User:COIBot/XWiki/oldtimerplus.de

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

BOT generated Meta report. The bot reports here when:

  • More than 66% of the placing and addition of this link has been performed by one editor.
  • The user is adding more than 2 domains, but they all reside on the same server.
  • The links are exclusively added by IPs.
  • Several IPs are adding the link, but the IPs are in a close (/24) range.

Links[edit]





Users[edit]












Selected additions[edit]

  1. 2013-01-29 08:45:51 w:de:User:217.91.25.114 (talk, contribs, 12) to w:de:Fendt (Marke) (diff, not top edit, link removed), link www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/tag/fendt/ (RXL,Search)
    Other links: www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/tag/fendt/ (12,11,3,2,,RXL,AdSense:7787678743752553:R)
  2. 2013-01-29 08:47:32 b:de:User:217.91.25.114 (talk, contribs, 12) to b:de:Traktorenlexikon: Fendt (diff, not top edit, still there), link www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/tag/fendt/ (RXL,Search)
    Other links: www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/tag/fendt/ (12,11,3,2,,RXL,AdSense:7787678743752553:R)
  3. 2013-06-09 07:31:58 w:de:User:37.201.7.110 (talk, contribs, 4) to w:de:Steyr (Traktorenhersteller) (diff, not top edit, link removed), link www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/farbtone-fur-alte-steyr-traktoren/ (RXL,Search)
    Other links: www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/farbtone-fur-alte-steyr-traktoren/ (4,11,4,1,,RXL,AdSense:7787678743752553:R)
  4. 2013-06-09 07:38:18 w:de:User:37.201.7.110 (talk, contribs, 4) to w:de:Lanz Bulldog (diff, not top edit, link removed), link www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/farbtone-fur-lanz-bulldog-traktoren/ (RXL,Search)
    Other links: www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/farbtone-fur-lanz-bulldog-traktoren/ (4,11,4,1,,RXL,AdSense:7787678743752553:R)
  5. 2013-06-09 07:41:32 w:de:User:37.201.7.110 (talk, contribs, 4) to w:de:Fendt (Marke) (diff, not top edit, link removed), link www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/farbtone-fur-alte-fendt-traktoren/ (RXL,Search)
    Other links: www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/farbtone-fur-alte-fendt-traktoren/ (4,11,4,1,,RXL,AdSense:7787678743752553:R)
  6. 2013-06-09 07:42:48 w:de:User:37.201.7.110 (talk, contribs, 4) to w:de:Porsche-Diesel Motorenbau (diff, not top edit, link removed), link www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/farbtone-fur-porsche-diesel-traktoren/ (RXL,Search)
    Other links: www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/farbtone-fur-porsche-diesel-traktoren/ (4,11,4,1,,RXL,AdSense:7787678743752553:R)
  7. 2013-06-09 15:15:59 b:de:User:92.196.109.129 (talk, contribs, 1) to b:de:Traktorenlexikon: Fendt (diff, not top edit, still there), link www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/tag/fendt/ (RXL,Search)
    Other links: www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/tag/fendt/ (1,11,1,1,,RXL,AdSense:7787678743752553:R)
  8. 2013-06-11 15:13:16 b:de:User:92.196.107.61 (talk, contribs, 1) to b:de:Traktorenlexikon: Fendt (diff, not top edit, still there), link www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/tag/fendt/ (RXL,Search)
    Other links: www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/tag/fendt/ (1,11,1,1,,RXL,AdSense:7787678743752553:R)
  9. 2013-07-10 10:56:05 b:de:User:217.91.25.114 (talk, contribs, 12) to b:de:Traktorenlexikon: Fendt Agrobil S (diff, not top edit, still there), link www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/fendt-agrobil-s-der-selbstfahrende-ladewagen/ (RXL,Search)
    Other links: www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/fendt-agrobil-s-der-selbstfahrende-ladewagen/ (12,11,3,2,,RXL,AdSense:7787678743752553:R)
  10. 2013-07-12 17:52:44 b:de:User:92.196.121.204 (talk, contribs, 2) to b:de:Traktorenlexikon: Fendt (diff, top edit, still there), link www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/tag/fendt/ (RXL,Search)
    Other links: www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/tag/fendt/ (2,11,2,1,,RXL,AdSense:7787678743752553:R)
  11. 2013-07-12 17:53:24 b:de:User:92.196.121.204 (talk, contribs, 2) to b:de:Traktorenlexikon: Fendt Agrobil S (diff, top edit, still there), link www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/fendt-agrobil-s-der-selbstfahrende-ladewagen/ (RXL,Search)
    Other links: www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/fendt-agrobil-s-der-selbstfahrende-ladewagen/ (2,11,2,1,,RXL,AdSense:7787678743752553:R)

Entry[edit]

Log entry for the Spam blacklist:

\boldtimerplus\.de\b         # ADMINNAME # {{sbl-diff|#}}; see [[User:COIBot/XWiki/oldtimerplus.de]]

Discussion[edit]

Request Status - Closed

See COIBot report for more details.

New data reported. --COIBot (talk) 11:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Reverted RevertedDefender (talk) 14:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

New data reported. --COIBot (talk) 15:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

I don't know why my IP is listed here (and what this page is in general) and I am not amused. I only undone the vandalism http://de.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Traktorenlexikon:_Fendt&curid=6952&diff=674354&oldid=671730 through m:User:Defender, who removes an unquestionable correct and actually informative web link. --92.196.109.129 17:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, unquestionable correct and actually informative web link. Face-smile.svg Defender (talk) 17:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Poor reply. You can't compare apples and oranges. Wikibooks is not wikipedia. In a lexicon with a special topic every link with additional informations is welcome. And this link, which is btw completely ad-free AFAICS, is a blog with relevant informations about FENDT-Traktoren. How can you judge about the legitimacy of a link w/o any knowledge of the language? --92.196.109.129 22:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

I have reverted all again. You may be not amused, but I would consider that you take into account, that we are writing an encyclopedia here, not a linkfarm. It is a blog .. not even an authoritative source, and all the information of www.oldtimerplus.de/blog/farbtone-fur-alte-fendt-traktoren/ can easily be incorporated, which defies the need to link in the first place (and no, you don't reference those additions to this blog, but to the official website of Fendt, which is a good, nay, the best primary source to verify thát type of information. I'd suggest you take care, this may well be on the way to blacklisting if you persist without discussion on the talkpages of the appropriate pages on the local wikis. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 06:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

It is a book at wikibooks, not a encyclopedia. At Wikibooks you can find hundreds of such links. It is the decision of the maintainer of a book, which links are worth to mention. Ok, I will look for another way. --92.196.46.44 07:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

No links left in here mentioned edits. Marked stale. . --COIBot (talk) 11:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

New data reported. --COIBot (talk) 15:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes. Because it is a blog with useful informations for Fendt enthusiasts about e.g. historical aspects, old manuals, merchandising articles etc. A book, even a fact book, is not a wikipedia article. Before you revert the link again, please explain on the discussion page there, why the site is banned for all times and for all wikimedia projects and why a book author can't decide by himself. Or please state the next higher authority to you. The system is pretty intransparent for me. --92.196.107.61 17:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I don't see that it is encyclopaedic, so wouldn't be on any of the WPs, and would leave it to the WBs to see whether they consider it problematic or not. That said, if it keeps being pasted widely by the one contributor, it can be problematic. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Closed Closedbillinghurst sDrewth 09:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

New data reported. --COIBot (talk) 11:21, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Sigh. --92.196.6.240 12:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

New data reported. --COIBot (talk) 17:57, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

New data reported. --COIBot (talk) 17:58, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes, again and again and again. Sorry, there is nothing wrong with the links to oldtimerplus.de. --92.196.121.204 18:05, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Closed Closed It is just a notation of an addition, don't fuss. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:11, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Not just. Each addition causes a deletion which we from de.wikibooks have to revert each time. Bizarre situation. --92.196.118.66 12:42, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Yes, just that. The reporting does not cause a deletion, the poor explanation of additions and insistence does. Calling it 'bot vandalismus' is not a reasoning why a link should be there - it is also not a bot that is removing the links. Individual editors make their individual decisions based on this report, and maybe they also think that the link to that site is not necessary. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 09:19, 14 July 2013 (UTC)