User talk:La fée Didier
Wikimedia Travel Guide: Naming poll open
You are receiving this message because you voiced your opinion at the Request for Comment on the Wikimedia Travel Guide.
The proposed naming poll opened a few days ago and you can vote for as many of the proposed names as you wish, if you are eligible. Please see Travel Guide/Naming Process for full details on voting eligibility and how the final name will be selected. Voting will last for 14 days, and will terminate on 16 October at 06:59:59 UTC.
Fundraising translation feedback
I wanted to ask for your help. As you may be aware we have been running banners on many language wikis. We have a lot of new content this year and I really want to conduct a thorough review of our translations. This is a combination of feedback from the community, readers, donors as well as those with professional translator experience. This will help us ensure the highest quality of translations used in our messaging.
To help us out with this I wonder if you would be willing to give us feedback in french using This Link
Simply follow the simple instructions on that page and if you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page.
Warning every wiki
However, the DanielTom ban attempt shows a defect in the process. The policy requires certain preconditions be set up before a global ban discussion may begin. If any individual can create an actual global ban discussion, on their own initiative, then a massively disruptive process, with notice going, possibly, to many wikis, can be initiated by a user who does not understand global ban process and appropriate application or who misappplies it. That happened with the DanielTom RfC. Hence my intention is to work on the Global ban policy, probably to set up a pre-RfC, a local process that cannot, itself, create a local ban. I.e., the most that consensus there could do is to allow filing of the actual request. The user would be notified, but only on the most active wiki or maybe a few wikis. The preban process would only decide on the basic preconditions for a global ban discussion, it would not debate benefit/harm, though there are aspects of the ban preconditions that require some judgment, and it would decide those. "Abuse," for example, as in the allegations of DanielTom, is a judgment call. Is criticism of administrative behavior "abuse"? It could be, but it might also be not abusive.
Because of possibly narrow participation, the preliminary RfC would not prejudice the final one, but a full ban discussion, with the possibility of leading to a ban conclusion, would not be allowed unless the pre-RfC shows consensus on the preconditions; if started prematurely, it would be immediately closed or frozen. --Abd (talk) 19:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear Morphypnos, since you are an administrator on a wiki from which no user participated in this discussion, I'd like to make sure you are aware of some recent events which may alter what the Wikimedia Foundation lets you do on your wiki: Superprotect.
- Request for comment: Requests for comment/Superprotect rights
- An open letter about its implementation: Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer
Peteforsyth 09:34, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Global CSS/JS migration
Hello Morphypnos. You have global scripts in User:Morphypnos/global.js, which you import using your local JS pages. Since August 2014, your global.js and global.css pages are loaded automatically on all wikis. Since you already import them yourself, you may experience script errors or tools being added twice. Do you want me to fix this by removing the imports from your local pages using Synchbot (without changing any other content)? —Pathoschild 20:38, 05 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hi again! I haven't heard back from you, so I'll assume you don't want to do this. Feel free to leave me a message or add a Synchbot request if you change your mind. :) —Pathoschild 17:37, 09 January 2016 (UTC)
Presenting Community Engagement Insights survey report: Tuesday, October 10, 1600 UTC
We will be hosting a public event online to present the data, a few examples on how teams will be using it for annual planning, and what are next steps for this project. The event will take place on Tuesday, October 10, at 9:00 am PST (1600 UTC), and the presentation will be in English. You can watch the livestream here, and ask question via IRC on #wikimedia-office.
We hope to have you join us online! -- María Cruz 23:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Update your subscription to these messages by clicking here.
Removal of global rollback
Hello La fée Didier. I hope that you are okay. Unfortunately your global rollback permissions have been removed because you have been inactive (no edits or log actions) in Wikimedia wikis for more than 2 years (at this moment your last edit dates back: 2018-04-28, and your last log action: 2018-03-31). Per policy "Global rollbackers who have not contributed to any Wikimedia project for the past 2 years should have their global rollback rights removed for inactivity". Please let me know if there's a mistake or if you have any questions or concerns. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Invitation for Functionary consultation 2021
Greetings SWMT member,
I'm letting you know in advance about a meeting I'd like to invite you to regarding the Universal Code of Conduct and the community's ownership of its future enforcement. I'm still in the process of putting together the details, but I wanted to share the date with you: 10 July, 2021. I do not have a time on this date yet, but I will let you soon. We have created a meta page with basic information. Please take a look at the meta page and sign up your name under the appropriate section.
Thank you for your time.--BAnand (WMF) 03:21, 3 June 2021 (UTC)