रणनीति/विकिमीडिया आंदोलन/२०१८-२०/सिफारिशें

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations and the translation is 58% complete.
Outdated translations are marked like this.
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Esperanto • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎italiano • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎हिन्दी • ‎বাংলা • ‎中文 • ‎日本語

यह किस बारे में है?

कार्य समूह के सदस्य आंदोलन पर शोध करने, सामुदायिक वार्तालापों के माध्यम से साझा किए गए सामुदायिक इनपुट का विश्लेषण करने, बाहरी रुझानों की जानकारी हासिल करने और दृष्टिकोणों की एक विविधतापूर्ण श्रंखला में एक सांझे दृष्टिकोण पर आने के लिए एक वर्ष से अथक प्रयास कर रहे हैं।

ड्राफ्ट की सिफारिशें सिफारिशों के दो संस्करण हैं:

  1. काम करने वाले समूहों द्वारा लिखा और प्रस्तुत किया गया पूर्ण विवरण और संदर्भ के साथ एक पूर्ण संस्करण, और
  2. संक्षिप्त सारांश जो कि आसान संलग्नता और अनुवाद के लिए तैयार किया गया है।

A second iteration of the recommendations was developed by the working groups in September 2019 after many on- and offline conversations with diverse stakeholders from across our movement; at Wikimania 2019, on the Talk Pages of the 1st iteration of the draft recommendations, and at many in-person events such as regional summits and strategy salons. The very first iteration of the draft recommendations were shared in August 2019, which you can find below, presented in full and abbreviated versions and with translations available.

यह सिफारिशें अंतिम नहीं हैं। उन्हें उस अवस्था में लाने के लिए, आपकी इनपुट की आवश्यकता है! सामुदायिक आवाज़ उन परिवर्तनों में एक व्यापक परिप्रेक्ष्य लाने के लिए आवश्यक हैं जो हमारे भविष्य को आकार देंगे। इसमें सहयोगी, समूह और अध्याय, विकिमीडिया फ़ाउंडेशन, समुदाय परियोजनए, भाषाओं और भौगोलिक क्षेत्रों में समुदाय शामिल हैं। हम यह सुनना चाहेंगे कि आपके स्थानीय या विषयगत संदर्भ में आपके लिए इन परिवर्तनों का क्या अर्थ होगा, आप उनके बारे में क्या पसंद करते हैं, और कहाँ आपको संभावित रूप से दिक्कतें आतीं हैं। और निश्चित रूप से, हमेशा आलोचनात्मक सवाल करें कि क्या ये सिफारिशें रणनीतिक दिशा का समर्थन करती हैं।

अपनी प्रतिक्रिया कैसे सांझी करें

ड्राफ्ट सिफारिशों को मान्य और चुनौती देने में फीडबैक महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाता है। विकिमीडिया समुदायों और संगठित समूहों की सिफारिशों के अर्थ, महत्व और गुणवत्ता का मूल्यांकन करने में मदद करने के लिए मार्गदर्शक प्रश्न रखना सहायक है। यहाँ कुछ सुझाव हैं:

  1. सिफारिशों के माध्यम से पढ़ें और संबंधित सिफारिशों के वार्ता पन्नों पर अपना इनपुट प्रदान करें।
    • आपको इस सिफारिश के बारे में क्या पसंद है? आपको क्या क्या नापसंद हैं? क्यूं?
    • आपके लिए सार्थक होने वाले संदर्भों में इस सिफारिश का क्या मतलब है - आपकी भाषा, आपकी परियोजनाएँ, आपका क्षेत्र, आपका संबद्ध समूह, आपकी पहचान? आप कैसे प्रभावित होंगे?
    • इस सिफारिश को लागू करते समय क्या ध्यान रखना जरूरी है? किन मूल्यों और विचारों को संरक्षित करना महत्वपूर्ण है? क्या कोई लाल रेखा है जिसे हमें पार नहीं करना चाहिए?
    • क्या यह सिफारिश पूरे मुक्त ज्ञान आंदोलन के लिए समर्थन प्रणाली बनने के लिए हमारी रणनीतिक दिशा का समर्थन करती है?
  2. यदि आप विकिमेनिया में होंगे, तो हमारे साथ विकिमीडिया 2030 स्ट्रेटजी स्पेस में शामिल हों! हम प्रत्येक विषयगत क्षेत्र के लिए समर्पित पूरे आयोजन के दौरान सत्रों के साथ दूसरे स्तर पर कमरे "कर्मन" में औला मैग्ना भवन में होंगे। विकिमनिया कार्यक्रम अनुसूची पर अधिक जानकारी प्राप्त करें।
  3. आप जहां रहते हैं, वहां एक संबद्ध द्वारा आयोजित एक रणनीति सैलून में भाग लें। अगस्त और सितंबर में, हम बेनिन, बोलीविया, भारत, पुर्तगाल और अन्य जगहों पर सैलून की मेजबानी करेंगे।
  4. अपनी भाषा में या प्रतिक्रिया साझा करने के लिए अपने संबद्ध के लिए एक रणनीति संपर्क तक पहुंचें, या अपनी खुद की बातचीत का नेतृत्व करें।
आगे क्या होगा?

15 सितंबर तक खुले सामुदायिक इनपुट को स्वीकार किया जाएगा, जिसके बाद कार्य समूह आंदोलन इनपुट के साथ-साथ बाहरी सलाह और अनुसंधान का उपयोग करके अपने काम को परिष्कृत और अंतिम रूप देंगे। अंतिम सिफारिशों को नवंबर में सार्वजनिक रूप से साझा किया जाएगा, और कार्यान्वयन चर्चाएं 2020 के आसपास प्रारंभ में शुरू होंगी। जैसे ही वे उपलब्ध हों, टाइमलाइन अपडेट के लिए "प्रतिभागी" पेज पर नज़र रखें।


कार्य समूह द्वारा दी गईं मसौदा सिफारिशें

Iteration 2 (September 2019)

Advocacy

  1. Transparency: A global network of Wikimedia advocates is built on community driven rules of engagement. Processes for decision making are known and comprehensible. There are established entry points for those who want to be involved or want to initiate advocacy activities
Discuss
  1. Diversity: Community actively seeks and provides a good environment and tailored pathways that attracts more people from a variety and diversity of languages and cultural backgrounds to engage in advocacy for Wikimedia on a local or global level
Discuss
  1. Global conversation: There is an established communication process for community advocates to have central conversations about advocacy
Discuss
  1. Knowledge management: There is constant knowledge management about methods, cases, success stories, and failures for all advocates to access and learn from, processed and maintained by, with and for them
Discuss
  1. Advocacy Hub: Movement advocacy efforts are streamlined and reinforced by a hub run with and for current and future advocates
Discuss
  1. Common positioning: The advocacy priorities of the Wikimedia movement are clearly articulated through a shared, highly visible and living document
Discuss
  1. Partnerships: Advocates for the Wikimedia movement are able to collaborate with and build upon an existing global network of partners working on aligned advocacy issues
Discuss
  1. Empowerment of advocates: Advocacy is recognized and encouraged as a valid pathway in the Wikimedia Movement
Discuss
  1. Self-Determination: Subsidiary decentralisation should be a model of collaboration for advocacy across the movement
Discuss
  1. Protection of Advocates: Advocates have access to clearly defined and accessible safety measures enabling them to work without having their personal and communal security compromised
Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

      11:46  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Advocacy/10 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:46  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Advocacy/8 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:46  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Advocacy/7 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:45  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Advocacy/6 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:45  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Advocacy/5 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:45  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Advocacy/4 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:45  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Advocacy/3 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:45  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Advocacy/2 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:44  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Advocacy/1 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template

Capacity Building

Community Health

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

      11:49  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Community Health/12 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:49  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Community Health/11 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:49  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Community Health/8 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:48  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Community Health/6 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:48  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Community Health/5 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:48  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Community Health/4 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:48  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Community Health/2 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template
      11:48  Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Sprint/Community Health/1 diffhist +71 SGrabarczuk (WMF) talk contribs template

Diversity

Partnerships

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

Product & Technology

Resource Allocation

Revenue Streams

Click here to learn more about the recommendations by RS Working Group

  1. Turn the Wikimedia API into a revenue source
  2. Provide Paid Wiki-related Services
  3. Monetize merchandise
  4. Expand global fundraising
  5. Develop non-fundraising revenue streams for affiliates
  6. Set a goal of financial sustainability for all movement actors
  7. Diversification of revenue channels
Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
D
Wikidata edit
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

9 December 2019

Roles & Responsibilities

Iteration 1 (August 2019)

Iteration 1 (August 2019)
मसौदा सिफारिशों की संक्षिप्त सारांश
OOjs UI icon language-rtl.svg

सारांश अरबी, फ्रेंच, जर्मन, हिंदी, मंदारिन, ब्राजीलियाई पोर्टुगेसी और स्पेनिश में अनुवाद के लिए तैयार किए गए हैं।

हिमायत
क्षमता निर्माण
सामुदायिक स्वास्थ्य

चर्चाओं में हालिया बदलाव

No changes during the given period match these criteria.
विविधता
सहभागिताएं

*Note: some of the recommendations are not based on full consensus of all the members of the working group yet. We are looking forward to discussing the nuances of these at Wikimania.

“How might we build Wikimedia into an effective convener of impactful partnerships, coalitions, and collective action based on a shared vision of free Open Knowledge Movement, such as the “Big Open” framework? What should be the purpose of such partnerships?”

Summary of recommendations

  1. A Framework that Supports Partnerships
Discuss
  1. Partnerships as a shared and equitable resource and enterprise
Discuss
  1. Partnerships as part of a Distributed Vision
Discuss
  1. Partnerships need practices that foster institutional memory
Discuss
  1. Define priorities for partnerships so that all key aspects of building the free knowledge ecosystem are covered
Discuss
  1. A single point of entry for partners to engage with Wikimedia
Discuss

“How do we develop technical infrastructure, capacities and the support we need in order to be an effective partner to share ‘the sum of all knowledge” and fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners?”

  1. A central infrastructure for content partnerships requiring technical solutions
Discuss
  1. Technical Partnership For Developments under a shared vision and resource collaboration
Discuss
  1. Partnership framework for harnessing modern technological developments
Discuss
  1. Data partnerships approach to fulfill the vision of knowledge as a service for our partners
Discuss
  1. Create an internal knowledge-base to curate details of partnerships across the movement
Discuss
  1. Develop Capacity Building Modules for running partnership
Discuss

“How can we empower people and organizations working on partnerships within our Movement to get the support they need to fulfill our potential and carry out diverse, sustainable, effective and impactful partnerships?”

“How do we create an inclusive, movement-wide culture of sharing knowledge, skills, and practices on collaborations and partnerships - so that everyone in the movement can participate in and benefit from them?”

  1. Recognition. Encourage proper attribution for content donations so institutions working with us are proud of their contribution and are acknowledged for their contribution
Discuss
  1. Encourage partnerships focusing on Knowledge gaps and knowledge equity
Discuss
  1. Documentation as a priority, not an afterthought, ending a barrier to participation and capturing our methodology and instructions in formats accessible for our global audiences
Discuss

चर्चाओं में हालिया बदलाव

No changes during the given period match these criteria.
उत्पाद और प्रौद्योगिकी
संसाधन आबंटन
आय के स्रोत
भूमिकाएं और ज़िम्मेदारियां

भूमिकाएं और ज़िम्मेदारियां कार्यकारी समूह की सिफारिशों के बारे में अधिक जानने के लिए यहां क्लिक करें

  1. Power and responsibilities need to be redistributed on the principle of self management (subsidiarity)
  2. Decisions should be taken at the “lowest” possible level / as near as possible to the process/community/activity that will be affected by the decision
  3. To establish a framework for decision-making, there will be a charter of principles, values, and governance behaviours. The charter will be developed through an equitable process with broad and diverse participation.
  4. This charter will be owned by a global governance and accountability body
  5. All of this exists to support our primary purpose: free knowledge and its distribution
  6. Movement organizations are to be governed by diverse, inclusive and accountable bodies (mix of elected and appointed members)
  7. Capacity building, facilitation, coaching, leadership development will be built into these structures to enable all entities to develop at their speed. This will be supported by staff.
Discuss

Recent changes in discussions

No changes during the given period match these criteria.