Talk:Requests for comment/2013 issues on Croatian Wikipedia/Evidence

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

The following request for comments is closed. The information gathering period is over. Please see the main RfC page for more info.

These pages are bilingual, in English and Croatian. Please feel free to start a new topic in either language. Also feel free to discuss in Wikipedia languages closely related to Croatian, using Latin script. Ove stranice su dvojezične, na engleskom i hrvatskom. Slobodno započnite novu temu na bilo kojem od tih jezika. Također slobodno raspravljajte na Wikipedijinim jezicima blisko srodnima hrvatskom, koristeći latinično pismo.

Obavijesti o ovim stranicama - Notifications about these pages[edit]

The purpose of this section is to keep track of who was notified about these pages, by whom, when, and why. This follows the recommended guideline to prevent canvassing. Please do not archive this section. Miranche (talk) 22:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Specific canvassing considerations for this page were discussed here. Please feel free to start a new talk topic if you believe there are issues that have not been properly met by this discussion, or if you believe any of the notifications were improper. Miranche (talk) 04:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Close and archive[edit]

If there are no objections, I will close the evidence pages at 00:00 UTC on 2014-02-26, and these talk pages 24 hours later. Miranche (talk) 18:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ok, closing. Miranche (talk) 05:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Closed. Please see the archives for past discussions. Miranche (talk) 00:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hello Miranche, thank you for this work. Were any conclusions drawn from the RfC? Normally a closure comes with a summary and directions for any followup action. SJ talk  23:38, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Sj, you're welcome, and thank you for the kind word. Sorry if it isn't clear from this section: the evidence pages were closed because all the time periods (for submissions, commenting etc.) have expired. There aren't any conclusions but this wasn't the aim, rather it was to gather information relevant to the main RfC, and all the summary, directions etc., if any, should eventually emerge there. Right now the main RfC seems largely inactive. Miranche (talk) 22:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ah, that makes sense. Thank you. Who would you expect to close that? SJ talk  03:25, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply