User talk:Feeglgeef

Unblock request granted This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request. Request reason: Hi. First, thanks for restoring my talk page access, so I can make this appeal, SHB2000. I’m requesting that my January 2025 block be lifted. I sincerely apologize for my behavior then, which involved incivility, name-calling, and personal attacks. I called constructive users "trolls" and "vandals", which was a completely inappropriate violation of expectations for the project. I recognize that misusing my talk page after my one-week block was a serious mistake that proved the necessity of the indefinite block. I understand that my actions were an inappropriate response to the frustration I was feeling at the time. To avoid similar behavior in the future, if I feel upset, frustrated, or angry during a discussion, I will walk away for 24 hours before responding. In the 17 months since the block I have matured, reflected, and contributed positively to the English Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and Abstract Wikipedia. I’m asking for a second chance to positively contribute to meta as well. Thanks, Feeglgeef (talk) 02:38, 1 June 2026 (UTC) Unblock reason: Unblocked. — xaosflux Talk 18:37, 1 June 2026 (UTC) This template should be archived normally.

block log gblock log blocklist stalktoy guc unblock gunblock contribs: +/-

• Please review the entirety of Meta:Civility. Do you understand this page, and agree with it? — xaosflux ^Talk 15:28, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

  Yes, I do. Feeglgeef (talk) 16:45, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

  • I've unblocked your account. Please be keep in mind, repeating disruptive conduct may result in new blocks, that will not be so easy to overcome. Disagreement with others is quite normal, and you are welcome to disagree with others - just be sure maintain decorum in discussion. — xaosflux ^Talk 18:37, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

    Thanks! Feeglgeef (talk) 18:43, 1 June 2026 (UTC)