Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/da

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations and the translation is 8% complete.

Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎italiano • ‎português do Brasil • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎हिन्दी • ‎বাংলা • ‎中文 • ‎日本語

What is this about?

Working group members have been working tirelessly for a year to research the movement, analyze community input shared via community conversations, gain insight into external trends, and come to a shared vision across a diverse range of perspectives.

Draft Recommendations

There are two versions of recommendations:

  1. a full version with complete explanations and context as offered by the working groups who authored them, and
  2. abbreviated summaries, prepared for easier engagement and translation.

The recommendations are not final. In order to get them to that stage, your input is needed! Community voices are essential for bringing a broad perspective into the changes that will shape our future. This includes affiliates, groups and chapters, the Wikimedia Foundation, and communities across projects, languages, and geographies. We would like to hear what these changes would mean for you in your local or thematic context, what do you like about them, and where you potentially see red flags. And of course, always critically question whether these recommendations support the strategic direction.

How to Share Your Feedback

Feedback plays a vital role in validating and challenging the draft recommendations. It’s helpful to have guiding questions to help Wikimedian communities and organized groups evaluate the meaning, importance, and quality of the recommendations. Here are some suggestions:

  1. Read through the recommendations and provide your input on the talk pages of respective recommendations.
    • What do you like about this recommendation? What do you dislike? Why?
    • What does this recommendation mean for you in contexts that are meaningful to you - your language, your projects, your region, your affiliate group, your identity? How would you be affected?
    • What is important to keep in mind when implementing this recommendation? What values and ideas are important to preserve? Are there any red lines we should not cross?
    • Does this recommendation support our Strategic Direction to become the support system for the whole free knowledge movement?
  2. If you will be at Wikimania, join us in the Wikimedia 2030 Strategy Space! We will be in the Aula Magna building in room “Karman” on the second level with sessions throughout the event dedicated to each thematic area. Find out more on the Wikimania program schedule.
  3. Attend a Strategy Salon hosted by an affiliate where you live. Over August and September, we will be hosting salons in Benin, Bolivia, India, Portugal, and elsewhere.
  4. Reach out to a Strategy Liaison in your language or for your affiliate to share feedback, or lead a conversation of your own.
What’s Next?

Open community input will be accepted until September 15, after which working groups will refine and finalize their work using movement input as well as external advice and research. The final recommendations will be shared publicly in November, and discussions around implementation will begin in early 2020. Keep an eye out on the “Participate” page for timeline updates as they are available.

Abbreviated summaries of draft recommendations

OOjs UI icon language-rtl.svg

Summaries have been prepared for easier engagement as well as translation into Arabic, French, German, Hindi, Mandarin, Brazilian Portugese, and Spanish. Translations will be uploaded as they become available:

Draft recommendations per Working Group

Advocacy

Capacity Building

Community Health

Mangfoldighed

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

15 September 2019

14 September 2019

13 September 2019

      23:32  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups/Diversity/Recommendations/11 diffhist +296 The wub talk contribs →‎Support: new section
      23:27  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups/Diversity/Recommendations/9 diffhist +492 The wub talk contribs →‎Comment
      23:18  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups/Diversity/Recommendations/4 diffhist +302 The wub talk contribs →‎Negative impacts
      23:08  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups/Diversity/Recommendations/3 diffhist +204 The wub talk contribs →‎Comment: +1
      23:01  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups/Diversity/Recommendations/5 diffhist +230 The wub talk contribs →‎Please, don't use Wikidata for this: +
      22:53  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups/Diversity/Recommendations/1 diffhist +551 The wub talk contribs →‎Existing code of conduct for technical spaces: new section
      17:49  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups/Diversity/Recommendations/10 diffhist +654 Unapersona talk contribs →‎What about sign languages? Tag: 2017 source edit

Partnerskaber

*Note: some of the recommendations are not based on full consensus of all the members of the working group yet. We are looking forward to discussing the nuances of these at Wikimania.

“How might we build Wikimedia into an effective convener of impactful partnerships, coalitions, and collective action based on a shared vision of free Open Knowledge Movement, such as the “Big Open” framework? What should be the purpose of such partnerships?”

Summary of recommendations

  1. A Framework that Supports Partnerships
Discuss
  1. Partnerships as a shared and equitable resource and enterprise
Discuss
  1. Partnerships as part of a Distributed Vision
Discuss
  1. Partnerships need practices that foster institutional memory
Discuss
  1. Define priorities for partnerships so that all key aspects of building the free knowledge ecosystem are covered
Discuss
  1. A single point of entry for partners to engage with Wikimedia
Discuss

“How do we develop technical infrastructure, capacities and the support we need in order to be an effective partner to share ‘the sum of all knowledge” and fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners?”

  1. A central infrastructure for content partnerships requiring technical solutions
Discuss
  1. Technical Partnership For Developments under a shared vision and resource collaboration
Discuss
  1. Partnership framework for harnessing modern technological developments
Discuss
  1. Data partnerships approach to fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners
Discuss
  1. Create an internal knowledge-base to curate details of partnerships across the movement
Discuss
  1. Develop Capacity Building Modules for running partnership
Discuss

“How can we empower people and organizations working on partnerships within our Movement to get the support they need to fulfill our potential and carry out diverse, sustainable, effective and impactful partnerships?”

“How do we create an inclusive, movement-wide culture of sharing knowledge, skills, and practices on collaborations and partnerships - so that everyone in the movement can participate in and benefit from them?”

  1. Recognition. Encourage proper attribution for content donations so institutions working with us are proud of their contribution and are acknowledged for their contribution
Discuss
  1. Encourage partnerships focusing on Knowledge gaps and knowledge equity
Discuss
  1. Documentation as a priority, not an afterthought, ending a barrier to participation and capturing our methodology and instructions in formats accessible for our global audiences
Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

13 September 2019

Produkter og teknologier

Resource Allocation

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

15 September 2019

14 September 2019

      21:22  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups/Resource Allocation/Recommendations/D‎‎ 3 changes history +3,380 [Ilario‎ (3×)]
      
21:22 (cur | prev) +73 Ilario talk contribs →‎Creating a strategy for 2030 using wrong schemes
      
21:20 (cur | prev) +1,365 Ilario talk contribs →‎When equity is discriminatory: new section
      
20:54 (cur | prev) +1,942 Ilario talk contribs →‎Creating a strategy for 2030 using wrong schemes: new section
      20:11  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups/Resource Allocation/Recommendations/C‎‎ 5 changes history +4,291 [Pierre-Yves Beaudouin‎; Ilario‎ (4×)]
      
20:11 (cur | prev) +1,140 Ilario talk contribs →‎Diversity: please clarify: new section
      
19:59 (cur | prev) +1,324 Ilario talk contribs →‎From equity to the disequity: new section
      
18:00 (cur | prev) +606 Ilario talk contribs →‎Why someone should keep the privileges?: new section
      
17:54 (cur | prev) +911 Ilario talk contribs →‎Please clarify the word "privileges".: new section
      
11:05 (cur | prev) +310 Pierre-Yves Beaudouin talk contribs →‎Wikimedia France: new section
N     11:02  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups/Resource Allocation/Recommendations/B diffhist +529 Pierre-Yves Beaudouin talk contribs Created page with "== Wikimedia France == Turn around the current linguistic logic and put the "weight" of linguistic diversity on structures that hold the movement's money and not on structures..."
N     11:00  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Working Groups/Resource Allocation/Recommendations/E diffhist +347 Pierre-Yves Beaudouin talk contribs Created page with "== Wikimedia France == Independance and decentralization : who will the employer of the staff of regional/thematic hubs? If it's the WMF, it's not decentralization. On behalf..."

Revenue Streams

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

17 September 2019

16 September 2019

14 September 2019

13 September 2019

Roles & Responsibilities

Click here to learn more about the recommendations by R&R Working Group

  1. Power and responsibilities need to be redistributed on the principle of self management (subsidiarity)
  2. Decisions should be taken at the “lowest” possible level / as near as possible to the process/community/activity that will be affected by the decision
  3. To establish a framework for decision-making, there will be a charter of principles, values, and governance behaviours. The charter will be developed through an equitable process with broad and diverse participation.
  4. This charter will be owned by a global governance and accountability body
  5. All of this exists to support our primary purpose: free knowledge and its distribution
  6. Movement organizations are to be governed by diverse, inclusive and accountable bodies (mix of elected and appointed members)
  7. Capacity building, facilitation, coaching, leadership development will be built into these structures to enable all entities to develop at their speed. This will be supported by staff.
Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

15 September 2019

14 September 2019