User talk:Lavallen/Arkiv 1

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Afrikaans | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца) | български | ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | Qaraqalpaqsha | kar | kurdî | Limburgs | ລາວ | lietuvių | Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | Napulitano | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | Norfuk / Pitkern | polski | português | português do Brasil | پښتو | Runa Simi | română | русский | संस्कृतम् | sicilianu | سنڌي | Taclḥit | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ꠍꠤꠟꠐꠤ | ślůnski | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча / tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 粵語 | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/-

Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello Lavallen!, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 14:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Lavallen, I apollogige for how long it took ANYONE to respond to you but I wanted to let you know I responded to your question/comments at Talk:Global_sysops#Project_criteria:.

Vote[edit]

Hi Lavallen! It's pretty obvious that he is a troublemaker but the reasons he is not eligible have nothing to do with this [1]. One needs to have 600 edits before 1 Nov 09 and 50 edits between 1 Aug 09 - 31 Jan 10, he doen't, so he can't vote. And anyway thank you for informing me. Regards! --Egmontaℨ 10:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If You are counting the edits made by all his acounts, I guess You can find enough edits for him. But I guess You are not counting edits in that way. If he is a troublemaker or not is of less importance... -- Lavallen 14:34, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic campaign ?[edit]

I was invited to vote - "Please vote" - and since the issue with Wapne/Wanpe last year I've avoided swedish wikipedia. Not because the different arguments. But I gave him a truelly good advice - not to edit subjects he is not familliar with. He wrote back very angty "Don't give me advices". Then he gave me a threatful warning. I then tried to ask him for help with editing the (at that time at least) extreamlly bad article about the spanish civil war, a major project. And I just wanted him to "stand by me" if I began this 20 hour project (But I have very good sources like "supplementet till NF 30-talsupplaga inlagd precis efter kriget" and other special books about f.inst. a spanish history 1850-1950 - in spanish, but I can manage written latin languages with dictionaries - at least spanish, portuguese and italian; french and romanian differs more) He replied that he couldn't do this, because his knowlidge didn't cover this subject (eighther, but still he probablly didn't want truelly good advices...). Two days later he threthened me for the second time, and when I in my own discussion page under his threats wrot my answer he expelled me. It was a few weeks - but I had got enough I thought and resigned from the swedish wikipedia , that claims "there are no conspiration" !!! However I kept writing in english and danish Wikipedia where polightness is used instead of threats. By some reason when I lerned to upload pictures (or wat I was doing) I happened to see that my enemy "Wanpe/Wapne" also had been expelled. So I decided to create a new acount "Awayandoder" came from an antispam word (awayanode) - and I began from scratch with this new signature. And this was perfectlly OK according to the rules I read - because the expell time was long time gone, and I've never used two signatures. I have never made any destruction, but people from the north (northern demographical point, not geographical) seems to use Stockholm as "point of view" - not "global". Befor my time I saw that "All Undergrounds in the world should be refered to 'tunelbanor' except in Helsinki - because the "metro" there is so wellknown ! Well known for Stockholmers that goes for a baltic trip to Finland, but surelly not in county of Skåne , Gothenburgh and the far "Norrland". Copenhagen metro was described in terms of Stockholmers, allthow far more swedes uses this metro then the one in Helsinki. But large parts remains - like S-Bahn in German cities. They have not the same function as "Pendeltågen" at Stockholm. Large parts in tunnels, no other trains on their tracks, about 100 of the 166 stations lies inside the ticket fare zones central area, and only perhaps ten stations is outside the Berlin citylimits (wich has not been changed since 1920) And the new S-line to Potsdam is all the way inside city-like areas ("tätort"). But this is just an example of what I mean putting Stockholm as the world-center, and then writer is trying to translate foreign matters into comparission with phenomenon in Stockholm. It's not concerning all subjects - but especially communications seems to be translated into comparission with Stockholm. Do we really need two swedisk Wikipedia in Sweden, like in Norway ? And please do not try to influate votings and voters any more. Stewarts needs to be older then at least 35 anyway. Best reguards Awayanoder 14:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Awayanoder, du pratar svenska så jag svarar på svenska. Din röst ströks för att kontot Awayanoder inte uppfyllde vissa kriterier, de reglerna har inte jag skrivit. Då jag vet att du använt andra konton informerade jag den som strök rösten om detta - i fall det skulle påverka så att du kanske trots allt skulle kunna få rösta. Jag kan inte se att kontot Awayanoder ska straffas pga av att du tidigare kallade dig något annat. - Det är helt enligt reglerna att använda flera konton så länge man inte manipulerar verksamheten eller kringgår sin blockering. Att du har haft det struligt på svwp är bara att beklaga, det påverkar absolut INTE din rätt att rösta. -- Hur vi ska få ordning på kommunikationen mellan dig och Wanpe och de andra vet jag inte. Jag skulle själv kunnat råka ut för samma sak själv när jag en gång kom till Wikipedia första gången. - På något sätt lyckades jag komma förbi det trassel som man ofta möter i början. - Kanske löste det sig genom att jag inte gick tillbaka för att se vad som hände med mina bidrag. - Fortfarande, är det så att jag struntar fullständigt i, om det jag skriver får vara kvar. Det är aldrig någon big deal för mig. -- Sakfrågorna du talar om, vet jag ingenting om. Åker själv bara till Stockholm om jag måste. Och då undviker jag tunnelbanan. - Här i Norrland åker vi skoter året runt, som du vet ;) -- Lavallen 16:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]