Stewards/confirm/2009/Drini

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2009
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Drini[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: es, en-5
  • Personal info: Stats: I'm sysop at 6 or 7 wikis, checkuser on 3, been wikimedian for 5 years. As inter-wiki people know, my work these days as stewards is dealing with vandalbots and the alike. So here I'm on my 2nd confirmation to get feedback on my work as steward. Thank you for your input.
español:
  • Idiomas: es, en-5
  • Información personal: Me conocen, soy biblio en 6 o 7 wikis (perdí la cuenta), checkuser en 3 y wikimedista desde hace 5 años. Los que trabajan en varias wikis saben que mi labor reciente ha sido lidiar con bots vandálicos. Esta es mi segunda confirmación y aprecio cualquier comentario o sugerencia sobre mi labor como steward.
日本語:
  • 言語: es, en-5
  • 候補者の情報: ステータス: 私は6、7のウィキで管理者を、3つのウィキでチェックユーザー係をしており、ウィキメディア歴は5年です。複数ウィキ間で作業している方々はご存知のように、ここ最近の私のスチュワードとしての仕事は、荒らしボットやその類への対処です。そのため、スチュワードとしての私の作業についてのフィードバックを得るため、2回目の信任の機会に出ております。ありがとうございました。
português:
  • Línguas: es, en-5
  • Informações pessoais: Sou administrador em 6 ou 7 wikis, checkuser em 3, e sou um wikimediano há 5 anos. Aqueles que trabalham em várias wikis sabem do meu trabalho recente como steward em combater os bots usados para vandalismos. Esta é minha segunda confirmação e ficaria grato se houvessem comentários ou sugestões sobre meu trabalho como steward. Obrigado.
русский:
  • Языки: es, en-5
  • Личная информация: Статистика: я администратор в 6 или 7 вики, чекюзер в трёх, участвую в проектах Викимедиа 5 лет. Метапедисты знают, что моя работа в эти дни была направлена на борьбу с ботовандалами и тому подобным. Это моя вторая конфирмация, я здесь, чтобы получить отзывы о своей работе в качестве стюарда. Спасибо вам за ваши отклики.


Comments about Drini[edit]

  • Support Support Drini is quite helpful & trustworthy. --Kanonkas 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Clear keep. Majorly talk 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Helpful and funny. miranda 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Active in the SWMT-area, doing a great job as a steward, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support You're a wonderful steward, always helpful and available. Thank you! --Thogo (talk) 01:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Drini has done a wonderful job as a steward. macy 01:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support He has my support.-- {Netito} 01:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Very obviously doing an excellent job.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Just avoid hurting poor Chris G. :) Great job, helpful guy, and certainly a good steward. Prodego talk 03:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Haha, per Prodego, think about the little people :p ...--Cometstyles 03:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Despite grumpiness :)... one of the most hardworking stewards out there and has been for a while. ++Lar: t/c 04:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Always available, experienced in checkusering, oversighting, and crosswiki countervandalism. Also an expert in evil math.--Shanel 04:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Very helpful! Good work--Nick1915 - all you want 13:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support SupportObvious confirm. Stifle 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Strong support he is doing a very good job, he is funny and always try to help. Gracias por tu ayuda Drini. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 16:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Obvious keep. Razorflame 21:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Keep of course --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Our beloved padre who helps all the time. Confirm, of course! Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support to confirm, -jkb- 14:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, we need this guy. →Na·gy 19:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Coimeád - definitely. Grumpy? I'd not noticed ^_^ - Alison 19:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Very helpful and active. John Vandenberg 03:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Endorse - trusted & good work, thanks --Herby talk thyme 09:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Very level-headed in my experience; keep. —Sean Whitton / 18:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support He is always ready to help! --Baiji --> (Opinión) 18:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Yessir, keep, keep. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support --oscar 22:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Confirm. — Dan | talk 00:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support نعم --Meno25 00:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support KveD (talk) 01:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support.--Jusjih 03:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support. Always active / Siempre activo, sigue así. --Taichi - (あ!) 05:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support---Zyephyrus 21:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support There is no such thing as evil math Face-devil-grin.svg -- Avi 05:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, good steward. ~Innvs: 12:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Annabel 15:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Woudloper 11:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 12:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support--Sadik Khalid 16:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Very trustworthy. –Ejs-80 22:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Mantem, muy y mucho activo, un gran trabajo como steward. Alex Pereira falaê 15:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support I'm inclined to support Drini (based on the overall good performance as steward). Nonetheless, I should say that I was dissatisfied by the way Drini handled this (I think if Drini wasn't too fast in defending Dungodung's mistake, we wouldn't see other mistakes like this ). Alefbe 19:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support without reservation. Kylu 20:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support of course, he is doing a great job. --Patricio.lorente 23:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support ...Aurora... 13:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support - Kaare 19:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Very active and helpful.--User:Antur - Talk/Discusión 06:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Tiptoety talk 00:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove. Due to this steward´s recent activities with capricious blocking for his friend Netito 777 of User JMundo and myself and abuse of sysop priveledges on the English Wikipedia, I have no faith that he can be trusted with any position on the projects. His mendacious mischaracterizations of what was said show a disdain for the truth and honesty.Die4Dixie 21:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
And sir, oh please explain me the high moral ground on canvassing? [1] [2] [3] es:Drini 21:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Ad hominem attacks only serve to highlight your lack of suitability for the position. These users have a unique knowledge of your actions. Would you expect me to open a Request for comment on your actions and link to it here? Exactly what would you say was the ideal way to let people know about abusive behavior and the forum to comment on it? Perhaps leave a messgage on every user´s page on all the projects? Notifying three people of this election without suggesting what they say is hardly canvassing. I believe my friendly notification falls under [[4]]. It was sent to three people(limited number) and neutrally worded. Please explain how this is a violation of WP:CANVASS or is this another mendacious twisting of something that you cannot not know is not canvassing. If you do not understand the policy on canvassing to correctly identify it, then I realy question on more grounds you ability to serve as a steward.Die4Dixie 22:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
None of this has anything to do with stewardship. Drini is probably one of the best stewards we've ever had. You're essentially saying you're opposing him continuing his good work because he blocked you. Canvassing to people to get them to attempt to come and sabotage this discussion in your favour hasn't helped you one bit either. Please consider your future actions more carefully. Thanks, Majorly talk 22:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
(edit conflict)I'm not familiar with meta-wiki or non-English projects but I seriously doubt Die4Dixie's incident is going to overturn anybody's candidacy for anything - the other comments are universally in support. Thus, I suggest all parties keep some decorum here and not get into wiki-arguing. I think the handling of Die4Dixie's block on English Wikipedia was unfortunate (a block for reasons poorly stated and seemingly mistaken, possibly not as a neutral party, followed by being unavailable for a day). Also, even though as Majorly points out Stewardship is very different than adminship, because of the increased authority it should be even more important that one keep a calm head, not play favorites, not get into grudges or matches with individual editors, etc. It is normal that the target of a block will be upset and make accusations, reasonable ones and otherwise, and perhaps even speak out of turn. Turning the other cheek and dealing with that in a firm but dignified way so that the blocked party can, hopefully, cool down and rejoin the editing process is also part of the job of administering blocks. The strong protest against alleged canvassing seems defensive, and piling on. Having said all that, and with all due respect to D4D and his (in my opinion) reasonable upset, I don't see this as anything to disqualify a candidate. No lasting harm done on either side, so please let it go. Wikidemon 23:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Btw sometimes Drini you yourself are soft with canvassing, so we're all to blame anyway--Vituzzu 20:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Per Die4Dixie, if you're going to canvass I'll make it work backwards Alexfusco5 23:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Without Pedro, we would need 10 more hard working stewards to replace him :) --Millosh 13:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  • keep --FiliP × 17:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove I don't question his vandal fighting work, but he lacks experience in conflict resolution. Without entering into detail about my personal case, Drini has refused to mediate after my request, 1 and defended the actions of the other party involved, 2. I hope that my posting will catch the attention of another Spanish speaking steward, any help is welcome. Thanks, --J.Mundo 19:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
    • May I just bring to your kind attention that steward's role is not meant as "super-administrator"; a Steward is not a sort of mediator, nor decides but always conforms to the relevant policies. Thank you for reading. --M/ 19:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)