Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Iteration 2/Partnerships/2

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it.
Most likely, new comments will not be taken into account by the new three Working Group members in their work of developing the final Recommendations. You are free however to continue discussing in the spirit of "discussing about Wikipedia is a work in progress". :)

For the Free Knowledge Movement to be a truly global movement it must be pulled together by really good machine translation in near-real time. Whatever service one is using should be available in many languages. Rather than depending on service providers, WMF should become the world's go-to translation provider - even on partner sites such as Creative Commons.Michaelgraaf (talk) 13:29, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Michaelgraaf thank you for this comment. It is a very interesting idea at the intersection of our thinking about Partnerships and the work of the Product and Technology Working Group. Please also note that we have a separate recommendation that concerns infrastructure for content partnerships (a slightly different take, but with a focus on infrastructural solutions that is similar to your idea). I promise that our team will review your proposal. Tarkowski (talk) 18:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]