User talk:2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:27

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

5/7 Appeal[edit]

×
Unblock request declined

This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request.
Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason: Please unblock/unlock me so I can do 2nd chance on-wiki. And to Camouflaged Mirage:stop reviewing your own blocks it is not allowed. Only a steward can do this, thus, I want a steward to review. And also not Tks4Fish because he locked me. A non steward should not review and decline before a steward does. Thank you.

I revert vandalism! Check this out https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/941469172 so please unlock. Also the Meta block was one tiny /64 range. This is a /56 2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:27 23:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I HAVE made a 2nd chance document but I am worried that essentially what happens is is it does not get carried through properly, causing extra work for the Stewards when they copy/paste(if they want to)to see if it was valid, and I am literally blind in the situation. Thank you. 2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:27 00:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason: No. No point leaving talk page access open. Multiple bad unblock requests. Email stewards@wikimedia.org if needed.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


বাংলা | English | español | français | magyar | italiano | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | українська | 中文 | edit

To Stewards/Meta Admins(especially Tegel)[edit]

@Tegel: I should not be doing this but stop protecting mine(Steven1825andrew2044’s)talk page. Just let them leave the template I am globally locked. It helps people out. 2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:27, 7:49 PM, 7 May 2020(UTC-4)23:49, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]