Talk:Fundraising 2011/Jimmy Letter 002/en

“

Compared to the other top-5 websites,

”

there are only other 4 websites. one is wikipedia itself. --Vssun 02:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is one top-5 website, and there are four other top-5 websites. Does that make sense? Jon Harald Søby (WMF) 05:25, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is better to use, Comparing top-5 websites --Vssun 08:27, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In English and Norwegian at least that formulation makes perfect sense; it may of course vary from language to language. The point is moot now anyways since the sentence in question was removed. :-) Jon Harald Søby (WMF) 06:28, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

:-)--Vssun 05:44, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if there are 93 staffs at Wikimedia Foundation or 73. The number of staffs has changed in this version. If 93 is the correct number of staffs, I believe, other letters which mentioned the number should be changed. Joshuajh 01:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is currently 94, but just leave it as 73 – we are exchanging the number with a template on donatewiki (where the appeals are stored), that will always stay up-to-date. If you leave it as 73, it is easier for us to just do an automatic search-and-replace when we fix it. :-) Jon Harald Søby (WMF) 02:37, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]