User talk:Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti?~metawiki/arhiva 1

Fratele lui Bonaparte, il cunosti? 19:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Atât timp cât lucrurile sunt făcute cum trebuie, stai liniştit că ajut. Nu vreau însă să fiu părtaş la lucruri făcute fără a gândi sau incorect (spun în general, nu în particular pentru mowiki) -Romihaitza 19:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Rebel stie. Problema a fost ca nu a verificat ceea ce ai facut tu, ci a crezut ca e tot propaganda. -Romihaitza 17:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Liar.

I won, fair and square. You vandalized the rules. You lose. Intotdeauna. And when do you get your ph.d kopkil ce esti?

Sock puppet

I'd looooooooove to see proof. :-D --Chris S. 14:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Problems with other users

Sysops on meta do not have any attribution for solving conflicts or disagreements with users. Problems arising from local versions of Wikimedia projects should be examined and solved there. Have a nice day, M/ 10:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Bonaparte!

Prietene, nu cred că node înţelege sau crede că Wikipedia aceasta va fi închisă :( - FrancisTyers 11:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Moldavian / Romanian

I don't know the relation between the Romanian and Moldavian. Can you send me credible resources about this topic. Thanks--Maviulke12 20:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

I think I am going to change my vote.--Maviulke12 08:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello! I see that Romanians also suffer from russian nationalists in the Moldavian vote. The same imperialistic Russians now are blocking the opening of Siberian wikipedia, just for nationalistic causes. Siberian language is attempt to revive an anciant Cossack dialect of the old Siberia, revive from old vocabularies, dialectical remains, etc. We have now wiki of 1200 (sic!) articles, about 10 persons write there, many people read it. But wiki is not open just because russian nationalists cry "The only slavonic language in Siberia is russian!" in the vote. If romanians will help us against the Russians there, I will call in our resources to help Romanians against russian lobby in the Moldavian vote, so I suggest you union, because we have the same enemy.

The siberian vote - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages#Chaldon-Siberian_.2844_support.2C_29_oppose.29

--Yaroslav Zolotaryov 13:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you.

http://samir74.livejournal.com/993008.html

About 800 readers of my rather popular in Russia blog read this. This is in russian language, because I have russian-speaking audience. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 14:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I have made link about your proposal in our talk page: http://ru-sib.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:%D0%93%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0#.D0.9E_.D0.B2.D0.BE.D0.B9.D0.BD.D0.B5

But how many votes can organize Romanians? Actually I can not say to Ukrainians support you, because many Ukrainians sympatize to Transnistria. But we have many non-Ukrainians in the group. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 12:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Node ue

Hi, I'm confused about this problem about Romanian Wikipedia; I suggest that is better talk to Foundation Member, because this problem is several and implies others wikis. Please don't leave more messages about this problem. I'm going to vacations and possibly don't attend this problem. Thanks. --Taichi - (あ！) 21:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Warnings

3RR

One more revert, and you'll have violated the 3RR. Enjoy... --Telex 12:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

User pages

Please refrain from editing other users' pages. --M/ 09:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Politics

You are heavily puting forward a political point of view. You harrass people. You cheer when people complain and are told that this is not en.wikipedia.. True enough. However, the Wikimedia projects are not political, they should not be but you make it so. What you do is not appreciated. GerardM 13:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Do not engage in personal attacks on Meta. Personal attacks include insults, accusations of bad faith, and other attempts to harm another contributor or their reputation. This behaviour is not acceptable in any form on Meta. - Amgine / ^{talk meta} 02:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

You are welcome to hold your opinions regarding this user's behaviour, and I am not disputing he is disruptive, however an accusation of vandalism is not merited. Node ue is acting in good faith, and in his opinion he is attempting to improve the Wikipedia project as a whole, just as you are doing. That you do not happen to agree with his actions does not necessarily mean he is vandalous.

Regarding the forged e-mail; I am unaware of the details surrounding this event and am not able to judge.

If you cannot talk calmly about the issue, you should remove yourself from the discussion to avoid causing further problems or accidentally violating policy. Emotional outbursts do not help your argument, but instead strengthen the opposing side's position. - Amgine / ^{talk meta} 14:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the message you've left on my talk page, sweetheart. I love you too (as much as I can). Unfortunately I am not taking any advices from anyone unfamiliar with the basic civility, so will ignore yours. Feel free to accuse me in whatever you want, dream, etc. -- Goldie ± ^(talk) 13:41, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your support for the future bel.wikipedia.org