Jump to content

Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2018

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 6 years ago by RadiX
This page allows for general discussion and questions regarding the 2018 steward confirmations.

Final decisions (by stewards)

[edit]

Confirmation discussions will remain open till 13 March 2018, 01:00 (UTC). This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

This page is for steward discussion only. Please do not comment in this box unless you are a steward.

The summaries below only provide a very strict overview of the most relevant confirmation comments. Stewards: Please leave your comments right below the boxes after reviewing the actual confirmation comments and your understanding of relevant policies.

Status Candidate Notes
   Confirmed
Ajraddatz clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Bsadowski1 clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Defender clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
DerHexer clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
HakanIST clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Hoo man clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Jyothis clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Linedwell clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
MarcoAurelio clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Mardetanha clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Masti clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Matanya clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Matiia clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
MBisanz clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Melos clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Mentifisto clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
MF-Warburg clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
NahidSultan clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Pmlineditor clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
QuiteUnusual clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
RadiX clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Ruslik0 clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Shanmugamp7 clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Sjoerddebruin clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Stryn clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Tegel clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Teles clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Trijnstel clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Vituzzu clear consensus to confirm
   Resigned
Avraham removal per his request
RadiX 01:01, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Relevant points: good steward / good work / great skills / friendly / nice user / helpful / versatile / highly active through the entire year / "ambassador" of the stewards to the en.wiki community / hardworking volunteer / useful insights / no concerns etc. (comments: 89/1/0)
Relevant points: excellent vandal-LTA fighter / competent / good work / active enough / helpful / no concerns etc. (comments: 60/0/0)
Relevant points: active through the entire year / good amount of work / very active in fighting vandalism / helpful / always around when needed / no concerns etc. (comments: 72/0/0)
Relevant points: long-term dedication / always willing to help / friendly / helpful / very experienced steward / competent / good work / no concerns etc. (comments: 142/2/0)
Relevant points: active through the entire year / trustworthy / good work / helpful / active in fighting vandalism / excellent steward / no concerns etc. (comments: 77/0/0)
Relevant points: occasionally active & reasonable actions / trustworthy / friendly / lots of technical expertise / helpful / useful skills / no concerns etc. (comments: 80/0/0)
Relevant points: occasionally active & reasonable actions / helpful at emergencies / good amount of work / trusted / useful insights / no concerns etc. (comments: 56/0/0)
Relevant points: helpful / good work / trusted / the only mentioned mistake was not relevant given the good amount of work etc. (comments: 67/0/0)
Relevant points: highly active at maintenance tasks / active through the entire year / excellent steward / proactive / helpful / important work behind the scenes with developers / always around when needed / friendly / polite / no concerns whatsoever etc. (comments: 97/0/0)
Relevant points: active enough / good work / friendly / willing to help / good skills / no concerns etc. (comments: 77/0/1)
Relevant points: active enough / good work / good steward / no concerns etc. (comments: 87/0/1)
Relevant points: active enough / good work / friendly / always around when needed / good technical skills / no concerns etc. (comments: 85/1/0)
Relevant points: highly active through the entire year / good work / excellent steward / around on IRC to help out with issues / active in fighting vandalism / no concerns etc. (comments: 71/1/0)
Relevant points: occasionally active & reasonable actions / useful insights / useful and helpful / trusted / a few concerns under activity / no relevant concerns etc. (comments: 62/2/0)
Relevant points: trusted / helpful / good work / important work behind the scenes / active enough. (comments: 63/0/0)
Relevant points: good work / reasonable actions / reasonable activity level although a little on the lower side / trusted / good at dealing with spam etc. (comments: 49/0/1)
Relevant points: good work / reasonable activity level although a little on the lower side / competent / experienced steward / useful insights / helpful / low activity. (comments: 78/2/4)
Relevant points: active / trusted / hardworking and experienced user / good work / others considered that there is no issue of substance on comment made by bnwiki user / no relevant concerns etc. (comments: 76/1/1)
Relevant points: active enough / reasonable actions / helpful / no concerns etc. (comments: 56/0/1)
Relevant points: active enough / experienced / trusted / good anti-spam work / kind and polite steward / good work / helpful / no concerns etc. (comments: 53/0/0)
Relevant points: active through the entire year / reasonable actions / plentiful amount of work / good work / competent / good steward / willing to help / friendly / around on IRC to help out with issues / defamatory comment made by ptwiki user followed by others' opinions, including the point of view of a WMF staff member. (comments: 77/4/0)
Relevant points: active enough / active in somewhat neglected areas of steward work / net positive / excellent work / helpful. (comments: 73/2/2)
Relevant points: good work / active enough / friendly / willing to help / around on IRC to help out with issues / no concerns etc. (comments: 63/0/1)
Relevant points: active enough / good work / reasonable actions / always around when needed / no issues etc. (comments: 62/0/1)
Relevant points: good steward / reasonable actions / very active / experienced steward / helpful / no issues etc. (comments: 77/1/1)
Relevant points: highly active through the entire year / active in fighting vandalism-spam / around on IRC to help out with issues / experienced steward / no concerns etc. (comments: 69/0/1)
Relevant points: active enough / reasonable actions / good work / useful at emergencies / helpful / good steward / defamatory comment made by ptwiki user followed by others' opinions, including the point of view of a WMF staff member / a few concerns over the OC-steward double role. (comments: 58/8/3)
Relevant points: active enough / good at CU related areas / trusted / kind / friendly / sensible / helpful / experienced steward / important work behind the scenes / around on IRC to help out with issues / no concerns. (comments: 90/0/3)
Relevant points: very active / experienced in dealing with long-term and cross-wiki abuse / good at CU related areas / experienced / sound steward / hardworking volunteer / helpful in blocking OPs and building his "walls" / concern brought by Juandev and Kusurija, not shared by others though / no relevant issues. (comments: 96/7/2)
This is a reserved place for all of you who still wish to thank Avraham for everything he has done for the Wikimedia projects over the past years. The user will be removed from the steward group after the end of the confirmations.

Discussion

[edit]