User:Stryn/elect

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Ciell[edit]

Ciell talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: nl-N, en-3, de-1, fr-1, af-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    I'm a Dutch Wikipedia admin since October 2006 and a Commons admin since 2008. Member of the Dutch OTRS team since 2007. As an OTRS-member and former member of the Arbitration Committee I have experience with confidentiality. I have some more time on my hands for 2018 and would like to pick up another task for the movement, for instance fighting vandalism on small wiki's.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Ciell
Emblem-important.svg
If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2018|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TonyBallioni (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Wischmat (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Ciell has extensive experience in handling sensitive information, being +sysop on the Dutch Wikipedia, in addition to showing experience and competency in handling OTRS e-mails, and handling Arbitration Committee material. They would make an excellent addition to the stewarding team. Nick (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 16:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Cameron11598 (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Has a lot of experience, as you can see in the personal information, but Ciell didn't mention it all. (I'm not gonna fill that in, but I know it) If anyone would be a good steward, Ciell would be. My vote is a big YES. Richardkiwi (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Ciell will do just fine. I'm sure off it. The steward team needs more then people who know how to revert LTA's. The team also needs people with fresh idea's, hart for the project and experience helping people. That is what Ciell has to offer. Natuur12 (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Ciell does great in OTRS which is a trusted, off-wiki, private, multilingual platform. The skillset Ciell uses for OTRS matches the need as a steward. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Shizhao (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Mbch331 (talk) 06:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Edoderoo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I know Ciell as a long term, friendly and dedicated volunteer. Edoderoo (talk) 06:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   +Experience, +activity, +trust, no issues. --Krd 07:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Legoktm (talk) 09:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Gereon K. (talk) 10:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. De Geo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Long time experience on Dutch wiki The Geo (talk) 11:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Pelz (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Pelz (talk) 12:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. 隼鷹 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   隼鷹 (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Great floors (talk) 20:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Elvesham (talk) 22:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Trusted user. Wolverène (talk) 03:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. SQL (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   SQLQuery me! 03:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wae35244 (talk) 09:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. Csisc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Csisc (talk) 11:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. JoostB (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   JoostB (talk) 12:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   BugWarp (talk) 13:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. Nuhaa (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Nuhaa (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. Bluemel1 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Bluemel1 (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  32. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Filipović Zoran (talk) 15:08, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  33. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Ciao • Bestoernesto 22:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  34. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Stüard olması üçün mövcud fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edərək, onu dəstəkləyirəm. Çünki uzun müddətli təcrübəsi var. Düşünürəm ki, faydalı işlər görəcək. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  35. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Potatornado (talk) 15:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  36. NickK (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Weak support. I believe Ciell would be a good steward, she might lack some experience but she is trusted enough and I hope she will be able to deal with it — NickK (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  37. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   StevenJ81 (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  38. Ecritures (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Ecritures (talk) 17:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  39. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Heart seems in the right place, worth giving the benefit of the doubt. --YodinT 20:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  40. Sj (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Humble, effective. SJ talk  21:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  41. Wthjmkuiper (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wthjmkuiper (talk) 21:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  42. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   TJH2018talk 16:51, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  43. MaynardClark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MaynardClark (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  44. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Trustworthy user given the amount of access he has. 1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  45. Kukkaspoika73 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Kukkaspoika73 (talk) 11:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  46. Sänger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Grüße vom Sänger ♫(Reden) 17:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  47. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Liridon (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  48. Litev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Litev (talk) 12:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
    Manusurmars (Not eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)   Manusurmars (talk) 14:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  49. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  50. JanB46 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   JanB46 (talk) 16:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  51. Chefallen (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Chefallen (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  52. RonnieV (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Enough trust in this person to give him this function. Is willing to do a lot for Wikipedia and has experience in Arbcom, mod, OTRS. RonnieV (talk) 00:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
    Phirun (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne)   Phirun (talk) 06:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  53. M.Tarnowski (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   M.Tarnowski (talk) 12:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  54. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   -Xbony2 (talk) 14:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  55. Cyberpower678 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 17:48, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
    Antoine2711 (Not eligible, checked by Xaosflux)   I think she has the qualities required to be a good arbitrator. She is a dedicated wikipedian and a very competent person. Antoine2711 (talk) 23:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   So far I don't see a good reason to support. It seems to me that fighting vandalism in small wikis can also be started without steward tools, as many SWMT people do. --MF-W 14:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  Not experienced cross-wiki. --Stïnger (会話) 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC).
  3. KPFC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  missing cross-wiki experience, also I see no need of steward rights for SWMT – KPFC💬 14:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  --cyrfaw (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Insufficient crosswiki experience, would consider supporting when the candidate gains more experience. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I remain unconvinced, if you have time to focus on a new task like fighting vandalism on small wikis you are very welcome to help in the SWMT, but this mostly does not require you to be a steward. I would certainly be willing to reconsider if you reapply next year with some more SWMT (or similar xwiki countervandalism) experience, though. —Vogone (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Ferran Mir (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   The statement is so short which I don't think he/her has fully understood for what is applying for. Moreover, he/her is one of the less active administrators of Commons, a bad sign for someone who is running for steward. Érico (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Eurodyne (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   — xaosflux Talk 15:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Steinsplitter (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Herby talk thyme 17:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Not convinced by statement; steward rights are not necessary for fighting vandalism on small wikis. I suggest that you gain some more relevant experience and apply in a future election. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   *Youngjin (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Milad A380 talk 20:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Tools are not necessary in order to fight vandalism. Unconvinced by the statement provided. Nihlus 20:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Question answers don't convince me, sorry. hiàn 21:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Little to no cross-wikiness. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Az1568 (talk) 04:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Need more training for cross-wiki experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 08:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   lack of cross wiki experience and lack of activity as admin worries me MoiraMoira (talk) 09:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   missing cross-wiki experience DCB (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
    Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Need more xp. Alex Pereira falaê 13:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   missing cross-wiki experience Holder (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. Wizard-Lizard (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Wizard-Lizard (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Simplexity22 (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   missing cross-wiki experience, no need of steward rights for SWMT The Banner (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Fails my criteria. KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   You can fight vandalism without the steward tools, Like above I see no valid reason to support at this present time. –Davey2010Talk 15:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   out of principle I can’t support the expansion of the Stewardry until (1) there exists a council for global ban/lock (non-WMF bans) appeals made up of users who are not sitting-stewards, or a global UTRS system to address global locks and bans as the current stewards clearly don't want discussions from globally banned/blocked users to stand, (2) stewards actually start following policy like “If they create new accounts and are not disruptive with those accounts, they will not be locked again merely because it is discovered that they were previously globally locked.”, and (3) when there’s a clear policy when global locks can be used for non-vandalism only accounts (e.g. Registered for shorter a month, having less than 500 edits, Etc.) as plenty of potentially constructive users with one bad day are locked out of their accounts and many will never return while actual trolls don't really care about such measures (the Nipponese dog, the Incorrible Troll, Etc.) Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  32. Athaenara (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   If Ciell needs something to keep busy, there's always editing more articles, finding and formatting citations, etc. Athaenara (talk) 06:15, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  33. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   No case made for steward access in particular, as opposed to other positions. Cross-wiki anti-abuse experience is a (de facto) prerequisite for this role. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  34. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Not experienced xwiki enough, neither represents any exotic language family for this to be considered a boon. --Base (talk) 13:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Base (talk) 13:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  35. ToastButterToast (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   ToastButterToast (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  36. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  37. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Maleine258 (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  38. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Freddy2001 talk 16:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  39. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  40. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Without taking anything away from your actions. I believe that more croos-wiki experience is needed Samuele2002 (Talk!) 21:06, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  41. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  42. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Slowking4 (talk) 13:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  43. Power~enwiki (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   power~enwiki (talk) 03:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  44. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Despite being here for long time and holding several advanced permissions/roles; the candidate seems to fundamentally misunderstood Stewardship. –Ammarpad (talk) 10:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  45. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Zabia (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  46. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Non convincing statement, neither their answers (some questions wasn't even answered). Doesn't seem to have experience and there's no need for the tools per MF-Warburg. Zerabat (discusión) 12:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  47. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ghilt (talk) 16:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  48. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vachovec1 (talk) 01:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  49. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   a×pdeHello! 06:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  50. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Frīheidasliova (talk) 09:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  51. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Statement a bit short to understand why Ciell wants to be Steward. Kind regards. Jules78120 (talk) 13:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  52. Risk Engineer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Risk Engineer (talk) 18:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  53. Allforrous (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Allforrous (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  Does have some relevant experience (sysop on multiple wikis, ArbCom) but no evident "mission statement" for their candidacy and vague answers to the questions make me hesitate. Rschen7754 14:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018  Based on your answers to the questions, I think you are a good candidate, however I think you still need to demonstrate more experience with the work area of the stewards. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Openskye (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Devraj poudel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Devraj poudel (talk) 02:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. My name is not dave (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Sitting here for now. Awaiting an answer to my question. My name is not dave (talk) 19:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Quickfingers (talk) 01:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 10:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. FeralOink (talk) 10:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   per Rschen7754 —Ah3kal (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   DENAMAX (talk) 20:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Rzuwig 22:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Stevenmitchell (talk) 11:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Alzinous (talk) 12:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Xxmarijnw (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Xxmarijnw (talk) 13:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Eddie891 (talk) 13:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   B20180 (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 09:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Adithyak1997 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Adithyak1997 (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   GZWDer (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   The user Ciell didn't answer Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Ciell for a long time. Garam (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. Storkk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Storkk (talk) 13:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Complainer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Complainer (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Anbans 585 (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Ankry (talk) 10:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Stephan1000000 (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   DePlusJean (talk) 00:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Coffee[edit]

Coffee talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: en, id-1, jv-1, es-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    I have been an administrator at en.wiki for over 10 years now. I've also been trusted as an OTRS member for several years as well, assisting in some of our more controversial cases to try to work towards a solution. I do not intend to use my entrusted user right to my advantage at any point, as I have never done so on en.wik (regardless of the half-dozen editors I've had to sanction or warn who would attempt to argue otherwise). Outside of Wikimedia, I am currently retired from the en:USAF, where I was entrusted with the highest-level clearance there is (a fact the foundation is aware of) to analyze intelligence, for cyber and nuclear missions. I also was trusted as the battle staff Assistant Director during every nuclear exercise and inspection we had (a position typically filled by a LtCol) during 2009-2010. For my actions I received the the Air Force Achievement Medal, Nuclear Deterrence Operations Medal, Outstanding Unit Award (x2), Good Conduct Medal, Honor Graduate Ribbon, among other awards such as Airman of the Year, Airman of the Quarter, Airman of the Month (x2), Non-Commissioned Officer of the Quarter, and the Chief's Choice award.

    Outside of the military I was elected President of a 501(c)3 (a non-governmental organization) with over 2,200 members included. We raised over $40,000 for the local Salvation Army and assisted in schools across the local area to help underprivileged children. The Base commander stated at the end of my annual tenure that I "saved the organization from being shut down". (Words that I didn't even expect to hear... not to brag on myself too much, but I'm supposed to be selling myself here.)

    Beyond that, in my civilian life while I was still active duty, I volunteered and became appointed by a Judge to be an "Officer of the Court" in my role as a en:Court Appointed Special Advocate, which I worked at for 3 years, receiving the CASA of the month award at one point. I spent hundreds of hours doing that, and it paid off to see children end up in safe homes, or back with their families when it was healthy to do so.

    I could continue to list my qualifications, but I think you all can get the point: many organizations (including the WMF) have entrusted my ability to keep confidential information confidential, and that I won't/haven't abused the authorities given to me. I fully hope this community also extends me this same trust. As I'm running for this position purely because I see a real need for stewards... Too often on IRC or other means of communication, there simply isn't one around to handle sensitive matters. I will take my role very seriously. And I will ensure to act very slowly until I have a handle on the new position fully.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Coffee
Emblem-important.svg
If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2018|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 15:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. MPS1992 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   MPS1992 (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   A little doubt, be not enough to vote neutral or no. Richardkiwi (talk) 20:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Kind of moral support. Wolverène (talk) 11:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Manjappabg (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Manjappabg (talk) 16:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. SparklingPessimist (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   SparklingPessimist (talk) 02:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Siddiqsazzad001 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Good faith edits always Siddiqsazzad001 (talk) 12:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
    Dragnadh (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67)   Dragnadh (talk) 14:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Cepice (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   10 of experiences Cepice (talk) 20:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wae35244 (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Alzinous (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   B20180 (talk) 14:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Fitindia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018    FITINDIA  14:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ascánder (talk) 15:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Ciao • Bestoernesto 22:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Dane (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   I have nothing but full confidence in Coffee. Every interaction we have had has been outstanding. Dane (talk) 06:01, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Düşünürəm ki, faydalı işlər görəcək. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   en-wiki activity doesn't concern this vote. — X-Javier [m'écrire] 09:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Filipović Zoran (talk) 15:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
    Jbhunley (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   For volunteer positions, even those of great responsibility or authority, I look for two simple criteria. Has the candidate done anything that would make me think they would abuse the position or indicate they have a motive for seeking the position which could be seen as 'improper'. The second is, do they have sufficient abilities/experience to learn the position and not do harm as they are learning it. Of all the candidates Coffee is the only one who I have observed enough to make an assessment. I have not seen any red flags that make me think he would abuse the position or fail to take it seriously. Nor have I seen any indication he would fail to diligently apply himself to learning his duties or carelessly cause harm while he does so.

    There is a part of me that has a concern that a person who has/had the level of access Coffee alludes to in his statement would mention it in a public forum - bad OPSEC. That, however, relates to a different threat environment than we have on Wikipedia so, on balance, I do not think it preculdes him from the position of Steward. JbhTalk 18:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC) Last edited: 19:24, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

  22. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   --Caligatus (talk) 23:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. Atsme (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Atsme📞📧 03:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. MaynardClark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MaynardClark (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   per assume good faith. Garam (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Liridon (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
    Ral 33 (Not eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)   Ral 33 (talk) 14:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
    Manusurmars (Not eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)   Manusurmars (talk) 14:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ghilt (talk) 16:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. Parcly Taxel (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Parcly Taxel (talk) 10:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. M.Tarnowski (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   M.Tarnowski (talk) 12:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. Risk Engineer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Risk Engineer (talk) 18:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  32. Cyberpower678 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I've had always positive interactions with Coffee and I trust him. Coffee has held the position of admin for a while. If his recent contributions are that concerning in respect to his contributions as a whole, he would have desysopped. I trust him to learn from past mistakes.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 17:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  33. Allforrous (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Allforrous (talk) 22:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Almost no qualifications beyond en.wiki adminship. While I don't think Coffee would leak private data, I do not think that he is temperamentally suited for the role (see the diffs mentioned here), which often involves making difficult decisions in public, and working collaboratively with other stewards and members of the community. I have seen the effects of when even just one fellow steward refuses to work as a team (as alluded to in my essay) and I do not want to take a chance here. The candidate also seems to overstate the "power" that the steward role has, which is not to "enforce regulations cross-wikis". Rschen7754 14:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   From the statement alone, which lists numerous off-wiki achievements (which may be good but just amount to saying: "because of bla and bla in the US air force, I won't reveal your private data! How great of me!") but barely mentions any on-wiki activity, I don't see why to support this candidate. In addition, with nearly 97% of edits on enwiki, he certainly does not have any cross-wiki activity. Taking also the controversial enwiki actions into account which were mentioned in some of the questions, I don't think it would be a good idea to support. Also unfortunately no reply to several questions so far. --MF-W 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Stïnger (会話) 14:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC).
  4. KPFC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   No cross-wiki activity, but controversial on his home-wiki; His off-wiki achievements could not convince me either – KPFC💬 14:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Pigsonthewing (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Sadly I think the concerns raised above, and those recently raised on en.Wikipedia about Coffee's interactions with users with whom they have had even mild disagreements rule them out for this role. I hope that this will not discourage them from doing good work elsewhere on the projects. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --cyrfaw (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Diannaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Coffee has made several mistakes in his administrative work on en.wiki recently and in my opinion is not suited to holding advanced positions at this time. Diannaa (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   His statement largely explains his achievements in real life more than his achievements within Wikimedia projects. Sorry, but this is not relevant for a candidacy for steward. There is also no proven global experience to evaluate how would perform on this task. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   per Rschen7754 and MF-W. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I'm not convinced. Neither is it clear for which tasks exactly these extended user rights are being requested, nor do the recent enwiki controversies outlined in the questions look promising. —Vogone (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. DoRD (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I'm sorry, but Coffee does not possess the temperament or the patience that I feel is necessary for Steward work. In addition, his recent enwiki actions have been controversial and policeman-like, so I don't think that Coffee having crosswiki advanced permissions is a good idea. —DoRD talk 14:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Thank you for your volunteer work, but you don't have enough cross-wiki experience. Érico (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I'd like to see more cross-wiki experience. Eurodyne (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Coffee would ordinarily make an good steward, but I don't believe the role is right for them at this time. I would prefer that they restrict themselves to English Wikipedia, and perhaps another project or two first, before moving into a Steward role. I disagree with the assertion that he has made several mistakes on English Wikipedia recently, he has shown a good deal of competency in managing Arbitration Enforcement, an area few others wish to tread now, such is its toxicity. Nick (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Herby talk thyme 15:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Not enough xwiki experience. — xaosflux Talk 15:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Steinsplitter (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. SoWhy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Recent events at en-wiki left me questioning his temperament to be an admin, much less a steward. Regards SoWhy 16:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Leaky caldron (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Temperamentally wholly unsuitable as demonstrated by recent escalating and petulant conflicts and dubious decision making accompanied by a whiff of attempting to brush off misjudgment as insignificant. Leaky caldron (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Concerns with temperament and lack of relevant experience. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Montanabw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   The behavior of this editor in using his existing administrative tools on en.wiki on multiple occasions to attack or just issue harsh warnings to other editors (one of whom was me) with insufficient evidence and then doubling down on his position when a simple defense is offered is a clear example that he may mean well, but lacks the patience and self-control needed for the highly sensitive and tremendously responsible Steward position. Montanabw (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   per above *Youngjin (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. SA 13 Bro (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Sorry, per mentioned by DoRD and Nick at above. Certain temperament issues on English Wikipedia that run against on the spirit for your Steward works, try again next year. SA 13 Bro (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I don't care about the real life of candidates and their social position. The candidate has clearly failed to provide any information about their work on-wiki above the bare minimum, which isn't sufficent for a steward election. Milad A380 talk 20:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Coffee's been involved in a lot of drama lately on enwiki, so much so that he's taken a break from that site. I really don't think this is the right time for stewardship. Lepricavark (talk) 20:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Temperament concerns. Nihlus 20:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   EN-WIKI based: no cross-wiki works. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Not too much cross-wiki activity, and actions on en.wiki concern me. hiàn 22:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. Mortee (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Recent conduct on en-wiki has been intemperate. It's not the right time for them to be trusted with more tools, especially ones with privacy implications. Mortee (talk) 23:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. Sir Joseph (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   I don't wish to echo all of the above, I will just say that I don't think Coffee is right for the job and is not temperamentally suited for more supervisory roles. Sir Joseph (talk) 00:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  32. Devraj poudel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Devraj poudel (talk) 02:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  33. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Az1568 (talk) 04:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  34. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018  --Krd 07:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  35. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Need more training for cross-wiki experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 08:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  36. Begoon (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Begoon (talk) 09:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  37. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Legoktm (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  38. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Gereon K. (talk) 10:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  39. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   DCB (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
    Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Alex Pereira falaê 13:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  40. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  41. Winged Blades of Godric (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Hmm...Temperament concerns, to put it mildly. Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  42. L235 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Kevin (aka L235 · t · c · enwiki) 16:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  43. Wizard-Lizard (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Wizard-Lizard (talk) 17:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  44. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Holder (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  45. Smeat75 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   After creating various dramas and brouhaha all over the place on English wikipedia, Coffee repeatedly complained that his WP activities were stressing him out and making him tense. He has gone on a self-enforced "wikibreak" and has not answered the questions put to him in this election the last few days. He is not an appropriate candidate for a position as a steward. Smeat75 (talk) 01:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  46. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  47. Fdssdf (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Fdssdf (talk) 02:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  48. Sagaciousphil (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Sagaciousphil (talk) 09:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  49. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  50. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   —Ah3kal (talk) 13:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  51. Aiken drum (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   I wouldn't normally vote on these, but Coffee is not a good candidate for this position. Aiken drum (talk) 14:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  52. Sam Sailor (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Far to much dramah created on English Wikipedia lately by this user to support stewardship any time soon. Sam Sailor 15:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  53. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Nope as per his behaviour at EN wiki - This user has a temperament issue and in all honestly shouldn't be an admin let alone a steward!. –Davey2010Talk 15:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  54. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   out of principle I can’t support the expansion of the Stewardry until (1) there exists a council for global ban/lock (non-WMF bans) appeals made up of users who are not sitting-stewards, or a global UTRS system to address global locks and bans as the current stewards clearly don't want discussions from globally banned/blocked users to stand, (2) stewards actually start following policy like “If they create new accounts and are not disruptive with those accounts, they will not be locked again merely because it is discovered that they were previously globally locked.”, and (3) when there’s a clear policy when global locks can be used for non-vandalism only accounts (e.g. Registered for shorter a month, having less than 500 edits, Etc.) as plenty of potentially constructive users with one bad day are locked out of their accounts and many will never return while actual trolls don't really care about such measures (the Nipponese dog, the Incorrible Troll, Etc.) Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  55. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Great floors (talk) 20:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  56. Govindaharihari (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Coffee is not a good / is a bad candidate for any advanced permissions on wikipedia, they have clear emotional concerns that are made worse by working on any authoritative permissions on wikipedia. Govindaharihari (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  57. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Rzuwig 22:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  58. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Too controversial on his home wiki, barely provide any info about his cross-wiki contribs. ~ℳɑrio (talk) 07:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  59. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Nearly none of the qualifications pertain specifically to tasks a steward is normally expected to do, namely cross-wiki work (emphasis on cross-wiki). I trust them on the English Wikipedia, but they are not at this time a match for cross-wiki positions. Jasper Deng (talk) 08:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  60. TheDragonFire (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   It is with great regret that I have to oppose Coffee's application for stewardship at this time. This user is a valued contributor to the English Wikipedia, however various unfortunate incidents over the past year or two have created community concern. Coffee is currently on an indefinite leave from the English Wikipedia, and as this represents 97% of their contributions, this request should be procedurally declined. This !vote in no way prejudices a reapplication at the next steward elections, and Coffee if you're reading, we'd love to see you there. TheDragonFire (talk) 12:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  61. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Eddie891 (talk) 13:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  62. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Virtually zero xwiki experience. Base (talk) 13:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  63. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   The Banner (talk) 13:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  64. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  65. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Sorry, but there does not appear to be enough crosswiki activity here; steward is a very crosswiki job so some experience there would be necessary. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  66. Tryptofish (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Not enough cross-wiki activity, and he has been having a lot of very serious problems as an administrator at en-Wiki. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  67. UKoch (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   UKoch (talk) 19:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  68. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Freddy2001 talk 16:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  69. NickK (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   The user unfortunately does not have a good cross-wiki experience (virtually nothing relevant) and has some issues in English Wikipedia which is his home wiki (links show a few edits that would have been problematic in most wikis) — NickK (talk) 17:03, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  70. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  71. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   From what I've been reading in the questions, this doesn't seem like the right time to give more responsibilities to Coffee. --YodinT 20:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  72. Nagualdesign (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   From what I've seen, Coffee exhibits questionable judgement. Nagualdesign (talk) 23:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  73. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Too many respected members of Coffee's home Wiki have voted no for me to be comfortable with any other vote. Dolotta (talk) 02:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  74. Rivertorch (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Although the user means well, I am unconvinced that he has the even temperament and cautious nature desirable in a steward. Rivertorch (talk) 10:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  75. Ritchie333 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Absolutely not - Wikipedia is not therapy and this appointment would undoubtedly cause high drama somewhere. Ritchie333 (talk) 11:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  76. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   This angry outburst indicates Coffee has too much responsibility already. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  77. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   TJH2018talk 16:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  78. AnAwesomeArticleEditor (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Too much controversy surrounding past contributions. AnAwesomeArticleEditor (talk) 19:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  79. Hummerrocket (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Per temperament concerns. Hummerrocket (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  80. Eilidhmax (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   I'm afraid I can't support this user's candidacy, after seeing the controversies surrounding them. Eilidhmax (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  81. Yngvadottir (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Candidate works very hard for Wikipedia and undoubtedly has good intentions, but should not receive any more power. Yngvadottir (talk) 00:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  82. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Sorry Coffee, but no, I can't get behind this. I really think you need to take a break from administrative work in general. Since you've returned to active editing at en.wp, you've made several decisions at Arbitration Enforcement which I felt were lacking in nuance, in particular blocks that I found excessive and unwarranted. I won't say that I'll never support you for stewardship, but this isn't the right time for that. Kurtis (talk) 07:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  83. VIGNERON (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   VIGNERON * discut. 07:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  84. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Slowking4 (talk) 13:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  85. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2018   Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  86. Huldra (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Huldra (talk) 20:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  87. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  Inept, presumptuous and irrelevant user statement, temperamentally unsuitable. –Ammarpad (talk) 23:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  88. Power~enwiki (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   power~enwiki (talk) 03:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  89. DARIO SEVERI (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   I'd like to see more cross-wiki experience. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 04:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
    Stanistani (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Nope. Not a good thing. Stanistani (talk) 07:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  90. Storkk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   per Rschen7754 Storkk (talk) 13:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  91. Ibrahim.ID (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   No cross-wiki activity Ibrahim.ID 14:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  92. Complainer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Complainer (talk) 16:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  93. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Zabia (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  94. De728631 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   De728631 (talk) 20:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  95. Calton (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   For a variety of reasons, including some bad admin judgments on en.wiki, a tendency to assert authority, and reacting badly to feedback. Considering that he's just ducked out of en.wiki in the middle of consideration of his latest controversy, he doesn't seem to have demonstrated the judgement or temperament to be a Steward, whatever irrelevancies he cites from his CV. --Calton (talk) 04:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  96. Deadrat (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   The user history seems little unreliable to me. Maybe after he gains some more experience (with no dramas and mixups) he can try again. Deadrat (talk) 08:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  97. Fish and karate (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Not at this time. Fish and karate (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  98. Zerabat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Lack of cross-wiki experience. Although enwiki issues != wikimedia issues unlike some of the enwiki users think, situation right now there with the user doesn't seem to be completely resolved. Zerabat (discusión) 12:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  99. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vachovec1 (talk) 01:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  100. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   a×pdeHello! 06:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  101. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Frīheidasliova (talk) 09:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  102. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Per above. Jules78120 (talk) 13:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  103. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Thank you for service but the role probably needs more crosswiki experience. -Xbony2 (talk) 14:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  104. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   DePlusJean (talk) 00:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Ferran Mir (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Wischmat (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahveotm (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Openskye (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Quickfingers (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   FeralOink (talk) 10:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 13:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Elvesham (talk) 22:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Unsure of his conflict and temperament issues... Stevenmitchell (talk) 12:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   BugWarp (talk) 13:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC) I trust this user, but with all the points made above I don't know what to say.
  12. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:28, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Seems good but has a few mistakes Potatornado (talk) 15:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   User's explanation seems reasonable enough, but event really a little too recent for my comfort. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   GZWDer (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Anbans 585 (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Stephan1000000 (talk) 19:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Cyberpower678[edit]

Cyberpower678 talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: en, de
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi, I'm Cyberpower678. I didn't initially plan on running for stewardship, but after some words of encouragement, I decided to throw my name into the hat. I am an administrator on the English Wikipedia, as well as a global renamer. While I haven't been very active in global renaming lately, I have been very active developing InternetArchiveBot, and moving to deploy it cross wiki. I've started picking up on my renaming activities, however. My development of IABot and engaging with different language communities have definitely broadened my understanding of different cultures on different language Wikipedias, as well as partially learn new languages.  :-)


    My activity is mostly on the technical side things, so if elected, I will of course continue work on rename requests, and carry out more complex requests that requires a steward to perform. In addition to that, I will also monitor the requests to globally lock and/or unlock accounts. The rename queue has been getting abused by an LTA. Obviously my steward experience is limited, but I'm not one to hastily push buttons when I'm new to something, and will of course work with other stewards to ensure I don't end up locking everyone. :-)—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 18:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Cyberpower678
Emblem-important.svg
If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2018|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. My name is not dave (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Can certainly be trusted. Was thinking crat, but this is good enough. My name is not dave (talk) 14:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   A bit of an unconventional candidate, but in the process of getting their bot approved crosswiki they likely have more crosswiki experience than some past successful steward candidates. I've gone through some of their recent enwiki admin actions and liked what I saw. Rschen7754 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. -revi (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   — regards, Revi 14:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Stïnger (会話) 14:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC).
  5. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TonyBallioni (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --cyrfaw (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. WQL (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   WQL 14:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   The comments of MF-Warburg are worrisome, but in any case, I would prefer to assume good faith. He has done a good job as a global renamer and I do not think there are any problems while doing things with caution and asking questions before doing anything. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Trusted, knowledgeable user. Miniapolis 14:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Ferran Mir (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Rxy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   per Rschen7754's comment. rxy (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   demonstrates unwavering commitment to the free content model, operating the InternetArchiveBot and working with the Internet Archive to make content more readily available and accessible to our users. There is a long and extensive track record of competence in undertaking +sysop level tasks on English Wikipedia and in undertaking global renaming functions. Nick (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Wischmat (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 15:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. SQL (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   SQLQuery me! 15:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. SoWhy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   SoWhy 16:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Known user, enough expierence to be a stew Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Despite the lack of cross-wikiness I like what I see, can trust the user and agree that the bot is something Kostas20142 (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Cameron11598 (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. BU Rob13 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   ~ Rob13Talk 19:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. Zoranzoki21 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Zoranzoki21 (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I trust him to do the job. Lepricavark (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
    Fanjiayi (Not eligible, checked by MacFan4000)   --Fanjiayi (talk) 03:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Shizhao (talk) 03:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. Csyogi (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Csyogi (talk) 05:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Thanks for your efforts on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 06:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Probably will be a fine steward. I do worry about them over-extending their commitments though. Legoktm (talk) 09:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Gereon K. (talk) 10:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   strong yes! --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  32. Faendalimas (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 11:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  33. LIVE NIEUWS (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Friendly, helpful and very active user. Also does good technical work cross-wiki. Livenws (talk) 11:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  34. Pelz (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Pelz (talk) 12:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  35. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TomášPolonec (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  36. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Jon Kolbert)2018   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  37. KrakatoaKatie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Katietalk 15:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  38. Winged Blades of Godric (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Enough trusted, competent and helpful.Why not?! Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  39. FriedhelmW (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   FriedhelmW (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  40. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Luke081515 20:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  41. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Holder (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  42. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   His technical skills might be very helpful to our steward team. Furthermore he's trusted and competent, so I see no reason to oppose. Trijnsteltalk 22:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  43. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  44. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  45. Vermont (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Vermont (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  46. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Quickfingers (talk) 01:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  47. Apap04 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Apap04 (talk) 04:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  48. Premeditated Chaos (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Premeditated Chaos (talk) 06:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  49. Siddiqsazzad001 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Nice explained to new users Siddiqsazzad001 (talk) 13:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  50. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Very technical editor, Easy support. –Davey2010Talk 15:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  51. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   DENAMAX (talk) 20:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  52. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Great floors (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  53. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Steinsplitter (talk) 20:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  54. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Wikifreund (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  55. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  56. Govindaharihari (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   trust this user with the advasnced permissions Govindaharihari (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  57. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Lanwi1(talk) 22:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  58. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Rzuwig 22:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  59. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Elvesham (talk) 22:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
    Fanjiayi (Not eligible, checked by MacFan4000)   --Fanjiayi (talk) 02:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  60. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Trusted user. Wolverène (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  61. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Ankry (talk) 07:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  62. Darylgolden (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Darylgolden (talk) 08:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  63. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wae35244 (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  64. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  65. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Eddie891 (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  66. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   It appears that the candidate is qualified and will make a contribution to the responsibilities and duties of a steward, so I vote Yes. Stevenmitchell (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  67. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Bff (talk) 14:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  68. Bluemel1 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Bluemel1 (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  69. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Filipović Zoran (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  70. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  71. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MZaplotnik(talk) 16:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  72. Sigma'am (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ar sog 16:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  73. CambridgeBayWeather (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  74. SlimVirgin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   SarahSV talk 16:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  75. Chrisaliv (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Chrisaliv (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  76. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I voted neutral but I would like to change this to support. This person is an organized communicator. They pulled reams of documentation from the either to address an issue I raised. I had an isolated hiccup of an experience connecting with them which I described below but we just had a far-ranging conversation that convinced me that this person can deliver complicated feedback on short notice. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  77. DHeyward (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   --DHeyward (talk) 19:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  78. Carlsrator (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Carlsrator (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  79. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Ciao • Bestoernesto 22:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  80. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  81. Telaneo (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Telaneo (User talk page) 00:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  82. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Stüard olması üçün mövcud fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edərək, onu dəstəkləyirəm. Düşünürəm ki, faydalı işlər görəcək. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  83. Yeza (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Yeza (talk) 08:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  84. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 09:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  85. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Absolutely YES. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  86. NickK (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Weak support, good technical skills and did not see any obvious red flags — NickK (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  87. Kojie (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Kojie (Tell me) 17:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  88. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  89. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Seems a good candidate, minor concerns aside, with a lot of potential that Stewarship should provide opportunities for: should be encouraged! --YodinT 20:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  90. Kein Einstein (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Kein Einstein (talk) 21:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  91. Atsme (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Atsme📞📧 03:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
    Ansumang (Not eligible, checked by علاء)   Encountered him many times in the past. Very Helpful. -- ɑηsuмaη «Talk» 13:33, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  92. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   TJH2018talk 16:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  93. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   GZWDer (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  94. MaynardClark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MaynardClark (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  95. Airbornemihir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Airbornemihir (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  96. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  97. UpsandDowns1234 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Cyberpower678 is pretty good with code, is an admin on English Wikipedia, and is obviously one who has an understanding of global policies. Ups and Downs () 02:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  98. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Trustworthy. Being a Steward will not be bad for him. 1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  99. Amortias (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Amortias (talk) 11:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
    Alioreks (Not eligible, checked by Defender)   Alioreks (talk) 16:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  100. Debenben (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Debenben (talk) 21:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  101. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Yes, by all means! Dolotta (talk) 22:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  102. BD2412 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   An excellent Wikipedian. BD2412 T 00:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  103. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Liridon (talk) 12:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  104. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   –Ammarpad (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  105. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Gripweed (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  106. Complainer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Complainer (talk) 16:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  107. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   The cross-wiki experience is good. Anbans 585 (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  108. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Zabia (talk) 19:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  109. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  110. Fish and karate (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Fish and karate (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  111. ThePlatypusofDoom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  112. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ghilt (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  113. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vachovec1 (talk) 01:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  114. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   a×pdeHello! 06:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  115. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Frīheidasliova (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  116. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Per Trijnstel. Jules78120 (talk) 13:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  117. Biplab Anand (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   per Rschen7754 Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  118. Superyetkin (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Superyetkin (talk) 16:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   In the statement, I don't see a reason why Cyberpower678 is candidating as steward. I also don't see a reason why I should support him. Even though he is a global renamer, he is not really active cross-wiki - surprisingly, 92% of his edits are on enwiki; of the rest, several of course come from page moves effected by global renames or edits related to the bot he mentions in his request. This bot does not have much relationship to stewards' work however. What is more, I perceive Cyberpower as a quite immature person. Often I see supposedly funny jokes from him (e.g. on the global-renamers mailing list) which do not serve any purpose except making people cringe. MF-W 14:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC) Addition: Supporting the proposed removal of an oppose vote against him in an ongoing election is really bad taste. --MF-W 13:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I'm not really convinced by this nomination, nor are there any significant xwiki contributions besides some bot requests and performed global renames, as far as I can see. —Vogone (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. KPFC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I can neither recognize a sufficient cross-wiki activity nor does his nomination per se convince me – KPFC💬 14:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Thank you for your volunteer work, but I don't think you have enough cross-wiki experience. Érico (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I would like to see more cross-wiki experience. Eurodyne (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Would like to see more administrative experience first (~1 year sysop experience on 1 project so far) — xaosflux Talk 15:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Leaky caldron (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Continues to demonstrate absolute commitment, but I fear over-stretching ability and just a hint of seeking to collect qualifications Leaky caldron (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Insufficient cross wiki experience Herby talk thyme 18:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Milad A380 talk 20:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Ibrahim.ID (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   he is very active global renamer and trusted user, but his admin activity in Enwiki is too small (236 in 2017!) and that make a concern, his contributions is 23k only since 2011 (~91% in Enwiki only) with low activity in other project, I think it's early to be steward, bot developing isn't enough Ibrahim.ID 20:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Jcc (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per my question, where he disclosed private information on en.wiki; his reply was that "I wasn't the only one to do it". Given that stewards are expected to handle private content on a daily basis, I have to oppose. Additionally- little admin experience as pointed out by others. Jcc (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    I personally find it unfair that from my answer to you, all you took from it were the last two sentences, and then using that as a justification to oppose. I can accept your reasoning of little admin experience, and I respect it, but I do wish my answer wasn't being taken out of context.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 21:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    @Cyberpower678: Not unfair at all- in fact, had you stopped your answer at "yes, I messed up", I would be on the other side right now. But no, instead, you wrote "I messed up...but someone else did it too!". I'm happy to discuss this more on my talk page. Jcc (talk) 11:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
    Cyberpower has clarified that it wasn't obvious that the public didn't have access to rename requests. Jcc (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Not enough cross-wiki[ness] for me, sorry. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Lack of cross-wiki behaviour, despite the ongoing development of IABot. hiàn 22:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Az1568 (talk) 04:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   --Krd 08:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   per MF-W DCB (talk) 11:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
    Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Need more experience... Alex Pereira falaê 13:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Alex Shih (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   One of the most highly skilled technical user on en.wiki, but I am not too sure if their temperament is suitable to be steward, sorry. Alex Shih (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Bbb23 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Helpful technically on en.wiki but too green to become a steward.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Sagaciousphil (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Sagaciousphil (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   —Ah3kal (talk) 13:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   out of principle I can’t support the expansion of the Stewardry until (1) there exists a council for global ban/lock (non-WMF bans) appeals made up of users who are not sitting-stewards, or a global UTRS system to address global locks and bans as the current stewards clearly don't want discussions from globally banned/blocked users to stand, (2) stewards actually start following policy like “If they create new accounts and are not disruptive with those accounts, they will not be locked again merely because it is discovered that they were previously globally locked.”, and (3) when there’s a clear policy when global locks can be used for non-vandalism only accounts (e.g. Registered for shorter a month, having less than 500 edits, Etc.) as plenty of potentially constructive users with one bad day are locked out of their accounts and many will never return while actual trolls don't really care about such measures (the Nipponese dog, the Incorrible Troll, Etc.) Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. Hhhhhkohhhhh (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 04:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ~ℳɑrio (talk) 07:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Per MF-Warburg. No (explicit) need for steward access stated. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Not cross-wiki enough. (However, I must note that I saw him "grow" a lot by operating his InternetArchiveBot on multiple languages, interacting with the respective communities and working hard to meet their needs. So I can understand why the fact is mentioned in the statement.) Nemo 11:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Little cross-wiki experience. Though the potential here is great as because of IA user does deal with other wikis, so this situation where only in 4 wikis user has 100 edits might change. --Base (talk) 13:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Base (talk) 13:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
    TheDoormouse (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   TheDoormouse (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. Howan Hansi (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Howan Hansi (talk) 19:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Per MF-W. SPQRobin (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. Dennis Brown (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Per xaosflux and others. Nice enough guy, good tech guy, but little experience using the tools with actual people and not a lot of crosswiki experience. I can see supporting in the future but this is a bit soon. Dennis Brown (talk) 01:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. Informationswiedergutmachung (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 03:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  32. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Freddy2001 talk 16:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  33. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Per MF-W above. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  34. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Slowking4 (talk) 13:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  35. Power~enwiki (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   There's no compelling need for the tools, and limited administrative experience. In particular, I think being a steward will be a hindrance to rolling out IABot on other projects. power~enwiki (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
    Eks-istifadəçi (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Per MF Warburg Eks-istifadəçi (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  36. Widr (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Too early, unfortunately. Widr (talk) 17:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  37. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   This isn't a "never", but a "not now". The statement here needs work - the candidate doesn't have much experience in steward areas, and doesn't specify what they bring to the table as it pertains to this role. Most of what they discuss can be done with their existing global renamer permission. I think that after a year of being active in cross-wiki work, and continuing to gain administrative experience on their home project, Cyber would be in a position to use the steward tools well. – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  38. Risk Engineer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Risk Engineer (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  39. Coffee (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Opposes are too convincing. Coffee // have a cup // 20:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  40. Allforrous (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Allforrous (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahir256 (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per both side. I couldn't make a strong decision. *Youngjin (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   To much doubt, but I don't vote 'no'. Richardkiwi (talk) 20:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahveotm (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Openskye (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    I am a huge fan of this person's work with the IABot but in the past I had some questions about their projects and they declined to talk. I do not mind anyone delaying discussion or even if they heard me out saying that they would take my comments but be unable to act. Instead the user just said that talking is not an option even on their wiki page. I was a bit confused by the exchange but in any case, I am sure that for a steward I want people who are like beacons for communication. Talking to the general public, including people like me who might be clueless and asking dumb questions, is part of the steward role. Not sure what is on Cyberpower's mind in wanting to be steward but obviously this person has lots of talent which might be better spent with something other than newbie and clueless user requests. I see in their statement that they have identified a category of technical problems which they think they can manage, and which others might not manage. I do trust that if Cyberpower wants steward rights to be able to do that, then they would be a benefit and a success in that role. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Come back after more experience and a bit more cross-wiki collaboration. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Simplexity22 (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 13:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Andyboorman (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Communicate more and try next year Andyboorman (talk) 22:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Alzinous (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   BugWarp (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   B20180 (talk) 14:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Potatornado (talk) 15:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   per user Richardkiwi. Garam (talk) 08:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Storkk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Lacking in xwiki experience, but not enough for me to oppose. Storkk (talk) 13:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Stephan1000000 (talk) 19:58, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   -Xbony2 (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   DePlusJean (talk) 00:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Faendalimas[edit]

Faendalimas talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: en-N, pt-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Real Name Scott Thomson. Meta Userpage Faendalimas. Wikispecies user page Faendalimas. I have been active on Wikipedia EN and Wikispecies for over 10 years. On Wikispecies I am a Bureaucrat and a CheckUser. On Wikispecies I developed the CheckUser pages I also have managed the active versus inactive admins. This has resulted in my applying on several occasions to Meta for removal of privelages. I spend significant time mediating issues that come up and have also been involved in the Wikipedia Copywrite cleanup, OTRS etc. In the course of my adminstrative activities I have had to go to Stewards on a number of occasions. As a CheckUser I have already signed the confidentiality agreements.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Faendalimas
Emblem-important.svg
If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2018|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Someone must be the first to vote Yes. :) Richardkiwi (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Gereon K. (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   The result is obvious, but I'm voting 'yes' as a moral support. Actually I've just never seen the candidate. Wolverène (talk) 11:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TomášPolonec (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahveotm (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Andyboorman (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   A foregone conclusion, but I would like to offer support in a developmental manner.. Andyboorman (talk) 10:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   FeralOink (talk) 10:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Great floors (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Thor Dockweiler (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Thor Dockweiler (talk) 03:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wae35244 (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Despite the uncertainty of his low contribution rate (which may have been very periodic and is not to visible non-admins) and some of his misunderstanding of a steward's role, I am voting yes because I think he can still contribute effectively. Stevenmitchell (talk) 13:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Bff (talk) 14:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   HalanTul (talk) 21:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Ciao • Bestoernesto 22:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Düşünürəm ki, faydalı işlər görə biləcək. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Filipović Zoran (talk) 15:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 12:02, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Spasage (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Spasage (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. Litev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Litev (talk) 12:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
    Eks-istifadəçi (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Moral support Eks-istifadəçi (talk) 13:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Complainer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Complainer (talk) 16:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   a×pdeHello! 06:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. M.Tarnowski (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   M.Tarnowski (talk) 12:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. Risk Engineer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Risk Engineer (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  Canvassing, no thanks, and it shows a severe lack of understanding of what being a steward is. 6,387 edits is also not that much (for perspective, he would have the lowest number of edits of any steward by around 4300 edits, and yes I was annoyed enough at the canvassing to figure that number out), Also the answer to MF-Warburg's question is wrong, stewards are not a global ArbCom. Rschen7754 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  --Stïnger (会話) 14:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC).
  3. KPFC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   per his answers, which show a huge misunderstanding of steward work – KPFC💬 14:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018  I'm sorry, I know and I've seen the work he does as administrator, bureaucrat and checkuser in Wikispecies (and the truth is good), but I do not think he's even ready to be steward. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  --cyrfaw (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TonyBallioni (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   From his statement, I don't see why he is candidating for steward except that he has made some requests to stewards in the past. They are however of such nature that he couldn't execute them himself as a steward. Also, I am flabbergasted by the reply to my question in which he suggests that, faced with a conflict on a local wiki with wheelwarring admins, he would - instead of the first and only thing that might be possible, namely to emergency-desysop admins gone rogue - (ab)use his steward rights in order to send warnings and issue blocks to people based on special enwiki policies (e.g. the "3RR", 3-revert-rule, which is hardly known outsite of enwiki). Wanting to help to mediate in a conflict is nice and well, but coming along and imposing a whole process of bureaucracy on a community backed by steward tools is not. --MF-W 14:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Ferran Mir (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   The answer to the questions (especially to MF-Warburg's) makes it clear to me that the steward role has not been understood sufficiently. —Vogone (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Thank you for your volunteer work, but I don't think you have enough cross-wiki experience. Érico (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I would like to see more cross-wiki experience. Eurodyne (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Artix Kreiger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Among the other users comments, no cross-wiki experience --Artix Kreiger (Message Wall) 15:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I'm afraid that they're not the capable and competent user they portray themselves to be. Their answers to questions and their canvassing would suggest more experience is needed in order to bring them up to the level of experience needed Stewards are expected to have. Nick (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Herby talk thyme 15:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Not enough xwiki experience, administrative experience on 1 project - but with limited actions. — xaosflux Talk 16:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Steinsplitter (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per MF-W, some key knowledge and experience is lacking here. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 17:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per Nick --Cameron11598 (talk) 17:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I will definitely assume good faith regarding the canvassing mentioned above. However I would like to see more cross-wiki participation, or at least something exceptional that will convince me to support before doing so. Don't let this discourage you, just thank you for your participation in Wikimedia so far! Kostas20142 (talk) 17:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per above *Youngjin (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Milad A380 talk 20:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Nihlus 21:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   per above, sorry. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. Devraj poudel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Devraj poudel (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Az1568 (talk) 04:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018  --Krd 07:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Need more training for cross-wiki experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 08:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Legoktm (talk) 09:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  32. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  33. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   his answers shows a huge misunderstanding of steward work DCB (talk) 11:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
    Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Alex Pereira falaê 13:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  34. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Jon Kolbert)2018   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  35. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  36. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Holder (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  37. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Simplexity22 (talk) 20:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  38. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  39. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Quickfingers (talk) 02:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  40. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  41. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   —Ah3kal (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  42. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   No crosswiki experience. –Davey2010Talk 15:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  43. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   out of principle I can’t support the expansion of the Stewardry until (1) there exists a council for global ban/lock (non-WMF bans) appeals made up of users who are not sitting-stewards, or a global UTRS system to address global locks and bans as the current stewards clearly don't want discussions from globally banned/blocked users to stand, (2) stewards actually start following policy like “If they create new accounts and are not disruptive with those accounts, they will not be locked again merely because it is discovered that they were previously globally locked.”, and (3) when there’s a clear policy when global locks can be used for non-vandalism only accounts (e.g. Registered for shorter a month, having less than 500 edits, Etc.) as plenty of potentially constructive users with one bad day are locked out of their accounts and many will never return while actual trolls don't really care about such measures (the Nipponese dog, the Incorrible Troll, Etc.) Also this user has around half of the number of edits I have. Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  44. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   DENAMAX (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  45. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Rzuwig 22:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  46. MarioFinale (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ~ℳɑrio (talk) 07:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  47. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   No need for steward access stated, and canvassing is a no-no. Just because a wiki has no member of their community as steward does not itself support a candidacy for steward access. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  48. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Eddie891 (talk) 13:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  49. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Very limited scope experience. Wikispecies is a very isolated and unique project, while on other wikis user is no prominent contributor. --Base (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Base (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  50. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   BugWarp (talk) 13:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  51. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  52. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Buggia 09:55, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  53. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Low edits, less experience Potatornado (talk) 15:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  54. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Freddy2001 talk 16:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  55. NickK (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Per Rschen7754 — NickK (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  56. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   StevenJ81 (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  57. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  58. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  59. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  60. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Slowking4 (talk) 13:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  61. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2018   Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  62. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Inept candidate, mediocre answers, unethical canvassing. But above all that, the candidate appears to misunderstand Stewards work in totality. –Ammarpad (talk) 13:15, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  63. Storkk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Storkk (talk) 13:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  64. Ibrahim.ID (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   No crosswiki experience and your contributions in your project is too small (~3k only)! Ibrahim.ID 14:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  65. De728631 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   De728631 (talk) 20:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  66. OJJ (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   ↑ --OJJ (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  67. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Frīheidasliova (talk) 08:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  68. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Statement to short. And per above. Jules78120 (talk) 13:26, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  69. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   -Xbony2 (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  70. Allforrous (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Allforrous (talk) 22:19, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Wischmat (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Definitely a trusted user; low number of cross-wiki edits concerns me. hiàn 22:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Openskye (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 13:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Elvesham (talk) 22:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Alzinous (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   B20180 (talk) 14:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 09:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Seems trustworthy, but concerned by his "interventionist" approach to MFW's question. --YodinT 21:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   GZWDer (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Power~enwiki (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   power~enwiki (talk) 03:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   per both sides. Garam (talk) 08:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Liridon (talk) 12:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Anbans 585 (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Zabia (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Ankry (talk) 10:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Stephan1000000 (talk) 19:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vachovec1 (talk) 02:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Cyberpower678 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mostly per the opposers, I am sitting here. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 18:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   DePlusJean (talk) 00:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Green Giant[edit]

Green_Giant talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: en-N, fr-2, de-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    User:Green Giant (Meta) and c:User:Green Giant (Commons). I have been active on several Wikimedia wikis on and off for twelve years. There are several gaps in activity, mainly due to work commitments but I am now able to devote more time to volunteering. Currently I have been given the privilege of three trusted permissions. I have been an OTRS volunteer since September 2014 (I have signed the confidentiality agreements), a Commons Administrator since October 2014, and an English Wikiversity Curator since April 2017. The links to check these are on my main userpage. Usually, I try to split my time between Commons, English Wikipedia and English Wikiversity plus some OTRS activities. Some of the crosswiki work I have done in the past or currently do can be viewed on my user subpage at User:Green Giant/Work, including transferring PD or licensed files to Commons from other wikis and trying to fix the summaries of those that cannot go to Commons. Some of my work on Commons itself includes deletion requests, changing permissions for users and some blocking of disruptive users. In particular I try to give such users an opportunity to change their actions by encouraging them to use their talk pages constructively, which I think is often the key to ameliorating vandalism. For anybody who is interested I am and have been a content creator on several wikis including articles on English Wikipedia and images on Commons, but one of my current projects is to improve the coverage of English Law on Wikiversity and Wikibooks.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Green_Giant
Emblem-important.svg
If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2018|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  good crosswiki experience (admin on two medium-large wikis) and seems to have the right mindset with most questions (except for that of MF-Warburg). Rschen7754 14:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  Definitely! Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  --cyrfaw (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Jdx (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   jdx Re: 14:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   I think he is a reliable user to perform this task. The answer to the question from MF-Warburg was not very accurate, but in the rest of the aspects, I do not see anything that could interfere with his possible performance as steward. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. SA 13 Bro (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   SA 13 Bro (talk) 14:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Érico (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Wischmat (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I'm familiar with Green Giant primarily through their work on Commons, where they have the +sysop permission, and where they have shown themselves to be a competent, friendly and helpful administrator. Their crosswiki work is excellent and the answers to the questions are sensible and pragmatic. Nick (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahir256 (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Through my own work in CVU and SWV I think that "give such users an opportunity to change their actions by encouraging them to use their talk pages constructively" never works out for good, but I can deal with non-believers :) enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 18:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Christian Ferrer (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   *Youngjin (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Milad A380 talk 20:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Richardkiwi (talk) 20:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Working with this user on en.wikiversity an en.wikibooks has always been a pleasure. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   hiàn 22:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I cannot speak to this person's multilingual ability, which I feel is a priority for stewards, and I always hesitate to support stewards with English emphasis. Still I confirm that this user knows Commons and file media very well and would be a trusted choice. Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. JMGM (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   JMGM (talk) 02:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Artix Kreiger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Artix Kreiger (Message Wall) 03:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Thanks for your efforts on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 06:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Legoktm (talk) 09:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Gereon K. (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Experienced user. --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. Faendalimas (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 11:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   DCB (talk) 11:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TomášPolonec (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
    Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Alex Pereira falaê 13:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Herby talk thyme 14:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Jon Kolbert)2018   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  32. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Trusted and competent Ankry (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  33. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Holder (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  34. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   I know him as a friendly, trusted and hardworking Commons admin. So he will probably a fine steward as well. Trijnsteltalk 22:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  35. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  36. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  37. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Quickfingers (talk) 02:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  38. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Good temperament and cross-wiki experience, and a willingness to learn in the areas where he lacks experience. – Ajraddatz (talk) 05:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  39. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Trusted admin, See him around at Commons and as far as I know never has any issues, No red flags here. –Davey2010Talk 15:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  40. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  41. Kghbln (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   [[kgh]] (talk) 18:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  42. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   DENAMAX (talk) 20:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  43. Majora (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Majora (talk) 21:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  44. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Lanwi1(talk) 22:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  45. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Rzuwig 22:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  46. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Elvesham (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  47. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Good luck! Wolverène (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  48. SQL (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   SQLQuery me! 03:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  49. Athaenara (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Green Giant seems to have earned considerable trust and not abused it, I hope that continues. Athaenara (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  50. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wae35244 (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  51. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Ruthven (talk) 10:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  52. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  53. Soul Train (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Soul Train (talk) 12:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  54. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Eddie891 (talk) 13:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  55. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   The Banner (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  56. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   BugWarp (talk) 13:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  57. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   B20180 (talk) 14:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  58. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Bff (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  59. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  60. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  61. Raymond Gelow (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Raymond Gelow (talk) 17:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  62. FrankyLeRoutier (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 04:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  63. RadiX (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Candidate looks fine to me. Very knowledgeable answers to questions and enough experience imo. RadiX 05:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  64. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Stüard olması üçün mövcud fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edərək, onu dəstəkləyirəm. Düşünürəm ki, yaxşı işlər görəcək. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  65. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 09:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  66. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Good cross-wiki profile Potatornado (talk) 15:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  67. NickK (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Good experience — NickK (talk) 17:40, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  68. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  69. Epìdosis (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Epìdosis 20:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  70. Sj (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Excellent contrib history. SJ talk  21:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  71. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Some concerns over response to MF-W, but overall seems a very good choice. Also taken by the balanced by pro transparency stance on WMF. Good luck! --YodinT 21:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  72. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  73. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Eager Lin (Message) 00:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  74. Mu301 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2018   Experienced and fine work cross-wiki; I trust and strongly support this candidacy. mikeu talk 00:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  75. Sammyday (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Sammyday (talk) 09:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  76. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Filipović Zoran (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  77. Jameslwoodward (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018        Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  78. Muadabuali (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Muadabuali (talk) 17:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  79. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Happy to support. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  80. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   GZWDer (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  81. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  82. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   OTRS is great enough, at least, for me. 1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  83. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2018   Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  84. Sänger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Grüße vom Sänger ♫(Reden) 17:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  85. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  86. Dave Braunschweig (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Dave Braunschweig (talk) 03:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  87. Power~enwiki (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   power~enwiki (talk) 03:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  88. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  89. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   per AlvaroMolina and Yodin. Garam (talk) 09:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  90. Litev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Litev (talk) 12:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  91. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   –Ammarpad (talk) 13:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  92. Storkk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Storkk (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
    Manusurmars (Not eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)   Manusurmars (talk) 14:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  93. Inatan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Inatan (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  94. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Anbans 585 (talk) 18:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  95. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Zabia (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  96. De728631 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   De728631 (talk) 20:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  97. OJJ (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Why not? --OJJ (talk) 15:50, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  98. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ghilt (talk) 16:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  99. Sombresprit (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Sombresprit (talk) 23:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  100. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vachovec1 (talk) 02:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  101. Fitindia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018    FITINDIA  03:39, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  102. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Frīheidasliova (talk) 08:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  103. M.Tarnowski (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   M.Tarnowski (talk) 12:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  104. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   -Xbony2 (talk) 14:54, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  105. Widr (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Widr (talk) 15:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  106. Superyetkin (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Superyetkin (talk) 16:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  107. Risk Engineer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Appreciate the Wikiversity work! ... Risk Engineer (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  108. Cyberpower678 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 18:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  109. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   DePlusJean (talk) 00:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TonyBallioni (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Az1568 (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   --Krd 08:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Not convinced.
  4. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   —Ah3kal (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   out of principle I can’t support the expansion of the Stewardry until (1) there exists a council for global ban/lock (non-WMF bans) appeals made up of users who are not sitting-stewards, or a global UTRS system to address global locks and bans as the current stewards clearly don't want discussions from globally banned/blocked users to stand, (2) stewards actually start following policy like “If they create new accounts and are not disruptive with those accounts, they will not be locked again merely because it is discovered that they were previously globally locked.”, and (3) when there’s a clear policy when global locks can be used for non-vandalism only accounts (e.g. Registered for shorter a month, having less than 500 edits, Etc.) as plenty of potentially constructive users with one bad day are locked out of their accounts and many will never return while actual trolls don't really care about such measures (the Nipponese dog, the Incorrible Troll, Etc.) Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Great floors (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Ciao • Bestoernesto 22:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Slowking4 (talk) 13:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   a×pdeHello! 06:01, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Allforrous (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Allforrous (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  --Stïnger (会話) 14:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC).
  2. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Ferran Mir (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vogone (talk) 14:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Eurodyne (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   On the edge here, may revisit. — xaosflux Talk 16:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Nihlus 21:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Openskye (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Devraj poudel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Devraj poudel (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 13:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   The described cross-wiki experience is nice, but does not pertain specifically to tools such as CheckUser and Oversight, both of which are nontrivial to use. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahveotm (talk) 11:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   The user has a cross-wiki interest and recently got involved in Meta-Wiki, but I've not yet checked the level of experience. Sitting here for now. Nemo 11:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Alzinous (talk) 12:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 14:51, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. VIGNERON (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   VIGNERON * discut. 07:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Liridon (talk) 12:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Complainer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Complainer (talk) 16:53, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Stephan1000000 (talk) 19:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Rxy[edit]

Rxy talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: ja-N, en-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, everyone. I'm rxy (formerly known as Hosiryuhosi). This is my second run for steward election (First is 2016).

    I joinned to Japanese Wikipedia in 2008, and I'm active sysop at Japanese Wikipedia. In addition to this, I joined to SWMT in 2010, then I appointed as the global-sysop in Dec 2011. However, I resigned that for busy in real world in Oct 2014. After that, I returned at Japanese Wikipedia as temporary sysop for suppressed massive vandalism (log) in Jan 2016. With this, I returned as SWMT member and global sysop too.

    Previously, I served as bureaucrat in Japanese Wikipedia, and served as sysop in meta and wikidata.

    In related with SWMT, I am one of the CVN staff, I manage CVNBots and IRC channels. This bots is used in SWMT.

    In the last year, I suppressed massive open proxy attacks at Russian wiktionary (History of wikt:ru:MediaWiki:Titleblacklist / block logs). If I had a steward permissions, I can able to global block quickly for those open proxies in this case.

    Thank you for reading my statement.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Rxy
Emblem-important.svg
If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2018|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Definitely! Excellent candidate and we need more Asian stewards. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Rxy has years of countervandalism experience crosswiki, and can be trusted with private information. Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Rxy is the best candidate for steward. 幸運を! --Stïnger (会話) 14:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC).
  4. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Trusted user, suitable for steward tools. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. KPFC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   trusted user – KPFC💬 14:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --cyrfaw (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Known and trusted cross-wiki user, also gave good answers to the questions. I am sure he will do well as a steward. --MF-W 14:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. -revi (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   — regards, Revi 14:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Y-dash (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Y-dash 14:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   幸運を! --Vogone (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Érico (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Great candidate! Eurodyne (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Cyberpower678 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 15:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Rxy may not have quite the extensive level of recent crosswiki experience that some candidates have, but their experience on their local project, the Japanese Wikipedia, has been of a very high level, demonstrating competency and capabilities we would look for in Stewards. Their previous global sysop access was well used and provided a benefit to wider WMF-sphere. Not that one needs an extra reason to support, but I also note Rxy is in an area globally where extra Stewards would be very helpful, in terms of time zones and in language skills. Nick (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahir256 (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Waggie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Waggie (talk) 16:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   — xaosflux Talk 16:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Steinsplitter (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Good cross-wiki experience and temperament for the role. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Stryn (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Stryn (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Cameron11598 (talk) 17:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Pamputt (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Stewards who speak Japanese are more than welcomed. Pamputt (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   *Youngjin (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 19:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   rxy has a long track record of ably contributing to many projects including small wikis and in my opinion would be a great asset to the Steward team. Snowolf How can I help? 19:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Linedwell [talk] 19:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vituzzu (talk) 20:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Milad A380 talk 20:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Steward before. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  32. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   hiàn 22:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  33. DarwIn (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   - Darwin Ahoy! 01:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  34. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  35. Devraj poudel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Devraj poudel (talk) 02:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  36. JMGM (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   JMGM (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  37. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Shizhao (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  38. Tulsi Bhagat (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Good luck ! although you've not replied me on IRC. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  39. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Az1568 (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  40. Csyogi (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Csyogi (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  41. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018  --Krd 07:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  42. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   MoiraMoira (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  43. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Legoktm (talk) 09:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  44. RadiX (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Should have been elected in 2016 already. RadiX 10:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  45. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   DCB (talk) 11:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  46. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  47. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TomášPolonec (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  48. MOs810 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   MOs810 (talk) 13:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
    Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Alex Pereira falaê 13:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  49. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Jon Kolbert)2018   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  50. ぱたごん (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   ぱたごん (talk) 15:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  51. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Natuur12 (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  52. Jayprakash12345 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Jayprakash >>> Talk 19:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  53. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Holder (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  54. Alex Shih (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Alex Shih (talk) 20:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  55. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Simplexity22 (talk) 20:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  56. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Rxy should have been promoted as steward two years ago. I still think he's trusted, active and will add, as he speaks Japanese, useful skills to our steward team. Trijnsteltalk 22:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  57. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  58. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  59. Haifun999 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Haifun999 (talk) 01:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  60. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Quickfingers (talk) 02:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  61. Krinkle (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Krinkle (talk) 06:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  62. 隼鷹 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   母語が非欧米言語の人間が必要 隼鷹 (talk) 09:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  63. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Why not? ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 13:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  64. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   —Ah3kal (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  65. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Seems a trusted user, I see no red flags here –Davey2010Talk 15:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  66. Aleator (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Aleator (talk) 17:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  67. Kghbln (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   [[kgh]] (talk) 18:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  68. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   DENAMAX (talk) 20:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  69. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Great floors (talk) 20:33, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  70. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Lanwi1(talk) 22:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  71. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Rzuwig 22:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  72. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Elvesham (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  73. Olsi (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Olsi (talk) 23:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  74. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Good luck! Wolverène (talk) 03:34, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  75. Thor Dockweiler (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Thor Dockweiler (talk) 03:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  76. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Ankry (talk) 07:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  77. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   This is only a weak vote in support as it has been many years since my last direct interaction with him. However, when I did know him, I knew I could trust him and his experience, and I am glad to see he has continued countervandalism work despite the inactivity of SWMT these days. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:08, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  78. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wae35244 (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  79. メルビル (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   melvil (talk) 09:33, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  80. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  81. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Veracious (talk) 12:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  82. Kingbjelica (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wish you success. Kingbjelica (talk) 12:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  83. Soul Train (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Soul Train (talk) 12:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  84. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Eddie891 (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  85. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   BugWarp (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  86. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   B20180 (talk) 14:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  87. Bluemel1 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Bluemel1 (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  88. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  89. Braveheart (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Braveheart (talk) 15:34, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  90. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  91. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Bff (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  92. Rmir2 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Rmir2 (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  93. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   This user has wiki social recognition in their home project and cross-language technical experience. Also globally the wiki movement has sought to elevate and encourage anyone editing in Japanese language. I wish this user the best. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  94. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Maleine258 (talk) 21:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  95. 고솜 (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   고솜 (talk) 00:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  96. 285Sunlize (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   I wish for your better activities. Good luck! 285Sunlize (talk) 00:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  97. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Stüard olması üçün mövcud fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edərək, onu dəstəkləyirəm. Layiqli namizəddir. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  98. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Eager Lin (Message) 08:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  99. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 09:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  100. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   If the number of acronyms he uses that are unfamiliar to me is any indication of how good of a steward he will be, I vote yes Potatornado (talk) 15:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  101. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Freddy2001 talk 16:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  102. NickK (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   I already supported back in 2016, my opinion did not change since then. There is still good experience and useful knowledge of Asian region and inactivity was already quite a while ago — NickK (talk) 17:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  103. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  104. Epìdosis (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Epìdosis 20:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  105. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Seems a good choice, and experienced at dealing with vandalism, and should help the balance of globally active Stewards. --YodinT 21:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  106. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  107. Frank Schulenburg (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  108. Sammyday (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Sammyday (talk) 09:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  109. Qolcomaq (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Qolcomaq (talk) 10:09, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  110. Balabinrm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Balabinrm (talk) 10:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  111. W.CC (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   W.CC (talk) 13:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  112. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Filipović Zoran (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  113. Muadabuali (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Muadabuali (talk) 17:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  114. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Solid candidate. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  115. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   GZWDer (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  116. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  117. Artix Kreiger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Artix Kreiger (Message Wall) 22:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  118. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  119. Kurihaya (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Kurihaya (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  120. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Żyrafał (talk) 08:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  121. ExpressGifu (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   ExpressGifu (talk) 13:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  122. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   We need more people who can speak non-Indo-European languages. メータには印欧語族の外の言語ができる人がもっと必要だと思う。このまま頑張ってください! Garam (talk) 09:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  123. ネイ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ネイ (talk) 10:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  124. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Liridon (talk) 12:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  125. Ibrahim.ID (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Ibrahim.ID 14:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  126. Inatan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Inatan (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  127. Complainer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Complainer (talk) 16:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  128. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Zabia (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  129. Teles (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  130. Kasir (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Kasir talk 23:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  131. Felipe da Fonseca (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 15:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  132. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ghilt (talk) 16:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  133. Ooo86 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Best kvalifiserte kandidat denne runden. Ooo86 (talk) 20:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  134. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Kusurija (talk) 00:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  135. 軽快 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   日本版ウィキペディアでは悪質な荒らしが頻出していますし、スチュワードとしても精力的に活動することはウィキメディア・プロジェクト全体の利益となります。当選したらグローバルでの対処が必要そうな「排他的論理積」荒らしへの対処に精力的に取り組んでいただきたく存じます。 軽快 (talk) 01:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  136. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vachovec1 (talk) 02:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  137. Miya (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   miya (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  138. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   a×pdeHello! 06:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  139. 切干大根 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ganba! 切干大根 (talk) 10:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  140. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   -Xbony2 (talk) 15:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  141. DARIO SEVERI (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   DARIO SEVERI (talk) 15:27, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  142. Melos (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Melos (talk) 16:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  143. Risk Engineer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Nice purpose statement ... Risk Engineer (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  144. Allforrous (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Allforrous (talk) 22:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  145. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   DePlusJean (talk) 00:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Nothing demonstrates they understand how stewards interact with permissions, both global and local, which is honestly the most visible part of steward work. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Wischmat (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Sri, to much doubt. Richardkiwi (talk) 20:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Nihlus 21:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Gereon K. (talk) 10:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   out of principle I can’t support the expansion of the Stewardry until (1) there exists a council for global ban/lock (non-WMF bans) appeals made up of users who are not sitting-stewards, or a global UTRS system to address global locks and bans as the current stewards clearly don't want discussions from globally banned/blocked users to stand, (2) stewards actually start following policy like “If they create new accounts and are not disruptive with those accounts, they will not be locked again merely because it is discovered that they were previously globally locked.”, and (3) when there’s a clear policy when global locks can be used for non-vandalism only accounts (e.g. Registered for shorter a month, having less than 500 edits, Etc.) as plenty of potentially constructive users with one bad day are locked out of their accounts and many will never return while actual trolls don't really care about such measures (the Nipponese dog, the Incorrible Troll, Etc.) Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahveotm (talk) 11:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Nice to have a Japanese-speaking candidate, but I see a very low contribution outside their home wiki. Nemo 11:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Ciao • Bestoernesto 22:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Slowking4 (talk) 13:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Anbans 585 (talk) 18:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Ferran Mir (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Openskye (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Alzinous (talk) 12:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:46, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Litev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Litev (talk) 12:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Stephan1000000 (talk) 20:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

There'sNoTime[edit]

There'sNoTime talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: en-N, de-3, es-3, it-3, fr-3
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi, I'm There'sNoTime, an English Wikipedia admin, CheckUser and Oversighter. My cross-wiki contributions are a lot less than many other stewards, though I believe that where I lack this specific experience I make up in technical knowledge, communicative skills and my drive to help identify, resolve and prevent harassment and abuse. If elected, I will of course work closely with other stewards to fill in the gaps in my experience, and I am keen to learn.

    I was granted both the CheckUser and Oversight permission on the English Wikipedia, so am familiar with the use of both tools. Through my real-world work in healthcare IT, I am appreciative of the strict importance of data privacy, and would apply skills I've learnt there in this role. I've also been a member of OTRS and ACC, where I have gained experience working with both new and experienced editors who need assistance.

    Ultimately, I'm putting myself forward for consideration in a bid to help counter cross-wiki harassment and abuse, which is a significant problem the Wikimedia projects face, as well as broadening the areas in which I can assist editors. I hope you can put your trust in me.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#There'sNoTime
Emblem-important.svg
If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2018|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. My name is not dave (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Yes! Technically and personally qualified. My name is not dave (talk) 14:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Narrowly, on experience with CU/OS, some technical experience, and some limited experience crosswiki. --Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   There’sNoTime is probably the single Wikimedian I trust the most, and we would be lucky to have him in this position. The tech skills are great and will be an asset to the steward corps, but the real reason to vote for him is that he is one of the kindest and most understanding users on the projects, who never forgets we are dealing with human beings behind the silly names. He’ll be an asset to the steward group, especially when it comes to dealing with harassing and abusive LTAs. Strongest possible support here. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I believe TNT is extremely qualified and I have no trouble trusting them with the tools. -- Dolotta (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Trustworthy and technically qualified, so supporting regardless cross-wiki activity. --Kostas20142 (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --cyrfaw (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. WQL (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   WQL 14:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Diannaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Highly trusted user on en.wiki. Have decided to support based on that, and on their answers to questions posted on the nomination page. Diannaa (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Chrissymad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Super duper support this. TNT is a hugely valuable asset to all WMF projects and I trust his use of the tools and excellent judgement. I also think he will be a great asset as a steward due to his extensive work tracking LTAs (cross-wiki!) Chrissymad (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Based on your answers to the questions and both your work as CU and OS in enwiki and global work, I believe that you have the necessary experience to perform as steward. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Not much cross-wiki activity so far, but it seems like he already has a good understanding of the steward role and policies. --MF-W 14:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Ferran Mir (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. -revi (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   — regards, Revi 14:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. KPFC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   KPFC💬 14:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Rxy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   rxy (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Unfortunately, there has been only very limited xwiki activity so far. Nevertheless, I decided to support because of the overall good impression of this user while browsing through the edit history and answers provided to the questions. —Vogone (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. SA 13 Bro (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   SA 13 Bro (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   There'sNoTime is capable and competent in managing the administrative and functionary duties already, holding +sysop, +CU and +OS permissions on the English Wikipedia. The cross-wiki collaboration this can provide will strengthen the abilities of the steward team, as a whole, in combating sockpuppetry, undisclosed paid editing, spamming/promotional editing and the like. Nick (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Eurodyne (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Cyberpower678 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 15:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   1997kB (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahir256 (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   in a heartbeat. Agree with Tony. enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 15:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. SQL (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   SQLQuery me! 15:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Technically Qualified. I trust this user with tools on our home project, I have no reason why I shouldn't trust them with tools on the global level. --Cameron11598 (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. Waggie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Waggie (talk) 16:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Has useful technical knowledge and experience dealing with long-term abuse, knows his way around the CU/OS tools on the largest project, and has an excellent statement that highlights exactly why he is requesting these rights and what he brings to the role. I trust that TNT will ease into the areas that he isn't as experienced in, and will work well with the rest of the steward group. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Cross wiki expierence is a big plus for stew function. But more important is to be able to solve issues that may happen, know how Wikipedia (other projects of the WMF) works, because that's almost the same at all 750+ projects. Anyway, stews must solve problems at wikis that they do not know, because they simply cannot be familiar with all the projects. Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. MPS1992 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   MPS1992 (talk) 18:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  32. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   *Youngjin (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  33. BU Rob13 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   ~ Rob13Talk 19:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  34. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Milad A380 talk 20:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  35. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Richardkiwi (talk) 20:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  36. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TNT has my implicit trust. I have no concerns about his ability to be a steward. Nihlus 20:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  37. Mahveotm (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018  Mahveotm (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  38. Drewmutt (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Incredibly personable, and during conflict always seems to find a balance between enforcement, humanity and humility. Couldn't think of anyone better suited for the position. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 00:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  39. DarwIn (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   - Darwin Ahoy! 01:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  40. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  41. Devraj poudel (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Devraj poudel (talk) 02:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  42. JMGM (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   JMGM (talk) 02:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  43. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Shizhao (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  44. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Az1568 (talk) 04:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  45. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Legoktm (talk) 09:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  46. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  47. Faendalimas (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 11:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  48. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   DCB (talk) 11:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  49. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  50. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TomášPolonec (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
    Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Alex Pereira falaê 13:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  51. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  52. KrakatoaKatie (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Katietalk 15:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  53. Winged Blades of Godric (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   No-Brainer.I'm not much concerned about lack of cross-wiki activity. Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  54. L235 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Kevin (aka L235 · t · c · enwiki) 16:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  55. Mz7 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Mz7 (talk) 17:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
    Lisa Beck (Not eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)   Lisa Beck (talk) 19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  56. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Luke081515 20:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  57. Simplexity22 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Simplexity22 (talk) 20:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  58. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   May not be hugely active cross-wiki, but TNT is trusted, active and will certainly be a hardworking steward. Trijnsteltalk 22:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  59. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  60. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  61. Vermont (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Vermont (talk) 01:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  62. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Quickfingers (talk) 02:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  63. RadiX (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TNT is an uncontroversial candidate with a long history on the English Wikipedia. He is calm, trustworthy and knowledgeable about various policies and guidelines, and also uses the CU tool proficiently. I am confident he would make a great Steward. RadiX 02:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  64. Premeditated Chaos (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Premeditated Chaos (talk) 06:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  65. Reception123 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Reception123 (talk) 08:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  66. Force Radical (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Force Radical (talk) 10:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  67. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   —Ah3kal (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  68. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 13:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  69. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Not much crosswiki experience however they're a technical editor so that IMHO makes up for the lack of crosswiki edits, Helpful EN admin, Easy support. –Davey2010Talk 15:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  70. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  71. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   DENAMAX (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  72. SparklingPessimist (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   SparklingPessimist (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  73. Majora (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Majora (talk) 21:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  74. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Lanwi1(talk) 22:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  75. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Rzuwig 22:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  76. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Elvesham (talk) 22:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  77. Hhhhhkohhhhh (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 04:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  78. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wae35244 (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  79. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  80. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Seems capable Stevenmitchell (talk) 11:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  81. Stylez995 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Stylez995 (talk) 12:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  82. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Alzinous (talk) 12:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  83. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Eddie891 (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  84. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   BugWarp (talk) 14:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  85. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   B20180 (talk) 14:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  86. Bluemel1 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Bluemel1 (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  87. Fitindia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018    FITINDIA  15:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  88. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Community trust, and the ability to speak five languages, qualifies this user in my opinion. ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:34, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  89. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  90. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ascánder (talk) 15:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  91. Chrisaliv (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Chrisaliv (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  92. Tryptofish (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   He is well respected and trusted at his home wiki. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:00, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  93. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  94. FrankyLeRoutier (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 04:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  95. Dane (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   TNT is trustworthy and I feel like he would be a fantastic steward. Dane (talk) 06:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  96. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Stüard olması üçün mövcud fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edərək, onu dəstəkləyirəm. İnanıram ki, faydalı işlər görəcək. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  97. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Eager Lin (Message) 08:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  98. Yeza (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Yeza (talk) 09:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  99. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 09:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  100. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Freddy2001 talk 16:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  101. Kojie (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   [[User:Kojie|Kojie]] ([[User talk:Kojie|Tell me]]) (talk) 17:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  102. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  103. Yodin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Going by Ajraddatz' question, TNT seems to have the technical skills that are needed by the Stewarding team. --YodinT 21:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  104. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   --Caligatus (talk) 23:25, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  105. Atsme (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Atsme📞📧 02:25, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  106. L736E (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   L736Etell me 07:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  107. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Jon Kolbert)2018   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:02, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  108. Balabinrm (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Balabinrm (talk) 10:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  109. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Filipović Zoran (talk) 16:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  110. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   TJH2018talk 16:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  111. Muadabuali (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Muadabuali (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  112. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   GZWDer (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  113. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  114. Hummerrocket (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Hummerrocket (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  115. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  116. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Chris Troutman (talk) 03:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  117. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   There'sNoTime may not have extensive cross-wiki experience, but he speaks five languages and is technically proficient, in addition to being a proven asset on en-wp. I think the benefits outweigh the shortcomings in this case. Kurtis (talk) 08:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  118. Amortias (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Amortias (talk) 11:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  119. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2018   Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  120. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   per Yodin and Kurtis. Garam (talk) 09:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  121. Litev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Litev (talk) 12:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  122. Complainer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Complainer (talk) 16:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  123. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Zabia (talk) 19:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  124. Kasir (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Kasir talk 23:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  125. Fish and karate (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Fish and karate (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  126. ThePlatypusofDoom (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   An excellent editor who I have had many interactions with. He's very trustworthy and I am confident that he will be a good steward ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 15:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  127. TheStrayDog (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   am convinced. TheStrayDog (talk) 19:44, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  128. Sombresprit (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Un Steward qui parle français, ça ne se refuse pas. Sombresprit (talk) 23:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  129. TheDragonFire (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Highly trusted user on the English Wikipedia. Limited cross-wiki experience, however they have demonstrated they can listen when they make mistakes, and they understand their own ability, which in some ways is more critical to elevated positions of trust than actual experience. Their technical knowledge will be invaluable to the steward team. TheDragonFire (talk) 02:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  130. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   a×pdeHello! 05:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  131. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Frīheidasliova (talk) 08:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  132. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Taivo (talk) 16:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  133. Melos (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Melos (talk) 16:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  134. Risk Engineer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Nice purpose statement ... Risk Engineer (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  135. Allforrous (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Allforrous (talk) 22:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  136. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   DePlusJean (talk) 23:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Insufficient cross wiki experience Herby talk thyme 16:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Thank you for your volunteer work, but I don't think you have enough cross-wiki experience. This is not the English Wikipedia: cw-experience is not expected, but required. Érico (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Little to no cross-wiki experience. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   --Krd 08:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Gereon K. (talk) 10:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per answer to MF-Warburg's question. I think we need stewards to support small Wikipedias. Holder (talk) 20:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   out of principle I can’t support the expansion of the Stewardry until (1) there exists a council for global ban/lock (non-WMF bans) appeals made up of users who are not sitting-stewards, or a global UTRS system to address global locks and bans as the current stewards clearly don't want discussions from globally banned/blocked users to stand, (2) stewards actually start following policy like “If they create new accounts and are not disruptive with those accounts, they will not be locked again merely because it is discovered that they were previously globally locked.”, and (3) when there’s a clear policy when global locks can be used for non-vandalism only accounts (e.g. Registered for shorter a month, having less than 500 edits, Etc.) as plenty of potentially constructive users with one bad day are locked out of their accounts and many will never return while actual trolls don't really care about such measures (the Nipponese dog, the Incorrible Troll, Etc.) Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Great floors (talk) 21:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Ankry (talk) 08:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   On the principle that stewards are required to have had substantial cross-wiki experience. Much of day-to-day steward tasks are not harassment cases, or even cases dealing with human editors: a large volume of locked accounts are spambots. It is important to understand other communities if you want to work with them. Jasper Deng (talk) 09:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   No cross-wiki experience at all. Nemo 11:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Base (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Little cross-wiki experience. We have enough mainly enwiki aware stewards as it is. --Base (talk) 13:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Base (talk) 13:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   On the fence, may change - Administrative/functionary experience does not have the length of service I'm usually looking for here. — xaosflux Talk 16:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC) (moved from neutral: 15:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC))
  15. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Slowking4 (talk) 13:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   –Ammarpad (talk) 12:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Widr (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Much too soon, unfortunately. Widr (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   --Ghilt (talk) 16:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   -Xbony2 (talk) 15:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Stïnger (会話) 14:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC).
  2. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Wischmat (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. MusikAnimal (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   One of the nicest Wikimedians I know, perhaps *too nice*, if that's possible =p I trust them fully, but I also think there's not as much cross-wiki experience as preferred, and promoting to enwiki admin, functionary, and steward all in just over a year seems like maybe we're moving too fast. — MusikAnimal talk 19:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   hiàn 22:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Openskye (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Alex Shih (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Per Xaosflux and MusikAnimal, sorry. Alex Shih (talk) 17:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Unfortunately I can't remember I've ever seen him cross-wiki. Wolverène (talk) 03:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Ciao • Bestoernesto 23:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Appreciate the yearning for knowledge. Will let majority decide Potatornado (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. NickK (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   The experience on enwiki is generally good but really no crosswiki experience makes me vote here — NickK (talk) 17:46, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Per MusikAnimal. Maybe next year. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:45, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Power~enwiki (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   power~enwiki (talk) 04:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Liridon (talk) 12:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Anbans 585 (talk) 18:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Stephan1000000 (talk) 20:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vachovec1 (talk) 02:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Wiki13[edit]

Wiki13 talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: nl, en-4, fr-1, de-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello everyone,

    I'm Wiki13. I'm a native Dutch speaker, but also can contribute in English when needed. Furthermore I can read a bit of French and German. Unfortunately I am not able to have an conversation in those two languages.

    I created my account back in 2009 on the Dutch Wikipedia. Four yours later I became administrator there. Not long after that a colleague administrator introduced me to way smaller wiki's at which point I decided I wanted to help them out in any way I can. To do this work more efficiently I am a global rollbacker. Also, to note, I have been global sysop twice. Also I helped with Wikidata when it started, being in the first batch of administrators. I resigned voluntarily from that position after some time.

    In terms of the global work I do: I'm mostly busy patrolling small wikis for vandalism and/or spam as part of SWMT. This also includes the occasional LTAs (Long term abuse) I come across. As a steward, I would like to help in several areas like blocking/locking spambots/spammers/LTAs/vandals, user rights, etc (basically any steward request page where I think I can help people). I'm almost daily on IRC too, and if elected, I would plan to also help out with requests made from that medium.

    If there are any questions you have, don't hesitate to ask me! I'll be happy to answer them. Thanks for your time and consideration. With kind regards, Wiki13 talk 22:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#Wiki13
Emblem-important.svg
If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2018|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Stïnger (会話) 14:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC).
  2. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --cyrfaw (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Jdx (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   jdx Re: 14:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Rxy (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   This candidate is active at IRC, and makes many report for lock a spambots. I think this candidate need a steward tools. rxy (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. SA 13 Bro (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   SA 13 Bro (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Wischmat (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Wischmat (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Artix Kreiger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I support them for his/her anti-spam work. --Artix Kreiger (Message Wall) 15:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Stryn (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Stryn (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Érico (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 19:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vituzzu (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per Rxy. Eurodyne (talk) 20:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Very trustfull (dialect) trustworthy user. I have no doubts. Richardkiwi (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Great work. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Joris (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Trustworthy colleague Joris (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   ArdiPras95 (talk) 01:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Shizhao (talk) 03:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Tulsi Bhagat (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   As per Rxy — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 03:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Mbch331 (talk) 06:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Thanks for your efforts on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 06:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   trusted experienced person who will do well MoiraMoira (talk) 09:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Saschaporsche (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Saschaporsche (talk) 10:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. Kippenvlees1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Kippenvlees1 (talk) 11:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. De Geo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   The Geo (talk) 12:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   TomášPolonec (talk) 13:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Jon Kolbert)2018   Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. Holder (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Holder (talk) 20:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  30. Freaky Fries (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Yes please! Freaky Fries (talk) 21:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  31. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   What he said almost four years ago is not important to me. Right now he is a hardworking user who could use the steward tools well. Trijnsteltalk 22:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  32. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by MacFan4000)2018   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  33. KGirlTrucker81 (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   KGirlTrucker81 (talk) 01:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  34. Vermont (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Vermont (talk) 01:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  35. Quickfingers (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Quickfingers (talk) 02:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  36. 隼鷹 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   隼鷹 (talk) 09:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  37. Aleator (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Aleator (talk) 17:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  38. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   DENAMAX (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  39. Great floors (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Great floors (talk) 21:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  40. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Lanwi1(talk) 22:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  41. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Rzuwig 22:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  42. Elvesham (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Elvesham (talk) 22:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  43. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Ankry (talk) 07:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  44. Wae35244 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Wae35244 (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  45. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   good candidate Ruthven (talk) 10:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  46. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  47. Stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Stevenmitchell (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  48. Alzinous (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Alzinous (talk) 12:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  49. Xxmarijnw (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Xxmarijnw (talk) 13:00, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  50. Eddie891 (Eligible, checked by Liuxinyu970226)2018   Eddie891 (talk) 13:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  51. BugWarp (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   BugWarp (talk) 14:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  52. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   B20180 (talk) 14:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  53. Xabier Cañas (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Xabier Cañas (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  54. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  55. Chrisaliv (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Chrisaliv (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  56. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Ciao • Bestoernesto 22:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  57. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I don't care that much about something that happened 3 years ago. I do trust them so if wants to help, why not? Kostas20142 (talk) 23:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  58. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Stüard olması üçün mövcud fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edərək, onu dəstəkləyirəm. Çünki uzun müddətli təcrübəsi var. Düşünürəm ki, faydalı işlər görəcək. Uğurlar! ►Cekli829 06:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  59. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Eager Lin (Message) 08:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  60. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 09:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  61. ExtremPilotHD (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ExtremPilotHD (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  62. Sj (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   SJ talk  21:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  63. RadiX (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Although some users have found concerns here, they are not enough for me to not support Wiki13. I am confident he is experienced enough and he will therefore do well with the new toolkit. RadiX 04:58, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  64. Pelex (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   Seems reasonable vote to me. Pelex (talk) 06:58, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  65. L736E (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   L736Etell me 07:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  66. Pjr (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Pjr (talk) 09:27, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  67. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I've found Wiki13 helpful in detecting and countering spam and vandalism across the wikis. I think he'll do fine. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  68. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Filipović Zoran (talk) 16:42, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  69. Muadabuali (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Muadabuali (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  70. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   GZWDer (talk) 20:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  71. MaynardClark (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   MaynardClark (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  72. Hrodvarsson (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  73. 1233 (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  74. Pjoona11 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Pjoona11 (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  75. Arif80s (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Arif80s (talk) 05:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  76. ぱたごん (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   ぱたごん (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  77. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   I choose to believe that Wiki13 will do well, as per Wiki13's answer in questions page. Garam (talk) 10:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  78. Liridon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Liridon (talk) 12:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  79. Litev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Litev (talk) 12:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  80. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   --Buggia 17:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  81. Zabia (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Zabia (talk) 19:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  82. Denkhenk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   --Denkhenk (talk) 19:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  83. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Taivo (talk) 09:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  84. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Ghilt (talk) 16:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  85. Sombresprit (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Sombresprit (talk) 23:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  86. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Vachovec1 (talk) 02:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  87. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Wiki13 has been around for a long time, and has quite a bit of experience dealing with cross-wiki vandalism and spam. I'm concerned by some of the diffs brought up by Rschen below, but I think that Wiki13 would be able to use the steward bit well on balance. – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  88. Xbony2 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   -Xbony2 (talk) 15:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  89. Risk Engineer (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Nice purpose statement! ... Risk Engineer (talk) 18:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose.svg No[edit]

  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I am not convinced so far. --MF-W 14:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Not convinced. --Vogone (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   per Rschen’s neutral. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. KPFC (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I’m too much concerned by the incidents, Rschen7754 mentioned in his neutral statement – KPFC💬 15:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   I remain concerned by the diffs Rschen7754 mentioned and cannot in good faith support at this time. I will note, otherwise, that the candidate is competent in the use of the global rollbacker tool and otherwise, their technical abilities would be compatible with becoming a Steward. Nick (talk) 15:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Cameron11598 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per Rschen7754's Neutral --Cameron11598 (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Milad A380 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Milad A380 talk 20:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Nihlus (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Concerns still exist that have not been addressed. Nihlus 20:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Az1568 (talk) 04:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Krd (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   --Krd 08:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by -revi)2018   Herby talk thyme 08:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Begoon (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Begoon (talk) 09:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   Legoktm (talk) 09:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   Gereon K. (talk) 10:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. DCB (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   not convinced DCB (talk) 11:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
    Alexanderps (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Alex Pereira falaê 13:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Nope as per Rschen7754 - We don't want stewards who resign their tools when they get in a huff, Better candidates tbh. –Davey2010Talk 15:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Donald Trung (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   this user is a moderator (sysop) at Dutch Wikipedia where the moderator class maintain secret mailing lists and closed IRC channels that never get publicly published. Dutch moderators seem to hound users simply to disagree and herass formerly banned users or simply users they don't like which is a culture I cannot condone. Dutch moderators seem to issue infinite blocks over large IP ranges that often have no edits at all essentially making it difficult for someone that doesn't pay for home internet to register an account or edit anonymously (something which this user advocated for in a recent vote concerning the blocking of such networks), and as I see more good edits come from IP editors than bad ones which means that this user has no issue preventing good faith editors from improving Wikimedia projects which isn't exactly a position I want to see expand globally (interlingually). Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (Articles 📚) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) 19:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Freddy2001 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Freddy2001 talk 16:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   SPQRobin (talk) 19:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Qolcomaq (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Qolcomaq (talk) 10:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
    Rotorcowboy (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Per Rschen's neutral. Rotorcowboy (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Slowking4 (Eligible, checked by TonyBallioni)2018   Slowking4 (talk) 13:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   –Ammarpad (talk) 10:15, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. Anbans 585 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Anbans 585 (talk) 18:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by علاء)2018   Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  25. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   The Banner (talk) 08:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  26. Trackinfo (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per Rschen7754 and I am suspicious of people who keep wanting to expand their power. We have too much oligarchy as it is. Trackinfo (talk) 00:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  27. Axpde (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2018   a×pdeHello! 05:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  28. Frīheidasliova (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Frīheidasliova (talk) 08:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  29. Allforrous (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Allforrous (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   The frequent resignations bother me (one of which was not entirely uncontroversial [1]). This was around the time that it appears that they took a controversial stance on a Wikimedia stalking incident, see [2] and comments at their subsequent RFA. That was over 3 years ago, but I haven't seen enough of their opinions or their activity since then to be confident enough to support. Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Ferran Mir (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   The comments from Rschen7754 are worrying, I think it is a good candidate, but I can not support it at this time. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 15:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   — xaosflux Talk 16:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   *Youngjin (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   hiàn 22:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
    Openskye (Not eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)   Openskye (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. BukhariSaeed (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   --Bukhari (Talk!) 10:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 10:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 10:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Not confortable to vote either yes or no —Ah3kal (talk) 13:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Wolverène (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2018   per Rschen7754. Wolverène (talk) 03:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   If this candidacy were 5 years ago, I would be strongly in support. However, his activity on SWMT has been nonexistent since then and he did not maintain involvement with the Wikidata project, which makes me wonder if he can manage to expanded role of being a steward. Jasper Deng (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. ZLEA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   ZLEA Talk\Contribs 15:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. స్వరలాసిక (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Potatornado (Eligible, checked by Artix Kreiger)2018   Potatornado (talk) 15:30, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Nihlus)2018   ~Cybularny Speak? 22:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Atsme (Eligible, checked by Hiàn)2018   Atsme📞📧 04:02, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. StevenJ81 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2018   Not convinced, and too many people I respect here are not convinced. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahir256 (talk) 04:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   Stephan1000000 (talk) 20:01, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Cyberpower678 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Per Rschen7754 —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 18:26, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  22. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2018   DePlusJean (talk) 00:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

علاء[edit]

علاء talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template
  • Languages: ar-N, en-4, he-1, es-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello,

    My name is Alaa (In Arabic: علاء). I am a native Arabic and near native English speaker. I created my account in October 2010, and I have been active (on a regular basis) since December 2014, so, I am active for over three years now. I am currently a bureaucrat, sysop and checkuser on Arabic Wikipedia, sysop on Wikidata and sysop on Arabic Wikibooks. I serve also as an OTRS member for Arabic queues. On Meta, I hold Global renamer permission since February 2017, and I am an active member of SWMT. I am active almost on all projects that I hold advanced rights in. Over the years, I have made more than 300K edits on Wikimedia wikis. I also run my bot, AlaaBot, on several wikis to do various maintenance tasks. In addition to this, I frequently spend time on various IRC channels, including #cvn-sw, #wikimedia-stewards and #wikimedia-rename.

    Moreover, I attended and helped in the organization of many Wikimedia-related events. For example, I helped in the organization of WikiArabia 2017. I am also a member of Wikimedians of the Levant since May 2015. In addition to this, I am one of the members of Arabic Wikipedia's social networking team. That's the team that manages the official accounts of Arabic Wikipedia on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.

    As a steward, I would like to help with the steward requests backlog. I would like to handle requests on Meta, mostly on SRUC, SRCU, SRGP, SRP and various other maintenance tasks from time to time. I want, also, to use my steward access for fighting crosswiki vandals/spammers. I also believe that, being an Arabic speaker and from the Global South, I will bring linguistic and cultural diversity to the steward team, as there is no currently-active Arabic steward.

    As a CheckUser I have already signed the confidentiality agreements.

    Thank you for your time and consideration and don't hesitate to ask any questions. Best, --Alaa :)..! 15:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2018/Questions#علاء
Emblem-important.svg
If you have JavaScript enabled, you can easily vote with a Vote! button which will appear in the place of this notice. If you would prefer to add your vote manually, please add:
# {{Se-vote|2018|Your username|checked=|cb=}} <optional comments>. ~~~~
to the bottom of the appropriate Yes, No or Neutral section.

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Is familiar with the steward role through the several requests they have made to stewards, has demonstrated experience handling private data (CU on arwiki), and has experience with different projects. Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --Stïnger (会話) 14:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC).
  3. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Nothing but good impressions. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   --cyrfaw (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. AlvaroMolina (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   He has the necessary experience (demonstrated on the basis of his answers to the questions and his work as checkuser in arwiki), as well as his knowledge of the Arabic language. Perfect candidate to fill the position. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 14:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  7. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Ferran Mir (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Bluemoon2999 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   Big Yes. He is an active and devoted admin with huge contribution and sound knowledge Bluemoon2999 (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  10. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  11. Meno25 (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   Highly trusted within Arabic Wikipedia community Surely competent for the role. Meno25 (talk) 14:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  12. علاء فحصي (Eligible, checked by Stïnger)2018   A big yes for this creditable user علاء فحصي (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  13. Érico (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Érico (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  14. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mahir256 (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  15. Nick (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   The crosswiki that علاء (Alaa) has is of the highest calibre and is precisely the type of calm, competent, capable administrator that traditionally has functioned very well in the Steward role. The presence of the +sysop and +CU and +OS flags on Arabic Wikipedia is an excellent indicator of ability and trust, the +sysop flag on Wikidata is exceptionally helpful given the rise in crosswiki issues stemming from Wikidata issues, and their +sysop flag on Arabic Wikibooks is a further sign of their trust and competency. Nick (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  16. L3X1 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   enL3X1 ¡‹delayed reaction›¡ 15:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  17. Helmoony (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Trustfull user that knows how to handle technical tools and calm down discussions related to policies and security. Helmoony (talk) 15:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  18. Mehman97 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Mehman 97 15:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  19. -revi (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2018   — regards, Revi 16:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  20. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   — xaosflux Talk 16:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  21. Noé (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Noé (talk) 16:44, 8 February 2018 (U T C)
  22. koussayou003 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   ala'a is one of the bests admins that i see in all my live, never you can find some one who is every where like ala'a and we need a stweard from the arabic wikipedia. Koussayou003 (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  23. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by AlvaroMolina)2018   Definitely. The nomination statement mentions pretty much everything that I would like to point out Kostas20142 (talk) 17:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
  24. Rufet Turkmen (Eligible, checked by