Talk:Universal Code of Conduct/Annual review/2025/Voter information
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Ooligan in topic Who are the "Vote scrutineers" - Please, provide a link.
Voter information voting criteria
[edit]The definition of edit needs clarification. Does it include comments, which I do many more of?
I would like you to permit comments, if not votes, from those who do not meet the voting criteria. Alternatively, their votes could be ‘for information only’ This could also be of interest.
Note, I have been told I am not logged in, but it recognises my username CuriousMarkE.
When I tried to login, I was told I was already logged in. Strange, curious and worrying!! CuriousMarkE (talk) 22:19, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
- Eventually, I got a message to reload my page, that appeared after quite a few attempts to write my previous note. CuriousMarkE (talk) 22:21, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
Who are the "Vote scrutineers" - Please, provide a link.
[edit]Quote:
- "Will people outside the Wikimedia Foundation be involved in scrutinizing the vote to verify authenticity?
- The outcome of the vote will be scrutinized for irregularities by non-staff Wikimedians with experience in movement
- voting and verification processes. Vote scrutineers will be announced soon.''"
Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 16:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Ooligan: Hello, generally vote scrutineers will be Stewards (e.g. U4C chapter ratification in the past). Thanks. SCP-2000 17:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000. First, thank for the prompt response. So are the two persons from last year's link serving this year or are the current "Scrutineers" uknown? -- Ooligan (talk) 18:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging draft submitter: @JSutherland (WMF). [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Annual_review/2025/Voter_information&diff=prev&oldid=28547177. -- Ooligan (talk) 18:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)