Stewards/confirm/2010/Dungodung

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2010
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning
English: The 2010 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2010 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2010 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2010 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2010 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد.
Français : Les élections de 2010 pour Steward se sont conclues. Aucun vote au-delà de cette date ne sera compté.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2010 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2010. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2010 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2010 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה.
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el.
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2010 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語: 2010年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2010 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2010 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2010 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2010 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2010 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文: 2010年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文(简体)‎: 2010年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文(繁體)‎: 2010年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢。
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2010 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι.
Türkçe: 2010 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2010 eşikağası seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha çox səs qəbul olunmaz.


Dungodung[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki logs & activity | translate: translation help, statement

Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • Informationen zur Person: Obwohl ich im Jahr 2009 weniger aktiv war als 2008, denke ich, dass ich genügend Steward-Aktivität gezeigt habe um bestätigt zu werden. Meiner Meinung nach, habe ich in den letzten zwei Jahren relativ gute Arbeit geleistet und würde meine Steward-Rechte mit der Zustimmung der Gemeinschaft gerne behalten. Zumeist bin ich über IRC erreichbar und gerne bereit zu helfen.
English:
  • Languages: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • Personal info: Even though I've been less active in 2009 than in 2008, I think I've had enough steward actions to still be considered active. In my opinion, I've done a relatively good job in the past two years, so I'd like to keep my steward rights, if the community agrees. I'm usually hanging on IRC and most of the times I'm ready to help out. --FiliP ██ 00:19, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
français:
  • Langues: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • Renseignements personnels: Bien que moins actif en 2009 qu'en 2008, je pense avoir malgré tout suffisamment agi en tant que steward pour être considéré actif. Je pense avoir relativement fait du bon travail ces deux dernières années, et je souhaiterais donc conserver mes droits de steward, si la communauté me le permet. Je suis souvent sur IRC et prèt à aider.
עברית:
  • שפות: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • מידע אישי: למרות שאני כבר פחות פעיל מאשר בשנת 2009 הייתי בשנת 2008, אני חושב שיש לי מספיק פעילות של דייל. לדעתי, עשיתי עבודה טובה יחסית של השנתיים האחרונות, ואז אני רוצה לשמור על הזכויות דייל שלי, אם הקהילה מסכים. אני בדרך כלל זמין ב-IRC ורוב פעמים אני מוכן לעזור.
日本語:
  • 言語: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • 候補者の情報: 2009年は2008年ほど活動できませんでしたが、スチュワードとして活動中、と言える程度には活動できたかと思います。これまでの2年間、私にしては良い仕事ができたかと思いまして、もしコミュニティの皆さまさえ宜しければ、スチュワード権限を維持させて頂ければと思います。お声がけ頂ければ対処できるよう IRC でお待ちしております。
русский:
  • Языки: sr, en-3, hr-3, bs-3, de-1
  • Личная информация: Хотя я не был столь активным в 2009 как в 2008, я думаю, что моей активно хватает для того, чтобы считаться активным стюардом. По-моему, я сделал достаточно хорошую работу в течении последних двух лет, поэтому, если сообщество согласно, я бы хотел сохранить мои права стюарда. Я обычно бываю на IRC и готов помочь большую часть времени.



Comments about Dungodung[edit]

  • Excellent steward. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • we need him --Jan eissfeldt 00:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Brilliant steward. Katerenka (d) 00:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • confirm. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Aces in my book. Reconfirm. ++Lar: t/c 01:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • We need more technically aware stewards like Dungodung, not fewer. Kylu 02:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep, advanced steward. —Innv {ru-ws} 05:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • I guess he can stay ;) James (T C) 06:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Christian Giersing 07:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Technical knowledge; good steward work. Pmlineditor  07:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • keep MoiraMoira 07:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Taichi - (あ!) 07:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. --Bsadowski1 08:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Tiptoety talk 08:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep, of course. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 08:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --WizardOfOz talk 10:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Good work, knows what he does. –Ejs-80 10:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • reconfirm. -Barras talk 11:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Good steward, confirm --Church of emacs talk 12:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • we Support need him! :)--Nick1915 - all you want 12:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. ChristianH 13:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Confirm. --Erwin 13:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 14:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • OK. Marcus Cyron 17:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • One of the most friendly steward , always helpful , always kind , happy to have such good friend --Mardetanha talk 17:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep.--Jusjih 04:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep for sure --Herby talk thyme 09:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. Obelix 11:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Razorflame 22:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete - Non-notable. bastique demandez! 23:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Keep Keep OTRS permissions received. bastique demandez! 19:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Jyothis 16:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
  • keep without a shadow of a doubt oscar 00:54, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Per reasons given on 2009 voting (by me, Synergy, NuclearWarfare, Alefbe). Dungodung's reaction was rude [1] (naming someone as "troll" just like that). This is not "always kind". I also don't like his running of CU tools (done after voting on Stewards/confirm/2009) on a recquest by a person that didn't ask the community for the opinion [2]. Dungodung reacted in less than half hour [3], without asking the requester "Do you have community consensus?". Kubura 04:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
  • supported by --Sargoth 09:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- ※   JéRRy   ┼   雨雨   ※  16:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - anyway, there is no need for community consensus when asking for CU, it's not voting. --Dalibor Bosits © 17:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
    There is a need for community consensus. Meta is strict here [4]. Please, see ection "Pristup alatu za provjeru". " I u ovom slučaju trebate dobiti konsenzus zajednice.". For those who don't understand Croatian [5] "You also need a community consensus (like above)". Kubura 23:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
    That section appears, to me, to be referring to local users being given access to the checkuser tool itself rather than stating that consensus is needed to use the tool. Sukida 14:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Confirm, and thanks for serving. Finn Rindahl 00:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
  • no brainer, keep. billinghurst sDrewth 13:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
  • confirm, helpful steward --Mercy 21:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
  • mreow ! mreoooow AWBWH1.png DarkoNeko 23:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
  • OK. --Aphaia 01:45, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Lymantria 12:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
  • confirm. Xqt 21:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Vituzzu 18:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - kind, reliable; excellent steward. --Sanya 19:48, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -FASTILY (TALK) 22:05, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.Teles (talk / pt-wiki talk) 06:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. The steward. --Millosh 13:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Of course. --micki talk 22:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. Yes, good stuff. Cirt (talk) 02:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Egmontaℨ 19:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FollowTheMedia 00:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose remove per the aforementioned incivility. --Caspian blue 16:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
    I'm sorry, but what uncivility are you refering to? Calling someone a "troll"? Are you contesting that the said user is definitely not a troll? Thank you. --FiliP ██ 16:42, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
    I refer to Kubura's oppose vote. I don't see any evidence that "the person" Alefbe is warranted to be called a "troll" by you.--Caspian blue 16:55, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
    Have you actually looked? I think I'm allowed to call someone a troll if I think they are. Just like I'd call vandal a vandal. For example, some might disagree that Gregory Khos is a troll, but most of us do agree. Besides, please take a look at their user talk page (or some of their many contributions here on meta) and many complaints there and then tell me whether you really believe the user is benevolent and has good intentions. --FiliP ██ 17:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
    The Meta Project is not bound to "one language" nor "one project". We don't know what you know. I don't still see his activities are enough to be called troll by you in my glance at the talk page. Moreover, the page is your confirmation page in 2009, and you should've not reacted like that.[6] That paints your image poorly.--Caspian blue 17:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
    OK, that's what you think. You're entitled to an opinion and you've presented it and I respect it. But I don't see anyone else here agreeing with you (except for Kubura). For me, this discussion is over. Have a nice day. Cheers --FiliP ██ 17:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Stepro 03:56, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --junafani 23:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Kaster 20:06, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Confirm I don't find much weight in the incivility opposition above, but I caution that stewards are watched more heavily. Thank you for your continued service and keep up the good work! NonvocalScream 01:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep helpful steward LeinaD (t) 16:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Confirm, but concerned about using "troll" too freely (and essentially reasserting it above). Compare with how spacebirdy and Pathoschild handled that situation. John Vandenberg 06:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
  • I felt comfortable this year with every single member of the team. This is true, regardless of the mere count of actions and the amount of interactions on wiki, mailing list, IRC, social networks or real life. Therefore I'd feel much more comfy if all current stewards are confirmed. --M/ 23:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Djordjes (talk) 23:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)