Universal Code of Conduct/Revised enforcement guidelines/Comparison/hi

VOTE HERE

सार्वभौमिक आचार संहिता

• नीति
• संशोधित प्रवर्तन दिशानिर्देश
• समन्वय समिति (U4C) charter / चार्टर का प्रारूप (candidates / questions / vote)
• परियोजना का अवलोकन
• अक्सर पूछे जाने वाले प्रश्न
• प्रशिक्षण मॉड्यूल

The Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines Revisions Committee has completed their updates to the Enforcement Guidelines. The revised guidelines will be voted on in a community ratification process from January 17 through January 31, 2023.

समिति ने मई २०२२ से जुलाई २०२२ तक सामुदायिक चर्चा अवधि और सितंबर और अक्टूबर २०२२ में सामुदायिक समीक्षा के साथ-साथ मार्च २०२२ में समाप्त हुए सामुदायिक वोट से एकत्रित इनपुट के आधार पर इन प्रारूप के दिशानिर्देशों को संशोधित करने के लिए सहकार्य किया।

संशोधन निम्नलिखित क्षेत्रों पर केंद्रित हैं:

• संशोधन समिति इस संशोधित संस्करण की समीक्षा और मतदान करने में आपके समय की सराहना करती है।
• गैर-विशेषज्ञों हेतु अधिक सुलभ अनुवाद और समझ के लिए भाषा को सरल बनाना;
• यूसीओसी की पुष्टि की अवधारणा को स्पष्ट करना
• अभियोक्ता और अभियुक्त की निजता के संतुलन की समीक्षा करना
• यूनिवर्सल आचार संहिता समन्वय समिति (यू४सी) और इसकी बिल्डिंग कमेटी पर अधिक विवरण प्रदान करना
• अस्पष्ट वाक्यांशों और शर्तों को स्पष्ट करन

संशोधन समिति इन परिवर्तनों की समीक्षा और टिप्पणी करने में आपके समय की सराहना करती है। वे समीक्षा प्रक्रिया के भाग के रूप में सुझावों को पढ़ेंगे और परिवर्तनों को शामिल करेंगे।

• मूल संस्करण, पूर्ण पाठ
• वर्तमान संशोधित संस्करण, पूर्ण पाठ

1. UCoC Enforcement Guidelines

पूर्व संस्करण	संशोधित संस्करण
The UCoC applies to all online and offline Wikimedia spaces. Therefore, enforcing the UCoC is a shared responsibility. In line with the movement value of subsidiarity, this should be done at the most local level possible.	The UCoC applies to all online and offline Wikimedia spaces. Therefore, enforcing the UCoC is a shared responsibility. In line with the movement principle of decentralisation, the UCoC should be enforced at the most relevant local level possible.
1.1 Translations of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines The original version of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines is in English. It will be translated into various languages used on Wikimedia projects. If any difference arises in the meaning between the English version and a translation, decisions will be based on the English version.	1.1 Translations of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines The original version of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines is in English. It will be translated into various languages used on Wikimedia projects. The Wikimedia Foundation will make their best effort to have accurate translations. If any difference arises in the meaning between the English version and a translation, decisions will be based on the English version.
new sub-section	1.2 Review of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines and UCoC Based on the Board of Trustees’s recommendation, one year after the ratification of the Enforcement Guidelines, the Wikimedia Foundation will host a community consultation and review of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines and UCoC.

2. Preventive work

पूर्व संस्करण	संशोधित संस्करण
२.१ UCoC की अधिसूचना एवं पुष्टि इसके अतिरिक्त, निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को UCoC के लिए अपने समर्थन का अनुमोदन करने की भी आवश्यकता है: विकिमीडिया फाउंडेशन के सभी कर्मचारी, न्यासी बोर्ड के सदस्य, विकिमीडिया संबद्ध बोर्ड के सदस्य एवं कर्मचारी;	२.१ UCoC की अधिसूचना एवं पुष्टि इसके अतिरिक्त, निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों को UCoC के लिए अपने समर्थन का अनुमोदन करने की भी आवश्यकता है: All Wikimedia Foundation staff and contractors, Board of Trustees members, Wikimedia affiliate board members and staff;
2.1.1 Promoting UCoC awareness In order to improve awareness, a link to the UCoC should be accessible on or at:	2.1.1 Promoting UCoC awareness In order to improve awareness, a link to the UCoC will be accessible on or at:

पूर्व संस्करण	संशोधित संस्करण
UCoC प्रशिक्षण हेतु अनुशंसाएँ U4C निर्माण समिति को विकिमीडिया फाउंडेशन के सहयोग से प्रशिक्षण विकसित तथा कार्यान्वित करना चाहिए जो UCoC और इसके कार्यान्वयन की एक सामान्य समझ प्रदान कर सके। प्रशिक्षण के विकास में प्रासंगिक हितधारकों से परामर्श किया जाना चाहिए, जिसमें शामिल हैं, लेकिन जो इन्हीं तक सीमित नहीं हैं यथा: संबद्ध (Affiliates), संबद्धता समिति (Affiliations Committee), मध्यस्थता (Arbitration) समितियाँ स्टिवर्ड (Stewards) एवं अन्य उन्नत अधिकार धारक, T&S और कानूनी विभाग, और अन्य क्योंकि UCoC का पूर्ण स्वरूप प्रदान करने के लिए यह विशेष रूप से लाभकारी हैं।	UCoC प्रशिक्षण हेतु अनुशंसाएँ The U4C Building Committee, with support from the Wikimedia Foundation, will develop and implement training to provide a common understanding of the UCoC and skills for its implementation. It is recommended that relevant stakeholders should be consulted in the development of training, including, but not limited to: Affiliates, the Affiliations Committee, Arbitration Committees, Stewards and other Advanced Rights Holders, T&S and legal, and others as it deems beneficial to providing a complete view of the UCoC.
प्रशिक्षण स्वतंत्र मोड्यूल में बनाया जाएगा जो सामान्य जानकारी, उल्लंघनों की पहचान और समर्थन, और जटिल मामलों और अपीलों को समाहित करेंगे। पहले U4C के ऑनबोर्ड होने के बाद, उन्हें आवश्यकतानुसार प्रशिक्षण मॉड्यूल को बनाए रखना और अद्यतन करना चाहिए।	The training will be set up in independent modules covering general information, identification of violations and support, and complex cases and appeals. After the first U4C is onboarded, it will be responsible for maintaining and updating the training modules as needed.
स्थानीय समुदाय एवं विकिमीडिया सहयोगी जो अपने सामुदायिक स्तर पर प्रशिक्षण प्रदान करना चाहते हैं, उन्हें प्रशिक्षण प्रदान करने के लिए विकिमीडिया फाउंडेशन से वित्तीय सहायता प्राप्त होगा। प्रशिक्षण मॉड्यूल विभिन्न प्रारूपों और विभिन्न प्लेटफार्मों पर आसान से पहुँच के लिए उपलब्ध कराया जाना चाहिए। एक मॉड्यूल पूरा करने वाले प्रतिभागियों को सार्वजनिक रूप से मान्यता प्रदान करने का विकल्प होना चाहिए।	Training modules will be available in different formats and on different platforms for easy access. Local communities and Wikimedia Affiliates who want to provide training at their community level will get financial support from the Wikimedia Foundation to implement training. This includes support for translations. We recommend participants who complete a module should have the option of having their completion publicly acknowledged.
प्रशिक्षण के निम्नलिखित सेट उपलब्ध होने चाहिए: 'मॉड्यूल ए - अभिरुचि (Orientation) (UCoC - सामान्य)' यह मॉड्यूल UCoC और इसके कार्यान्वयन की एक सामान्य समझ सुनिश्चित करने में सहायता करेगा यह संक्षेप में समझाएगा की UCoC क्या है, किस प्रकार के प्रवर्तन की उम्मीद की जाएगी साथ ही इसके उल्लंघनों की रिपोर्ट करने की सहायता के लिए किस प्रकार के टूल उपलब्ध हैं। 'मॉड्यूल बी - पहचान और रिपोर्टिंग (UCoC - उल्लंघन)' यह मॉड्यूल लोगों को UCoC उल्लंघनों की पहचान करने, रिपोर्टिंग प्रक्रियाओं को समझने तथा रिपोर्टिंग टूल के उपयोग का तरीका सीखने की योग्यता प्रदान करेगा। विस्तार से उल्लंघन के प्रकार, उनके स्थानीय संदर्भ में रिपोर्ट करने, रिपोर्ट कैसे करें और कहां बनाएं, तथा UCoC प्रक्रियाओं के तहत कैसे यथासम्भव सर्वोत्तम रूप से केस को सम्हालें। जहां भी लागू हो, प्रशिक्षण UCoC के विशिष्ट भागों पर भी ध्यान केंद्रित करेगा, जैसे उत्पीड़न और शक्ति का दुरुपयोग। 'मॉड्यूल C - जटिल मामले, अपील (UCoC - एकाधिक उल्लंघन, अपील)' ये मॉड्यूल U4C में शामिल होने के लिए एक पूर्वापेक्षित हैं, तथा संभावित U4C आवेदकों और उन्नत अधिकार धारकों के लिए अनुशंसित हैं। इस मॉड्यूल में दो विशिष्ट विषय शामिल होने चाहिए: C1- जटिल मामलों को संभालना (UCoC - एकाधिक उल्लंघन): इसमें क्रॉस-विकी मामलों, दीर्घकालिक उत्पीड़न, खतरों की विश्वसनीयता की पहचान, प्रभावी एवं संवेदनशील संचार, तथा पीड़ितों और अन्य कमजोर लोगों की सुरक्षा को बचाना शामिल होगा। C2- अपील को संभालना, मामलों को बंद करना (UCoC - अपील): इसमें UCoC अपीलों को संभालना शामिल होगा। ये मॉड्यूल प्रशिक्षक-नेतृत्व वाले और अनुरूप प्रशिक्षण, U4C सदस्यों और आवेदकों, और समुदाय-निर्वाचित पदाधिकारियों को प्रदान किए जाएँगे, जिन्होंने गैर-सार्वजनिक व्यक्तिगत डेटा तक पहुँच नीति (Access to Nonpublic Personal Data Policy) पर हस्ताक्षर किए हों। इन प्रशिक्षक-नेतृत्व वाले प्रशिक्षण, जैसे व्यक्तिगत मॉड्यूल, स्लाइड, प्रश्न, आदि, सार्वजनिक रूप से उपलब्ध होनी चाहिए।	The following sets of trainings are proposed: 'मॉड्यूल ए - अभिरुचि (Orientation) (UCoC - सामान्य)' Help to ensure a common understanding of the UCoC and its implementation Explain concisely what the UCoC is and its expected enforcement, as well as what tools are available to help report violations 'मॉड्यूल बी - पहचान और रिपोर्टिंग (UCoC - उल्लंघन)' Give people the ability to identify UCoC violations, understand reporting processes and learn how to use reporting tools Detail the type of violation, how to identify reportable instances in their local context, how and where to make reports, and optimal handling of cases within UCoC processes Training will also focus on specific parts of the UCoC, such as harassment and abuses of power (as required) 'मॉड्यूल C - जटिल मामले, अपील (UCoC - एकाधिक उल्लंघन, अपील)' ये मॉड्यूल U4C में शामिल होने के लिए एक पूर्वापेक्षित हैं, तथा संभावित U4C आवेदकों और उन्नत अधिकार धारकों के लिए अनुशंसित हैं। इस मॉड्यूल में दो विशिष्ट विषय शामिल होने चाहिए: C1- Handling complex cases (UCoC - Multiple Violations): Cover cross-wiki cases, long term harassment, identifying credibility of threats, effective and sensitive communication, and protecting the safety of victims and other vulnerable people C2 - Handling appeals, closing cases (UCoC - Appeals): Cover handling of UCoC appeals ये मॉड्यूल प्रशिक्षक-नेतृत्व वाले और अनुरूप प्रशिक्षण, U4C सदस्यों और आवेदकों, और समुदाय-निर्वाचित पदाधिकारियों को प्रदान किए जाएँगे, जिन्होंने गैर-सार्वजनिक व्यक्तिगत डेटा तक पहुँच नीति (Access to Nonpublic Personal Data Policy) पर हस्ताक्षर किए हों। When possible the materials for these instructor-led trainings, such as individual modules, slides, questions, etc., will be publicly available

3. Responsive work

पूर्व संस्करण	संशोधित संस्करण
new line	The following principles are standards for reporting systems across the Movement.

पूर्व संस्करण	संशोधित संस्करण
3.1 Principles for filing and processing of UCoC violations Reports: Reporting of UCoC violations should be possible by the target of the violation, as well as by uninvolved third parties that observed the incident Reports should be capable of covering UCoC violations, whether they happen online, offline, in a space hosted by a third party, or a mix of spaces It should be possible for reports to be made publicly or with varying degrees of privacy Credibility and verifiability of accusations should be investigated thoroughly to properly assess risk and legitimacy Users who continually send bad faith or unjustified reports risk facing loss of reporting privileges Accused individuals should have access to the particulars of the alleged violation made against them unless such access would risk danger or likely harm to the reporter or others’ safety जब वर्णन उन भाषाओं में प्रदान की जाती है जिस्से नामित व्यक्ति अपरिचित हैं, तो हम अनुशंसा करते हैं कि अनुवाद संसाधन विकिमीडिया फाउंडेशन द्वारा प्रदान किए जाएंगे।	3.1 Principles for filing and processing of UCoC violations Reports: Reporting of UCoC violations should be possible by the target of the violation, as well as by uninvolved third parties that observed the incident Reports shall be capable of covering UCoC violations, whether they happen online, offline, in a space hosted by a third party, or a mix of spaces It must be possible for reports to be made publicly or with varying degrees of privacy Credibility and verifiability of accusations will be investigated thoroughly to properly assess risk and legitimacy Users who continually send bad faith or unjustified reports risk facing loss of reporting privileges Accused individuals shall have access to the particulars of the alleged violation made against them unless such access would risk danger or likely harm to the reporter or others’ safety Resources for translation must be provided by the Wikimedia Foundation when reports are provided in languages that designated individuals are not proficient
Guidance for processing violations: The outcome of a case should be proportional to the severity of the violation Cases should be judged in an informed way, which makes use of context, balanced against the principles of the UCoC Cases should be resolved within a consistent time frame, with timely updates provided to participants if it is prolonged	Processing violations: Outcomes shall be proportional to the severity of the violation Cases shall be judged in an informed way, which makes use of context, in alignment with the principles of the UCoC Cases shall be resolved within a consistent time frame, with timely updates provided to participants if it is prolonged
प्रक्रिया में पारदर्शिता Provide a public archive of cases, while preserving privacy and security in non-public cases Publish basic statistics about UCoC violations and reporting while honoring principles of minimal data collection and respect for community members’ privacy	प्रक्रिया में पारदर्शिता Where possible, the group that processed the UCoC violation will provide a public archive of those cases, while preserving privacy and security in non-public cases The Wikimedia Foundation will publish basic statistics about usage of the central reporting tool proposed in section 3.2, while honoring the principles of minimal data collection and respect for privacy. Other groups that process UCoC violations are encouraged to provide basic statistics about UCoC violations and reporting as they are able, while honoring the principles of minimal data collection and respect for privacy.
3.1.1 Providing resources for processing cases Enforcement of the UCoC by local governance structures should be supported in multiple ways.	3.1.1 Providing resources for processing cases Enforcement of the UCoC by local governance structures will be supported in multiple ways.
3.1.2 Enforcement by type of violations Violations involving litigation or legal threats Cases should be quickly sent to the Wikimedia Foundation Legal team, or, when appropriate, other professionals who can appropriately evaluate the merit of the threats Violations involving the nonconsensual disclosure of personally identifiable information Generally handled by users with oversight or edit suppression permissions Occasionally handled by Trust & Safety If this kind of violation invokes a legal obligation, the case will be quickly sent to the Wikimedia Foundation Legal team or, when appropriate, other professionals who can appropriately evaluate the merits of the case Violations related to affiliate governance Handled by the Affiliations Committee Systematic failure to follow the UCoC Handled by U4C Some examples of systematic failure include: Lack of local capacity to enforce the UCoC Consistent local decisions that conflict with the UCoC Refusal to enforce the UCoC Lack of resources or lack of will to address issues On-wiki UCoC violations UCoC violations that happen across multiple wikis: Handled by global sysops and stewards and the bodies that handle single-wiki UCoC violations or handled by the U4C; UCoC violations that happen on a single wiki: Handled by individual Wikimedia projects according to their existing guidelines Simple UCoC violations such as vandalism should be handled by existing enforcement structures through existing means, where they do not conflict with these guidelines Violations in technical spaces Handled by Technical Code of Conduct Committee	3.1.2 Enforcement by type of violations Violations involving litigation or legal threats Sent to the Wikimedia Foundation Legal team, or, when appropriate, other professionals who can appropriately evaluate the merit of the threats Violations involving the nonconsensual disclosure of personally identifiable information Generally handled by users with oversight or edit suppression permissions Occasionally handled by Trust & Safety Sent to the Wikimedia Foundation Legal team or, when appropriate, other professionals who can appropriately evaluate the merits of the case if this kind of violation invokes a legal obligation Violations related to affiliate governance Handled by the Affiliations Committee or equivalent body Violations in technical spaces Handled by Technical Code of Conduct Committee Systemic failure to follow the UCoC Handled by U4C Some examples of systemic failure include: Lack of local capacity to enforce the UCoC Consistent local decisions that conflict with the UCoC Refusal to enforce the UCoC Lack of resources or lack of will to address issues On-wiki UCoC violations UCoC violations that happen across multiple wikis: Handled by global sysops and stewards and the bodies that handle single-wiki UCoC violations or handled by the U4C where they do not conflict with these guidelines UCoC violations that happen on a single wiki: Handled by existing enforcement structures according to their existing guidelines, where they do not conflict with these guidelines Simple UCoC violations such as vandalism should be handled by existing enforcement structures through existing means, where they do not conflict with these guidelines

पूर्व संस्करण	संशोधित संस्करण
3.2 Recommendations for a reporting tool A centralized reporting and processing tool for UCoC violations will be developed and maintained by the Wikimedia Foundation. It should be possible to make reports through MediaWiki with this tool.	3.2 Recommendations for a reporting tool A centralized reporting and processing tool for UCoC violations will be developed and maintained by the Wikimedia Foundation. It will be possible to make reports through MediaWiki with this tool.

पूर्व संस्करण	संशोधित संस्करण
प्रक्रियाओं में निष्पक्षता सभी पक्षों के पास अपना दृष्टिकोण रखने का अवसर होना चाहिए, लेकिन यह गोपनीयता और सुरक्षा के बचाव के लिए सीमित हो सकता है। अधिक जानकारी, परिप्रेक्ष्य और संदर्भ प्रदान करने में सहायता के लिए दूसरों से प्रतिक्रिया भी आमंत्रित की जा सकती है।	प्रक्रियाओं में निष्पक्षता All parties will usually have the opportunity to give their perspective on the issues and evidence, and feedback from others can also be invited to help provide more information, perspective, and context. This may be limited to protect privacy and safety.
३.३.२ प्रक्रिया की पारदर्शिता U4C, ४.१ में परिभाषित अपने उद्देश्य और दायरे के अनुरूप, UCoC प्रवर्तन कार्रवाइयों की प्रभावशीलता और पूरे आंदोलन में सामान्य उल्लंघनों के संबंध में दस्तावेज़ीकरण प्रदान करना चाहिए। उन्हें इस शोध के संचालन में विकिमीडिया फाउंडेशन द्वारा उनका समर्थन किया जाना चाहिए। इस दस्तावेज़ीकरण का लक्ष्य UCoC को लागू करने के लिए सर्वोत्तम प्रथाओं को विकसित करने में प्रवर्तन संरचनाओं की सहायता करना है। विकिमीडिया परियोजनाओं और सहयोगी को, जब भी संभव हो, UCoC नीति पाठ के अनुसार नीतियों और प्रवर्तन तंत्र को रेखांकित करने वाले दस्तावेजों को बनाए रखना चाहिए। यदि परियोजनाओं और सहयोगियों के मौजूदा दिशानिर्देश या नीतियां UCoC नीति पाठ के विपरीत हैं, तो परिवर्तनों को वैश्विक सामुदायिक मानकों के अनुरूप चर्चा की जानी चाहिए। नई स्थानीय नीतियों का अद्यतन या निर्माण UCoC दिशानिर्देशों के विरोध में नहीं होना चाहिए। परियोजनाएं और सहयोगी संभावित नई नीतियों या दिशानिर्देशों के बारे में U4C से सलाह का अनुरोध कर सकते हैं।	३.३.२ प्रक्रिया की पारदर्शिता The U4C, in line with its purpose and scope as defined in 4.1, shall provide documentation on the effectiveness of UCoC enforcement actions and their relation to common violations throughout the movement. Wikimedia projects and affiliates, when possible, shall maintain pages outlining policies and enforcement mechanisms in line with the UCoC policy text.
३.३.३ अपील एक व्यक्तिगत उन्नत अधिकार धारक (advanced rights holder) द्वारा की गई कार्रवाई U4C के अलावा किसी अन्य स्थानीय अथवा साझा प्रवर्तन संरचना पर अपील योग्य होनी चाहिए। यदि ऐसी कोई प्रवर्तन संरचना मौजूद नहीं है, तो U4C में इसकीअपील की अनुमति दी जा सकती है। इस व्यवस्था के अलावा, स्थानीय समुदाय किसी भिन्न व्यक्तिगत उन्नत अधिकार धारक के पास अपील की अनुमति दे सकते हैं। प्रवर्तन संरचनाओं को उचित एवं प्रासंगिक जानकारी और शमन (mitigating) करने वाले कारकों के आधार पर अपीलों को स्वीकार करने और उन पर विचार करने के लिए मानक निर्धारित करना चाहिए। इन कारकों में निम्न शामिल हैं, लेकिन इन ही तक सीमित नहीं हैं: आरोपों की सत्यता, मंजूरी की अवधि और प्रभाव, और क्या सत्ता के दुरुपयोग अथवा अन्य प्रणालीगत मुद्दों का संदेह है। अपील स्वीकृति की गारंटी नहीं है। विकिमीडिया फाउंडेशन के कानूनी विभाग द्वारा किए गए कुछ निर्णयों के खिलाफ अपील संभव नहीं है।	३.३.३ अपील An action taken by an individual advanced rights holder will be appealable to a local or shared enforcement structure other than the U4C. Enforcement structures will set standards for accepting and considering appeals based on relevant contextual information and mitigating factors. These factors include, but are not limited to: verifiability of the accusations, the length and effect of the sanction, and whether there is a suspicion of abuse of power or other systemic issues, and the likelihood of further violations. विकिमीडिया फाउंडेशन के कानूनी विभाग द्वारा किए गए कुछ निर्णयों के खिलाफ अपील संभव नहीं है। However, some Wikimedia Foundation office actions and decisions are reviewable by the Case Review Committee. The limitation, specifically on appeals from office actions and decisions, may not apply in some jurisdictions, if legal requirements differ.

4. UCoC Coordinating Committee (U4C)

पूर्व संस्करण

संशोधित संस्करण

A new global committee called the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) will be formed. This committee will be a co-equal body with other high-level decision making bodies (e.g. ArbComs and AffCom). Its purpose is to serve as final recourse in the case of systematic failures by local groups to enforce the UCoC. The U4C’s membership should be reflective of the global and diverse makeup of our global community.

A new global committee called the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) will be formed. This committee will be a co-equal body with other high-level decision making bodies (e.g. ArbComs and AffCom). Its purpose is to serve as final recourse in the case of systemic failures by local groups to enforce the UCoC. The U4C’s membership shall be reflective of the global and diverse makeup of our global community.

पूर्व संस्करण	संशोधित संस्करण
4.2 Selection, membership, and roles Annual elections, organized by the global community with support from Foundation staff as necessary, will select voting members.	4.2 Selection, membership, and roles Annual elections, organized by the global community, will select voting members.
The Wikimedia Foundation may appoint up to two non-voting members to the U4C and provide support staff as desired and appropriate.	The Wikimedia Foundation may appoint up to two non-voting members to the U4C and will provide support staff as desired and appropriate.

पूर्व संस्करण	संशोधित संस्करण
4.3 Procedures The U4C will decide on how often it should convene and on other operating procedures.	4.3 Procedures The U4C will decide on how often it will convene and on other operating procedures.

पूर्व संस्करण

संशोधित संस्करण

4.5 U4C Building Committee Following ratification of the UCoC enforcement guidelines, the Wikimedia Foundation will facilitate a Building Committee to: Determine the procedures, policy, and precedent of the U4C Draft the remainder of the U4C process Designate any other logistics necessary to establish the U4C Help facilitate the initial election procedures for the U4C The Building Committee should consist of volunteer community members, affiliate staff or board members, and Wikimedia Foundation staff. Members will be selected by the Vice President of Community Resilience and Sustainability of the Wikimedia Foundation. Volunteer members for the committee should be respected community members, prioritizing the following skills or traits: experience in policy drafting experience with the application of existing rules and policies on Wikimedia projects experience in cooperating online empathy experience in collaborating in an international team participatory decision making They will be selected as much as possible to also represent the diversity of our movement including but not limited to: Languages spoken Geography Gender Age Project size of their home wiki Roles within the Wikimedia movement As this committee is tasked with the practical application of these enforcement guidelines, its members should have extensive experience with, and reflect the diversity of, the movement’s enforcement processes.

4.5 U4C Building Committee Following ratification of the UCoC enforcement guidelines, the Wikimedia Foundation will facilitate a Building Committee to: Determine the procedures, policy, and use of precedent of the U4C Draft the remainder of the U4C process Designate any other logistics necessary to establish the U4C Help facilitate the initial election procedures for the U4C The Building Committee shall consist of volunteer community members, affiliate staff or board members, and Wikimedia Foundation staff. Members will be selected by the Vice President of Community Resilience and Sustainability of the Wikimedia Foundation. Volunteer members for the committee should be respected community members. Members shall reflect the diverse perspectives of the movement’s enforcement processes with experience in things such as, but not limited to: policy drafting, involvement in and awareness of the application of existing rules and policies on Wikimedia projects, and participatory decision making. Its members shall reflect the diversity of the movement, such as but not limited to: languages spoken, gender, age, geography, and project type.

5. Glossary

पूर्व संस्करण	संशोधित संस्करण
Local Referring to a single Wikimedia project. This term usually refers to the smallest, most immediate governing body applicable to the situation.	Local Referring to a single Wikimedia project, affiliate, or organization. This term usually refers to the smallest, most immediate governing body applicable to the situation.
Systemic issue An issue for which there is a pattern of failing to follow the Universal Code of Conduct with participation of several people, particularly those with advanced rights.	Systemic issue or failure An issue for which there is a pattern of failing to follow the Universal Code of Conduct with participation of several people, particularly those with advanced rights.
new addition	Binding verbs When drafting the Enforcement Guidelines, the drafting committee considered the words ‘create’, ‘develop’, ‘enforce’, ‘must’, ‘produce’, ‘shall’, and ‘will’ as binding. Compare this to recommendation verbs. Case Review Committee See definition on Meta. Recommendation verbs When drafting the Enforcement Guidelines, the drafting committee considered the words ‘encourage’, ‘may’, ‘propose’, ‘recommend’, and ‘should’ as recommendations. Compare this to binding verbs. Staff Employees of and/or staff members assigned to a Wikimedia movement organization or contractors of such a movement organization whose work requires interaction with Wikimedia community members or in Wikimedia movement spaces (including third-party spaces such as off-wiki platforms dedicated to Wikimedia movement activity). Wikimedia Foundation Office Action Policy The policy found on Meta or its equivalent successor policy.