Talk:Ohio Wikimedians User Group

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Congratulations[edit]

Congratulations on going through the user group process and getting recognition. You have had cool projects since you started. Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

I second the congratulations! It was a pleasure to meet Addis at a Wikimedia NYC WikiWednesday recently. As a Wikimedian born in Ohio, I am so happy there is now an Ohio Wikimedians User Group! --Lange.lea (talk) 15:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
@Bluerasberry: @Lange.lea: Thank you both very much! We're looking forward to what the future holds. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Planning: Groups, Newsletters, and Meetings[edit]

@SuperHamster, AddisWang, Rimmel.Edits, Parsecboy, Malik Shabazz, Mikeatnip, Fritzmann2002, and Stevexu95:

Hello everyone! Thank you very much for signing up for the Ohio Wikimedians User Group. As you may have noticed, we've formed in just the last few months - which means there is a lot of room for growth :)

I've created an unfinalized list of ideas and proposals I'd like to implement in the coming weeks. Please feel free to provide thoughts, comments, and suggestions within each subsection - and if you have your own ideas, feel free to tack them onto the list. Thank you! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:24, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Member groups[edit]

To get a better idea of each member's level of interest in participating in the Group, I figure it is a good idea to have two types of membership:

  • General Members are active Wikimedians who are interested in the Ohio Wikimedians User Group movement and events; they would like to stay informed of updates through the newsletter.
  • Organizing Members are more involved in the organizing aspect of the User Group, whether it is contributing to newsletters, running social media, and/or organizing events in Ohio. Organizing Members would be expected to participate in regular online group meetings.
    • The Organizing Members could have a Chief and Vice Chief, who are responsible for ensuring the Group works towards its objectives, set up meetings, etc.

~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:24, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

I'd just like to be a general member. I just want to be a part of some Ohio-related collaboration. If you need help making articles or the like, I'd be more than happy to help, but I'm not really available for online or irl meetups, etcetera. Fritzmann2002 (talk) 12:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
@Fritzmann2002: Great, no problem! Right now I'm just trying to formulate a plan and hear thoughts; I figure once these are finalized, users can add themselves to whichever group they'd like to be a part of on the user group page. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 13:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Since we're a small/new group, I figure we'll hold off on having distinct groups until it's necessary. Might as well keep it simple :) ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 09:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Monthly newsletter[edit]

To keep members engaged and informed, I'd like to create a series of monthly newsletters. Some of its contents could include:

  • Upcoming Wikimedia events that are of interest to Ohioans
  • Accomplishments within the last month (WikiProject Ohio article improvements, new images of Ohio, etc.)
  • Featured image of Ohio
  • "Did you know?" section
  • More?

The newsletter could be distributed through both talk pages and e-mail. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:24, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

I think a "Topic of the Month" section would be a good addition. Just some topic within Ohio (ex: birds, a specific county, bridges, companies, and so on) that would be the focus for that month for the user group. Fritzmann2002 (talk) 12:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
I think Accomplishments and Featured Image could be a bit bureaucratic and overlapped with WikiProject. I think we can just send some message (maybe thru massmessage) about what's going on and what will happen, in a monthly basis, considering our user group is bit small and does not have that much audience. We can invest some more time if we think there is a sufficient number of members or a simple message can not express everything we want to discuss and inform our members.--AddisWang (talk) 15:53, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
First newsletter has gone out. Feel free to leave an feedback here. March's newsletter skeleton has also been set up; anyone is free to contribute to it. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 10:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Meetings[edit]

As we continue to grow, I figure it would be best to have regular online meetings for our Organizing Members. Since we're just starting out, I think monthly meetings would be sufficient. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:24, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

I would proposal that we should have some kind of tradition to have an offline annual meeting/ event.--AddisWang (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Wiknic would be great for this in the summer. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 10:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject United States: 50,000 Challenge[edit]

50k Challenge poster.jpg You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

-Another Believer (talk) 03:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

@Another Believer: Thanks for the invite! I've added it to our events list, and will also be including it in our newsletter that will go out in the coming days. Cheers, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 09:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Monthly meetings[edit]

@AddisWang, Rimmel.Edits, Parsecboy, Malik Shabazz, Mikeatnip, Fritzmann2002, and Stevexu95:

Hi all! I'd like to gauge interest in monthly virtual meetings, which would probably last less than 30 minutes and run through Google Hangouts. The goal of these meetings will be to discuss happenings around the state, plan/raise awareness of events, and discuss the contents of each upcoming newsletter. We'd also plan for larger initiatives, such as Wiki Loves Monuments. This would also be a great opportunity to get to know some fellow Ohio Wikimedians :)

If you're interested, could you reply below with a quick affirmative? Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 09:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Sounds good! Rimmel.Edits (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
I agree. Malik Shabazz (talk) 23:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Looking forward Aharon (talk) 02:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
@Rimmel.Edits, Malik Shabazz, and Aharon: Thanks for the interest all! Let's try to set up a time to meet next week? I have created a Doodle poll here; if you haven't used it before, simply click to expand all options, enter your name/username, and select whichever times you're available for a meeting. If everyone can spend a few minutes filling it out in the next couple days, that would be great. If next week is out of the question, feel free to comment below we can do it later in the month. I don't think our first meeting should last more than 30 minutes - topics I can think of to discuss are the three Art+Feminism events happening around the state, potential photo events later this spring, and just general future planning. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 08:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

De-Recognition of Affiliates with Long-standing Non-Compliance[edit]

Review of initial updates on Wikimedia movement strategy process[edit]

Overview #2 of updates on Wikimedia movement strategy process[edit]

Note: Apologies for cross-posting and sending in English. This message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.

As we mentioned last month, the Wikimedia movement is beginning a movement-wide strategy discussion, a process which will run throughout 2017. This movement strategy discussion will focus on the future of our movement: where we want to go together, and what we want to achieve.

Regular updates are being sent to the Wikimedia-l mailing list, and posted on Meta-Wiki. Each month, we are sending overviews of these updates to this page as well. Sign up to receive future announcements and monthly highlights of strategy updates on your user talk page.

Here is a overview of the updates that have been sent since our message last month:

More information about the movement strategy is available on the Meta-Wiki 2017 Wikimedia movement strategy portal.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, 19:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC) • Please help translate to your languageGet help

We invite you to join the movement strategy conversation (now through April 15)[edit]

05:00, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Start of the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees elections[edit]

Please accept our apologies for cross-posting this message. This message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.

Wikimedia-logo black.svg

On behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, I am pleased to announce that self-nominations are being accepted for the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections.

The Board of Trustees (Board) is the decision-making body that is ultimately responsible for the long-term sustainability of the Wikimedia Foundation, so we value wide input into its selection. More information about this role can be found on Meta-Wiki. Please read the letter from the Board of Trustees calling for candidates.

The candidacy submission phase will last from April 7 (00:00 UTC) to April 20 (23:59 UTC).

We will also be accepting questions to ask the candidates from April 7 to April 20. You can submit your questions on Meta-Wiki.

Once the questions submission period has ended on April 20, the Elections Committee will then collate the questions for the candidates to respond to beginning on April 21.

The goal of this process is to fill the three community-selected seats on the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. The election results will be used by the Board itself to select its new members.

The full schedule for the Board elections is as follows. All dates are inclusive, that is, from the beginning of the first day (UTC) to the end of the last.

  • April 7 (00:00 UTC) – April 20 (23:59 UTC) – Board nominations
  • April 7 – April 20 – Board candidates questions submission period
  • April 21 – April 30 – Board candidates answer questions
  • May 1 – May 14 – Board voting period
  • May 15–19 – Board vote checking
  • May 20 – Board result announcement goal

In addition to the Board elections, we will also soon be holding elections for the following roles:

  • Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC)
    • There are five positions being filled. More information about this election will be available on Meta-Wiki.
  • Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson (Ombuds)
    • One position is being filled. More information about this election will be available on Meta-Wiki.

Please note that this year the Board of Trustees elections will be held before the FDC and Ombuds elections. Candidates who are not elected to the Board are explicitly permitted and encouraged to submit themselves as candidates to the FDC or Ombuds positions after the results of the Board elections are announced.

More information on this year's elections can be found on Meta-Wiki. Any questions related to the election can be posted on the election talk page on Meta-Wiki, or sent to the election committee's mailing list, board-elections(at)wikimedia.org.

On behalf of the Election Committee,
Katie Chan, Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Joe Sutherland, Community Advocate, Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, 03:35, 7 April 2017 (UTC) • Please help translate to your languageGet help

Voting has begun in 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees elections[edit]

19:02, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Join the next cycle of Wikimedia movement strategy discussions (underway until June 12)[edit]

19:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Start of the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Funds Dissemination Committee elections[edit]

21:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Learning Quarterly: October 2017[edit]

L&E Newsletter / Volume 4 / Issue 14 / October 2017
Learning Quarterly

Stay tuned
blogs, events
& more!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Notification of Past Due Reporting[edit]

Greetings, This is a notification to bring to your attention that your organization is currently past due on its required annual reporting. User Groups are required to submit an annual activity report covering the entirety of the 12-month agreement period in order to renew their status as a Wikimedia User Group. Reports must be written in English, posted to meta, and linked on the meta Reports page.

As noted on the meta Reports page, your organization’s 2017 annual reporting became past due in July. Please be sure to

  1. Post your 2017 annual Activities reporting to the meta Reports page as soon as possible to return to compliance with your Usergroup agreement.
  2. Check that your group’s page is also up to date with past report links for historical record-keeping, and
  3. Please send an email to Wikimedia-l in order to share with a movement-wide audience.

If you have any questions or need any further guidance, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

Kindest regards -- DNdubane (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Report for 2016-17 been posted here. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikimedia Strategic Direction endorsement[edit]

Hi all - as you may or may not have seen, the Wikimedia community has been working on coming up with a movement strategy to carry us through 2030. More information can be viewed at Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017. The strategy, as it stands, is as follows:

By 2030, Wikimedia will become the essential infrastructure of the ecosystem of free knowledge, and anyone who shares our vision will be able to join us.
We, the Wikimedia contributors, communities, and organizations, will advance our world by collecting knowledge that fully represents human diversity, and by building the services and structures that enable others to do the same.
We will carry on our mission of developing content as we have done in the past, and we will go further.
Knowledge as a service: To serve our users, we will become a platform that serves open knowledge to the world across interfaces and communities. We will build tools for allies and partners to organize and exchange free knowledge beyond Wikimedia. Our infrastructure will enable us and others to collect and use different forms of free, trusted knowledge.
Knowledge equity: As a social movement, we will focus our efforts on the knowledge and communities that have been left out by structures of power and privilege. We will welcome people from every background to build strong and diverse communities. We will break down the social, political, and technical barriers preventing people from accessing and contributing to free knowledge.

So far, over 80 organized groups endorse the Strategic Direction. I'd like for the Ohio Wikimedians to also endorse the direction. Please do express any support or opposition you may have in doing this; if no opposition comes up, I plan on endorsing the direction on January 20. Thank you! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 16:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Inviting you to participate in the women editing contest "The women you have never met"[edit]

Dear Ohio Wikimedia User Group!

Hope this message finds you all well :) On behalf of Iberocoop network I want to invite you to be part of the women editing contest we are organizing along with many other chapters and user groups in the movement. You are doing an excellent work on your local context and we will be so pleased to have you on board. In this very early stage, we are asking the organizations to add their interest in the following meta page Hope to see you there soon! Hugs----Anna Torres (WMAR) --Anna Torres (WMAR) (talk) 15:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Learning Quarterly: January 2018[edit]

L&E Newsletter / Volume 5 / Issue 15 / January 2018
Learning Quarterly

Stay tuned
blogs, events
& more!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Share your feedback in this global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Dear Wikimedia Affiliates,
My name is María Cruz and I work for the Wikimedia Foundation on the Learning and Evaluation team. In one week or so, the Foundation is starting a global survey to learn about the experiences and feedback of Wikimedians. I am writing here, because I wanted to share with you a bit more about the project.
The survey is called "Wikimedia Communities and Contributors" and is conducted annually. We will send the survey to editors across all the Wikimedia projects, as well as Wikimedia affiliates and volunteer developers. This survey is going to be our way of making sure that we can hear feedback from a significant number of users from across the projects. This research supports editors and Wikipedia’s mission. This is our second annual CE Insights survey, and we look forward to improving it every year.
We will be contacting 2 people from each affiliate, based on the primary contact information that we have. Each affiliate will receive an additional third link which they can distribute to any leader in their chapter or user group.
Go to the project page to see the results of last year’s survey, and to see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support communities. You can sign up to be notified about the results of the survey, or to learn how you can help with planning the survey next year.
If you have any questions or concerns about this project, please feel free to send them to Edward Galvez's talk page on Meta-Wiki or email him directly at surveys@wikimedia · org in any language. You can learn more about this project and read about frequently asked questions. You can also share your feedback on Meta-Wiki.

Thank you for your time supporting this project!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Net Neutrality Statement[edit]

Hello all, if you've been keeping up with internet legislation, you'll know that the FCC recently moved to remove many of the protections for net neutrality. There is a short window of opportunity for Congress to act, and block the FCC from implementing the change and preserve the 2015 regulations preserving net neutrality in the United States. The Wikimedia Foundation and several other US user groups have expressed support for this effort to preserve net neutrality, and to show Ohio Wikimedians User Group's dedication to a free and open internet in solidarity with the above groups, I would like to propose we issue the following statement:

"To freely share in the sum of all knowledge requires that one be able to freely access that knowledge. Under previous protections, the rights of everyone to use the internet as they saw fit were guaranteed. Now with new FCC regulations repealing Net Neutrality, the ability to use the internet to spread free knowledge with the entire world is now in doubt. It is possible, and in our opinion quite likely, that restrictions on internet usage in the United States would be instituted, limiting access behind paywalls or data caps and ensuring that only those who pay would truly have access to one of mankind's greatest achievements. In order to preserve the spread of knowledge afforded only by a free and open internet, Ohio Wikimedians User Group declares our support for Net Neutrality, and any and all efforts to preserve it in the United States and throughout the world."

Let me know what you all think below and feel free to offer suggestions for improvement. If the group is in favor, we can publish this on our main page and make this important statement. --- Blervis (talk) 12:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

  • Support Support I believe this fits into our mission, and as a US affiliate we should make our position known in the midst of the net neutrality debate in Congress. Having our affiliate join other US affiliates and the Foundation with this message can lead to a strong message and actions from the community. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 14:16, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support This is an easy support. Great idea! -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support the broad principle. I'm not familiar enough with the details to suggest any improvements. Some may be concerned about the potential loss of future telecom innovation caused by regulations, but I'm hopeful for innovation that obsoletes the current broadband oligopoly; see this article about community mesh networking Larger last-miles communities should have more leverage for negotiating better deals for access to the backbone. Wbm1058 (talk) 23:21, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Malik Shabazz (talk) 01:23, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Support Parsecboy (talk) 16:34, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
It would appear everyone is in favor, so I'm going to make it official. SuperHamster and I are also working on a more official statement with some other users, in an attempt to get larger messaging in favor of this on Wikipedia at large. I will update you all when we have something to discuss as a community at large. the support you have shown here will be essential if we are going to do something about preserving net neutrality. Thank you all for your support! Blervis (talk) 00:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Learning Quarterly: June 2018[edit]

L&E Newsletter / Volume 5 / Issue 16 / June 2018
Learning Quarterly

Stay tuned
blogs, events
& more!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)