- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it.
- Most likely, new comments will not be taken into account by the new three Working Group members in their work of developing the final Recommendations. You are free however to continue discussing in the spirit of "discussing about Wikipedia is a work in progress". :)
Planning based on valid information is generally a good thing. Watching this, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 13:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
After a couple of readings, I found the recommendation too vague. Despite I acknowledge the will to close the social and technical gap, since it seems to deal with potentially politically sensitive aspects and, at the same time, it suggests an additional associated workforce who might stay a bit in limbo, I admit I became a bit concerned. I would suggest additional thoughts on this. --Toniher (talk) 10:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Combine with recommendation 8?
I support this kind of introspection about the impact of our product choices on society but I wonder if this can be combined with the previous recommendation. TNegrin (WMF) (talk) 02:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
From Catalan Salon
Would be interesting to engage academia in this. We don't need a big entity (...)