User talk:I live in singapore
The IP was from Singapore, properly was you. SA 13 Bro (talk) 02:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Please stop your trolling at here. SA 13 Bro (talk) 02:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- That was a good find, SA 13 Bro, but I know where the disruptive user behind 117.20.41.10 lives and it's not Singapore. That's an open proxy. Nevertheless, the account registration time makes this quite possible. I don't know if this is worth rattling the cage of a checkuser. --Abd (talk) 03:10, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Abd: Yeah, you are right, he admitted using an open proxy IP, see this edit which he did at English Wikipedia site. SA 13 Bro (talk) 03:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- As of now,the last edits of 107.20.41.09 on Wikipedia admit to being the same user as the .10 IP, even though it was obvious. This user knows that the IP will be blocked, but meanwhile he can troll. He doesn't care about being blocked, he's been blocked hundreds of times. He just moves on to another open proxy. Meanwhile, he is helping to identify open proxies, and calling more attention to the long-term abuse situation.
- While you obviously may revert the edits of this user, it may not be necessary. One of the things that this user does is to create disruptive churning, which calls attention to his lies and deceptions. More than one revert or so, I suggest letting admins handle it. Then, once the user is blocked, any damaged content can be fixed. This user also points to pages that allegedly out other users. He does this to attack the alleged "outer." Yet he is spreading information and notice about these information sources, and, in at least one case, he has sent the information to archive.is so it cannot be deleted. I.e., attacking his target by maintaining "proof" of his claims is more important to him than the privacy of those he allegedly defends. It's insane. I cannot document this on WMF wikis, even though I have technical evidence, without drawing attention to outing, so I won't. It may be documented elsewhere, perhaps. This user should be clearly exposed and stopped, he's been causing real-world damage for years. The impersonation he has commonly done is clearly illegal. But it can go on for a long time before authorities will act. --Abd (talk) 16:37, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Abd: Yeah, you are right, he admitted using an open proxy IP, see this edit which he did at English Wikipedia site. SA 13 Bro (talk) 03:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- That was a good find, SA 13 Bro, but I know where the disruptive user behind 117.20.41.10 lives and it's not Singapore. That's an open proxy. Nevertheless, the account registration time makes this quite possible. I don't know if this is worth rattling the cage of a checkuser. --Abd (talk) 03:10, 2 December 2017 (UTC)