User talk:Micru

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

-

Where[edit]

Where did you advertise Requests for comment/Interproject links interface to get that many responses? PiRSquared17 (talk) 13:27, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

It's nice to see actually interesting RfCs for a change. ;) PiRSquared17 (talk) 14:32, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, since the RFC was your baby, you might want to respond to Requests_for_comment/Interproject_links_interface#Misleading_RFC. (Sorry if it's a bit harsh - see my replies to Mzmcbride.) Rd232 (talk) 09:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia blog post[edit]

Hi Micru, I'm only going to make small edits to your blog post, but I can have it ready to go for tomorrow, 8 May. Does that work for you and Andrea? Matthew (WMF) (talk) 23:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

From a magic carpet[edit]

Here is something you can modify (with Inkscape)

Wikivoyage magic carpet.svg

Shyamal (talk) 01:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikisource User Group[edit]

Hi,

Thanks a lot for getting back to me.

  • French is the only language I know well enough to translate something into it, but I see that the French translation has already been done by Vigneron... However, I have a comment to make about the invitation text : "To get the best results out of these projects, we would like your comments on the same." I don't understand this sentence. In particular, I don't understand what "on the same" refers to... Maybe there is something to be fixed here, before sending the invitation out?
  • The list of Wikisourceros that you were planning to send the invitation to seems quite comprehensive to me, and I cannot think of anyone to be added, at least from the French community
  • I will probably have some comments to make about the WsUG page, I will do so on the Talk page.

Zaran (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Wikivoyage balloon cropped.png[edit]

Hi, Micru. :) That's a beautiful design. So that it can be considered in the final vote, if it is selected, can you please ask your friend to write to liaison@wikimedia.org to confirm that he is the author of the design and to acknowledge his acceptance of the policies set out at Logo_selection_procedure#Logo_submission_rules? If so, I will be happy to pass that on to the lawyers. :) If you have any questions, please let me know! Thank you for all your work on those logos. --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 23:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much. :) --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 00:10, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Fantasy balloon[edit]

Hi Micru, which of the following should we add to the the gallery, the visitors will vote from?

-- Rillke (talk) 13:15, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

I would recommend a vertical alignment, actually:
I'm concerned that at present the graphic is displayed very small compared to the other logos up for vote, and it is very easy to overlook! --Peter Talk 19:29, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikisource en español[edit]

Hola Micru!! He visto lo del grupo de usuarios de Wikisource, y si no me he unido es por el idioma. Si bien puedo leer inglés, me lleva mucho tiempo entender los debates y/o comentarios. En este momento estoy colaborando bastante en Wikidata, y trato de mantenerme actualizada con las modificaciones, pero mi tiempo disponible cada vez es más escaso. Mis disculpas por no poder involucarme más. Saludos cordiales y que tengas una buena jornada. --LadyInGrey (talk) 01:09, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Balloon in the final[edit]

Hi Micru, I don't know whether you noticed that the Fantasy Balloon stands for finalist review. Congratulations and thank you for submitting this excellent proposal. It would be great if you could participate in the discussion or even submit derivative versions. Thanks in advance. Kind regards Rillke (talk) 07:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

SPCom[edit]

Hi. Since you seem to be a catalyst for change around here, and you've shown some interest in SPCom in the past, I think you might be interested in reviving the proposal (mailing list, talk). PiRSquared17 (talk) 20:52, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Help test better mass message delivery[edit]

Hi. You're being contacted as you've previously used global message delivery (or its English Wikipedia counterpart). It doesn't feel so great to be spammed, does it? ;-)

For the past few months, Legoktm has built a replacement to the current message delivery system called MassMessage. MassMessage uses a proper user interface form (no more editing a /Spam subpage), works faster (it can complete a large delivery in minutes), and no longer requires being on an access list (any local administrator can use it). In addition, many tiny annoyances with the old system have been addressed. It's a real improvement! :-)

You can test out MassMessage here: testwiki:Special:MassMessage. The biggest difference you'll likely notice is that any input list must use a new {{#target:}} parser function. For example, {{#target:User talk:Jimbo Wales}} or {{#target:User talk:Jimbo Wales|test2.wikipedia.org}}. For detailed instructions, check out mw:Help:Extension:MassMessage.

If you find any bugs, have suggestions for additional features, or have any other feedback, drop a note at m:Talk:MassMessage. Thanks for spamming! --MZMcBride (talk) 05:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Beginning of MassMessage, end of EdwardsBot[edit]

Hi. You're being contacted as you're listed as an EdwardsBot user.

MassMessage has been deployed to all Wikimedia wikis. For help using the new tool, please check out its help page or drop a note on Meta-Wiki.

With over 400,000 edits to Wikimedia wikis, EdwardsBot has served us well; however EdwardsBot will no longer perform local or global message delivery after December 31, 2013.

A huge thanks to Legoktm, Reedy, Aaron Schulz and everyone else who helped to get MassMessage deployed. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Upcoming IdeaLab Events: IEG Proposal Clinics[edit]

Idea Lab
Idea Lab

Hello, Micru! We've added Events to IdeaLab, and you're invited :)

Upcoming events focus on turning ideas into Individual Engagement Grant proposals before the March 31 deadline. Need help or have questions about IEG? Join us at a Hangout:

  • Thursday, 13 March 2014, 1600 UTC
  • Wednesday, 19 March 2014, 1700 UTC
  • Saturday, 29 March 2014, 1700 UTC

Hope to see you there!

This message was delivered automatically to IEG and IdeaLab participants. To unsubscribe from any future IEG reminders, remove your name from this list

Open Datasets / Wikimania[edit]

Hi Micru, I'm producing an article about Wikimedia's relationship to data that I will use as part of the material to promote Wikimania this year. Would you be interested in contributing to it, basically summarising the context, purpose and possible outcomes of this discussion: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/How_to_deal_with_open_datasets

You can find the article here: https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page/Open_Data. Currently it only talks about wikidata, but I think the relationship between wikidata semantic web stuff and open datasets is important and poorly understood at the moment, both within the community and outside it. EdSaperia (talk) 10:42, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Please mention e.g. the fact that hopefully we'll soon have a visualisation plugin http://trifacta.github.io/vega/editor/ for wikipedia that could draw from "data-commons" - think that could be massively significant and isn't currently conceivable to most people. EdSaperia (talk) 10:45, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Data views ten years earlier[edit]

[1] :) That was 5 days after rev:1641 (links via Krenair). --Nemo 21:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar and a request for feedback[edit]

IEG barnstar 2.png Individual Engagement Grant Barnstar
Thank you for commenting on Individual Engagement Grant proposals during this recent round! We really appreciate that you took the time to share your thoughts.

To help us improve the IEG program for future participants, would you mind taking this quick 3-question survey?

Thanks again for your help,

--Siko and Haitham, Wikimedia Foundation Grantmaking

Letter petitioning WMF to reverse recent decitions[edit]

The Wikimedia Foundation recently created a new feature, "superprotect" status. The purpose is to prevent pages from being edited by elected administrators -- but permitting WMF staff to edit them. It has been put to use in only one case: to protect the deployment of the Media Viewer software on German Wikipedia, in defiance of a clear decision of that community to disable the feature by default, unless users decide to enable it.

If you oppose these actions, please add your name to this letter. If you know non-Wikimedians who support our vision for the free sharing of knowledge, and would like to add their names to the list, please ask them to sign an identical version of the letter on change.org.

I'm notifying you because you participated in one of several relevant discussions. -Pete F (talk) 22:14, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Please fill out our Inspire campaign survey[edit]

Inspire astrocat aqua.png

Thank you for participating in the Wikimedia Inspire campaign during March 2015!

Please take our short survey and share your experience during the campaign.



Many thanks,

Jmorgan (WMF) (talk), on behalf of the IdeaLab team.

23:37, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

This message was delivered automatically to Inspire campaign participants. To unsubscribe from any future IdeaLab reminders, remove your name from this list

Recent mass message...[edit]

Was malformed. You should of included a signature, or at least a datestamp, otherwise it messes with archiving bots, and also makes it unclear about who/when it was sent. Regards, Mdann52 (talk) 10:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Mdann52, sorry for the lack of timestamp, I thought it was enough with my username. --Micru (talk) 10:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
On en (i'm not sure about the meta policy on global delivery), it is effectively policy to include a ~~~~ at the end, in order to keep track. Do you have a list of who the messages were sent to on en, so I can ass a timestamp please? Thanks a lot, Mdann52 (talk) 16:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
@Mdann52: The list is this one. I would offer to edit it manually but it seems too much for me to handle without automating it. Is there any tool I could use to correct it? --Micru (talk) 13:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Group accounts[edit]

I expanded on a concern with group accounts (and added a sub-concern) at Grants talk:IdeaLab/Research team editing#Group accounts. Given the difficulties involved with group accounts, it may be better to see if there is an alternative means of accomplishing the same goal. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

@Philosopher: Thanks for your input, I will reply shortly! (And of course thanks for posting also in my talk page, it was a good reminder to follow up).--Micru (talk) 06:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Building a "we"[edit]

Dear Micru, thank you for your article on building a Wikimedia community. Here's my view on the subject. In a word, Wikimedia's biggest issues are social, and these can't be solved with technical solutions. We must try to become a better community. Good luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 01:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

@NaBUru38: Thanks for your inspiring comic, it is very much like that :) In fact I think that most of the social problems are not approached because very few people know how to approach them, whereas solving technical problems seems to be more straightforward. It is also a matter of tracking resources, it is not easy to know if the resources spent in building a social aspect are well spent, and with all the drive to "metrify" everything it seems to become sort of unjustified spending. In my opinion the drive has to come from the community, however for that to happen it requires more organization and commitment. My hope is to start small scale, for the Wikisource community, and if it works, then increase the scope. Let's see how it goes! Gracias por tus comentarios! :) --Micru (talk) 09:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Just in case, I did it with a meme generator, it's a running joke.
I'm a computer engineer and solving technical things is very tricky. But we do control computers (sort of), whereas nobody really controls people, so I'm aware that solving social issues is even harder.
I'm afraid that many Wikimedia members are very concerned about technology but seem no to care about social issues. We must change this, first by explaining people.
¡Buena suerte! --NaBUru38 (talk) 17:30, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Contact method...[edit]

Hey, I've written that there should be a contact method on the page Social workers of Wikimedia, but I didn't add it myself. So, I know, I am guilty, but may you add your own :) (link to "email user" would be also fine) --Millosh (talk)

@Millosh: Good point! :) I have added my details too, I should have read more carefully the instructions!--Micru (talk) 21:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikisource Conference 2015[edit]

Hi;
I saw your Grant project about Wikisource Conference 2015, I propose to changed the end date after 15 days after the end date of the event, and if you need help I can help you --Touzrimounir (talk) 12:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

GAC comments[edit]

Hi ;
to succeed Wikisource Conference 2015, the community needs to answer the questions of GAC and Community, Now, there are two comments in the Discussion Page --Touzrimounir (talk) 07:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

How can we improve Wikimedia grants to support you better?[edit]

Hi! The Wikimedia Foundation would like your input on how we can reimagine Wikimedia Foundation grants to better support people and ideas in your Wikimedia project.

After reading the Reimagining WMF grants idea, we ask you to complete this survey to help us improve the idea and learn more about your experience. When you complete the survey, you can enter to win one of five Wikimedia globe sweatshirts!

In addition to taking the the survey, you are welcome to participate in these ways:

This survey is in English, but feedback on the discussion page is welcome in any language.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery. 01:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Last call for WMF grants feedback![edit]

Hi, this is a reminder that the consultation about Reimagining WMF grants is closing on 8 September (0:00 UTC). We encourage you to complete the survey now, if you haven't yet done so, so that we can include your ideas.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery. 19:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Movement Wide Finance Report 2014[edit]

Dear Micru,

I’m Alex, currently a finance fellow (i.e intern) at the Wikimedia Foundation. I worked before for Wikimedia France, planning the Hackathon Lyon 2015 mainly. I'm today contacting you because of your activity for Wikimedia Wikisource Community User Group.

Last year, Finance Fellows produced a financial report that included financial activity from every chapters. It was great and has been presented at the Wikimania in Mexico.

If you haven’t seen the results of the Report 2013, here they are: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Chapter-wide_Financial_Trends_Report_2013

We’re currently starting the Report 2014 and this year we also want to include user groups to improve the scope of our work. I want to tell you that I’ve tried to make the process as short and easy as possible, so that shouldn’t require a lot of your time.

The aim of such a report is global. It helps having an idea of how the money is used across the movement, it helps chapters and user groups to learn about best practice and finally it leads to more transparency through a qualitative work, which I believe is important.

Could you briefly tell me if you had any income and expenses in 2014? If you are not the person responsible for this, please tell me who is the user the most likely to know this information.

I’ll be your contact for this project this year, I’m looking forward to working with you!

Cheers, ACella (WMF) (talk) 23:32, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

What future IdeaLab campaigns would you like to see?[edit]

IdeaLab logo dark orange.png

Hi there,

I’m Jethro, and I’m seeking your help in deciding topics for new IdeaLab campaigns that could be run starting next year. These campaigns aim to bring in proposals and solutions from communities that address a need or problem in Wikimedia projects. I'm interested in hearing your preferences and ideas for campaign topics!

Here’s how to participate:

Take care,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation. 03:34, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Snakey[edit]

Your Snakey on Magic Towel is still floating around: #11 on Wikipedia15 :) --Nizil Shah (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@Nizil Shah: Thanks for the info! That was a pleasant surprise :) --Micru (talk) 07:03, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Future IdeaLab Campaigns results[edit]

IdeaLab badge 1.png

Last December, I invited you to help determine future ideaLab campaigns by submitting and voting on different possible topics. I'm happy to announce the results of your participation, and encourage you to review them and our next steps for implementing those campaigns this year. Thank you to everyone who volunteered time to participate and submit ideas.

With great thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation. 23:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Inspire Campaign on content curation & review[edit]

WPCube.png

I've recently launched an Inspire Campaign to encourage new ideas focusing on content review and curation in Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia volunteers collaboratively manage vast repositories of knowledge, and we’re looking for your ideas about how to manage that knowledge to make it more meaningful and accessible. We invite you to participate and submit ideas, so please get involved today! The campaign runs until March 28th.

All proposals are welcome - research projects, technical solutions, community organizing and outreach initiatives, or something completely new! Funding is available from the Wikimedia Foundation for projects that need financial support. Constructive feedback on ideas is welcome - your skills and experience can help bring someone else’s project to life. Join us at the Inspire Campaign to improve review and curation tasks so that we can make our content more meaningful and accessible! I JethroBT (WMF) 05:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery.

Open Call for Individual Engagement Grants[edit]

IEG barnstar 2.png

Greetings! The Individual Engagement Grants (IEG) program is accepting proposals until April 12th to fund new tools, research, outreach efforts, and other experiments that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers. Whether you need a small or large amount of funds (up to $30,000 USD), IEGs can support you and your team’s project development time in addition to project expenses such as materials, travel, and rental space.

With thanks, I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources 15:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Survey on content curation & review Inspire Campaign[edit]

WPCube.png

Thanks for your participation in IdeaLab during the Inspire Campaign focused on improving content curation & review processes from February to March 2016. I'm interested in hearing your feedback about your participation during campaign, so if you're able, I invite you to complete this brief survey to describe how you contributed to the campaign and how you felt about participating.

Immediate results of the campaign can be found here. Please feel free to review them and let me know if you have any questions about the campaign or the survey. Thanks! I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 02:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

(Opt-out instructions)

Participate in the Inspire Campaign and help address harassment![edit]

NounProject Leaves.png

Through June, we’re organizing an Inspire Campaign to encourage and support new ideas focusing on addressing harassment toward Wikimedia contributors. The 2015 Harassment Survey has shown evidence that harassment in various forms - name calling, threats, discrimination, stalking, and impersonation, among others - is pervasive. Available methods and systems to deal with harassment are also considered to be ineffective. These behaviors are clearly harmful, and in addition, many individuals who experience or witness harassment participate less in Wikimedia projects or stop contributing entirely.

Proposals in any language are welcome during the campaign - research projects, technical solutions, community organizing and outreach initiatives, or something completely new! Funding is available from the Wikimedia Foundation for projects that need financial support. Constructive feedback on ideas is appreciated, and collaboration is encouraged - your skills and experience may help bring someone else’s project to life. Join us at the Inspire Campaign so that we can work together to develop ideas around this important and difficult issue. With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 17:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC) (Opt-out instructions)

Community Wishlist Survey votes[edit]

Hi Micru, Thanks for participating in the Wishlist Survey! I'm sorry that this wasn't clear -- this is the proposals phase of the survey, when people are posting and discussing proposals. The voting phase starts in a couple weeks, on November 28th. We're not counting votes that are cast early, because the proposals can change during this phase, and you might end up voting for something that changes in a way that you didn't expect. I've added some text at the top of the page, explaining this better.

I don't want people to see your Support votes and get confused, so I'm going to change the Support template in your message to "Good idea". If that response doesn't work for you, then feel free to change it. Sorry again about the confusion -- I'm really glad that you're participating. I hope you keep coming back to discuss and improve proposals, and you'll have a chance to vote starting on Nov 28th. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! -- DannyH (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

@DannyH (WMF): Sorry about that, I was not aware that votes were not valid, I saw that other people were offering their support, so I assumed it was already open season. Ok, I will wait till the process opens. Thanks for the heads-up and your nice message.--Micru (talk) 20:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Re: billion euro[edit]

I would certainly not trust the WMF with 1 billion euro, but I already had one idea how to spend such a large amount of money (or larger) with the collaboration of legions of local entities: strategy:Proposal:Make Wikisource scale. :) --Nemo 08:16, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Presenting Community Engagement Insights survey report: Tuesday, October 10, 1600 UTC[edit]

Hi Micru,
I am reaching out to you because you signed up to receive updates about the Global Wikimedia survey.[1]

We will be hosting a public event online to present the data, a few examples on how teams will be using it for annual planning, and what are next steps for this project. The event will take place on Tuesday, October 10, at 9:00 am PST (1600 UTC), and the presentation will be in English. You can watch the livestream here, and ask question via IRC on #wikimedia-office.

If you are unable attend, you can also find the report on meta, and watch the recording of the event at a later time.

We hope to have you join us online! -- María Cruz 23:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

  1. Update your subscription to these messages by clicking here.

Solomon203[edit]

If you are a system engineer, then you should have some notion of both mathematical statistics and how check-user works. Well, look at the following facts:

  1. On the global unlock request Ruslik0 declared that “remember [that] saw this account (before the request on SRG) while performed a checkuser request on some NDC accounts”. This IMHO amounts to an admission that 2017 data are not available to stewards, if not squandered at all.
  2. On June 1 ToniBallioni said that Solomon203 will not be rehabilitated before making an own unblock request. Also, virtually an admission that they lack any technical data on Solomon203.
  3. On June 3 Solomon203 made two edits and in 12 hours Bbb23 replied with his {{tallyho}} (technically indistinguishable) template.

Which information do you possess to say that I don’t see the whole picture? And why on Earth should I, Incnis Mrsi, be “helpful” for Bbb23? First, he mistreated me, deleting my posts two times before the Solomon203 campaign and without any relation to it. Second, he intervened obviously not to resolve the conflict, but to shield fellow functionaries Ruslik0 and Sir_Sputnik – presumedly, from me, the Taiwanese, SA_13_Bro and all the “responsible” faction on Meta. Do you really expect me to trust this Wikipedian establishment? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:32, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@Incnis Mrsi: Nobody has the whole picture. You don't know what the involved people are thinking or what are their circumstances. The principle of civility asks us to be cordial to everyone, even when we feel wronged, and if you don't feel capable of that the best is to ask for mediation to help clear the atmosphere. Also take into account something, when a person makes you suffer, that person is suffering too, and they need help. Remember that and you will have a more peaceful time here.--Micru (talk) 17:53, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Which “*human* systems engineer” may you become if still struggle with differences between “civility” and “helpfulness”, between “happiness” and “trust”? At first, you pushed forward some assessments of my “behaviour” in a conflict about which you had little idea at the time of writing. Now you dodge my questions (the only social engineering skill I observe here) and reply with general humanitarian stuff. The errant en.Wikipedian check-users have the whole administrative hierarchy to help them, whereas my business is to defend “our” users (of Wikimedia Commons in this context) from outrage by the lazy admins, not to help these admins (or anybody else) with internal business of Wikipedia. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 03:15, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
@Incnis Mrsi: You should realize that helping others is a voluntary activity, you cannot force anyone to help you or to pay attention to the topics that you consider important. Generally people want to help, specially if you want to help others as it seems that you want. I know too little about the user you want to help, or even about yourself. It is true that I assessed your behaviour with little data, you seem to have suffered a lot from admin actions and I understand that you might have a bone to pick, but still I don't think that seeing wrong-doing is the best way. Most of the time people (or admins) do whatever they can to make things better, it is unfortunate that they didn't see any other option other than banning a user, but if there are other options it is not skillfull to blame others for not seeing them.--Micru (talk) 18:08, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_website/2017-2018_update[edit]

Did you see these plans to degrade user experience and inclusiveness? --Nemo 21:04, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

@Nemo bis: I needed the whole day to manage my anger. Cannot comment on that now.--Micru (talk) 20:16, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
I understand! Better wait one more day rather than write someone you later regret. :) --Nemo 21:24, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Moving request[edit]

I suggest you move your request from here to here. Best, --Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 12:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

SVG Translate Community wishlist survey project[edit]

Hello! Thank you for voting for the SVG Translate project that was proposed in the 2017 Wishlist survey. The Community Tech team in the Wikimedia Foundation is beginning to start their work on the project. We're currently looking for feedback on some open questions which will allow us to come up with preliminary designs for the tool. If you are interested in being involved, you can watch the project page and join in the discussions on the talk page. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and learning from your experiences. Thank you. -- NKohli (WMF), Product Manager, Community Tech (talk) 21:53, 16 August 2018 (UTC)