Stewards/elections 2009/statements/Leinad

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Leinad[edit]

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: pl, en-2, de-0.5, es-0.5
  • Personal info: Hello, my name is Daniel and I come from Gdynia, Poland. I have been active in Wikimedia projects since May 2006. I have been a sysop on the Polish Wikipedia since August 2007 and a bureaucrat since April 2008. I am interested in the technical aspects of MediaWiki and I am working as a translator on Betawiki. I am often present on many IRC channels and willing to help users. I'm interested in becoming a steward, because I can help fight cross-wiki vandalism and spam and also help out with requests.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: pl, en-2, de-0.5, es-0.5
  • Informationen zur Person: Hallo, mein Name ist Daniel und ich komme aus Gdynia in Polen. Ich bin seit Mai 2006 in Wikimedia-Projekten aktiv. Ich bin seit August 2007 Administrator und seit April 2008 Bürokrat auf der polnischen Wikipedia. Ich bin an den technischen Aspekten MediaWikis interessiert und beteilige mich als Übersetzer auf Betawiki. Ich bin häufig auf vielen IRC-Channeln präsent und helfe Benutzern bereitwillig. Ich bin interessiert daran, Steward zu werden, weil ich kann im Kampf gegen Crosswiki-Vandalismus und -Spam helfen und ebenso bei den Anträgen aushelfen.
español:
  • Idiomas: pl, en-2, de-0.5, es-0.5
  • Información personal: Hola, me llamo Daniel y soy de Gydnia, Polonia. Soy activo de los proyectos de Wikimedia desde marzo de 2008. He sido un sysop en la Wikipedia en polaco desde agosto de 2007 y un burócrata desde abril de 2008. Estoy interesado en los aspectos técnicos de MediaWiki y estoy trabajando como traductor en Betawiki. Suelo estar presente en muchos canales IRC y deseo ayudar a los usuarios. Estoy interesado en convertirme en steward porque puedo ayudar a combatir al vandalismo entre wikis y al spam, así como ayudar con otros asuntos.
français:
  • Langues: pl, en-2, de-0.5, es-0.5
  • Renseignements personnels: Bonjour, mon nom est Daniel et je suis de Gdynia, Pologne. Je suis un contributeur actif dans les projets wikimedia depuis mai 2006. J'ai été administrateur sur la Wikipédia Polonaise depuis août 2007 et bureaucrate depuis avril 2008. Je m'intéresse aux aspects techniques de Media Wiki et je suis traducteur sur BetaWiki. Je suis souvent présent sur plusieurs chan IRC où j'aide les utilisateurs. Je suis intéressé à devenir steward, parce que je pourrais aider à lutter contre les vandalismes interwiki, les spam et aussi aider à répondre aux requêtes.
italiano:
  • Lingue: pl, en-2, de-0.5, es-0.5
  • Informazioni personali: Ciao, sono Daniel e vivo a Gdynia, in Polonia. Sono attivo nei progetti Wikimedia dal maggio 2006. Sono stato amministratore della wikipedia polacca fino ad agosto 2007 e burocrate fino all'aprile del 2008. Sono interessato agli aspetti tecnici di MediaWiki e sto lavorando come traduttore su Betawiki. Sono spesso spresente su vari canali IRC e disponibile ad aiutare gli utenti tramite essi. Voglio diventare steward per aiutare a combattere lo spamming ed il vandalismo interwikipediano, ed essere disponibile per qualsiasi aiuto.
日本語:
  • 言語: pl, en-2, de-0.5, es-0.5
  • 候補者の情報: こんにちは、私は Daniel と申します。ポーランドのグディニア出身です。私は2006年3月からウィキメディアプロジェクトで活動しています。ポーランド語版ウィキペディアで2007年8月から管理者を、2008年4月からはビューロクラットを務めています。MediaWikiの技術面に興味があり、Betawikiの翻訳者として作業しています。利用者の手助けをしようと思い、よく多くのIRCチャンネルにいます。複数ウィキにまたがる荒らしやスパムと戦ったり、依頼を処理するのを手伝うことができるので、スチュワード就任に関心を持っています。
polski:
  • Języki: pl, en-2, de-0.5, es-0.5
  • Informacje osobiste: Cześć, na imię mam Daniel i pochodzę z Gdyni w Polsce. Jestem aktywny w projektach Wikimedia od maja 2006. W polskiej Wikipedii jestem administratorem od sierpnia 2007 oraz biurokratą od kwietnia 2008. Interesuję się technicznymi aspektami MediaWiki oraz jestem aktywnym tłumaczem w projekcie Betawiki. Często jestem dostępny na wielu kanałach IRCa i chętnie pomagam użytkownikom. Jestem zainteresowany zostaniem stewardem, ponieważ pomógłbym w zwalczaniu międzyprojektowego wandalizmu i spamu, a także pomógł w realizacji wniosków.
português:
  • Línguas: pl, en-2, de-0.5, es-0.5
  • Informações pessoais: Olá, meu nome é Daniel e sou de Gdynia, Polônia. Sou ativo nos projetos Wikimedia desde maio de 2006. Sou administrador na Wikipédia em polonês desde agosto de 2007 e burocrata desde abril de 2008. Eu me interesso nos aspectos técnicos do MediaWiki e trabalho como tradutor no Betawiki. Estou presente frequentemente em muitos canais IRC e querendo ajudar usuários. Estou interessado em me tornar um steward, porque eu posso ajudar a combater vandalismo e spam cross-wiki e também ajudar com os pedidos.
русский:
  • Языки: pl, en-2, de-0.5, es-0.5
  • Личная информация: Привет! Меня зовут Даниэль, я родом из польского города Гдыни. А активно работаю в проектах Фонда Викимедиа с мая 2006 года. Я был администратором в разделе Википедии на польском языке с августа 2007 года и бюроктом с апреля 2008. Я интересуюсь техническими аспектами МедиаВики и работаю над переводами в Бетавики. Я часто присутствую на многих IRC-каналах и готов помогать пользователям. Я заинтересован в том, чтобы стать стюардом, потому что я могу помочь в борьбе с кросс-вики вандализмом и спамом, а также работать с запросами.


Pictogram voting question.svg Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. One of the new promising and hard working leaders of Polish Wikipedia, with excellent technical skills. Trusted user, very good candidate. Szwedzki 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  2. I know Leinad personally, I think he would be very useful and helpful on other Wikimedia projects. Awersowy 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  3. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  4. Locksmith 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  5. Because: hard woriking, always available, very friendly, helpful, and has some tech-skills. Masur 00:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  6. --Ivan Štambuk 00:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  7. Yes, why not. Marcus Cyron 01:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  8. --FollowTheMedia 01:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  9. Excellent candidate. Grzegorz Petka 02:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  10. Support Support Good candidate. Indu 02:44 , 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  11. Support Support --Cinik 03:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  12. Support Support --Luisfege 03:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  13. Support Support Extremely helpful, experienced, active and reasonable, knows what's going on around the projects well.--Adi 04:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  14. Support Support Smat 05:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  15. --Sir James 06:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  16. Avjoska 06:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  17. Galileo01 07:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Candidate is well-known on Polish Wikipedia as very solid user.
  18. Support Support Hulek 07:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  19. Support Support --Wiher 07:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  20. Support Support Louve 08:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  21. Sebleouf 08:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  22. Support Support PS11 08:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  23. Support Support I have known the candidate for a while and he is definitely trustworthy Pundit 09:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  24. Support Support Merdis 09:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  25. Adrian 1111 09:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  26. Support Support Sp5uhe 09:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  27. --StSasha 10:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC) tak
  28. ABX 10:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  29. Astromp 10:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  30. Klejas 10:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  31. --Wing 10:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  32. A technically-oriented administrator and bureaucrat, initiator of quality projects at Polish Wikipedia (one of the main drives behind Flagged Revisions, like this extension or not), tester of Mediawiki software and its extensions on the Polish toolserver, interface translator - so definitely knowledgeable in "what's ticking in Mediawiki". I also trust him to do a good job as a steward, especially from the "clockworks" perspective. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  33. Sure. Jon Harald Søby 10:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  34. Efbé Je suis un WikiLover 10:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  35. ToAr 10:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  36. Bukaj 11:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  37. Support Support--Konsnos 11:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
    Yes. Sproject 11:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Does not have 600 edits before 01 November 2008 Bukaj 11:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  38. --MannMaus 11:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  39. Żbiczek 12:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Trustworthy, reasonable, technically-skilled, alaways available and helpful.
  40. --Wyksztalcioch 12:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  41. Definitely.--Verwolff 12:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  42. Support Support Patrol110 12:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Probably the best candidate for this post.
  43. Plati 13:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  44. Support Support Mat86 13:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  45. Support Support Trustworthy. Timpul 13:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  46. Support Support Lonio17 14:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)The best candidate
  47. Support Support Mo Cuishle 14:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  48. Matma Rex 15:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  49. Support За --Ahonc 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  50. Popieram. Fiskot 15:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  51. --Fabexplosive The archive man 15:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  52. Support Support Paweł Drozd aka --Drozdp 16:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  53. Support Support Dawid Mrożek 16:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  54. Don't always agree with him, but I trust he will be a good steward. Nux (talk) 16:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  55. Support Support Micpol 17:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  56. Support Support Excellent candidate Vertigo12 18:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  57. Support Support Red 81 19:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  58. Michał460 19:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  59. Support Support Lukasz Lukomski 20:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  60. Support Support Trambampas 20:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  61. Support Support Very good candidature. Wulfstan 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  62. Support Support--Adamt 22:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  63. Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ!) 03:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  64. Support Support --Andreasmperu 04:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  65. faithless (speak) 05:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  66. "Polak, Węgier, dwa bratanki, i do szabli, i do szklanki." - Pilgab 05:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  67. Delimata 08:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
    Motic +1 11:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
    vote by anon, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 19:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
  68. --P@d@w@ne 09:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  69. Sobol2222 09:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  70. Vuvar1 13:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  71. Jaranda | wat's sup 14:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  72. Szalakóta 14:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  73. Support Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  74. --Zivax 16:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  75. Grzegorz Wysocki 16:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  76. Support Support Nutaj 18:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  77. Support Support Monopol 19:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  78. --Ralf Roletschek 20:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  79. - Support, Bjoertvedt
  80. Support Support Derski 20:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  81. Symbol support vote.svg Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  82. ~ Seb35 22:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  83. --Thogo (talk) 01:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  84. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 04:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  85. Good enough. Hillgentleman 05:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  86. Support Support Michał Sobkowski 11:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  87. sure Przykuta 13:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  88. Maedin\talk 13:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  89. Szymon Żywicki 15:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  90. Support Support --Lighterside 16:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  91. Support Support AlexKazakhov 16:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  92. Support Support Kmarius
  93. Elfhelm 19:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  94. Yes. Alefbe 20:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  95. Support Support --Korovioff 20:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  96. Support Support--Raboe001 20:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  97. Support Support-- JAn Dudík 21:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  98. Yes, of course support --Omega933 21:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  99. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  100. of course, Pjahr 11:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  101. Sounds good to me! Vertigo893 13:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  102. Laforgue 15:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  103. Yarl 16:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  104. Support - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  105. Support Support why not --Gdgourou 10:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  106. Support Support, good ideas. ~Innvs: 12:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  107. --Church of emacs talk 16:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  108. John Vandenberg 17:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  109. Support Support Karol007 06:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  110. Support Support Gdarin | talk 08:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  111. Support Support Seems good! --HansRoth 10:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  112. Support Support Picus viridis 11:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  113. Maikking 11:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  114. Support Support Rosiestep 17:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  115. Support Support and I'm waiting for some necessary help in the future :) Stefaniak 18:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  116. Support Support --Wayiran 19:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  117. Support Support Skotos 07:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  118. Support Support --Daniel73480 11:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  119. --Hardenacke 17:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  120. Support Support Dawid86 22:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  121. ok --Rax 20:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  122. Nbarth 01:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  123. Support Support Rain City Blues 03:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  124. Support Support --Diligent 19:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  125. Support Support --Zeljko 08:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
  126. Support Support Bartek m0 16:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
  127. Support Support--Thesupermat 09:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
  128. --Mayer Bruno 18:46, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
  129. Wiktoryn 21:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
  130. PMG 00:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
  131. Support SupportNatanaeel83 21:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
  132. Support Support Maire 21:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
  133. Support Support - Punx 07:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  134. Support Support - Dorgan 11:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
  135. Support Support If I support Dorgan, I must support you as well! Your profiles are very similar, it's really funny! :) --OrsolyaVirág 18:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
  136. Support Support technicall Reasons --دانقولا 23:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
  137. Support Support --Mardetanha talk 21:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
  138. Support Support --Meno25 23:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. Aitias // discussion 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  2. Sorry, doesn't seem very experienced for this. Majorly talk 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  3. Puntori 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  4. Oppose Oppose neuro(talk) 01:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  5. Prodego talk 04:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  6. --Latitude 08:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  7. -- ""well known" in the Polish wikipedia? Never heard of him. Not so experienced. No!--Alexvonf 10:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  8. Oppose Oppose Vyk 11:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  9. --MF-W 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  10. Obelix 15:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  11. Oppose Oppose per Majorly. -- Nahum 15:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  12. NonvocalScream 21:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  13. Hargau 05:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  14. per Majorly. Sorry. Alex Pereira falaê 12:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  15. Oppose Oppose No. Tesi1700 18:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  16. Cross wiki experience? ...Aurora... 12:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  17. Oppose Oppose fr33kman t - c 02:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  18. I think that the candidate should be more experienced and has more edits beside own pl-Wiki. Andrzej19 12:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
    Oppose Oppose Admin LeinaD is member of gruop that is responsible for keeping LGBT articles in polish Wikipedia in fatal, strongly POV state (with Szwedzki, Louve, Pływak, Grzegorz Petka). Any attempt on make these articles more neutral results in ongouing reverts and fast ban, as in my case. Because of his misunderstaning of NPOV — strongly NO. Dobromir Sośnierz
    Insufficient edit count to vote. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 16:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  19. Oppose Oppose per Majorly. --Wikikids 02:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
  20. Oppose Oppose -- Harrywad 23:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
  21. Oppose Oppose. Khoikhoi 23:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. I agree that he's helpful, hard-working etc., but I don't think it's a job for him. McMonster 16:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  2. dto. --Uwe Gille 11:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  3. Per Majorly, but still seems trusted. --FiliP × 12:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
  4. --Davecrosby uk 00:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  5. -- BenceRotating earth (large).gif My Talk 18:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  6. Neutral Neutral Poco a poco 12:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  7. Neutral Neutral Experience a bit poor but not a bad candidate. O. Morand 10:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
  8. As with Laaknor, I simply don't see cross-wiki experience. You're not involved in anything for which the steward tools are needed. You say you're interested in countering spam and vandalism, yet you've never reported a single domain to the blacklist, nor do you seem to be involved in cross-wiki anti-vandalism. Actually doing things is far better than promises to do them in the future. I doubt you're going to go on a rampage, but I think we can do better.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)