Talk:Global Data and Insights Team/Movement Data/Equity Landscape/Pilot & Consultation/Design Considerations

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consideration 1.[edit]

The Nomenclature
Do any of the proposed metric domain or facet labels present potential challenges to you or your group’s planned projects and partnerships?
Please share your thoughts and sign with four "~" to sign and date your input.

  • Metric counts. Count of organizing hubs engaged might be confusing/problematic, since "hubs" are now being discussed as part of Movement Strategy, and some of these networks (such as Iberocoop or CEE) weren't called "hubs" before MS (and they might not be called hubs afterwards, as a matter of fact). Maybe call them "regional networks" or "affiliates networks". This is my first thought but I'll come back to looking these metrics more in detail later on. --Scann (talk) 17:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Consideration 2.[edit]

Metadata frame
To what extent do the metadata classification systems enable or inhibit potential cross-use with datasets you or your team use to understand Wikimedia communities?
Please share your thoughts and sign with four "~" to sign and date your input.

The metadata classification system reinforce the the cross-use in that it helps with clarity in project measurement and execution--Zend2020 (talk) 05:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)-Reply[reply]

Consideration 3.[edit]

Referring to (In)Equity
Does referring to equity or inequity resonate more with recent patterns of use you have seen in research and evaluation of inequity in your operating space?
Please share your thoughts and sign with four "~" to sign and date your input.

Equity resonates more in my operating space and it is more in play than inequity.--Zend2020 (talk) 07:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Consideration 4.[edit]

Measuring Diversity & (In)equity
If you are familiar enough with any of the coefficients and approaches, please briefly share your thoughts.
Please share your thoughts and sign with four "~" to sign and date your input.

I think when an intersection amongst diversity,equity,inclusion and belonging can be achieve there could be a steady walk/roadmap in achieving DEI.--Zend2020 (talk) 07:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Consideration 5.[edit]

Scaling and Weighting
What engagement and resourcing gaps are most important to the strategy work you or your group engage in? Please share what excitements, concerns, or curiosities about the above weighting options you have.
Please share your thoughts and sign with four "~" to sign and date your input.

Consistency,continuity, joining the community and replication that is members of the group when onboarded are consistent,continue,join in the larger community and are able to replicate those same steps in a nutshell leadership development.--Zend2020 (talk) 08:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]