Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Italian Wikisource Village pump
What group or community is this source coming from?
|name of group||Italian Wikisource|
|virtual location (page-link) or physical location (city/state/country)||Village pump|
|Location type (e.g. local wiki, Facebook, in-person discussion, telephone conference)||local wiki|
|# of participants in this discussion (a rough count)||8|
The summary is a group of summary sentences and associated keywords that describe the relevant topic(s). Below is an example.
The first column (after the line number) should be a single sentence. The second column should be a comma-separated list of keywords about that sentence, and so on. Taken together, all the sentences should provide an accurate summary of what was discussed with the specific community.
Summary for the discussion:
|Line||Statement (summary sentence)||Keywords|
|1||Wikimedia projects should me more interconnected, in procedures, skills, data, and people.||interconnection|
|2||It should be easier to contribute to Wikisource, uploading, transcribing and proofreading texts.||easiness|
|3||Wikisource should host more Creative Commons licensed work (not it is more focused on public domain ones). E.g. open access articles.||open access, creative commons|
|4||Texts published on Italian Wikisource contains link to author and works cited. Other Wikisource should do the same.||hypertext, links, interconnection|
|5||Wikisource is not a digital library but a digital typography: it should be focused on scanned text needing proofreading and formatting, not on texts that are born-digital.||typography, proofreading, formatting|
|6||Wikisource should be more integrated with other Wikimedia projects, without entity duplication.||integration, interconnection, Wikidata|
|7||It should be easier to build services on Wikisource texts (e.g. mass export, text mining, etc.)||easiness|
|8||It should be easier to read and edit Wikisource with e-book readers, smartphones and tablets.||mobile|
|9||Texts should have coordinates allowing identification of different parts.||text_coordinates|
|10||Wikimedia projects users should be able to annotate and underline text.||web_annotation|
|11||It should be possible to quote a passage from a text on Wikisource univocally.||quotations|
|12||Wikisource should be simpler and text editor should be improved.||easiness|
|13||We need more information about Wikisource readers.||readers|
|14||(Italian) Wikisource should allow original translations.||translations|
|15||(Italian) Wikisource should host more kind of texts, without focusing only on scanned books.||scope|
|16||Wikisource should work more with external partners (libraries, institutions) to obtain more texts.||partner, libraries, institutions|
|17||Wikisource should increase quantity and quality of its content.||quantity, quality|
|18||Wikisource need better software and technology to improve the experience of readers and editors.||engineering, user experience|
|19||The wiki (free, public, collaborative) way should be spread even in real life, outside of Wikimedia and of the web (e.g. in environment care).||real_life, wiki_way|
|20||An improvement to Wikisource software would improve productivity and serenity, and would bring more volunteers.||engineering|
If you need more lines, you can copy them from Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Lines.
Detailed notes (Optional)
If you have detailed notes in addition to the summary, you may add them here. For example, the notes may come from an in-person discussion or workshop. If your discussion happened on a wiki or other online space, you do not need to copy the detailed notes here.