User:COIBot/XWiki/rx.ua

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

BOT generated Meta report. The bot reports here when:

  • More than 66% of the placing and addition of this link has been performed by one editor.
  • The user is adding more than 2 domains, but they all reside on the same server.
  • The links are exclusively added by IPs.
  • Several IPs are adding the link, but the IPs are in a close (/24) range.

Links[edit]









Users[edit]




Selected additions[edit]

  1. 2019-11-20 11:51:17: w:en:User:Atlasveryshrugged (talk, contribs, 10) to w:en:Bioequivalence (diff, top edit, still there), link rx.ua (RXL,Search)
    Other links: rx.ua (10,31,10,2,,RXL)
  2. 2019-11-22 13:31:41: w:uk:User:Atlasveryshrugged (talk, contribs, 10) to w:uk:5-фторурацил (diff, not top edit, still there), link rx.ua/drug/5dd7a94d58df526766568fa3-flakon-5-ml-n1x1 (RXL,Search)
    Other links: rx.ua/drug/5dd7a94d58df526766568fa3-flakon-5-ml-n1x1 (10,31,10,2,,RXL)
  3. 2019-12-02 11:48:50: w:uk:User:Atlasveryshrugged (talk, contribs, 10) to w:uk:5-фторурацил (diff, not top edit, still there), link rx.ua/drug/5-ftoruracil-ebeve-ebeve-farma-avstriya-koncentrat-dlya-prygotuvannya-rozchynu-dlya-infuziy-50-mg-ml-flakon-5-ml-n1x1 (RXL,Search)
    Other links: rx.ua/drug/5-ftoruracil-ebeve-ebeve-farma-avstriya-koncentrat-dlya-prygotuvannya-rozchynu-dlya-infuziy-50-mg-ml-flakon-5-ml-n1x1 (10,31,10,2,,RXL)
  4. 2019-12-02 16:10:36: w:uk:User:Atlasveryshrugged (talk, contribs, 10) to w:uk:5-фторурацил (diff, not top edit, still there), link rx.ua/drug/5-ftoruracil-ebeve-ebeve-farma-avstriya-koncentrat-dlya-prygotuvannya-rozchynu-dlya-infuziy-50-mg-ml-flakon-5-ml-n1x1 (RXL,Search)
    Other links: rx.ua/drug/5-ftoruracil-ebeve-ebeve-farma-avstriya-koncentrat-dlya-prygotuvannya-rozchynu-dlya-infuziy-50-mg-ml-flakon-5-ml-n1x1 (10,31,10,2,,RXL) rx.ua/drug/5-ftoruracil-ebeve-ebeve-farma-avstriya-koncentrat-dlya-prygotuvannya-rozchynu-dlya-infuziy-50-mg-ml-flakon-5-ml-n1x1 (10,31,10,2,,RXL)
  5. 2019-12-02 16:43:02: w:uk:User:Atlasveryshrugged (talk, contribs, 10) to w:uk:5-фторурацил (diff, top edit, still there), link rx.ua/inn-mnn/ftoruracil (RXL,Search)
    Other links: rx.ua/inn-mnn/ftoruracil (10,31,10,2,,RXL)
  6. 2019-12-05 11:39:15: w:uk:User:Atlasveryshrugged (talk, contribs, 10) to w:uk:Нітроксолін (diff, top edit, still there), link rx.ua/inn-mnn/nitroksolin (RXL,Search)
    Other links: rx.ua/inn-mnn/nitroksolin (10,31,10,2,,RXL)
  7. 2019-12-05 11:47:45: w:uk:User:Atlasveryshrugged (talk, contribs, 10) to w:uk:Ліофілізація (diff, not top edit, link removed), link rx.ua/drug/a-bakterin-farmstandart-biolik-ukrayina-liofilizat-flakon-5-doz-n10x1 (RXL,Search)
    Other links: rx.ua/drug/a-bakterin-farmstandart-biolik-ukrayina-liofilizat-flakon-5-doz-n10x1 (10,31,10,2,,RXL)
  8. 2019-12-05 11:51:28: w:uk:User:Atlasveryshrugged (talk, contribs, 10) to w:uk:Депресія (психологія) (diff, not top edit, link removed), link rx.ua/drug/a-depresin-teva-farma-izrayil-tabletky-vkryti-plivkovoyu-obolonkoyu-50-mg-n30x1 (RXL,Search)
    Other links: rx.ua/drug/a-depresin-teva-farma-izrayil-tabletky-vkryti-plivkovoyu-obolonkoyu-50-mg-n30x1 (10,31,10,2,,RXL)
  9. 2019-12-05 12:05:47: w:uk:User:Atlasveryshrugged (talk, contribs, 10) to w:uk:Сертралін (diff, not top edit, still there), link rx.ua/drug/a-diston-biolik-ukrayina-krapli-dlya-peroralnogo-zastosuvannya-flakon-50-ml-n1x1 (RXL,Search)
    Other links: rx.ua/drug/a-diston-biolik-ukrayina-krapli-dlya-peroralnogo-zastosuvannya-flakon-50-ml-n1x1 (10,31,10,2,,RXL)

Entry[edit]

Log entry for the Spam blacklist:

\brx\.ua\b                   # ADMINNAME # {{sbl-diff|#}}; see [[User:COIBot/XWiki/rx.ua]]
\bschizophrenia\.rx\.ua\b    # ADMINNAME # {{sbl-diff|#}}; see [[User:COIBot/XWiki/schizophrenia.rx.ua]]

Discussion[edit]

Request Status - Closed

See COIBot report for more details.

New data reported. --COIBot (talk) 16:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

New data reported. --COIBot (talk) 00:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

@NickK: one for your review. Seems unusual for an "authoritative" guide to just appear and multiple times all from a new user.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:35, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: Thanks for reporting this. Pinging @Brunei: who is a fellow admin with a better knowledge of medical resources than mine — NickK (talk) 13:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
m:The website itself is not untrustful as it just aggregates drug manuals which are approved by Ministry of Health of Ukraine. But it really looks like website promotion, especially in this diff. —Brunei (talk) 15:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
m:@Brunei: Guide me on what I should do with it? Is ukWP going to manage? Want me to have COIBot to actively tracked additions, rather than suspicious additions? Shall I just revert?  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
m:This is a number of difficult answers you've asked. :-) I think we could discuss it with ukWP community. Of course, it will take time. I don't really understand what you meant in COIBot to actively tracked additions, rather than suspicious additions. Maybe, it is good to revert to show user it is not good way to act.--Brunei (talk) 13:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
m:@Brunei and NickK: COIBot standard monitoring criteria is specified at the top of this page; I have the modify that to have a higher watch level. The watch level is irrelevant if I don't know how to act.

With regard to my general actions, where I see clear spam, I will revert it and may be blacklist it; if I am seeing xwiki abuse, then I will revert. Certain wiki specific additions, like here, I think it looks suspicious, though not in the earlier categories, so I flag it for an admin to review and to give me advice on how the community wishes it to be handled into the future. So I am looking for your advice, on whether you want me to act, and undo/revert, or just leave them alone, and your community will manage it.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

m:@Brunei: The basic question is whether we want this website to be blacklisted, or if we consider it acceptable. I don't know if we have any alternative for this website — NickK (talk) 15:41, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
m:m:We have alternative websites. I started a discussion about it in Project:Medicine. — Brunei (talk) 16:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC) So, as far as I see, website is a trustful database but several users with COI are extensively promoting it. I suggest their edits should be reverted, but no blacklisting is needed.--Brunei (talk) 21:26, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Closed Closed  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:56, 6 December 2019 (UTC)