User talk:216.176.139.74

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
×
Unblock request declined

This blocked user has had his or her unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request.
Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason: i just notified materialscientist of a possible future ban
Decline reason: a 31 hour seems soft, and the next time you don't manage to keep within the community expectations it will be significantly longer.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:14, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

English | español | français | magyar | italiano | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | 中文 | edit

Harassment needs to stop now[edit]

You need to get over your fascination with harassing people, particularly Materialscientist. We are all volunteers, and your approach is not conducive to community, and is obviously attention-seeking, and self-centred. Please desist of your own volition, otherwise the community representatives will take action. The next time that you edit on MS's talk page, or create an account like his, I will block this IP locally to match the global block.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:14, 23 November 2014 (UTC) THAT COLDHEARTED LOWLIFE BANNED ME FOR NO REASON WHILE IVE LEARNED MY FUCKING LESSON!HE SHOULD FEEL ASHAMED FOR HIMSELF! I WISH CHECKUSERS WERE OUTLAWED BY THE WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION!

On a wiki with an ArbCom, the process is to appeal a block to them; please see w:Wikipedia:Unblock. The process is not to go around insulting people which will always look bad in appeal, and reinforces the point of view that the blocking person was correct in their appraisal. At this point of time my outsider's assessment of your chances of getting an enWP unblock are somewhere between wikt:Buckley's and none, and that is due to your outside of enWP reaction, and nothing to do with the initial block. Continuation of your method of response will more likely result in a ban with a trend towards no redemption, rather than just an extended, enforced holiday. So live within the reality as it exists and work out which way you really want to participate. There are plenty of projects outside of enWP which want eager volunteers.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

and im just about blocked on all of them that i found as well.

And now you're blocked here as well. -- Tegel (Talk) 18:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Hell's bells, if I had seen that last contribution at that time and I would have blocked you for a year. Bloody disgusting! Really time for you to 'pull your head in'. If you take one step out of line with that filth when the current block stops, and that will be it. [A promise of the consequence of continuing such an action]  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)