सार्वभौमिक आचार संहिता/समन्वयन समिति/मुकदमे
U4C चार्टर और समन्वयन के दिशानिर्देशों के अंतर्गत U4C एक कार्यान्वयन संरचना है जो सार्वभौमिक आचार संहिता (UCOC) का एक निष्पक्ष और सुसंगत कार्यान्वयन प्रदान करने को समर्पित है। UCOC के अधिकतम कार्यान्वयन स्थानीय प्रक्रियाओं के माध्यम से होते हैं, या फिर क्रॉस-विकि उल्लंघनों के मामले में स्टीवार्ड्स और वैश्विक सिसॉप्स द्वारा हैंडल किए जाते हैं। U4C केवल कुछ विशिष्ट प्रकार के मुकदमे ही देखता है:
- UCOC के क्रॉस-विकि उल्लंघन, एक स्पष्ट रूप से बताए गए कारण के साथ कि क्यों प्रबंधक या वैश्विक सिसॉप्स कथित उल्लंघन को संभाल नहीं सके।
- UCOC के संभावित उल्लंघनों से संबंधित स्थानीय प्रबंधकों या अन्य सदस्यों द्वारा की गई प्रवर्तन कार्रवाइयों की अपील। कृपया ध्यान दें कि यदि किसी परियोजना के लिए एक अन्य उच्च-स्तरीय निर्णय लेने वाला निकाय मौजूद हो, जैसे कि मध्यस्थता समिति, तो प्रवर्तन कार्यों की अपील को उस निकाय की ओर निर्देशित की जानी चाहिए।
- UCOC के, विकि से बाहर कथित उल्लंघनों, जैसे कि एडिटथॉन्स या अन्य व्यक्तिगत कार्यक्रमों में, के संदर्भ।
- किसी विशिष्ट परियोजना या क्रॉस-विकि पर UCOC को लागू करने में प्रणालीगत विफलता के आरोप।
मुकदमा दर्ज कराएँ
U4C के साथ मुकदमा दर्ज कराने के लिए कृपया निम्नलिखित अनुदेशों को ध्यान से पढ़ें, और फिर नया मुकदमा दर्ज कराने के लिए इनपुट बक्से का प्रयोग करें और प्रीलोड की गई सामग्री को पूरा करें। ऐसे मुकदमों के लिए जहाँ विकि के बाहर की जानकारी शामिल हो, नीचे का गोपनीयता अनुभाग देखें। समिति के अलग-अलग सदस्यों से किए गए आवेदनों पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा।
सार्वजनिक आवेदन प्रस्तुत करने से पहले
सार्वजनिक आवेदन प्रस्तुत करने से पहले कृपया विचार करें कि क्या उल्लंघन की सूचना देने के अन्य सभी स्थानीय रूप से मौजूद तरीकों का प्रयास किया गया है। मुकदमे के आधार पर, अन्य समाधानों में शामिल हो सकते हैंः
- शामिल सदस्य(ओं) को उनके चर्चा पृष्ठ पर सूचित करना
- अन्य पृष्ठों पर मुकदमे की चर्चा
- स्थानीय प्रबंधकों से व्यक्तिगत रूप से या सूचनापट्ट पृष्ठ पर संपर्क करना
- टिप्पणियों के लिए स्थानीय अनुरोध (RfC) प्रक्रियाएँ या प्रबंधकीय कार्रवाई समीक्षा/संशोधन पृष्ठ
U4C ऐसे मुकदमे नहीं लेगा जिनमें मुख्य रूप से UCoC का उल्लंघन या उसे लागू करना शामिल न हो। U4C लेख की सामग्री से जुड़े मामलों को भी नहीं देखता, बल्कि सदस्यों के व्यवहार और आचरण को देखता है।
फ़ॉर्म कैसे भरें
मुकदमे के विवरण में यह स्पष्ट रूप से व्यक्त किया जाना चाहिए कि यह अनुरोध किस प्रकार के मुकदमे से संबंधित है:
- UCOC के तहत प्रवर्तन कार्रवाई की अपील
- क्रॉस-विकी UCOC उल्लंघन
- UCOC को लागू करने में प्रणालीगत विफलता।
UCOC उल्लंघनों के विकि के बाहर के उल्लंघनों के संदर्भ निजी तौर पर U4C को ईमेल किए जाने चाहिए।
The person filing the request (and each of the involved parties) should describe the problem from their point of view in their own section. All writing should be complete, but also as concise as possible. Also, describe which part of the UCoC was violated. You may use your native language and the U4C will translate to English.
Other rules:
- Each party should add comments and replies in their own section or in the discussion section.
- Contributions from non-parties will either be removed, moved to the "Other feedback" section or the editor will be included in the list of parties.
- Contributions that do not help clarify the matter can be removed.
- All accusations and claims must be supported with diffs/links.
Before submitting the request following points should be checked:
- Is the description clear?
- Are all accusations and allegations backed up with links?
- Are all previous attempts at a solution named and linked?
- Have all involved parties been named?
- Is there an explanation of the hoped outcome from the process?
Notification: Once a case request is filed, the initiator should notify all involved parties in the project where the issue started using the notifications provided at Template:U4C case notification.
सार्वजनिक आवेदन की समयरेखा
A thorough investigation by the U4C takes time, and depending on the complexity of a conflict and the number of people involved, may even take months.
आवेदन की स्वीकृति
After case requests are filed, the U4C members have circa 2 weeks to vote on accepting or declining a case. Voting periods may be shortened or prolonged by decision of the U4C. A case is accepted if the U4C has voted to accept with the support of at least five members and more than 50 % of the members.
मुकदमे की कार्यवाही
After the filing of a request, the request will be discussed by all involved parties and considered by the U4C. Uninvolved users may comment in the section 'other feedback' or on the talk page. Comments and links provided will also be discussed by the U4C in private. Based on the evidence provided in this phase the U4C will publicly vote on the acceptance of the request; accepting a case requires the support of at least five members and more than 50 % of the members. Unless extended or shortened by the U4C this will take around 2 weeks.
Users, both those who are named parties of cases and others, are permitted to concisely comment on cases and present their perspective. Please note that the U4C expects users to comment on cases from their primary account - the use of multiple accounts, or logged out editing, is disruptive to the case process and edits made in such circumstances will be reverted, and the users engaging in such behaviour may have their participation in U4C cases restricted or be otherwise sanctioned. Users wishing to provide a private comment to the U4C are free to do so via email at Special:EmailUser/U4C.
Once a request is accepted there may be an investigation phase lasting around 2 weeks. In this phase parties and other editors can still submit further evidence. The U4C will examine comments and links, conduct fact-finding or mediation as required. If the case has not been resolved, the U4C will take up to a week to review the evidence and write a draft case result.
After posting the draft result, the U4C will listen to feedback from parties and others and vote on principles, the proposed facts, remedies, and enforcement arrangements and decide other elements of the case. These will be publicly voted upon and must get the support of at least five members and more than 50 % of the members. This will normally last 2 weeks.
Voting periods and length of the different phases may be shortened or prolonged by decision of the U4C.
The decision of the U4C is binding for all Wikimedia projects, according to the Enforcement Guidelines of the Universal Code of Conduct. After publication of the decision, the case may enter a probation period or will be closed.
नाम दें और आवेदन फ़ॉर्म भरें
गोपनीयता
All off-wiki referrals and any on-wiki cases with privacy implications should be emailed privately to the U4C, who will then decide whether the case should be publicly or privately considered. If you have any questions or concerns about whether a case should be private, please feel free to contact the U4C via email: u4c. The U4C can also accept cases referred to it, relating to alleged off-wiki violations of the UCOC. In these cases, if you are an event organizer or other person responsible for UCOC enforcement in an off-wiki space and you wish to refer a case to the U4C, please contact us privately by email and provide the necessary case information. Depending on the specific circumstances, the U4C may decide to make the case public, but will generally avoid making public any cases that could infringe on the privacy of any of the parties involved. Any on-wiki cases with privacy implicates can also be emailed to the U4C, instead of using the public process below - however please note that by default, cases should be publicly reported.
wikimedia.org
मुकदमे
नए मुकदमे
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Repeated CU abuse and lack of meaningul appeal on Turkish Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Voluntarily requesting an IBAN
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Unjust NPOV block and systematic failure to engage with unblock requests in Turkish Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Abuse of power, collusion with a Global LTA, and suppression of appeal rights on arzwiki
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Indefinite Account Block on Turkish Wikipedia over Alleged Conflict of Interest
सक्रिय मुकदमे
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Wikimedia Eesti
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/False Accusations and Intimidation by Arabic Wikipedia Admins
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/Uzbek Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/Systemic failure in enforcing the code of conduct in Hebrew Wikipedia
लंबित
No pages meet these criteria.
हल किए गए या समाप्त मुकदमे
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Redlinkphobia imposed without consensus on Esperanto Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/UCoC Violation Report: Coordinated Cross-Wiki Harassment and Admin Tag-Teaming (el.wiki / Commons)
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/SIMPLE WP:ONESTRIKE can be a Troll’s Charter
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Indefinitely blocked in Turkish Wikipedia over allegedly being a sock
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/False accusations and abuse of sysop tools for personal advantage on commons
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Possible UCoC violation and administrative abuse on Scots Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Review of administrative conduct on Azerbaijani Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/When I'm blocked, I'm also blocked from sending emails.
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Report a false Sockpuppet block in Wiki.tr (Turkish Wikipedia)
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Systemic failure to provide UCoC protection by ENWP admins
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Admin conduct of BRPever on Simple English Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Polygnotus
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Formal Complaint on Deliberate Defamation an Exposing Private Information by a Board of Trustees Member
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/English Wikipedia's Systemic Failure to Enforce the UCoC
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Disputed sockpuppetry case on Wikimedia Commons ONLY
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/中文维基文库管理员Midleading对红渡厨的封禁争议 第二次
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Admin response on Wikimedia Commons
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Lemonaka与红渡厨的跨维基争议
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/中文维基文库管理员Midleading对红渡厨的封禁争议
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Apparent acceptance of beneficial socking
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Suspected abuse of power by Asamboi
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Maybe, abuse of power by admin Nguyentrongphu on ViWikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Systematic failure to enforce UCoC on Simple wiki
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Request for U4C Review: Indefinite Block and Admin Misuse on Azerbaijani Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Administrative abuse on bnwiki
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Wikimedia Discord Block (BZPN)
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Some of ArWiki admins are violating U4C
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Sysop abuse on Croatian Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/囍鵲
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Hiwiki community disruption by a non local administrator
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Situation in Spanish Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Unsuitable Warning and bias by Admin in ArWiki
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/User conduct and block review where Commons admins are too involved
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Spanish Wikipedia Abuse
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Administrator abuse on Portuguese Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Conflicts related with Ancient Greek, LPP policy and Incubator stuffs
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Arabic Wikipedia works against Eastern Arabic numerals
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Hounding claim on Chinese Wikisource
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/Snævar
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Dispute over admin and CU abuse on Turkish Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/Zhxy 519, Jusjih and Chinese Wikisource
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/RoyZuo
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/شكوى
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Alex 21
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Sysop abuse on Bosnian Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Administrative abuse on plwiki
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Administrator rights abuse on Greek Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Allegations of discrimination in ArWiki
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2025/Commons and UCoC enforcement
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2024/Sysop abuse in Swahili Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2024/Arabic Wikipedia admins against the Levantine Arabic Incubator Wikipedia
- Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2024/Missbrauch von Adminfunktionen im deutschsprachigen Wiktionary