What governance and organizational structures do we need to support the delivery of the strategic direction?
Bisika ya nkaka ya beto ta tadila sambu na kutadila diambu yai kele:
mutindu ya kuyidika mambu ya kimvuka ya Wikimedia; * kukabisa bisalu mpi mikumba na ntangu yai mpi na bilumbu ke kwisa na kati ya Fondation Wikimedia, bimvuka na yo mpi bakomite; * luyalu ya kimvuka ya mvimba mpi mutindu ya kubaka badesizio, ti bangwisana na kati ya bimvuka, mpi mukumba ya bantu yina ke sadila kiyeka; * kukabula mikumba: banda na ntoto ya mvimba tii na kisika ya mvimba to na kimvuka ya bantu ya luzolo ya mbote; * lunungu na kati ya kimvuka na beto mpi kukabisa mikumba sambu na bisalu ya mfunu (kuyela ya software, kuvutula mbongo, kuvutula mvutu, * bansoba ya nsiku na makuki ya politiki na bilumbu ke landa;
Bubu yai, kele ti bisalu mingi na internet, bimvuka, bakomite, mpi bimvuka ya ofele na kati ya kimvuka ya Wikimedia. Mambu yai me yelaka mingi-mingi na mutindu ya mbote, mpi yo me salamaka ntete ve na mutindu ya nene.
Mbala mingi, kuwakana na kati ya bitini ya kuswaswana ya kimvuka ke vandaka ve pwelele. Kisika ya pwelele kele ve sambu na kusolula na kati ya bitini ya kuswaswana ya kimvuka, mpi kele ve ti mutindu ya mbote ya kubaka lukanu na nsuka ya disolo ya mutindu yai. Fondation ya Wikimedia ke salaka bantangu ya nkaka kisalu ya kutambusa masolo mpi badesizio na mambu ya mutindu yai, kansi yo lenda to ta sala yo ve mbala na mbala.
Ata kele ti bambandu mingi ya mbote ya lusadisu ya beto zole mpi ya kumanisa mambu na kuvukana, kukonda pwelele yai ke basisa bampasi. Mbala mingi, mambu yina bo ke vingilaka ke vandaka ve pwelele mpi bo ke monaka nde kusolula kele ve mbote. Bisalu mpi bisalu, ti bisalu ya nkaka ya mfunu, ke salamaka ve sambu yo kele kisalu ya muntu ve na kusala yo.
Our aim is to document and evaluate the existing governance and organisational structures of the Wikimedia Movement through consultation with a wide range of past and current stakeholders, to identify where roles and structures are working well (responsibilities/authority for decision making and communication are clear, and responsibilities are being executed) and where they are not. This “mapping” will also include other known gaps or obstacles that must be addressed in order to reach our 2030 goals. With this baseline in place, the group will then examine other governance models in terms of their suitability for reaching our direction for 2030, bearing in mind both current ‘pain points’ and the likely future environment and challenges the Wikimedia movement will face.
The process the group is following is adapted from the book “Farsighted”, which focuses on best practices for decision-making in situations where long-term consequences and high-stakes results are a key factor.
The goal is to identify a future structure for the Wikimedia Movement that will create less friction and more synergies by better allocating the roles and responsibilities we need to strengthen Wikimedia's role as a pioneer in knowledge sharing, and to support the Strategic Direction.
Inki kele bangiufula ya mfunu na kati ya kimvuka ya kisalu?
What governance and organizational structures do we need to support the delivery of the strategic direction, particularly knowledge equity?
How do we ensure that our governance and operational structures can adapt to social, technological and political change?
How and to whom should movement roles and structures be accountable?
What structures, processes, and behaviours will enable us to include all voices (including e.g. current contributors and emerging audiences) in our decision-making?
What is the best way to understand the contributions and capabilities of the nodes in our future network?
Which responsibilities are better placed at a global, regional, local or thematic level; which should be centralized and which decentralized?
How might we integrate the Wikimedia Movement with the greater free knowledge ecosystem?
How should conflict management and resolution be structured across the movement?
How can we be strategic about ensuring relevance as we scale while still supporting the existing editing community? (Note: This point is about the relevance, quality and richness of content)
