be qualified for the role. ST47 (talk) 17:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  34. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Linedwell [talk] 19:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  35. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Hadrianus (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  36. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   --Wright Streetdeck 04:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  37. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  38. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   cyrfaw (talk) 13:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  39. Vmavanti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Vmavanti (talk) 17:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  40. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Thanks for the offer but I miss the necessary experience with currently less than 20,000 overall contributions. In addition, stewards should be familiar with common English technical terms of Wikimedia projects but this is apparently not the case. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  41. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Per Rschen7754 Waddie96 (talk) 19:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  42. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  43. Tymon.r (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Not yet. But have a great day and thank you for this application! Tymon.r (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  44. Mercy (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Mercy (talk) 08:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  45. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Rzuwig 11:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  46. Der-Wir-Ing (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 20:21, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  47. Juanmachavez7 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Juanmachavez7 (talk) 01:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
  48. Arraque (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Arraque (talk) 14:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  49. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Good intentions but the work doesn't meet up with it. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  50. ManuRoquette (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   Not convinced ManuRoquette (talk) 18:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  51. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Per all. John M Wolfson (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  52. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   as per Rschen and AFBorchert. –Davey2010Talk 22:57, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  53. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   DannyS712 (talk) 05:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  54. DeltaQuad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Not aware enough to know about the ANPIP/N - how will they know when to hand out the tools?.... -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:47, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  55. Mardus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Grammar inconsistencies in the user's statement. Mardus (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
  56. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Per Amanda and the rest Kostas20142 (talk) 23:57, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
  57. Nightenbelle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Unsatisfactory answers to questions posed. Nightenbelle (talk) 15:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
  58. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   User doesn't have enough cross-wiki experience. --Uğurkenttalk 18:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
  59. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Insufficient Eng skills. WikiAviator (talk) 04:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
  60. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   per Rschen and AFBorchert. OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
  61. Tazkeung (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Tazkeung (talk) 09:35, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
  62. 悔晚斋 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   悔晚斋 (talk) 12:49, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
  63. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Centaur271188 (talk) 14:07, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
  64. Pawnkingthree (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:12, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
  65. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Hannes 24 (talk) 17:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  66. Jni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   jni (talk) 06:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  67. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   You are weak in mathematics. You do not understand, what does ln(3t+25) means. Taivo (talk) 16:53, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  68. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   TJH2018talk 22:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  69. Brown Chocolate (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   Brown Chocolate (talk) 09:55, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  70. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 07:23, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
  71. NickK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   That's not really a kind of profile suitable for stewardship. Comments in this nomination, including confusing a vanished user and an IPv6, are seriously concerning — NickK (talk) 13:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   Richardkiwi (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  2. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020   I agree with Rschen7754 and Camouflaged Mirage. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  3. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   --Mirer (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  4. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 04:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  5. Fanchb29 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   -- Fanchb29 (talk) 13:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  6. Daniel J Zhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Daniel J Zhao (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  7. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020   Miniapolis 16:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  8. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   De bonne volonté mais j'ai l'impression étrange qu'il se trompe d'élection. Cbyd (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  9. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Fenikals (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  10. Borschts (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Borschts (talk) 01:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  11. 人人生來平等 (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020   人人生來平等 (talk) 05:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  12. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Stephan1000000 (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  13. Saederup92 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Saederup92 (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  14. Rots61 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Rots61 (talk) 21:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  15. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Too little experience. Meiræ 01:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
  16. Dede2008 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020   Dede2008 (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
  17. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  18. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   CactusWriter (talk) 15:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
  19. OSeveno (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   --oSeveno (talk) 12:48, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  20. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   --FonAfon (talk | contribs) 13:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  21. JogiAsad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   JogiAsad (talk) 13:23, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  22. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020   Geonuch (talk) 01:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
  23. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   AGK ■ 07:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
  24. Patsagorn Y. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Patsagorn Y. (Talk) 08:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
  25. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Darkhan 16:45, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
  26. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020   Garam talk 18:48, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
  27. Tomec (Eligible, checked by OhKayeSierra)2020   Tomec (talk) 22:28, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
  28. Cabayi (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020   Cabayi (talk) 12:28, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  29. RudolfSimon (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020   RudolfSimon (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  30. Eihel (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2020   Les réponses "écrèment" les candidatures: si votre présentation est "alléchante", vos réponses démontrent un manque de connaissances flagrant. Ces connaissances sont cruciales pour ce rôle prenant au demeurant. Eihel (talk) 21:21, 27 February 2020 (UTC)