From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Previous discussion[edit]

  1. This one's nice, but could we see a version with a less detailed globe, and also different colours? I think the detail in the globe makes this less logo-like. Note that this one scales surprisingly well. The favicon would need text removed, and should be tweaked to give better contrast. – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. I like this idea. Why don't we change the color of grey lines to black? --Pietrodn · talk with me 18:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. This is probably the best logo, in my opinion. Keeps the logo, looks very neat and professional, and represents wikibooks better. It's an open book with a globe on it rather than a stack of closed books with a random atomic logo on it. 21:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
    ..although you could also say that it has a random globe logo on it as well --penubag (talk; w) 22:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. I like this. @Mike: what do you mean "a less detailed globe"? Just to simplify the shapes or something more? --Ramac 23:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. I think the concept is a bit of a cliché, just sticking a globe on a book doesn't let it represent 'books for the world'. Why not make a world made out of books, or a book made out of earth globes? There are many creative options here. Husky 21:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. I think that, as things stand, this logo has definitely got to be my favourite of all the submissions. In my opinion the globe should be left as is, i think the detailed edges give the logo a certain professional feel that may well go some way to giving the site itself the same quality (not that it lacks this at the moment). Love the colour, though it may be worth seeing some other variants to get a fuller feel for the logo. Favicon needs to be changed though, I don't believe that the image scales down to the smaller sizes required. Reece (Talk) (Wikibooks) 22:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  7. Not bad. I prefer others, but this isn't too bad. Webaware talk 01:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
  8. I don't like it, why Earth and not Mars. I know the answer but anyhow I agree with Husky here: too much of a cliché. Londenp 11:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
  9. This logo is a very neat idea. I like it. Others are better, IMO, but I'd certainly be happy with this one. Νεοπτόλεμος 01:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
  10. I think this is the best without modification to any of the others, some are almost as good. Wants too be a little more 3d on the book, maybe a slight shadow from the world or a book line or ocrner turning like d. Either way this is a great logo already. SunCreator 14:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
  11. I like this one. But to use the detailed globe can make Wikibooks to be seen as eurocentric or westernized since the world is seen from above. - Jorge Morais 18:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  12. I like this one a lot, what about changing the blue globe for the wikipedia's puzzle sphere?--Afa86 17:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)